CMG
Price
$55.05
Change
+$0.78 (+1.44%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
74.17B
25 days until earnings call
DPZ
Price
$446.39
Change
-$8.33 (-1.83%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
15.28B
23 days until earnings call
SDG
Price
$75.26
Change
-$0.17 (-0.23%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Net Assets
166.3M
Interact to see
Advertisement

CMG or DPZ or SDG

Header iconCMG vs DPZ vs SDG Comparison
Open Charts CMG vs DPZ vs SDGBanner chart's image
Chipotle Mexican Grill
Price$55.05
Change+$0.78 (+1.44%)
Volume$14.97M
Capitalization74.17B
Dominos Pizza
Price$446.39
Change-$8.33 (-1.83%)
Volume$963.26K
Capitalization15.28B
iShares MSCI Global Sust Dev Goals ETF
Price$75.26
Change-$0.17 (-0.23%)
Volume$2.88K
Net Assets166.3M
CMG vs DPZ vs SDG Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CMG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
DPZ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SDG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 29, 2025
Stock price -- (CMG: $55.05 vs. DPZ: $446.20)
Brand notoriety: CMG and DPZ are both notable
Both companies represent the Restaurants industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CMG: 108% vs. DPZ: 168%
Market capitalization -- CMG: $74.17B vs. DPZ: $15.28B
CMG [@Restaurants] is valued at $74.17B. DPZ’s [@Restaurants] market capitalization is $15.28B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Restaurants] industry ranges from $208.47B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Restaurants] industry is $8.13B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CMG’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileDPZ’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CMG’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • DPZ’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CMG is a better buy in the long-term than DPZ.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CMG’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while DPZ’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CMG’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • DPZ’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CMG is a better buy in the short-term than DPZ.

Price Growth

CMG (@Restaurants) experienced а +4.30% price change this week, while DPZ (@Restaurants) price change was -0.24% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was -0.34%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.23%, and the average quarterly price growth was -3.00%.

Reported Earning Dates

CMG is expected to report earnings on Jul 23, 2025.

DPZ is expected to report earnings on Jul 21, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Restaurants (-0.34% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CMG vs DPZ: Fundamental Ratings
CMG
DPZ
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
175
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
83
Overvalued
71
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2872
SMR RATING
1..100
21100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5559
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8381
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

DPZ's Valuation (71) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as CMG (83). This means that DPZ’s stock grew similarly to CMG’s over the last 12 months.

CMG's Profit vs Risk Rating (28) in the Restaurants industry is somewhat better than the same rating for DPZ (72). This means that CMG’s stock grew somewhat faster than DPZ’s over the last 12 months.

CMG's SMR Rating (21) in the Restaurants industry is significantly better than the same rating for DPZ (100). This means that CMG’s stock grew significantly faster than DPZ’s over the last 12 months.

CMG's Price Growth Rating (55) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as DPZ (59). This means that CMG’s stock grew similarly to DPZ’s over the last 12 months.

DPZ's P/E Growth Rating (81) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as CMG (83). This means that DPZ’s stock grew similarly to CMG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CMGDPZSDG
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
78%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 18 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
82%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CMG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
DPZ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SDG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FTDR58.590.72
+1.24%
Frontdoor
BRKR41.81-0.38
-0.89%
Bruker Corp
WNW1.74-0.04
-2.25%
Meiwu Technology Company Limited
SVM4.07-0.13
-3.10%
Silvercorp Metals
EPSN7.49-0.32
-4.11%
Epsilon Energy Ltd

CMG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CMG has been loosely correlated with FRSH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CMG jumps, then FRSH could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CMG
1D Price
Change %
CMG100%
+1.44%
FRSH - CMG
61%
Loosely correlated
N/A
WING - CMG
53%
Loosely correlated
+1.19%
SG - CMG
44%
Loosely correlated
-0.44%
KRUS - CMG
40%
Loosely correlated
-0.29%
SHAK - CMG
39%
Loosely correlated
+0.04%
More

DPZ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DPZ has been loosely correlated with QSR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 45% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if DPZ jumps, then QSR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DPZ
1D Price
Change %
DPZ100%
-1.87%
QSR - DPZ
45%
Loosely correlated
-0.31%
YUM - DPZ
41%
Loosely correlated
+0.92%
FRSH - DPZ
39%
Loosely correlated
N/A
CNNE - DPZ
38%
Loosely correlated
+0.05%
CMG - DPZ
36%
Loosely correlated
+1.44%
More