Advertisement
BAP or PWOD or STT
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BAP’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whilePWOD’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s), and STT’s FA Score reflects 1 green FA rating(s).
- BAP’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
- PWOD’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- STT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BAP’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PWOD’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s), and STT’s TA Score reflects 2 bullish TA indicator(s).
- BAP’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
- PWOD’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
- STT’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
Price Growth
BAP (@Regional Banks) experienced а +0.88% price change this week, while PWOD (@Regional Banks) price change was -4.23% , and STT (@Investment Managers) price fluctuated -2.74% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -1.08%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.43%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.43%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +0.74%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.72%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.99%.
Reported Earning Dates
BAP is expected to report earnings on Aug 14, 2025.
PWOD is expected to report earnings on Apr 25, 2025.
STT is expected to report earnings on Jul 15, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Regional Banks (-1.08% weekly)Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.
@Investment Managers (+0.74% weekly)Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.
| BAP | PWOD | STT | |
| Capitalization | 13.5B | 146M | 23.3B |
| EBITDA | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Gain YTD | 33.481 | -4.079 | 2.834 |
| P/E Ratio | 10.41 | 8.03 | 13.84 |
| Revenue | 21.6B | 63.3M | 11.9B |
| Total Cash | N/A | N/A | 4.05B |
| Total Debt | 25.4B | 397M | 21.5B |
BAP | PWOD | STT | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 26 | 76 | 70 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 90 Overvalued | 56 Fair valued | 34 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 17 | 28 | 34 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 4 | 41 | 8 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 38 | 50 | 47 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 33 | 36 | 71 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
STT's Valuation (34) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as PWOD (56) and is somewhat better than the same rating for BAP (90). This means that STT's stock grew similarly to PWOD’s and somewhat faster than BAP’s over the last 12 months.
BAP's Profit vs Risk Rating (17) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as PWOD (28) and is in the same range as STT (34). This means that BAP's stock grew similarly to PWOD’s and similarly to STT’s over the last 12 months.
BAP's SMR Rating (4) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as STT (8) and is somewhat better than the same rating for PWOD (41). This means that BAP's stock grew similarly to STT’s and somewhat faster than PWOD’s over the last 12 months.
BAP's Price Growth Rating (38) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as STT (47) and is in the same range as PWOD (50). This means that BAP's stock grew similarly to STT’s and similarly to PWOD’s over the last 12 months.
BAP's P/E Growth Rating (33) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as PWOD (36) and is somewhat better than the same rating for STT (71). This means that BAP's stock grew similarly to PWOD’s and somewhat faster than STT’s over the last 12 months.
| BAP | PWOD | STT | |
|---|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 66% | 3 days ago 61% | 2 days ago 64% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 52% | 2 days ago 65% | 2 days ago 63% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 46% | 2 days ago 59% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 39% | 2 days ago 51% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 64% | 2 days ago 50% | 2 days ago 60% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 60% | 2 days ago 47% | 2 days ago 57% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 63% | 9 days ago 53% | 9 days ago 63% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | about 1 month ago 66% | 2 days ago 50% | 17 days ago 58% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 63% | N/A | 2 days ago 69% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 55% | 2 days ago 44% | 2 days ago 62% |
Advertisement
BAP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BAP has been loosely correlated with BSAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 57% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BAP jumps, then BSAC could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BAP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BAP | 100% | +0.22% | ||
| BSAC - BAP | 57% Loosely correlated | -1.74% | ||
| IFS - BAP | 53% Loosely correlated | -0.11% | ||
| BCH - BAP | 48% Loosely correlated | -2.15% | ||
| GGAL - BAP | 46% Loosely correlated | -0.28% | ||
| SBNY - BAP | 46% Loosely correlated | -5.88% | ||
More | ||||
PWOD and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PWOD has been loosely correlated with BRKL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PWOD jumps, then BRKL could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PWOD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PWOD | 100% | -1.08% | ||
| BRKL - PWOD | 64% Loosely correlated | -1.67% | ||
| SHBI - PWOD | 63% Loosely correlated | -1.17% | ||
| CAC - PWOD | 61% Loosely correlated | -1.30% | ||
| HOPE - PWOD | 61% Loosely correlated | -0.30% | ||
| VBTX - PWOD | 61% Loosely correlated | -1.15% | ||
More | ||||
STT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, STT has been closely correlated with NTRS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if STT jumps, then NTRS could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To STT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| STT | 100% | +2.98% | ||
| NTRS - STT | 82% Closely correlated | +1.23% | ||
| BN - STT | 78% Closely correlated | +2.59% | ||
| PFG - STT | 77% Closely correlated | +0.22% | ||
| CRBG - STT | 76% Closely correlated | +1.75% | ||
| BLK - STT | 76% Closely correlated | +1.07% | ||
More | ||||