BOTZ
Price
$37.60
Change
-$0.28 (-0.74%)
Updated
Jun 17, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
3.51B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
ERTH
Price
$48.99
Change
+$0.14 (+0.29%)
Updated
Jun 17, 02:49 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
141.94M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
FTWO
Price
$45.12
Change
+$0.26 (+0.58%)
Updated
Jun 17, 04:17 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
76.7M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BOTZ or ERTH or FTWO

Header iconBOTZ vs ERTH vs FTWO Comparison
Open Charts BOTZ vs ERTH vs FTWOBanner chart's image
BOTZ vs ERTH vs FTWO Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which ETF would AI Choose? Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence ETF (BOTZ) vs. Invesco MSCI Sustainable Future ETF (ERTH) vs. Strive Natural Resources and Security ETF (FTWO)

Key Takeaways

  • BOTZ offers targeted exposure to robotics and AI through 62 holdings, with heavy industrials (44.8%) and technology (34.5%) tilts, at a 0.68% expense ratio.
  • ERTH provides broader sustainable future focus with 160 holdings across real estate (28%) and industrials (27%), also at 0.66%-0.68% expense ratio, emphasizing environmental solutions.
  • FTWO concentrates on national and natural resource security via 54 holdings, featuring energy (29%) and industrials (32%), with the lowest 0.49% expense ratio and quarterly rebalancing.
  • BOTZ boasts superior liquidity and scale with $3.79B AUM (assets under management, total value of fund assets), compared to ERTH's $148M and FTWO's $79M.
  • All are passive thematic ETFs, but BOTZ and ERTH show semi-annual/quarterly rebalancing, while FTWO's sector-neutral approach diversifies across five key security themes.
  • Structural differences highlight BOTZ for tech innovation, ERTH for ESG-aligned growth, and FTWO for resource resilience amid geopolitical tensions.

Introduction

Thematic ETFs like BOTZ, ERTH, and FTWO capture distinct slices of innovation and security trends amid accelerating technological adoption, sustainability mandates, and resource scarcity. BOTZ targets robotics and AI leaders, ERTH emphasizes environmentally beneficial companies, and FTWO focuses on national security-linked sectors. These passive funds represent varied approaches to long-term growth themes: pure tech disruption versus sustainable infrastructure versus strategic resources. Comparing them reveals trade-offs in diversification, costs, and exposure, aiding investors navigating AI-driven markets, green transitions, and geopolitical shifts in recent months.

Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence ETF (BOTZ) Overview

The Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence ETF (BOTZ) is a passive thematic fund tracking the Indxx Global Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic Index. It invests at least 80% of assets in companies involved in robotics, automation, and AI across developed markets. The fund holds 62 stocks, with top holdings including KEYENCE CORP (9.42%), ABB Ltd (8.83%), FANUC CORP (8.49%), NVDA (8.37%), and Intuitive Surgical (ISRG, 5.91%). Sector allocation tilts toward industrials (44.8%), information technology (34.5%), and health care (9.6%). Expense ratio is 0.68%. Semi-annual rebalancing maintains thematic purity. With $3.79B AUM, BOTZ offers high liquidity and global diversification unconstrained by traditional sectors.

Invesco MSCI Sustainable Future ETF (ERTH) Overview

The Invesco MSCI Sustainable Future ETF (ERTH) passively tracks the MSCI Global Environment Select Index, targeting companies deriving at least 50% of revenue from environmental solutions like clean energy and pollution control. It features 160 holdings for broader diversification. Top holdings include Digital Realty Trust (DLR, 5.53%), NVDA (5.35%), Vestas Wind Systems (4.67%), TSLA (4.60%), and First Solar (FSLR, 3.10%). Sectors emphasize real estate (28.37%), industrials (27.09%), consumer discretionary (20.50%), and information technology (12.72%). Net expense ratio is 0.66% (gross 0.68%). Quarterly rebalancing aligns with index reviews. AUM stands at $148M, positioning it as a mid-tier ESG thematic vehicle.

Strive Natural Resources and Security ETF (FTWO) Overview

The Strive Natural Resources and Security ETF (FTWO) is a passive fund tracking the BFAANGST Index, selecting top North American companies in fuel, aerospace & defense, agriculture, nuclear, and precious metals for national resource security. It holds 54 stocks. Top holdings: Deere & Co (DE, 9.89%), Constellation Energy (CEG, 9.25%), Exxon Mobil (XOM, 7.57%), Cameco (4.93%), and GE Aerospace (GE, 4.48%). Sector weights include industrials (31.87%), energy (28.94%), materials (25.97%), and utilities (12.07%). Expense ratio is 0.49%. Quarterly rebalancing ensures sector neutrality. AUM is $79M, reflecting its newer launch in 2023.

