Advertisement
AGX or DY or PWR
Which Stock Would AI Choose? Argan (AGX) vs. Dycom Industries (DY) vs. Quanta Services (PWR) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- All three companies are infrastructure contractors riding overlapping tailwinds from data centers, electrification, and fiber expansion, but each has a distinct business focus and risk profile.
- AGX is the purest play on power-plant construction and has delivered the strongest growth, yet trades at a premium valuation after a sharp recent pullback.
- DY offers a record backlog and rapid revenue growth, but negative earnings-estimate revisions and near-term margin pressure have weighed on its share price.
- PWR is the largest and most diversified of the three, with scale, a record backlog, and the strongest analyst sentiment, but it also carries a rich earnings multiple.
- Relative performance has diverged sharply in recent months, highlighting how valuation sensitivity and momentum differ across these stocks.
Introduction
Argan, Dycom Industries, and Quanta Services sit at the intersection of three of the market's most durable investment themes: artificial-intelligence-driven power demand, grid modernization, and fiber connectivity. Although all three are specialty contractors, they compete in different layers of the infrastructure value chain, which makes a side-by-side stock comparison especially instructive. Growth-oriented investors drawn to the energy and digital-infrastructure buildout, as well as traders tracking momentum and valuation, may find this comparison relevant. Understanding how each company converts demand into backlog, revenue, and profitability — and how the market is currently pricing that potential — can clarify their relative market positioning.
AGX Overview and Recent Performance
Argan, Inc. (AGX) provides engineering, procurement, and construction (EPC) services focused primarily on natural gas-fired power plants and renewable energy facilities, alongside industrial fabrication and teledata infrastructure. The company has emerged as a direct beneficiary of rising electricity demand tied to AI data centers. In recent quarters, Argan has reported accelerating growth: revenue rose more than 50% year over year, and its backlog, which stood around $2.5 billion after more than doubling in its prior fiscal year, provides multi-year visibility. Argan also maintains a notably conservative balance sheet, holding roughly $1 billion in cash and investments with no debt.
Recent market activity, however, has been more volatile. After a strong run that pushed the stock to new highs, shares pulled back meaningfully in recent weeks, and the stock now trades at a premium — roughly 30 times forward earnings, above its historical median. Analysts have noted execution risks around project timing and softening industrial margins, while heavy insider selling and elevated valuation have added to investor caution. Sentiment remains broadly positive on the underlying demand story, but the setup now weighs growth momentum against a richer price.
DY Overview and Recent Performance
Dycom Industries, Inc. (DY) is a leading provider of specialty contracting services to the telecommunications infrastructure and utility industries. Its Communications segment handles program management, aerial and underground construction, and maintenance for telecom providers, while its newer Building Systems segment delivers electrical and structured-cabling work for data centers. Dycom has posted record quarterly revenue in recent periods, with sales up more than 45% year over year and total backlog exceeding $12 billion, up over 50% year over year.
Despite strong top-line results, the stock has underperformed, sliding noticeably over the trailing three-month period. Investor concern has centered on near-term margin pressure from workforce investments, the deferral of certain wireless equipment-replacement revenues, and guidance that came in slightly below some estimates. As a result, earnings estimates have been revised downward in recent weeks. Longer term, management points to a multi-year opportunity in fiber-to-the-home, long-haul and middle-mile fiber, and data-center interconnects, suggesting the current softness is more about timing and investment than a weakening demand environment.
PWR Overview and Recent Performance
Quanta Services, Inc. (PWR) is the largest specialty contractor in North America focused on energy and communications infrastructure, spanning electric power transmission and distribution, renewable generation, and underground utility work. It is the most diversified of the three names, with a record backlog of roughly $53 billion tied to grid modernization, storm hardening, and AI-driven power demand. Recent results have been strong: net income nearly doubled year over year in its latest quarter, with revenue up more than 40%, and the company raised its full-year outlook.
Quanta's stock has delivered a robust year-to-date gain, though it has cooled from its highs in recent months. Analyst sentiment remains the most constructive of the group, with a consensus "Strong Buy" rating and a series of recent price-target increases. That optimism is tempered by valuation: Quanta trades at a forward price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio well above its industry average, reflecting high expectations for continued earnings growth. The market's current debate centers on whether the company's scale and diversified backlog justify its premium multiple.
