Advertisement
CMS or ETR or PEG
Which Stock Would AI Choose? CMS Energy (CMS) vs. Entergy (ETR) vs. Public Service Enterprise Group (PEG) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- CMS Energy, Entergy, and Public Service Enterprise Group are all regulated utilities with stable cash flows from electric and gas operations, making them relevant for income-focused investors seeking defensive exposure in the utilities sector.
- Recent market activity shows Entergy (ETR) delivering stronger year-to-date returns compared to CMS and PEG, supported by affirmed earnings guidance and consistent quarterly results.
- CMS Energy reported lower second-quarter earnings versus the prior year but reaffirmed full-year adjusted earnings per share guidance and introduced 2027 targets, highlighting operational resilience amid a strategic shift toward regulated activities.
- PEG maintains a higher dividend yield relative to peers and is positioned ahead of its upcoming second-quarter earnings release, with prior-quarter results exceeding analyst expectations.
- Valuation sensitivity varies: PEG trades at a lower price-to-earnings multiple, while ETR commands a premium amid stronger recent momentum; all exhibit low beta characteristics typical of the sector.
- Sector exposure to rate-regulated businesses provides a buffer against economic volatility, though interest rate environments and regulatory outcomes remain key variables influencing relative performance.
Introduction
CMS Energy, Entergy, and Public Service Enterprise Group represent established players in the U.S. regulated utilities sector, offering investors exposure to essential electric and natural gas services. This comparison examines their recent stock behavior, earnings trends, and market positioning to assist traders and long-term investors evaluating relative value within defensive, income-oriented portfolios. The analysis draws on verifiable financial metrics and sector dynamics to highlight contrasts in performance and risk profiles without forward-looking speculation.
CMS Overview and Recent Performance
CMS Energy Corporation operates primarily through its Consumers Energy subsidiary, providing electric and natural gas services in Michigan with a focus on regulated utility operations. In recent market activity, the stock has traded near $72, reflecting a year-to-date return of approximately 4.5% that lagged broader market benchmarks. Second-quarter 2026 results showed reported and adjusted earnings per share of $0.37, down from the prior year, alongside flat operating revenue. Management reaffirmed 2026 adjusted earnings guidance of $3.83 to $3.90 per share and introduced 2027 guidance, underscoring confidence in long-term growth targets of 6% to 8%. Sentiment has been influenced by the company’s strategic emphasis on regulated assets and rate relief contributions.
ETR Overview and Recent Performance
Entergy Corporation delivers electric utility services across multiple states in the South, with operations centered on regulated generation, transmission, and distribution. The stock has recently traded around $108, posting year-to-date gains near 18% that outpaced peers amid positive earnings momentum. Second-quarter 2026 results delivered earnings per share of $1.03 on both reported and adjusted bases, roughly in line with expectations despite a modest year-over-year decline. The company affirmed its 2026 adjusted earnings per share guidance range of $4.25 to $4.45. Performance in recent weeks has benefited from operational consistency and sector tailwinds, supporting relative strength versus broader utilities benchmarks.
PEG Overview and Recent Performance
Public Service Enterprise Group Incorporated provides electric and gas utility services primarily in New Jersey through its PSE&G subsidiary, alongside a competitive power generation segment. Shares have recently traded near $77, with year-to-date performance in negative territory around -3.4% amid broader market rotation. The company reported first-quarter 2026 non-GAAP operating earnings that exceeded consensus estimates, and it maintains a dividend yield near 3.5%. Second-quarter 2026 results are scheduled for release on August 4, 2026, with analysts projecting modest earnings growth. Recent market activity reflects a pullback from 52-week highs above $91, influenced by sector rotation and interest rate sensitivity.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page curates a selection of high-performing AI trading bots from a library of hundreds that actively trade thousands of different tickers. Only those demonstrating the strongest suitability for prevailing market conditions earn placement in this focused section. Available bots span a wide range of trading styles, strategies, timeframes, performance metrics, and ticker sets, with many posting win rates between 60% and 80% or annual returns in the 20% to 100%+ range depending on the specific model and backtested period. Investors can review detailed statistics on each bot to identify approaches aligned with their risk tolerance and objectives. Explore the full selection on the Trending AI Robots page for data-driven trading options.
