Advertisement
ASAN or COMP or ZM
ASAN | ZM | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 38 | 18 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 62 Fair valued | 75 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 98 | 31 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 37 | 44 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | 97 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 85 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
ASAN's Valuation (62) in the null industry is in the same range as ZM (75) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that ASAN’s stock grew similarly to ZM’s over the last 12 months.
ASAN's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as ZM (100) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that ASAN’s stock grew similarly to ZM’s over the last 12 months.
ZM's SMR Rating (31) in the Packaged Software industry is significantly better than the same rating for ASAN (98) in the null industry. This means that ZM’s stock grew significantly faster than ASAN’s over the last 12 months.
ASAN's Price Growth Rating (37) in the null industry is in the same range as ZM (44) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that ASAN’s stock grew similarly to ZM’s over the last 12 months.
ZM's P/E Growth Rating (97) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as ASAN (100) in the null industry. This means that ZM’s stock grew similarly to ASAN’s over the last 12 months.
| ASAN | COMP | ZM | |
|---|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 83% | 1 day ago 77% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 88% | 1 day ago 81% | 1 day ago 67% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 82% | 1 day ago 88% | 1 day ago 69% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 69% | 1 day ago 84% | 1 day ago 77% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 79% | 1 day ago 82% | 1 day ago 67% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 78% | 1 day ago 86% | 1 day ago 60% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 76% | 6 days ago 83% | 4 days ago 65% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 86% | 11 days ago 84% | 13 days ago 75% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 75% | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 73% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 81% | 1 day ago 80% | 1 day ago 70% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ASAN’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green while COMP’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s), and ZM’s FA Score reflects 1 green FA rating(s).
- ASAN’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- COMP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- ZM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ASAN’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while COMP’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s), and ZM’s TA Score reflects 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- ASAN’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
- COMP’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
- ZM’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
ASAN (@Packaged Software) experienced а +16.82% price change this week, while COMP (@Real Estate Development) price change was +1.84% , and ZM (@Packaged Software) price fluctuated +5.23% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +0.26%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.30%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.75%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Development industry was -2.92%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -9.32%, and the average quarterly price growth was -6.66%.
Reported Earning Dates
ASAN is expected to report earnings on Dec 08, 2026.
COMP is expected to report earnings on Nov 11, 2026.
ZM is expected to report earnings on Nov 23, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Packaged Software (+0.26% weekly)Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
@Real Estate Development (-2.92% weekly)Activities range from the renovation and re-lease of existing buildings to the purchase of raw land and the sale of developed land or parcels to others. Demand for land development business is driven by GDP growth, employment rates, interest rates, and access to/cost of capital. For individual companies in this industry, proper cost estimation and successful bidding play critical roles in their profitability. Large companies could potentially have greater access to capital, while smaller companies can specialize in a specific geographic area or market niche. CBRE Group, VICI Properties Inc and Brookfield Property Partners L.P. are some of the large companies in this industry.
Advertisement
ASAN and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ASAN has been closely correlated with WDAY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ASAN jumps, then WDAY could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ASAN | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ASAN | 100% | +2.03% | ||
| WDAY - ASAN | 76% Closely correlated | -0.65% | ||
| FRSH - ASAN | 75% Closely correlated | +2.05% | ||
| HUBS - ASAN | 74% Closely correlated | -1.53% | ||
| TEAM - ASAN | 72% Closely correlated | +1.58% | ||
| NOW - ASAN | 71% Closely correlated | +0.79% | ||
More | ||||
COMP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, COMP has been loosely correlated with COIN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if COMP jumps, then COIN could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To COMP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| COMP | 100% | -1.37% | ||
| COIN - COMP | 62% Loosely correlated | +4.30% | ||
| AFRM - COMP | 62% Loosely correlated | +4.60% | ||
| U - COMP | 59% Loosely correlated | +2.16% | ||
| CLSK - COMP | 59% Loosely correlated | -1.27% | ||
| TDOC - COMP | 58% Loosely correlated | +4.15% | ||
More | ||||
ZM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ZM has been loosely correlated with COIN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ZM jumps, then COIN could also see price increases.