Trending AI Robots
For traders seeking a systematic, data-driven edge in this kind of stock comparison, Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page offers a curated view of the platform's best-performing automated strategies. Tickeron hosts hundreds of AI trading bots that collectively trade thousands of different tickers, each with its own trading style, strategy, timeframe, performance history, and set of securities. Because not every bot suits every market environment, only those most appropriate for current conditions earn a place in the Trending AI Robots section. Browsing the page can help investors see which strategies are gaining traction right now and how different bots approach momentum, trend, and volatility. Explore the Trending AI Robots to review the available bots and their current performance.
Head-to-Head Comparison
The clearest contrast among these three names is their positioning along the infrastructure value chain. AGX is the most concentrated, with a heavy tilt toward gas-fired power-plant construction, giving it high leverage to power-generation demand but also greater sensitivity to project timing and margin variability. DY spans telecom and data-center services, balancing a stable, recurring maintenance base against program work that can shift between quarters. PWR is the broadest, spanning electric grid, generation, and underground infrastructure, which diversifies its drivers but also makes it a proxy for the entire energy transition.
Growth profiles also differ. Argan is growing fastest from a smaller base, while Dycom's growth is strong but partly acquisition-driven, and Quanta's is the largest in absolute terms with a more diversified mix. On risk, Argan faces concentration and valuation risk; Dycom faces near-term margin and estimate-revision pressure; and Quanta faces a premium multiple and sensitivity to any cooling in utility capital expenditure. On market sentiment, Quanta currently enjoys the strongest analyst support, Argan retains a positive but more mixed view, and Dycom's near-term revisions have turned cautious.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Based on observable factors — trend consistency, relative strength, breadth of backlog, and analyst sentiment — Tickeron's AI would most likely favor PWR at present. Quanta combines the most durable momentum with the strongest consensus support, a record backlog, and the scale to execute large multi-year programs across multiple demand sources. That said, the assessment is probabilistic rather than definitive: Argan offers faster growth and a pristine balance sheet, while Dycom's record backlog could re-rate if margin concerns ease. The AI's preference for Quanta reflects a relatively smoother blend of trend stability and catalysts, not a guarantee of future outperformance.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
AGX's RSI Oscillator remains in oversold zone for 1 day
It is expected that a price bounce should occur soon.
Technical Analysis (Indicators)
Bullish Trend Analysis
The Stochastic Oscillator shows that the ticker has stayed in the oversold zone for 7 days. The price of this ticker is presumed to bounce back soon, since the longer the ticker stays in the oversold zone, the more promptly an upward trend is expected.
Following a +9.33% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where AGX advanced for three days, in 262 of 346 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 76%.
AGX may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options.
Bearish Trend Analysis
The Momentum Indicator moved below the 0 level on October 14, 2026. You may want to consider selling the stock, shorting the stock, or exploring put options on AGX as a result. In 59 of 94 cases where the Momentum Indicator fell below 0, the stock fell further within the subsequent month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 63%.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence Histogram (MACD) for AGX turned negative on October 20, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to turn lower in the coming weeks. Traders may want to sell the stock or buy put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 50 similar instances when the indicator turned negative. In 32 of the 50 cases the stock turned lower in the days that followed. This puts the odds of success at 64%.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where AGX declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 60%.
The Aroon Indicator for AGX entered a downward trend on October 07, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.
Fundamental Analysis (Ratings)
The Tickeron Seasonality Score of 23 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is slightly undervalued in the industry. The Tickeron Seasonality score describes the variance of predictable price changes around the same period every calendar year. These changes can be tied to a specific month, quarter, holiday or vacation period, as well as a meteorological or growing season.
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 26 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating very strong sales and a profitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 62 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating well-balanced risk and returns. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 77, placing this stock slightly better than average.
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 64 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating steady price growth. AGX’s price grows at a higher rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 68 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is slightly overvalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (9.163) is normal, around the industry mean (15.331). P/E Ratio (25.721) is within average values for comparable stocks, (168.892). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.030) is also within normal values, averaging (3.522). Dividend Yield (0.008) settles around the average of (0.195) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (4.697) is also within normal values, averaging (2.905).
