Advertisement
AMAT or ASML or UCTT
AMAT | ASML | UCTT | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 71 Overvalued | 84 Overvalued | 52 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 39 | 22 | 80 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 25 | 20 | 92 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 38 | 40 | 46 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 9 | 9 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 85 | 85 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
UCTT's Valuation (52) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry is in the same range as AMAT (71) and is in the same range as ASML (84). This means that UCTT's stock grew similarly to AMAT’s and similarly to ASML’s over the last 12 months.
ASML's Profit vs Risk Rating (22) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry is in the same range as AMAT (39) and is somewhat better than the same rating for UCTT (80). This means that ASML's stock grew similarly to AMAT’s and somewhat faster than UCTT’s over the last 12 months.
ASML's SMR Rating (20) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry is in the same range as AMAT (25) and is significantly better than the same rating for UCTT (92). This means that ASML's stock grew similarly to AMAT’s and significantly faster than UCTT’s over the last 12 months.
AMAT's Price Growth Rating (38) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry is in the same range as ASML (40) and is in the same range as UCTT (46). This means that AMAT's stock grew similarly to ASML’s and similarly to UCTT’s over the last 12 months.
AMAT's P/E Growth Rating (9) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry is in the same range as ASML (9) and is significantly better than the same rating for UCTT (100). This means that AMAT's stock grew similarly to ASML’s and significantly faster than UCTT’s over the last 12 months.
| AMAT | ASML | UCTT | |
|---|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 67% | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 70% | 3 days ago 73% | 3 days ago 80% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 73% | 3 days ago 70% | 3 days ago 78% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 79% | 3 days ago 78% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 67% | 3 days ago 72% | 3 days ago 77% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 79% | 3 days ago 75% | 3 days ago 79% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 79% | 13 days ago 72% | 12 days ago 74% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 66% | 4 days ago 68% | 4 days ago 73% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 75% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 61% | 3 days ago 68% | 3 days ago 86% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
AMAT’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green while ASML’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s), and UCTT’s FA Score reflects 0 green FA rating(s).
- AMAT’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- ASML’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
- UCTT’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
AMAT’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ASML’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s), and UCTT’s TA Score reflects 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- AMAT’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
- ASML’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
- UCTT’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
AMAT (@Electronic Production Equipment) experienced а -6.11% price change this week, while ASML (@Electronic Production Equipment) price change was -4.66% , and UCTT (@Electronic Production Equipment) price fluctuated -5.64% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronic Production Equipment industry was -8.03%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.04%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.25%.
Reported Earning Dates
AMAT is expected to report earnings on Nov 12, 2026.
ASML is expected to report earnings on Oct 14, 2026.
UCTT is expected to report earnings on Oct 27, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Electronic Production Equipment (-8.03% weekly)The electronic production equipment industry makes equipment used to produce semiconductors. Such equipment includes wafer fabrication, plasma etching and photo-resist processing equipment. The industry also makes chemical vapor deposition processing systems and photomasks, which are high-purity quartz plates that contain patterns to define integrated circuits layouts. Applied Materials, Inc., Lam Research Corporation, and KLA-Tencor Corporation are examples of electronic production equipment manufacturing companies.
Advertisement
UCTT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, UCTT has been closely correlated with ICHR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if UCTT jumps, then ICHR could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To UCTT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| UCTT | 100% | +1.49% | ||
| ICHR - UCTT | 80% Closely correlated | +1.84% | ||
| ONTO - UCTT | 79% Closely correlated | +0.64% | ||
| AMAT - UCTT | 77% Closely correlated | -0.50% | ||
| COHU - UCTT | 77% Closely correlated | -0.26% | ||
| LRCX - UCTT | 76% Closely correlated | -0.55% | ||
More | ||||