Advertisement
CRM vs TTAN
Which Stock Would AI Choose? Salesforce (CRM) vs. ServiceTitan (TTAN) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- Salesforce (CRM) operates a leading cloud-based customer relationship management platform serving enterprises across multiple industries.
- ServiceTitan (TTAN) provides an end-to-end cloud software platform tailored for home service contractors in the United States, Armenia, and Canada.
- Recent market activity shows both stocks exhibiting volatility typical of the technology sector amid shifting investor sentiment toward software growth names.
- CRM benefits from broad enterprise adoption and recurring revenue stability, while TTAN focuses on a specialized vertical with potential for targeted expansion.
- Relative performance has varied with sector-wide movements, with each ticker reflecting distinct business model exposures and growth trajectories.
- Market positioning highlights trade-offs between CRM’s scale and diversification versus TTAN’s niche focus and operational specialization.
Introduction
This comparison examines Salesforce (CRM) and ServiceTitan (TTAN), two technology companies with software platforms serving different customer segments. The analysis is relevant for traders and investors seeking to understand relative performance, business model differences, and market positioning within the software and application sector. It provides factual context on recent developments without making forward-looking projections, assisting those evaluating portfolio allocation or sector exposure in the current environment.
CRM Overview and Recent Performance
Salesforce (CRM) delivers cloud-based customer relationship management (CRM) solutions and related enterprise software. In recent weeks, the stock has reflected broader technology sector movements, with performance influenced by earnings reports, macroeconomic signals, and investor focus on cloud spending trends. Sentiment has been shaped by ongoing demand for digital transformation tools among large organizations, alongside periodic adjustments in valuation multiples for growth-oriented software names. The company maintains a diversified revenue base across sales, service, and marketing applications.
TTAN Overview and Recent Performance
ServiceTitan (TTAN) offers a cloud-based platform designed for home service contractors, integrating scheduling, dispatching, invoicing, and customer management functions. Recent market activity has seen the stock respond to sector sentiment and company-specific updates on user adoption within its vertical. Performance has been driven by expansion in the contractor software space, with sentiment tied to housing-related service demand and technology penetration rates among small and medium businesses. The platform emphasizes operational efficiency for users in plumbing, HVAC, and electrical services.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron maintains a curated Trending AI Robots section featuring select AI trading bots from a larger library of hundreds of automated strategies. These bots trade thousands of different tickers using varied approaches, timeframes, and performance metrics. Only those demonstrating strong suitability for prevailing market conditions are highlighted in the trending section. Available bots span multiple strategies, risk profiles, and historical statistics, allowing users to review detailed performance data before considering any automated approach. Review the Trending AI Robots page for current listings and specifications.
Head-to-Head Comparison
Salesforce (CRM) and ServiceTitan (TTAN) differ in scale and target markets. CRM serves a global enterprise customer base with a broad suite of applications, while TTAN concentrates on a specialized vertical serving contractors. Growth drivers for CRM include enterprise digital adoption and cross-selling opportunities; for TTAN, they center on increasing software penetration in the home services industry. Recent momentum has aligned with technology sector trends for both, though exposure to distinct end markets creates different sensitivities to economic cycles. Risk factors include competition in cloud software for CRM and vertical-specific adoption rates for TTAN. Market sentiment reflects ongoing evaluation of recurring revenue stability versus niche growth potential.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Based on observable factors such as trend consistency in recent market activity, relative stability of enterprise revenue streams, and positioning within established software categories, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a higher probabilistic weighting to Salesforce (CRM) in a comparative evaluation. This reflects its broader diversification and consistent sector leadership, though outcomes remain subject to evolving market conditions and individual risk tolerances.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CRM is a StrongBuy and TTAN is a StrongBuy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CRM’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTTAN’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- CRM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- TTAN’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CRM’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TTAN’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CRM’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 7 bearish.
- TTAN’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
CRM (@Packaged Software) experienced а -8.77% price change this week, while TTAN (@Packaged Software) price change was -9.06% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -1.58%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.30%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.43%.
Reported Earning Dates
CRM is expected to report earnings on Sep 02, 2026.
TTAN is expected to report earnings on Sep 03, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Packaged Software (-1.58% weekly)Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
| CRM | TTAN | CRM / TTAN | |
| Capitalization | 123B | 5.97B | 2,061% |
| EBITDA | 13.7B | -44.69M | -30,659% |
| Gain YTD | -43.043 | -41.249 | 104% |
| P/E Ratio | 17.40 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 42.8B | 1.01B | 4,221% |
| Total Cash | 1.8B | 422M | 427% |
| Total Debt | 41.9B | 51M | 82,157% |
CRM | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 51 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 15 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 52 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 65 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 95 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| CRM | TTAN | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 86% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 77% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 66% | 2 days ago 85% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 63% | 2 days ago 73% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 65% | 2 days ago 83% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | 2 days ago 54% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 23 days ago 69% | 19 days ago 65% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 64% | 12 days ago 89% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 62% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 38% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| MVV | 89.89 | 0.69 | +0.77% |
| ProShares Ultra MidCap400 | |||
| QRMI | 15.58 | 0.01 | +0.05% |
| Global X NASDAQ 100® Risk Mngd Inc ETF | |||
| CPHY | 51.57 | -0.04 | -0.08% |
| F/m Compoundr High Yield Bond ETF | |||
| IBHF | 22.64 | -0.02 | -0.09% |
| iShares iBonds 2026 Term HY & Inc ETF | |||
| SCHX | 29.37 | -0.12 | -0.41% |
| Schwab US Large-Cap ETF™ | |||
TTAN and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TTAN has been loosely correlated with CRM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TTAN jumps, then CRM could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TTAN | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TTAN | 100% | -2.58% | ||
| CRM - TTAN | 64% Loosely correlated | -1.09% | ||
| GWRE - TTAN | 63% Loosely correlated | -4.79% | ||
| FRSH - TTAN | 63% Loosely correlated | +0.79% | ||
| HUBS - TTAN | 61% Loosely correlated | -1.83% | ||
| ADBE - TTAN | 60% Loosely correlated | -0.13% | ||
More | ||||