ACES
Price
$35.01
Change
-$0.39 (-1.10%)
Updated
Jun 24, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
129.22M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
ICLN
Price
$20.48
Change
-$0.19 (-0.92%)
Updated
Jun 24 closing price
Net Assets
3B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
QCLN
Price
$60.52
Change
-$0.65 (-1.06%)
Updated
Jun 24 closing price
Net Assets
838.64M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

ACES or ICLN or QCLN

ACES vs ICLN vs QCLN Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which ETF would AI Choose? ALPS Clean Energy ETF (ACES) vs. iShares Global Clean Energy ETF (ICLN) vs. First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund (QCLN)

Key Takeaways

  • ALPS Clean Energy ETF (ACES) offers North American-focused clean energy exposure with 39 holdings and a 0.55% expense ratio, emphasizing concentrated positions in solar and fuel cell companies.
  • iShares Global Clean Energy ETF (ICLN) provides the broadest diversification with 106 holdings across global markets at the lowest expense ratio of 0.39%, reducing single-region concentration risk.
  • First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund (QCLN) delivers a U.S.-centric approach with 53 holdings and a 0.59% expense ratio, incorporating significant semiconductor and technology exposure.
  • Structural differences in geographic scope and sector tilt drive distinct risk profiles, with ICLN offering superior cost efficiency and diversification depth compared to the more concentrated ACES and QCLN.
  • All three ETFs track passive indexes in the clean energy theme, with varying rebalancing tied to market-cap weighting and eligibility criteria focused on renewables, storage, and enabling technologies.
  • Relative positioning favors ICLN for investors seeking global reach and lower costs, while ACES and QCLN suit those preferring regional or technology-enhanced tilts within the same thematic universe.

Introduction

These three ETFs compete in the clean energy thematic space, providing investors with targeted exposure to companies involved in renewable power generation, energy storage, and related technologies. While they share a common focus on sustainable energy solutions, they differ in geographic scope, index construction, and sector emphasis. ACES emphasizes North American issuers, ICLN delivers global diversification, and QCLN concentrates on U.S.-listed firms with added technology components. This comparison helps clarify how each fund's design influences diversification, costs, and sensitivity to regional policy and supply-chain dynamics in the evolving clean energy landscape.

ALPS Clean Energy ETF (ACES) Overview

The ALPS Clean Energy ETF (ACES) seeks to track the CIBC Atlas Clean Energy Index, a market-cap-weighted benchmark of U.S. and Canadian companies engaged in clean energy production and enabling technologies. The fund holds approximately 39 securities and maintains a passive structure with annual rebalancing aligned to index constituents. Top holdings typically include ENPH, PLUG, FSLR, NXT, and ORA, representing a concentrated allocation often exceeding 50% in the top 10 positions. Sector exposure centers on utilities, technology, and industrials. The expense ratio stands at 0.55%. Distinguishing features include its regional North American mandate and emphasis on pure-play clean energy firms without significant international diversification.

iShares Global Clean Energy ETF (ICLN) Overview

The iShares Global Clean Energy ETF (ICLN) tracks the S&P Global Clean Energy Index, providing exposure to a broad universe of global equities involved in clean energy activities. It maintains around 106 holdings in a passive, market-cap-weighted framework with periodic rebalancing. Prominent positions often feature BE, FSLR, NXT, ENPH, and international names such as China Yangtze Power. Sector allocations span industrials, technology, and utilities across multiple regions. The expense ratio is 0.39%, the lowest among the group. Key characteristics include extensive global reach, higher holding count for improved diversification, and inclusion of both developed and select emerging market issuers.

First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund (QCLN) Overview

The First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund (QCLN) follows the NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index, targeting U.S.-listed companies active in renewable electricity generation, energy storage, and advanced materials. The fund contains roughly 53 holdings under a passive, market-cap-weighted methodology with regular index-driven rebalancing. Leading positions frequently comprise BE, ON, MPWR, FSLR, and TSLA, resulting in top-10 concentration near 60%. Sector breakdown highlights technology and industrials with notable semiconductor influence. The expense ratio is 0.59%. Distinctive elements encompass its U.S.-only focus combined with explicit inclusion of energy intelligence and storage sub-sectors.

