Accenture, EPAM Systems, and ExlService Holdings all operate in the business and IT services landscape, but they serve very different corners of it. This stock comparison matters because the three names sit at contrasting points on the growth-versus-scale spectrum, with each responding differently to the same macro forces: shifting enterprise IT budgets, tightening corporate spending, and the rapid rise of generative AI. Traders seeking momentum, investors focused on relative performance and valuation, and those evaluating market positioning across the services sector may all find this three-way comparison relevant. The sections below review recent developments, growth drivers, and risk factors for each company before offering a head-to-head view and a data-driven verdict.
Accenture is a global professional-services firm spanning consulting, technology, and managed services (ongoing operations it runs for clients). Recent market activity has been volatile. After a sharp decline earlier in the year on concerns that generative AI could pressure traditional consulting demand, ACN shares staged a strong rebound over recent months, though the stock remains well below its prior 52-week high.
In its latest reported quarter, revenue rose roughly 6% with adjusted earnings per share (EPS, profit divided by shares outstanding) up about 9%. However, the company trimmed its full-year local-currency revenue growth outlook to a 3% to 4% range, citing a drag from its U.S. federal business and geopolitical uncertainty. Sentiment has been shaped by several catalysts: a multi-year AI-safety partnership with Anthropic, the launch of new AI-led offerings, and a $2 billion increase to its share repurchase program. Analysts remain divided, with some raising price targets while others flag soft near-term demand.
EPAM Systems is a digital-platform engineering and software-development services company focused on helping enterprises build and modernize technology. In recent weeks, EPAM has been under pressure after reporting second-quarter results that beat estimates but included a lowered full-year outlook.
Revenue grew about 4.5% year over year, while adjusted EPS rose more than 20%. Strength in financial services and life sciences offset declines in software and high-tech and business information and media, and the EMEA region (Europe, the Middle East, and Africa) grew in the double digits while the Americas were roughly flat. Management reduced its 2026 revenue-growth forecast to a 3.2% to 4.2% range, citing slower North American demand and project ramp-downs, which sent shares lower. Positively, AI-native revenue accelerated to more than 11% of the business, and the firm deepened partnerships with OpenAI, Google, and Anthropic. Its low valuation and clean balance sheet remain notable contrasts to its decelerating top line.
ExlService Holdings is a global data, analytics, and AI company that helps clients in insurance, healthcare, and banking reinvent operations and decision-making. Among the three, EXLS has shown the most consistent recent momentum.
Second-quarter revenue rose about 15.6% year over year, with adjusted EPS up more than 22%, and the company raised its full-year revenue guidance. Data-and-AI-led services and solutions reached about 61% of revenue and grew roughly 30% year over year, reflecting clients moving from AI pilots to production deployments. The company also completed its acquisition of iMerit, an AI model-training specialist, and expanded partnerships with NVIDIA, AWS, Google Cloud, Snowflake, and Anthropic. While EXLS is the smallest company in this comparison, its double-digit growth and improving mix of higher-value AI work distinguish its market positioning, even as its valuation carries a premium to the larger players.
For traders looking to translate market analysis into action, Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page offers a curated selection of AI-powered trading bots. Tickeron hosts hundreds of AI Trading Bots that collectively trade thousands of different tickers, each with its own trading style, strategy, timeframe, performance record, statistics, and watchlist of securities. Because not every bot suits every market environment, only the strongest and most relevant performers are surfaced in the Trending AI Robots section, helping users quickly identify tools aligned with current conditions. Whether you prefer short-term momentum strategies or longer-horizon trend following, exploring the Trending AI Robots can provide a practical starting point for evaluating automated approaches across names like those covered here.
The three companies differ most clearly in scale, growth, and valuation. Accenture is by far the largest, with diversified global revenue and a substantial capital-return program, but its growth has slowed and it increasingly relies on acquisitions for expansion. EPAM offers a lower valuation and a strong balance sheet, yet it faces headwinds in discretionary software spending and recently lowered guidance, making it the most value-oriented and cyclically sensitive of the group. ExlService delivers the strongest organic growth and the most direct AI-monetization story, but it trades at a higher earnings multiple and is more concentrated in regulated industries.
