| UTG | ZAP | UTG / ZAP | |
| Gain YTD | 7.133 | 10.469 | 68% |
| Net Assets | 3.45B | 458M | 753% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.23 | 0.50 | 446% |
| Turnover | 37.00 | 18.09 | 205% |
| Yield | 0.58 | 1.74 | 33% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 2 years | - |
| UTG | ZAP | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 76% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 68% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 84% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 70% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 86% | 5 days ago 84% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 75% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 75% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 43% |
A.I.dvisor tells us that UTG and TU have been poorly correlated (+13% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that UTG and TU's prices will move in lockstep.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ZAP has been loosely correlated with XEL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 57% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ZAP jumps, then XEL could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ZAP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ZAP | 100% | +0.79% | ||
| XEL - ZAP | 57% Loosely correlated | +0.12% | ||
| AEP - ZAP | 57% Loosely correlated | -0.11% | ||
| LNT - ZAP | 55% Loosely correlated | +0.01% | ||
| EVRG - ZAP | 53% Loosely correlated | +0.32% | ||
| AMSC - ZAP | 45% Loosely correlated | +3.04% | ||
More | ||||