Thematic ETFs like BOTZ, ERTH, and FTWO capture distinct slices of innovation and security trends amid accelerating technological adoption, sustainability mandates, and resource scarcity. BOTZ targets robotics and AI leaders, ERTH emphasizes environmentally beneficial companies, and FTWO focuses on national security-linked sectors. These passive funds represent varied approaches to long-term growth themes: pure tech disruption versus sustainable infrastructure versus strategic resources. Comparing them reveals trade-offs in diversification, costs, and exposure, aiding investors navigating AI-driven markets, green transitions, and geopolitical shifts in recent months.
The Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence ETF (BOTZ) is a passive thematic fund tracking the Indxx Global Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic Index. It invests at least 80% of assets in companies involved in robotics, automation, and AI across developed markets. The fund holds 62 stocks, with top holdings including KEYENCE CORP (9.42%), ABB Ltd (8.83%), FANUC CORP (8.49%), NVDA (8.37%), and Intuitive Surgical (ISRG, 5.91%). Sector allocation tilts toward industrials (44.8%), information technology (34.5%), and health care (9.6%). Expense ratio is 0.68%. Semi-annual rebalancing maintains thematic purity. With $3.79B AUM, BOTZ offers high liquidity and global diversification unconstrained by traditional sectors.
The Invesco MSCI Sustainable Future ETF (ERTH) passively tracks the MSCI Global Environment Select Index, targeting companies deriving at least 50% of revenue from environmental solutions like clean energy and pollution control. It features 160 holdings for broader diversification. Top holdings include Digital Realty Trust (DLR, 5.53%), NVDA (5.35%), Vestas Wind Systems (4.67%), TSLA (4.60%), and First Solar (FSLR, 3.10%). Sectors emphasize real estate (28.37%), industrials (27.09%), consumer discretionary (20.50%), and information technology (12.72%). Net expense ratio is 0.66% (gross 0.68%). Quarterly rebalancing aligns with index reviews. AUM stands at $148M, positioning it as a mid-tier ESG thematic vehicle.
The Strive Natural Resources and Security ETF (FTWO) is a passive fund tracking the BFAANGST Index, selecting top North American companies in fuel, aerospace & defense, agriculture, nuclear, and precious metals for national resource security. It holds 54 stocks. Top holdings: Deere & Co (DE, 9.89%), Constellation Energy (CEG, 9.25%), Exxon Mobil (XOM, 7.57%), Cameco (4.93%), and GE Aerospace (GE, 4.48%). Sector weights include industrials (31.87%), energy (28.94%), materials (25.97%), and utilities (12.07%). Expense ratio is 0.49%. Quarterly rebalancing ensures sector neutrality. AUM is $79M, reflecting its newer launch in 2023.
These ETFs operate amid converging megatrends: AI proliferation boosting robotics demand, regulatory pushes for net-zero emissions driving sustainable tech, and supply chain vulnerabilities elevating resource security. Capital flows into AI and clean energy have surged with policy support like the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA), while geopolitical tensions—trade wars, energy transitions—underscore critical minerals and defense needs. Earnings growth in holdings like NVDA and XOM reflects macro tailwinds, but sector risks persist: semiconductor shortages for BOTZ/ERTH, commodity volatility for FTWO, and interest rate sensitivity across real estate-heavy portfolios. Broader cycles favor innovation over cycles, tempered by inflation and supply constraints.
In recent months, BOTZ has demonstrated resilient trend consistency, buoyed by AI momentum, though exhibiting higher volatility from tech concentration. ERTH displayed steadier drawdowns via diversified sustainability plays but lagged amid energy transition delays. FTWO showed lower relative volatility, benefiting from energy resilience, yet smaller scale amplified liquidity spreads. Differences stem from exposures: BOTZ's sensitivity to tech cycles, ERTH's to green policy flows, FTWO's to commodity macros. Concentration risks elevate in BOTZ (top 10 ~58%) versus ERTH (~38%), with FTWO (~55%) balancing via sector caps. Risk-adjusted positioning favors diversified thematic tilts over recent market cycles.
Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization (total market value of a company’s shares), technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener identifies trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Explore it today to enhance your ETF comparison and discovery process.
Tickeron’s AI favors BOTZ with moderate conviction (65% probability edge) due to superior scale, liquidity, and momentum stability from AI thematic purity, balanced diversification (62 holdings), and established track record. While FTWO offers cost efficiency and ERTH broader ESG depth, BOTZ's structural positioning aligns best with durable tech growth amid current cycles, prioritizing risk-adjusted returns over shorter horizons.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
| BOTZ | ERTH | FTWO | |
| Gain YTD | -0.607 | 0.501 | 7.556 |
| Net Assets | 3.42B | 136M | 73.8M |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 0.66 | 0.49 |
| Turnover | 12.11 | 31.00 | 21.00 |
| Yield | 0.59 | 1.37 | 1.01 |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 20 years | 3 years |
| BOTZ | ERTH | FTWO | |
|---|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 76% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 88% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 77% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 71% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 73% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 25 days ago 88% | 5 days ago 85% | 11 days ago 90% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | 10 days ago 87% | 3 days ago 72% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 86% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | N/A | 2 days ago 70% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| QUS | 184.49 | 0.92 | +0.50% |
| Stt Strt® SPDR® MSCI USA StratFacs ETF | |||
| FDEV | 35.25 | 0.07 | +0.20% |
| Fidelity International Multifactor ETF | |||
| LCAP | 32.38 | N/A | N/A |
| Principal Capital Appreciation Sel ETF | |||
| EWUS | 41.73 | -0.20 | -0.48% |
| iShares MSCI United Kingdom Small-Cp ETF | |||
| XLKI | 26.49 | -0.32 | -1.19% |
| State Street®TechSelSectSPDR®PrmETF | |||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ERTH has been loosely correlated with NXT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ERTH jumps, then NXT could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ERTH | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ERTH | 100% | -0.07% | ||
| NXT - ERTH | 61% Loosely correlated | -2.99% | ||
| NVDA - ERTH | 53% Loosely correlated | -1.64% | ||
| FSLR - ERTH | 52% Loosely correlated | +0.11% | ||
| RUN - ERTH | 51% Loosely correlated | -5.69% | ||
| TSLA - ERTH | 50% Loosely correlated | -0.11% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FTWO has been closely correlated with AEM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FTWO jumps, then AEM could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FTWO | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FTWO | 100% | +0.88% | ||
| AEM - FTWO | 74% Closely correlated | +1.77% | ||
| NEM - FTWO | 72% Closely correlated | +1.39% | ||
| WPM - FTWO | 72% Closely correlated | +0.26% | ||
| FNV - FTWO | 71% Closely correlated | +0.11% | ||
| RGLD - FTWO | 70% Closely correlated | +1.18% | ||
More | ||||