This comparison examines Freshworks Inc. (FRSH) and ServiceTitan, Inc. (TTAN), two technology companies offering software-as-a-service solutions. The analysis focuses on their business models, recent market activity, and relative positioning to assist traders and investors evaluating opportunities in the application software space. Professionals monitoring sector trends, earnings momentum, or AI-driven product adoption may find this overview relevant for portfolio allocation decisions. The discussion draws on observable performance metrics and developments from the past several weeks to provide a balanced view without forward-looking projections.
Freshworks Inc. (FRSH) develops uncomplicated service software for customer and employee experiences across multiple regions. Its solutions emphasize intuitive interfaces and rapid value delivery for organizations seeking efficiency in support functions. In recent weeks, the stock has reflected steady demand for its platform amid ongoing adoption of AI-enhanced features. Revenue growth has remained consistent, supported by expansion in annual recurring revenue from existing customers. Sentiment has been influenced by quarterly results highlighting operational improvements and broader technology sector dynamics. Market activity shows measured responses to earnings releases, with emphasis on retention metrics and customer expansion.
ServiceTitan, Inc. (TTAN) provides an end-to-end cloud-based platform connecting workflows for contractors in industries such as HVAC, plumbing, and pest control. The offering includes scheduling, dispatching, invoicing, and fintech tools. Since its December 2024 IPO, the stock has experienced notable price movements tied to earnings beats and guidance updates. In recent weeks, performance has reflected volatility around quarterly reports and AI platform enhancements. Revenue expansion continues at a robust pace, though profitability remains a focus area during the growth phase. Sentiment has responded to operational leverage improvements and sector demand signals.
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page curates top-performing automated trading strategies from hundreds of AI trading bots that execute trades across thousands of different tickers. Only those demonstrating the strongest alignment with prevailing market conditions earn placement in this section. Available bots span a wide range of trading styles, strategies, timeframes, performance statistics, and ticker sets, with historical win rates and risk metrics varying by configuration. This diversity allows users to explore options suited to different market environments. For additional details on current trending selections, visit the Trending AI Robots page.
Freshworks Inc. (FRSH) and ServiceTitan, Inc. (TTAN) both operate in the software application sector but target different end markets. FRSH emphasizes broad customer and employee experience tools with a focus on simplicity and global reach, while TTAN specializes in vertical solutions for trades businesses with integrated operational and financial workflows. Growth drivers for FRSH include recurring revenue expansion and AI feature adoption, whereas TTAN benefits from contractor industry digitization and platform upsell potential. Recent momentum has shown FRSH maintaining steadier price behavior compared with TTAN’s post-IPO swings. Risk factors differ, with FRSH facing competition in horizontal software and TTAN navigating integration and scaling challenges in a specialized vertical. Sector exposure places both in technology but with varying sensitivity to enterprise versus small-business spending cycles. Market sentiment reflects these distinctions, with analyst coverage highlighting unique catalysts for each.
Based on observable factors such as trend consistency, earnings stability, and relative positioning in recent market activity, Tickeron’s AI models currently assign a modestly higher probabilistic preference to Freshworks Inc. (FRSH) over ServiceTitan, Inc. (TTAN). This assessment considers FRSH’s established profitability trajectory and lower volatility profile alongside TTAN’s higher growth potential offset by post-listing fluctuations. Outcomes remain subject to evolving market conditions and company-specific developments.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
| FRSH | TTAN | FRSH / TTAN | |
| Capitalization | 3.2B | 5.31B | 60% |
| EBITDA | 66.7M | -38.36M | -174% |
| Gain YTD | 0.000 | -48.319 | - |
| P/E Ratio | 19.43 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 904M | 1.07B | 85% |
| Total Cash | 664M | 480M | 138% |
| Total Debt | 34.6M | 47.8M | 72% |
FRSH | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 59 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 89 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 47 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 40 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 9 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| FRSH | TTAN | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 84% | 4 days ago 69% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 77% | 4 days ago 88% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 79% | 4 days ago 65% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 75% | 4 days ago 77% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 72% | 4 days ago 75% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 84% | 4 days ago 76% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 71% | 26 days ago 70% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 79% | 11 days ago 86% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 72% | 4 days ago 71% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 77% | 4 days ago 64% |
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
FRSH’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while TTAN’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
FRSH’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TTAN’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
FRSH (@Packaged Software) experienced а +3.03% price change this week, while TTAN (@Packaged Software) price change was +0.66% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -0.83%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.72%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.76%.
FRSH is expected to report earnings on Nov 03, 2026.
Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| RDVY | 79.31 | 0.12 | +0.15% |
| First Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF (RDVY) | |||
| JULH | 25.29 | N/A | N/A |
| Innovator Premium Income 20 Barrier ETF - July (JULH) | |||
| NOEQ | 28.88 | N/A | N/A |
| Northern Trust US Equity ETF (NOEQ) | |||
| BKFI | 23.17 | -0.11 | -0.45% |
| BNY Mellon Active Core Bond ETF (BKFI) | |||
| DSTX | 34.91 | -0.38 | -1.06% |
| Distillate International Fundamental Stability & Value ETF (DSTX) | |||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TTAN has been closely correlated with CRM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TTAN jumps, then CRM could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TTAN | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TTAN | 100% | +1.46% | ||
| CRM - TTAN | 67% Closely correlated | -2.03% | ||
| NOW - TTAN | 65% Loosely correlated | -2.17% | ||
| BRZE - TTAN | 64% Loosely correlated | -2.01% | ||
| HUBS - TTAN | 63% Loosely correlated | -5.86% | ||
| WK - TTAN | 61% Loosely correlated | -0.03% | ||
More | ||||