On sector exposure, Accenture spans virtually every industry; EPAM leans toward software, financial services, and high-tech clients; and ExlService is anchored in insurance, healthcare, and banking. Risk profiles also diverge: Accenture and EPAM are both exposed to the concern that AI could reduce demand for traditional services, while ExlService is positioned to benefit from AI adoption but carries execution and integration risk from its recent acquisition. From a sentiment standpoint, ExlService has shown the steadiest positive momentum, Accenture is in a sharp but still partial recovery, and EPAM is contending with investor caution following its guidance cut.
Based on observable trend consistency, growth catalysts, and relative positioning, Tickeron's AI would likely favor EXLS among the three. The company combines the strongest and most durable recent revenue momentum, upwardly revised guidance, and a revenue mix increasingly weighted toward higher-value data and AI work. Accenture's rebound and shareholder returns are notable, but its decelerating organic growth introduces uncertainty, while EPAM's lowered outlook and softer near-term demand make its trend less consistent. This assessment is probabilistic rather than definitive: it reflects current momentum and catalysts, not a guarantee of future performance. Traders should weigh their own timeframe and risk tolerance when interpreting this relative ranking.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
The 50-day moving average for ACN moved above the 200-day moving average on October 19, 2026. This could be a long-term bullish signal for the stock as the stock shifts to an upward trend.
The Momentum Indicator moved above the 0 level on October 01, 2026. You may want to consider a long position or call options on ACN as a result. In 44 of 76 past instances where the momentum indicator moved above 0, the stock continued to climb. The odds of a continued upward trend are 58%.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for ACN just turned positive on October 01, 2026. Looking at past instances where ACN's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 34 of 49 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 69%.
ACN moved above its 50-day moving average on September 29, 2026 date and that indicates a change from a downward trend to an upward trend.
Following a +8.21% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where ACN advanced for three days, in 183 of 299 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 61%.
The Aroon Indicator entered an Uptrend today. In 114 of 179 cases where ACN Aroon's Indicator entered an Uptrend, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued Uptrend are 64%.
The RSI Indicator demonstrates that the ticker has stayed in the overbought zone for 7 days. The longer the ticker stays in the overbought zone, the sooner a price pull-back is expected.
The Stochastic Oscillator demonstrated that the ticker has stayed in the overbought zone for 8 days. The longer the ticker stays in the overbought zone, the sooner a price pull-back is expected.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where ACN declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 64%.
ACN broke above its upper Bollinger Band on October 22, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to drop as the stock moves back below the upper band and toward the middle band. You may want to consider selling the stock or exploring put options.
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 2 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating outstanding price growth. ACN’s price grows at a higher rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 38 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating strong sales and a profitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 41 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to consistent earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 70 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is slightly overvalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (4.785) is normal, around the industry mean (2.645). P/E Ratio (19.744) is within average values for comparable stocks, (16.736). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (1.268) is also within normal values, averaging (2.284). Dividend Yield (0.027) settles around the average of (0.118) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (1.618) is also within normal values, averaging (139.965).
The Tickeron Seasonality Score of 75 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is slightly overvalued in the industry. The Tickeron Seasonality score describes the variance of predictable price changes around the same period every calendar year. These changes can be tied to a specific month, quarter, holiday or vacation period, as well as a meteorological or growing season.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 100 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. ACN’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 93, placing this stock worse than average.
EPAM's Aroon Indicator triggered a bullish signal on September 24, 2026. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor detected that the AroonUp green line is above 70 while the AroonDown red line is below 30. When the up indicator moves above 70 and the down indicator remains below 30, it is a sign that the stock could be setting up for a bullish move. Traders may want to buy the stock or look to buy calls options. A.I.dvisor looked at 161 similar instances where the Aroon Indicator showed a similar pattern. In 115 of the 161 cases, the stock moved higher in the days that followed. This puts the odds of a move higher at 71%.
The Momentum Indicator moved above the 0 level on October 08, 2026. You may want to consider a long position or call options on EPAM as a result. In 55 of 83 past instances where the momentum indicator moved above 0, the stock continued to climb. The odds of a continued upward trend are 66%.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for EPAM just turned positive on October 12, 2026. Looking at past instances where EPAM's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 25 of 36 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 69%.
