CIBR
Price
$83.25
Change
-$1.09 (-1.29%)
Updated
Jun 10 closing price
Net Assets
12.87B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
FTEC
Price
$268.43
Change
-$6.20 (-2.26%)
Updated
Jun 10 closing price
Net Assets
20.11B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SKYY
Price
$133.63
Change
-$2.67 (-1.96%)
Updated
Jun 10 closing price
Net Assets
3.05B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CIBR or FTEC or SKYY

Header iconCIBR vs FTEC vs SKYY Comparison
Open Charts CIBR vs FTEC vs SKYYBanner chart's image
CIBR vs FTEC vs SKYY Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which ETF would AI Choose? First Trust Nasdaq Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR) vs. Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF (FTEC) vs. First Trust Cloud Computing ETF (SKYY)

Key Takeaways

  • CIBR offers targeted exposure to cybersecurity with ~42 holdings and 0.58% expense ratio, balancing thematic focus and moderate diversification.
  • FTEC provides broad information technology sector coverage with ~286 holdings at a low 0.084% expense ratio, emphasizing cost efficiency and mega-cap dominance.
  • SKYY targets cloud computing with ~62 holdings and 0.60% expense ratio, delivering modified equal-weight exposure to a high-growth subsector.
  • FTEC exhibits lower costs and higher diversification, reducing concentration risk compared to the thematic tilts of CIBR and SKYY.
  • All three are passive ETFs tracking specialized indexes, with CIBR and SKYY showing higher volatility due to niche focus versus FTEC's sector breadth.
  • In recent months, FTEC has demonstrated stronger trend consistency driven by mega-cap tech leaders, while CIBR and SKYY reflect subsector-specific dynamics.

Introduction

Investors navigating the technology sector in today's market often weigh broad exposure against targeted thematic opportunities. CIBR, FTEC, and SKYY represent distinct approaches: CIBR focuses on cybersecurity via the Nasdaq CTA Cybersecurity Index, SKYY targets cloud computing through the ISE Cloud Computing Index, and FTEC tracks the broad MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index. These ETFs compete within technology but vary in scope—CIBR and SKYY offer niche strategies amid rising cyber threats and cloud adoption, while FTEC provides comprehensive sector coverage. This comparison highlights structural differences, aiding decisions in an environment shaped by AI-driven innovation, regulatory scrutiny, and geopolitical tensions.

First Trust Nasdaq Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR) Overview

The First Trust Nasdaq Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR) seeks investment results corresponding to the Nasdaq CTA Cybersecurity Index, a liquidity-weighted benchmark of companies classified as cybersecurity providers by the Consumer Technology Association (CTA). It holds approximately 42 stocks, with top holdings including AVGO (~9%), PANW (~9%), CRWD (~9%), FTNT (~8%), and CSCO (~8%), comprising over 50% of assets. Sector allocation is heavily tilted toward technology (~94%), with minor industrials and communication services exposure. The expense ratio is 0.58%, and the fund is passively managed with quarterly rebalancing. CIBR's thematic design emphasizes cybersecurity across software, hardware, and services, offering focused exposure without leverage.

Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF (FTEC) Overview

FTEC, the Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF, tracks the MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index, representing U.S. information technology equities across large-, mid-, and small-cap segments. It features ~286 holdings for broad diversification, with top positions dominated by NVDA (~19%), AAPL (~14%), MSFT (~10%), AVGO (~5%), and MU (~3%), accounting for ~59% of assets. Nearly 100% allocated to technology, the fund's ultra-low 0.084% expense ratio supports cost-efficient passive replication. FTEC invests at least 80% in index securities, with quarterly rebalancing to maintain sector purity and diversification limits per IRS rules for regulated investment companies (RICs).

First Trust Cloud Computing ETF (SKYY) Overview

SKYY, the First Trust Cloud Computing ETF, aims to replicate the ISE Cloud Computing Index, a modified theme strength-weighted benchmark of cloud computing firms, capped at ~4.5% per stock. With ~62 holdings, top names include DigitalOcean Holdings (~6%), ORCL (~4%), AMZN (~4%), Alphabet (GOOGL, ~4%), and ANET (~4%), representing ~40% of the portfolio. Primarily technology (~86%) with communication services (~9%), the 0.60% expense ratio reflects its passive strategy. SKYY's equal-weight tilt promotes balanced exposure to cloud infrastructure, platforms, and software providers.