Industry and Thematic Landscape

The clean energy sector encompasses renewable power sources such as solar, wind, and geothermal alongside enabling technologies including battery storage and smart grid solutions. Macro drivers include government incentives, grid modernization efforts, and corporate sustainability commitments, which influence capital allocation across equipment manufacturers and project developers. Regulatory developments around carbon reduction targets and supply chain localization affect input costs and project viability. Earnings trends among major holdings reflect demand for solar modules and fuel cells, tempered by commodity price volatility and competition from traditional energy sources. Geopolitical factors, such as trade policies on imported components, introduce variability in manufacturing margins and deployment timelines across the theme.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent market cycles, structural differences have produced varying sensitivity to interest rate movements and commodity fluctuations. ICLN’s global holdings have historically moderated volatility through exposure to diverse regulatory environments compared with the more concentrated U.S. and North American mandates of QCLN and ACES. QCLN’s technology tilt, particularly semiconductors, has amplified responsiveness to chip-cycle dynamics, while ACES has shown tighter linkage to North American project pipelines. Drawdowns during periods of rising rates have tended to affect higher-beta holdings across all three funds, with concentration levels influencing the magnitude of sector-specific corrections. Relative positioning reflects trade-offs between ICLN’s breadth and the thematic purity or tech-enhanced exposure offered by the other two funds.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Explore the AI Screener to uncover additional opportunities aligned with your investment criteria.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable structural attributes, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign the highest probabilistic favorability to iShares Global Clean Energy ETF (ICLN) owing to its lowest expense ratio, broadest holding count for enhanced diversification, and global exposure that mitigates single-market concentration. ACES and QCLN present compelling alternatives for investors prioritizing North American or technology-augmented tilts, respectively, though their higher costs and narrower geographic footprints introduce comparatively elevated risk-adjusted considerations in a diversified clean energy allocation.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ICLN has more net assets: 3B vs. QCLN (839M) and ACES (129M). QCLN has a higher annual dividend yield than ICLN and ACES: QCLN (35.737) vs ICLN (24.985) and ACES (8.081). ACES was incepted earlier than ICLN and QCLN: ACES (8 years) vs ICLN (18 years) and QCLN (19 years). ICLN (0.39) has a lower expense ratio than ACES (0.55) and QCLN (0.59). ACES has a higher turnover ICLN (25.00) and QCLN (23.00) vs ICLN (25.00) and QCLN (23.00).
ACESICLNQCLN
Gain YTD8.08124.98535.737
Net Assets129M3B839M
Total Expense Ratio0.550.390.59
Turnover39.0025.0023.00
Yield0.541.140.15
Fund Existence8 years18 years19 years
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ACESICLNQCLN
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
89%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
81%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
89%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ACES
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
ICLN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
QCLN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FJP76.970.27
+0.35%
First Trust Japan AlphaDEX® ETF
CRDT23.200.07
+0.30%
Simplify Opportunistic Income ETF
MEAR50.360.03
+0.06%
iShares Short Maturity Muni Bd Act ETF
AGIX45.01-0.35
-0.77%
KraneSharesArtfclIntglcandTechPub-PvtETF
CBTJ17.48-0.23
-1.33%
Calamos Bitcoin 80 Str Alt Prt ETF-Jan

ACES and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ACES has been closely correlated with NXT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ACES jumps, then NXT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ACES
1D Price
Change %
ACES100%
-1.10%
NXT - ACES
68%
Closely correlated
-3.29%
ENPH - ACES
65%
Loosely correlated
+1.27%
BLDP - ACES
62%
Loosely correlated
-11.63%
RUN - ACES
62%
Loosely correlated
+12.57%
FSLR - ACES
61%
Loosely correlated
-0.35%
More

ICLN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ICLN has been closely correlated with NXT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ICLN jumps, then NXT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ICLN
1D Price
Change %
ICLN100%
-0.92%
NXT - ICLN
73%
Closely correlated
-3.29%
BE - ICLN
69%
Closely correlated
+1.31%
FCEL - ICLN
68%
Closely correlated
-1.19%
FSLR - ICLN
65%
Loosely correlated
-0.35%
SEDG - ICLN
59%
Loosely correlated
-5.00%
More