EPAM moved above its 50-day moving average on October 08, 2026 date and that indicates a change from a downward trend to an upward trend.
The 10-day moving average for EPAM crossed bullishly above the 50-day moving average on October 12, 2026. This indicates that the trend has shifted higher and could be considered a buy signal. In 11 of 17 past instances when the 10-day crossed above the 50-day, the stock continued to move higher over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 65%.
Following a +6.11% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where EPAM advanced for three days, in 201 of 309 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 65%.
The RSI Indicator demonstrates that the ticker has stayed in the overbought zone for 4 days. The longer the ticker stays in the overbought zone, the sooner a price pull-back is expected.
The Stochastic Oscillator demonstrated that the ticker has stayed in the overbought zone for 5 days. The longer the ticker stays in the overbought zone, the sooner a price pull-back is expected.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where EPAM declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 79%.
EPAM broke above its upper Bollinger Band on October 19, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to drop as the stock moves back below the upper band and toward the middle band. You may want to consider selling the stock or exploring put options.
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 37 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating steady price growth. EPAM’s price grows at a higher rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 61 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to average earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 64 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is fair valued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (1.998) is normal, around the industry mean (2.645). P/E Ratio (18.412) is within average values for comparable stocks, (16.736). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.575) is also within normal values, averaging (2.284). Dividend Yield (0.000) settles around the average of (0.118) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (1.135) is also within normal values, averaging (139.965).
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 66 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating strong sales and a profitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron Seasonality Score of 95 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is significantly overvalued in the industry. The Tickeron Seasonality score describes the variance of predictable price changes around the same period every calendar year. These changes can be tied to a specific month, quarter, holiday or vacation period, as well as a meteorological or growing season.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 100 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. EPAM’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 93, placing this stock worse than average.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for EXLS turned positive on October 05, 2026. Looking at past instances where EXLS's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 30 of 42 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 71%.
The Momentum Indicator moved above the 0 level on October 01, 2026. You may want to consider a long position or call options on EXLS as a result. In 57 of 95 past instances where the momentum indicator moved above 0, the stock continued to climb. The odds of a continued upward trend are 60%.
EXLS moved above its 50-day moving average on October 08, 2026 date and that indicates a change from a downward trend to an upward trend.
The 10-day moving average for EXLS crossed bullishly above the 50-day moving average on October 12, 2026. This indicates that the trend has shifted higher and could be considered a buy signal. In 10 of 20 past instances when the 10-day crossed above the 50-day, the stock continued to move higher over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 50%.
Following a +5.02% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where EXLS advanced for three days, in 177 of 302 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 59%.
The RSI Indicator demonstrates that the ticker has stayed in the overbought zone for 6 days. The longer the ticker stays in the overbought zone, the sooner a price pull-back is expected.
The Stochastic Oscillator demonstrated that the ticker has stayed in the overbought zone for 10 days. The longer the ticker stays in the overbought zone, the sooner a price pull-back is expected.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where EXLS declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 59%.
EXLS broke above its upper Bollinger Band on October 22, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to drop as the stock moves back below the upper band and toward the middle band. You may want to consider selling the stock or exploring put options.
The Aroon Indicator for EXLS entered a downward trend on October 08, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 36 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating steady price growth. EXLS’s price grows at a higher rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 37 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating strong sales and a profitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 52 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to consistent earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 60 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating well-balanced risk and returns. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 93, placing this stock slightly better than average.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 77 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is slightly overvalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (7.403) is normal, around the industry mean (2.645). P/E Ratio (26.604) is within average values for comparable stocks, (16.736). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.899) is also within normal values, averaging (2.284). Dividend Yield (0.000) settles around the average of (0.118) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (2.527) is also within normal values, averaging (139.965).
The Tickeron Seasonality Score of 85 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is significantly overvalued in the industry. The Tickeron Seasonality score describes the variance of predictable price changes around the same period every calendar year. These changes can be tied to a specific month, quarter, holiday or vacation period, as well as a meteorological or growing season.
ACN | EPAM | EXLS | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 45 | 31 | 38 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 70 Overvalued | 64 Fair valued | 77 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | 60 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 38 | 66 | 37 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 2 | 37 | 36 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 41 | 61 | 52 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 75 | 90 | 85 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
EPAM's Valuation (64) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as ACN (70) in the Information Technology Services industry, and is in the same range as EXLS (77) in the Data Processing Services industry. This means that EPAM's stock grew similarly to ACN’s and similarly to EXLS’s over the last 12 months.
