Advertisement
AFL or LNC or MFC
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
AFL’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileLNC’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s), and MFC’s FA Score reflects 1 green FA rating(s).
- AFL’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- LNC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- MFC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
AFL’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LNC’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s), and MFC’s TA Score reflects 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- AFL’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
- LNC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
- MFC’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
AFL (@Life/Health Insurance) experienced а -1.44% price change this week, while LNC (@Life/Health Insurance) price change was +1.16% , and MFC (@Life/Health Insurance) price fluctuated +0.22% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Life/Health Insurance industry was +0.31%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.10%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.24%.
Reported Earning Dates
AFL is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2025.
LNC is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2025.
MFC is expected to report earnings on Aug 06, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Life/Health Insurance (+0.31% weekly)Life insurance companies mainly sell policies that pay a death benefit as a lump sum upon the death of the insured to their beneficiaries. Life insurance policies may be sold as term life, (which guarantees payment of a stated death benefit and expires at the end of a specified term) or permanent /typically whole life (which is more expensive but lasts a lifetime and carries a cash accumulation component). Life insurance firms may also sell long-term disability policies that help to replace the insured individual’s income if they become sick or disabled. Health insurance, on the other hand, helps pay for medical expenses. Anthem, Inc., MetLife, Inc. and Aflac Incorporated are some of the largest U.S. companies in this industry.
| AFL | LNC | MFC | |
| Capitalization | 49.4B | 5.42B | 44.6B |
| EBITDA | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Gain YTD | -0.928 | 7.235 | 4.233 |
| P/E Ratio | 10.95 | 9.80 | 12.74 |
| Revenue | 18.8B | 11.7B | 42.3B |
| Total Cash | 77.6B | 23B | 20.3B |
| Total Debt | 7.36B | 5.95B | 12.7B |
AFL | LNC | MFC | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 65 | 62 | 5 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 71 Overvalued | 12 Undervalued | 35 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 2 | 82 | 8 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 97 | 99 | 100 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 56 | 55 | 48 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 13 | 44 | 42 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
LNC's Valuation (12) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is in the same range as MFC (35) and is somewhat better than the same rating for AFL (71). This means that LNC's stock grew similarly to MFC’s and somewhat faster than AFL’s over the last 12 months.
AFL's Profit vs Risk Rating (2) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is in the same range as MFC (8) and is significantly better than the same rating for LNC (82). This means that AFL's stock grew similarly to MFC’s and significantly faster than LNC’s over the last 12 months.
AFL's SMR Rating (97) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is in the same range as LNC (99) and is in the same range as MFC (100). This means that AFL's stock grew similarly to LNC’s and similarly to MFC’s over the last 12 months.
MFC's Price Growth Rating (48) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is in the same range as LNC (55) and is in the same range as AFL (56). This means that MFC's stock grew similarly to LNC’s and similarly to AFL’s over the last 12 months.
AFL's P/E Growth Rating (13) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is in the same range as MFC (42) and is in the same range as LNC (44). This means that AFL's stock grew similarly to MFC’s and similarly to LNC’s over the last 12 months.
| AFL | LNC | MFC | |
|---|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 76% | 1 day ago 59% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 52% | 2 days ago 78% | 1 day ago 68% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 46% | 2 days ago 68% | 1 day ago 60% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 43% | 2 days ago 72% | 1 day ago 59% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 36% | 2 days ago 74% | 1 day ago 55% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 60% | 3 days ago 73% | 6 days ago 63% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 43% | 10 days ago 73% | 1 day ago 58% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 80% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 41% | 2 days ago 66% | 1 day ago 50% |
Advertisement
AFL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AFL has been closely correlated with GL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if AFL jumps, then GL could also see price increases.
LNC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LNC has been closely correlated with PRU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LNC jumps, then PRU could also see price increases.