Industry and Thematic Landscape

These ETFs operate amid converging megatrends: AI proliferation boosting robotics demand, regulatory pushes for net-zero emissions driving sustainable tech, and supply chain vulnerabilities elevating resource security. Capital flows into AI and clean energy have surged with policy support like the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA), while geopolitical tensions—trade wars, energy transitions—underscore critical minerals and defense needs. Earnings growth in holdings like NVDA and XOM reflects macro tailwinds, but sector risks persist: semiconductor shortages for BOTZ/ERTH, commodity volatility for FTWO, and interest rate sensitivity across real estate-heavy portfolios. Broader cycles favor innovation over cycles, tempered by inflation and supply constraints.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent months, BOTZ has demonstrated resilient trend consistency, buoyed by AI momentum, though exhibiting higher volatility from tech concentration. ERTH displayed steadier drawdowns via diversified sustainability plays but lagged amid energy transition delays. FTWO showed lower relative volatility, benefiting from energy resilience, yet smaller scale amplified liquidity spreads. Differences stem from exposures: BOTZ's sensitivity to tech cycles, ERTH's to green policy flows, FTWO's to commodity macros. Concentration risks elevate in BOTZ (top 10 ~58%) versus ERTH (~38%), with FTWO (~55%) balancing via sector caps. Risk-adjusted positioning favors diversified thematic tilts over recent market cycles.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization (total market value of a company’s shares), technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener identifies trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Explore it today to enhance your ETF comparison and discovery process.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron’s AI favors BOTZ with moderate conviction (65% probability edge) due to superior scale, liquidity, and momentum stability from AI thematic purity, balanced diversification (62 holdings), and established track record. While FTWO offers cost efficiency and ERTH broader ESG depth, BOTZ's structural positioning aligns best with durable tech growth amid current cycles, prioritizing risk-adjusted returns over shorter horizons.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BOTZ has more net assets: 3.51B vs. ERTH (142M) and FTWO (76.7M). FTWO has a higher annual dividend yield than BOTZ and ERTH: FTWO (10.113) vs BOTZ (3.754) and ERTH (1.978). BOTZ was incepted earlier than ERTH and FTWO: BOTZ (10 years) vs ERTH (20 years) and FTWO (3 years). FTWO (0.49) has a lower expense ratio than ERTH (0.66) and BOTZ (0.68). ERTH has a higher turnover FTWO (21.00) and BOTZ (12.11) vs FTWO (21.00) and BOTZ (12.11).
BOTZERTHFTWO
Gain YTD3.7541.97810.113
Net Assets3.51B142M76.7M
Total Expense Ratio0.680.660.49
Turnover12.1131.0021.00
Yield0.591.371.01
Fund Existence10 years20 years3 years
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BOTZERTHFTWO
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 16 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
72%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BOTZ
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
ERTH
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
FTWO
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FMPTX35.97N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Mid Cap Value M
RIFYX41.37N/A
N/A
Victory RS Science and Technology Y
AMTOX11.32N/A
N/A
AB All Market Real Return 1
LSVMX10.67N/A
N/A
LSV US Managed Volatility Institutional
BBTLX17.78-0.23
-1.28%
Bridge Builder Tax Managed Large Cap

BOTZ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BOTZ has been loosely correlated with NVDA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 60% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BOTZ jumps, then NVDA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BOTZ
1D Price
Change %
BOTZ100%
-0.77%
NVDA - BOTZ
60%
Loosely correlated
-1.33%
SERV - BOTZ
58%
Loosely correlated
+1.91%
WRD - BOTZ
57%
Loosely correlated
+0.08%
HSAI - BOTZ
53%
Loosely correlated
-0.35%
SOUN - BOTZ
51%
Loosely correlated
-0.73%
More

ERTH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ERTH has been loosely correlated with NXT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ERTH jumps, then NXT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ERTH
1D Price
Change %
ERTH100%
-1.65%
NXT - ERTH
61%
Loosely correlated
-1.84%
XPEV - ERTH
50%
Loosely correlated
-2.89%
NVDA - ERTH
49%
Loosely correlated
-1.33%
NIU - ERTH
49%
Loosely correlated
-4.11%
CHPT - ERTH
48%
Loosely correlated
+6.81%
More

FTWO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FTWO has been closely correlated with AEM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FTWO jumps, then AEM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FTWO
1D Price
Change %
FTWO100%
-0.42%
AEM - FTWO
73%
Closely correlated
-1.61%
NEM - FTWO
72%
Closely correlated
-2.55%
WPM - FTWO
72%
Closely correlated
-1.86%
FNV - FTWO
71%
Closely correlated
-1.41%
RGLD - FTWO
69%
Closely correlated
-1.40%
More