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 68 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to worse than average earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
DY sees MACD Histogram crosses below signal line
DY saw its Moving Average Convergence Divergence Histogram (MACD) turn negative on October 21, 2026. This is a bearish signal that suggests the stock could decline going forward. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 47 instances where the indicator turned negative. In 37 of the 47 cases the stock moved lower in the days that followed. This puts the odds of a downward move at 79%.
Technical Analysis (Indicators)
Bearish Trend Analysis
The Momentum Indicator moved below the 0 level on October 14, 2026. You may want to consider selling the stock, shorting the stock, or exploring put options on DY as a result. In 53 of 84 cases where the Momentum Indicator fell below 0, the stock fell further within the subsequent month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 63%.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where DY declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 66%.
The Aroon Indicator for DY entered a downward trend on October 23, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.
Bullish Trend Analysis
The RSI Indicator shows that the ticker has stayed in the oversold zone for 5 days. The price of this ticker is presumed to bounce back soon, since the longer the ticker stays in the oversold zone, the more promptly an Uptrend is expected.
The Stochastic Oscillator shows that the ticker has stayed in the oversold zone for 9 days. The price of this ticker is presumed to bounce back soon, since the longer the ticker stays in the oversold zone, the more promptly an upward trend is expected.
Following a +6.09% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where DY advanced for three days, in 266 of 329 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 81%.
DY may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options.
Fundamental Analysis (Ratings)
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 43 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is fair valued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (3.282) is normal, around the industry mean (15.331). P/E Ratio (20.249) is within average values for comparable stocks, (168.892). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.250) is also within normal values, averaging (3.522). Dividend Yield (0.000) settles around the average of (0.195) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (1.252) is also within normal values, averaging (2.905).
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 48 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating strong sales and a profitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron Seasonality Score of 50 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is fair valued in the industry. The Tickeron Seasonality score describes the variance of predictable price changes around the same period every calendar year. These changes can be tied to a specific month, quarter, holiday or vacation period, as well as a meteorological or growing season.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 67 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. DY’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 77, placing this stock better than average.
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 82 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to worse than average earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 85 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating slightly worse than average price growth. DY’s price grows at a lower rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
PWR in downward trend: price dove below 50-day moving average on October 15, 2026
PWR moved below its 50-day moving average on October 15, 2026 date and that indicates a change from an upward trend to a downward trend. In 24 of 33 similar past instances, the stock price decreased further within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 73%.
Technical Analysis (Indicators)
Bearish Trend Analysis
The Momentum Indicator moved below the 0 level on October 15, 2026. You may want to consider selling the stock, shorting the stock, or exploring put options on PWR as a result. In 52 of 79 cases where the Momentum Indicator fell below 0, the stock fell further within the subsequent month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 66%.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence Histogram (MACD) for PWR turned negative on October 15, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to turn lower in the coming weeks. Traders may want to sell the stock or buy put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 50 similar instances when the indicator turned negative. In 33 of the 50 cases the stock turned lower in the days that followed. This puts the odds of success at 66%.
The 10-day moving average for PWR crossed bearishly below the 50-day moving average on October 22, 2026. This indicates that the trend has shifted lower and could be considered a sell signal. In 9 of 13 past instances when the 10-day crossed below the 50-day, the stock continued to move higher over the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 69%.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where PWR declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 60%.
Bullish Trend Analysis
The RSI Indicator demonstrates that the ticker has stayed in the oversold zone for 1 day, which means it's wise to expect a price bounce in the near future.
The Stochastic Oscillator shows that the ticker has stayed in the oversold zone for 5 days. The price of this ticker is presumed to bounce back soon, since the longer the ticker stays in the oversold zone, the more promptly an upward trend is expected.
Following a +6.36% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where PWR advanced for three days, in 257 of 348 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 74%.
PWR may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options.
The Aroon Indicator entered an Uptrend today. In 257 of 362 cases where PWR Aroon's Indicator entered an Uptrend, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued Uptrend are 71%.
Fundamental Analysis (Ratings)
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 23 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating low risk on high returns. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 77, placing this stock better than average.
