This comparison examines ServiceTitan (TTAN) and Workiva (WK), two software companies with distinct business models within the technology sector. Traders and investors focused on SaaS growth stories, relative performance in volatile markets, and sector-specific catalysts may find the analysis relevant. The review highlights observable differences in business exposure, recent price behavior, and market positioning without projecting future outcomes.
ServiceTitan (TTAN) delivers an end-to-end cloud platform that connects workflows for contractors in industries such as HVAC, plumbing, and pest control. The company reported revenue growth exceeding 24% year-over-year in its most recent fiscal periods. In recent market activity, the stock has traded within a wide range following its December 2024 initial public offering, reflecting broader software sector rotation and investor digestion of post-IPO supply. Sentiment has been influenced by strong gross transaction volume increases alongside ongoing net losses typical of high-growth software firms scaling operations.
Workiva (WK) offers a cloud-based platform that enables collaborative reporting for accounting, finance, sustainability, and audit teams, serving a large portion of Fortune 1000 companies. The company has posted consistent revenue expansion near 20% annually in recent years while narrowing losses. In recent weeks, the stock has displayed measured price movements supported by high customer retention and incremental adoption of AI-assisted features. Market sentiment remains tied to enterprise demand for regulatory and environmental, social, and governance (ESG) reporting solutions amid steady operational execution.
Tickeron maintains a curated Trending AI Robots section that highlights select AI trading bots from its extensive library of hundreds of bots trading thousands of tickers. Only those demonstrating strong suitability for prevailing market conditions receive placement in this section. Available bots span diverse trading styles, strategies, timeframes, performance metrics, and ticker universes, with many showing win rates in the 60-75% range and varying drawdown profiles depending on market regime. This resource allows users to explore automated approaches aligned with individual risk parameters and objectives.
ServiceTitan (TTAN) and Workiva (WK) both pursue SaaS recurring revenue models yet serve different customer bases: TTAN addresses fragmented trade services with field operations software, while WK targets centralized corporate reporting functions. Growth drivers for TTAN include platform adoption among contractors and fintech add-ons, contrasted with WK's emphasis on regulatory compliance and multi-stakeholder collaboration. Recent momentum shows TTAN with sharper price swings post-IPO, whereas WK has exhibited narrower trading ranges. Risk factors include TTAN's higher valuation sensitivity as a newer public company and WK's exposure to slower enterprise budget cycles. Sector exposure overlaps in technology but diverges in vertical focus, with market sentiment reflecting TTAN's growth-at-scale narrative versus WK's path toward sustained profitability.
Based on observable factors such as trend consistency, earnings stability, and relative positioning in recent market activity, Tickeron’s AI models currently assign a modestly higher probabilistic preference to Workiva (WK) over ServiceTitan (TTAN). This assessment considers WK's more established revenue predictability and narrower volatility profile alongside TTAN's elevated post-IPO fluctuations, though outcomes remain contingent on evolving market conditions and company-specific execution.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
| TTAN | WK | TTAN / WK | |
| Capitalization | 5.27B | 3.91B | 135% |
| EBITDA | -44.69M | 75.5M | -59% |
| Gain YTD | -48.657 | -16.684 | 292% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | 85.55 | - |
| Revenue | 1.01B | 966M | 105% |
| Total Cash | 422M | 815M | 52% |
| Total Debt | 51M | 793M | 6% |
WK | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 77 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 99 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 40 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 97 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| TTAN | WK | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 68% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 73% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 72% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 62% | 2 days ago 66% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 72% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 75% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 17 days ago 70% | 13 days ago 71% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 73% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 82% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 50% | 2 days ago 76% |
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
TTAN’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green while WK’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
TTAN’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WK’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
TTAN (@Packaged Software) experienced а -37.81% price change this week, while WK (@Packaged Software) price change was -6.13% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -4.16%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -6.20%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.48%.
WK is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2026.
Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TTAN has been closely correlated with CRM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TTAN jumps, then CRM could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TTAN | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TTAN | 100% | -2.37% | ||
| CRM - TTAN | 67% Closely correlated | +1.94% | ||
| BRZE - TTAN | 65% Loosely correlated | -1.34% | ||
| NOW - TTAN | 65% Loosely correlated | +1.04% | ||
| HUBS - TTAN | 63% Loosely correlated | +0.80% | ||
| WK - TTAN | 61% Loosely correlated | +0.74% | ||
More | ||||