Head-to-Head Comparison
Business models center on regulated rate-base growth for all three, though CMS Energy has accelerated its pivot away from competitive renewables toward core utility operations. Growth drivers include rate cases and infrastructure investment, with Entergy benefiting from regional demand trends that have supported stronger recent share-price momentum. Risk factors encompass regulatory lag, interest-rate exposure, and weather variability, areas where PEG’s lower beta may offer relative stability. Valuation sensitivity shows PEG at a more modest price-to-earnings multiple compared with Entergy’s premium, while CMS sits in between. Market sentiment favors Entergy’s earnings consistency in recent weeks, contrasting with CMS’s guidance reaffirmation and PEG’s upcoming reporting cycle. Sector exposure remains uniform, yet trade-offs emerge in dividend yields—higher for PEG—and earnings visibility.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Based on observable factors such as trend consistency, earnings stability, and relative positioning in recent market activity, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a higher probability of favorable near-term performance to Entergy (ETR). The stock’s stronger year-to-date returns and affirmed guidance provide a measurable edge in momentum and visibility compared with the more modest results and upcoming catalysts at the other two names. This assessment remains probabilistic and tied to continuing data patterns rather than any guarantee of outcomes.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CMS’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileETR’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s), and PEG’s FA Score reflects 0 green FA rating(s).
- CMS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- ETR’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- PEG’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CMS’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ETR’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s), and PEG’s TA Score reflects 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CMS’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
- ETR’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
- PEG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
Price Growth
CMS (@Electric Utilities) experienced а -0.54% price change this week, while ETR (@Electric Utilities) price change was -0.41% , and PEG (@Electric Utilities) price fluctuated -1.33% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electric Utilities industry was -0.29%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.54%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.52%.
Reported Earning Dates
CMS is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2026.
ETR is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2026.
PEG is expected to report earnings on Nov 03, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Electric Utilities (-0.29% weekly)Electric utilities companies generate, transmit and distribute electricity to businesses/offices and residences. Companies may be owned by the government or investors or public shareholders, or a combination thereof. The industry also includes firms that buy and sell electricity. Companies in this industry typically require significant investments in infrastructure. Many firms in this industry pay substantial and regular dividends to shareholders. However, changes in interest rates (and their impact on debt burdens), natural disasters and changing commodity prices could be factors affecting energy utilities’ profit margins. NextEra Energy, Inc., Duke Energy Corporation, Dominion Energy Inc. and Southern Company are among U.S. electric utilities companies with the largest market capitalizations.
| CMS | ETR | PEG | |
| Capitalization | 22.3B | 50B | 37.7B |
| EBITDA | 3.3B | 6.38B | 5.07B |
| Gain YTD | 3.375 | 16.602 | -4.196 |
| P/E Ratio | 21.36 | 27.41 | 18.82 |
| Revenue | 8.81B | 13.5B | 12.8B |
| Total Cash | N/A | 3.85B | N/A |
| Total Debt | 19.3B | 34.6B | 24.4B |
CMS | ETR | PEG | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 58 | 83 | 51 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 64 Fair valued | 68 Overvalued | 79 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 46 | 2 | 37 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 67 | 71 | 62 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 60 | 55 | 61 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 55 | 30 | 69 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 | 55 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CMS's Valuation (64) in the Electric Utilities industry is in the same range as ETR (68) and is in the same range as PEG (79). This means that CMS's stock grew similarly to ETR’s and similarly to PEG’s over the last 12 months.
ETR's Profit vs Risk Rating (2) in the Electric Utilities industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PEG (37) and is somewhat better than the same rating for CMS (46). This means that ETR's stock grew somewhat faster than PEG’s and somewhat faster than CMS’s over the last 12 months.
PEG's SMR Rating (62) in the Electric Utilities industry is in the same range as CMS (67) and is in the same range as ETR (71). This means that PEG's stock grew similarly to CMS’s and similarly to ETR’s over the last 12 months.
ETR's Price Growth Rating (55) in the Electric Utilities industry is in the same range as CMS (60) and is in the same range as PEG (61). This means that ETR's stock grew similarly to CMS’s and similarly to PEG’s over the last 12 months.
ETR's P/E Growth Rating (30) in the Electric Utilities industry is in the same range as CMS (55) and is somewhat better than the same rating for PEG (69). This means that ETR's stock grew similarly to CMS’s and somewhat faster than PEG’s over the last 12 months.
| CMS | ETR | PEG | |
|---|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 65% | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 71% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 54% | 2 days ago 63% | 2 days ago 62% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 41% | 2 days ago 40% | 2 days ago 43% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 43% | 2 days ago 33% | 4 days ago 46% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 40% | 2 days ago 39% | 2 days ago 47% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 38% | 2 days ago 38% | 2 days ago 45% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 49% | 5 days ago 60% | 16 days ago 54% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 42% | 3 days ago 40% | 4 days ago 45% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 63% | 2 days ago 62% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 30% | 2 days ago 20% | 2 days ago 26% |
Advertisement
CMS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CMS has been closely correlated with DTE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CMS jumps, then DTE could also see price increases.
ETR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ETR has been closely correlated with AEE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ETR jumps, then AEE could also see price increases.