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 51 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to consistent earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 56 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating strong sales and a profitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 60 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating steady price growth. PWR’s price grows at a higher rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Seasonality Score of 75 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is slightly overvalued in the industry. The Tickeron Seasonality score describes the variance of predictable price changes around the same period every calendar year. These changes can be tied to a specific month, quarter, holiday or vacation period, as well as a meteorological or growing season.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 81 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is slightly overvalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (8.524) is normal, around the industry mean (15.331). P/E Ratio (61.604) is within average values for comparable stocks, (168.892). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (1.443) is also within normal values, averaging (3.522). Dividend Yield (0.001) settles around the average of (0.195) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (2.860) is also within normal values, averaging (2.905).
AGX | DY | PWR | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 83 | 67 | 69 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 68 Overvalued | 43 Fair valued | 81 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 62 | 67 | 23 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 26 | 48 | 56 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 64 | 85 | 60 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 68 | 82 | 51 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 23 | 50 | 75 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
DY's Valuation (43) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as AGX (68) and is somewhat better than the same rating for PWR (81). This means that DY's stock grew similarly to AGX’s and somewhat faster than PWR’s over the last 12 months.
PWR's Profit vs Risk Rating (23) in the Engineering And Construction industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AGX (62) and is somewhat better than the same rating for DY (67). This means that PWR's stock grew somewhat faster than AGX’s and somewhat faster than DY’s over the last 12 months.
AGX's SMR Rating (26) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as DY (48) and is in the same range as PWR (56). This means that AGX's stock grew similarly to DY’s and similarly to PWR’s over the last 12 months.
PWR's Price Growth Rating (60) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as AGX (64) and is in the same range as DY (85). This means that PWR's stock grew similarly to AGX’s and similarly to DY’s over the last 12 months.
PWR's P/E Growth Rating (51) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as AGX (68) and is in the same range as DY (82). This means that PWR's stock grew similarly to AGX’s and similarly to DY’s over the last 12 months.
| AGX | DY | PWR | |
|---|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 78% | 3 days ago 76% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 63% | 3 days ago 63% | 3 days ago 66% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 64% | 3 days ago 79% | 3 days ago 66% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 59% | 3 days ago 69% | 3 days ago 62% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 59% | 3 days ago 62% | 3 days ago 70% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 20 days ago 76% | 20 days ago 81% | 20 days ago 74% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 60% | 3 days ago 66% | 3 days ago 60% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 74% | 3 days ago 84% | 3 days ago 89% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 75% | 3 days ago 56% | 3 days ago 71% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
AGX’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while DY’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s), and PWR’s FA Score reflects 1 green FA rating(s).
- AGX’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- DY’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- PWR’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
AGX’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while DY’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s), and PWR’s TA Score reflects 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- AGX’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
- DY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
- PWR’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
AGX (@Engineering & Construction) experienced а -4.01% price change this week, while DY (@Engineering & Construction) price change was -11.45% , and PWR (@Engineering & Construction) price fluctuated -13.52% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Engineering & Construction industry was -5.11%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -15.13%, and the average quarterly price growth was -29.76%.
Reported Earning Dates
AGX is expected to report earnings on Dec 03, 2026.
DY is expected to report earnings on Nov 18, 2026.
PWR is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Engineering & Construction (-5.11% weekly)Engineering & Construction includes companies that engage in non-residential construction and contract services, including ventilation, heating and air conditioning (HVAC) services. The level/value of construction & engineering activity is one of the potentially relevant indicators of the health of businesses, and hence of the overall economy. Some of the large-cap U.S. companies in this industry include Jacobs Engineering Group Inc,, AECOM and Quanta Services, Inc.
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| BTCZ | 3.09 | 0.01 | +0.16% |
| T-Rex 2X Inverse Bitcoin Daily Target ETF | |||
| JULT | 48.70 | -0.14 | -0.28% |
| AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer10 Jul ETF (JULT) | |||
| MGC | 279.34 | -1.34 | -0.48% |
| Vanguard Morningstar Mega Cap ETF (MGC) | |||
| BNOV | 48.78 | -0.30 | -0.60% |
| Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - November (BNOV) | |||
| IXG | 128.68 | -1.15 | -0.89% |
| iShares Global Financials ETF (IXG) | |||
AGX and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AGX has been loosely correlated with PWR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if AGX jumps, then PWR could also see price increases.
DY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DY has been loosely correlated with MTZ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if DY jumps, then MTZ could also see price increases.