Industry and Thematic Landscape

The technology sector, encompassing cybersecurity and cloud computing, faces robust macro tailwinds including AI proliferation, hyperscaler capital expenditures exceeding $500 billion annually, and surging demand for data centers. Capital flows favor AI infrastructure and security, with cybersecurity attracting premium valuations amid rising threats from geopolitical tensions and regulatory mandates like expanded SEC disclosures. Cloud adoption accelerates, yet misconfigurations drive breaches, boosting demand for integrated solutions. Earnings growth in holdings like NVDA and MSFT supports sector resilience, though risks include supply chain vulnerabilities, power constraints, and inflation in commodities. Geopolitical shifts prompt sovereignty-focused tech strategies, enhancing thematic relevance.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent months, FTEC has led with superior trend consistency and lower relative volatility (~5% monthly vs. higher for peers), propelled by mega-cap leaders amid AI rallies. CIBR displayed moderate drawdowns and stable momentum in cybersecurity cycles, with beta ~0.85-1.13 reflecting defensive traits. SKYY experienced greater swings tied to cloud subsector rotations, showing higher sensitivity to growth factors. Performance divergences stem from FTEC's broad diversification mitigating concentration risk, versus CIBR and SKYY's thematic exposures amplifying sector-specific volatility. All exhibit positive recent weeks' gains, but FTEC's structure yields better risk-adjusted positioning.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization (market cap), technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener identifies trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening, empowering data-driven decisions across asset classes including ETFs like CIBR, FTEC, and SKYY. Explore it today to uncover hidden insights.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron’s AI favors FTEC with moderate confidence due to its superior cost efficiency (0.084% expense ratio), extensive diversification (~286 holdings), and stable risk-adjusted positioning amid recent market cycles. While CIBR and SKYY excel in thematic exposure, FTEC's broad structure better balances momentum and concentration risk probabilistically over multi-month horizons.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTEC has more net assets: 20.1B vs. CIBR (12.9B) and SKYY (3.05B). FTEC has a higher annual dividend yield than CIBR and SKYY: FTEC (19.600) vs CIBR (16.717) and SKYY (2.729). CIBR was incepted earlier than FTEC and SKYY: CIBR (11 years) vs FTEC (13 years) and SKYY (15 years). FTEC (0.08) has a lower expense ratio than CIBR (0.58) and SKYY (0.60). SKYY has a higher turnover CIBR (21.00) and FTEC (9.00) vs CIBR (21.00) and FTEC (9.00).
CIBRFTECSKYY
Gain YTD16.71719.6002.729
Net Assets12.9B20.1B3.05B
Total Expense Ratio0.580.080.60
Turnover21.009.0030.00
Yield0.460.330.00
Fund Existence11 years13 years15 years
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CIBRFTECSKYY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
89%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
89%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
85%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
87%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
86%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
87%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
89%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
88%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
87%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
87%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
86%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CIBR
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
FTEC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SKYY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GBAB14.110.05
+0.36%
Guggenheim Taxable Municipal
HYMB25.14-0.06
-0.24%
Stt Strt® SPDR® Nuveen ICE HY Muncpl ETF
LEAD85.22-1.51
-1.74%
Siren DIVCON Leaders Dividend ETF
CNCG34.80-0.86
-2.41%
Leverage Shares 2X Long CNC Daily ETF
AZYY15.40-0.40
-2.53%
Graniteshares YieldBOOST AMZN ETF

FTEC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FTEC has been closely correlated with NVDA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FTEC jumps, then NVDA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FTEC
1D Price
Change %
FTEC100%
-2.26%
NVDA - FTEC
76%
Closely correlated
-3.73%
LRCX - FTEC
69%
Closely correlated
-1.64%
AVGO - FTEC
69%
Closely correlated
-5.12%
CEVA - FTEC
67%
Closely correlated
-4.61%
AMAT - FTEC
67%
Closely correlated
-0.44%
More

SKYY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SKYY has been closely correlated with CRWD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SKYY jumps, then CRWD could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SKYY
1D Price
Change %
SKYY100%
-1.96%
CRWD - SKYY
72%
Closely correlated
+0.44%
ASAN - SKYY
70%
Closely correlated
+0.53%
TWLO - SKYY
70%
Closely correlated
+1.17%
CRM - SKYY
69%
Closely correlated
-2.53%
RBRK - SKYY
66%
Loosely correlated
-0.59%
More