Investors navigating the technology sector in today's AI-driven landscape often compare ETFs like CIBR, MAGS, and SMH for their distinct approaches to high-growth themes. CIBR focuses on cybersecurity, a resilient subsector amid rising threats. MAGS concentrates on the Magnificent Seven mega-caps, capturing broad tech innovation. SMH targets semiconductors, the backbone of AI infrastructure. These funds represent varied strategies—passive index-tracking for CIBR and SMH, active equal-weighting for MAGS—within overlapping tech exposure, allowing tiered risk profiles from defensive cybersecurity to high-beta chipmakers. This comparison highlights structural differences amid capital rotation into AI enablers.
The First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR) is a passive ETF that seeks to replicate the Nasdaq CTA Cybersecurity Index, targeting companies classified as cybersecurity providers by the Consumer Technology Association (CTA). It holds approximately 45 stocks, with top holdings including AVGO (around 9%), PANW (9%), CRWD (9%), FTNT (8%), and CSCO (8%), comprising about 60% of assets. Sector allocation is heavily tilted toward information technology (over 90%), with minor industrials exposure. The expense ratio is 0.58%. The fund is non-diversified, liquidity-weighted, and rebalanced quarterly, emphasizing mid- to large-cap firms with minimum market cap and liquidity thresholds for structural efficiency.
The Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGS) is an actively managed fund providing equal-weight exposure to seven mega-cap tech leaders: Alphabet, Amazon, Apple, Meta, Microsoft, NVDA, and Tesla. It maintains roughly equal allocations (around 14% each pre-rebalance), with top holdings reflecting these stocks plus Treasury collateral and swaps for diversification compliance. Sector breakdown spans technology, communications, and consumer discretionary. The expense ratio stands at 0.30%. Rebalanced quarterly, the non-diversified structure uses total return swaps alongside direct equity to achieve tax-efficient exposure as a regulated investment company (RIC), prioritizing pure thematic concentration over broad indexing.
The VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) passively tracks the MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index, focusing on the largest and most liquid U.S.-listed semiconductor firms involved in production and equipment. It features 25-26 holdings, led by NVDA (18%), Taiwan Semiconductor (TSM, 10%), AVGO (8%), INTC (8%), and AMD (7%), accounting for over 70% of assets. Allocation is 100% semiconductors within technology. The expense ratio is 0.35%. Market-cap weighted with liquidity screens, it rebalances periodically, offering concentrated exposure to global players via U.S. listings in a non-diversified format.
The technology sector, encompassing cybersecurity, semiconductors, and mega-cap innovators, faces a dynamic environment shaped by AI proliferation, geopolitical tensions, and regulatory scrutiny. Capital flows have surged into AI infrastructure, boosting semiconductors amid demand for chips, while cybersecurity benefits from escalating threats like AI-powered attacks and data breaches. Macro drivers include U.S.-China trade frictions impacting supply chains, inflation pressuring capex (capital expenditures), and strong earnings from AI adopters. Regulatory shifts emphasize data privacy and export controls, with geopolitical risks elevating cybersecurity needs. Sector risks involve cyclical downturns in semis, concentration in Magnificent Seven amid rotation to broader tech, and persistent cyber inequities widening capability gaps.
In recent months, SMH has led with strong upward trends fueled by AI chip demand, though exhibiting higher volatility (around 30% annualized) and deeper drawdowns in cycles compared to peers. MAGS shows momentum stability from mega-cap resilience but lags in relative gains due to equal-weighting diluting top performers like NVDA. CIBR demonstrates lower volatility (20-25%) and consistent trends as a defensive play, with shallower drawdowns. Differences stem from structures: SMH's cap-weight concentration amplifies beta to tech rallies; MAGS balances leaders but heightens single-stock risk; CIBR's subsector focus reduces macro sensitivity, favoring risk-adjusted positioning over raw growth.
Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization (market cap), technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener identifies trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening, empowering data-driven decisions across asset classes. Explore it today to uncover hidden gems in sectors like technology.
Tickeron’s AI favors SMH with moderate conviction (65% probability) due to its optimal blend of cost efficiency (0.35% expense ratio), semiconductor exposure aligned with AI infrastructure momentum, and risk-adjusted positioning via 25+ holdings. While MAGS offers lower fees, its ultra-concentration elevates volatility; CIBR provides diversification but higher costs and subdued growth. SMH's structure balances stability and upside in current cycles.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
| CIBR | MAGS | SMH | |
| Gain YTD | 19.634 | -1.592 | 72.149 |
| Net Assets | 13B | 3.58B | 71.9B |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 0.30 | 0.35 |
| Turnover | 21.00 | 27.00 | 12.00 |
| Yield | 0.46 | 1.38 | 0.18 |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 3 years | 14 years |
| CIBR | MAGS | SMH | |
|---|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 85% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 88% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 89% | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 84% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 78% | 3 days ago 90% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 13 days ago 87% | 18 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 82% | 5 days ago 75% | 5 days ago 82% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 81% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 90% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MAGS has been closely correlated with TSLA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MAGS jumps, then TSLA could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MAGS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MAGS | 100% | N/A | ||
| TSLA - MAGS | 70% Closely correlated | +1.82% | ||
| AMZN - MAGS | 69% Closely correlated | -1.23% | ||
| NVDA - MAGS | 67% Closely correlated | +0.16% | ||
| META - MAGS | 65% Loosely correlated | -0.26% | ||
| GOOGL - MAGS | 60% Loosely correlated | +0.53% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SMH has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SMH jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SMH | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SMH | 100% | +1.72% | ||
| LRCX - SMH | 86% Closely correlated | +1.18% | ||
| AMAT - SMH | 83% Closely correlated | +2.64% | ||
| KLAC - SMH | 83% Closely correlated | +5.55% | ||
| ASML - SMH | 80% Closely correlated | -1.89% | ||
| TSM - SMH | 80% Closely correlated | +0.68% | ||
More | ||||