EXLS's Profit vs Risk Rating (60) in the Data Processing Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for EPAM (100) in the Information Technology Services industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for ACN (100) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that EXLS's stock grew somewhat faster than EPAM’s and somewhat faster than ACN’s over the last 12 months.
EXLS's SMR Rating (37) in the Data Processing Services industry is in the same range as ACN (38) in the Information Technology Services industry, and is in the same range as EPAM (66) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that EXLS's stock grew similarly to ACN’s and similarly to EPAM’s over the last 12 months.
ACN's Price Growth Rating (2) in the Information Technology Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for EXLS (36) in the Data Processing Services industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for EPAM (37) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that ACN's stock grew somewhat faster than EXLS’s and somewhat faster than EPAM’s over the last 12 months.
ACN's P/E Growth Rating (41) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as EXLS (52) in the Data Processing Services industry, and is in the same range as EPAM (61) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that ACN's stock grew similarly to EXLS’s and similarly to EPAM’s over the last 12 months.
| ACN | EPAM | EXLS | |
|---|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 59% | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 54% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 62% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 58% | 2 days ago 66% | 2 days ago 60% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 71% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 61% | 2 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 60% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 61% | 2 days ago 66% | 2 days ago 59% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 61% | 3 days ago 65% | 3 days ago 59% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 19 days ago 64% | 13 days ago 79% | 13 days ago 59% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 60% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 64% | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 54% |
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ACN’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while EPAM’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s), and EXLS’s FA Score reflects 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ACN’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while EPAM’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s), and EXLS’s TA Score reflects 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
ACN (@Information Technology Services) experienced а +8.57% price change this week, while EPAM (@Information Technology Services) price change was +11.51% , and EXLS (@Information Technology Services) price fluctuated +7.05% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Information Technology Services industry was +0.74%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.43%, and the average quarterly price growth was -7.52%.
ACN is expected to report earnings on Dec 17, 2026.
EPAM is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2026.
EXLS is expected to report earnings on Oct 27, 2026.
The industry, whose total market cap runs into trillions, makes hardware/software that allows data to be stored, retrieved, transmitted, and manipulated on computers. With the ever-increasing relevance of data, the information technology (IT) industry has gained momentous growth over the years, and continues to thrive on innovation. Some of the behemoths in the industry are International Business Machines Corporation, Accenture, and VMware, Inc.
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| BSMV | 20.29 | 0.07 | +0.35% |
| Invesco BulletShares 2031 Municipal Bond ETF (BSMV) | |||
| QJUN | 33.15 | N/A | N/A |
| FT Vest Nasdaq-100 Buffer ETF - June (QJUN) | |||
| SHRT | 6.92 | -0.01 | -0.15% |
| Gotham Short Strategies ETF (SHRT) | |||
| MOAT | 112.04 | -1.07 | -0.95% |
| VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF (MOAT) | |||
| PJIO | 57.20 | -0.57 | -0.98% |
| PGIM Jennison Focused International Equity ETF (PJIO) | |||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EPAM has been closely correlated with GLOB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EPAM jumps, then GLOB could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EPAM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EPAM | 100% | -1.75% | ||
| GLOB - EPAM | 77% Closely correlated | -1.64% | ||
| ACN - EPAM | 73% Closely correlated | -3.62% | ||
| CTSH - EPAM | 71% Closely correlated | -4.31% | ||
| INFY - EPAM | 64% Loosely correlated | -6.58% | ||
| G - EPAM | 63% Loosely correlated | -2.27% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EXLS has been closely correlated with G. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EXLS jumps, then G could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EXLS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EXLS | 100% | -1.42% | ||
| G - EXLS | 75% Closely correlated | -2.27% | ||
| CTSH - EXLS | 74% Closely correlated | -4.31% | ||
| GLOB - EXLS | 64% Loosely correlated | -1.64% | ||
| GIB - EXLS | 63% Loosely correlated | -0.21% | ||
| JKHY - EXLS | 56% Loosely correlated | +0.46% | ||
More | ||||