COHR
Price
$403.03
Change
-$14.40 (-3.45%)
Updated
Jun 4, 01:07 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
81.67B
70 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
FN
Price
$694.49
Change
-$30.51 (-4.21%)
Updated
Jun 4, 01:09 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
25.98B
81 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
MRVL
Price
$308.42
Change
+$6.77 (+2.24%)
Updated
Jun 4, 01:16 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
254.38B
77 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

COHR or FN or MRVL

Header iconCOHR vs FN vs MRVL Comparison
Open Charts COHR vs FN vs MRVLBanner chart's image
COHR vs FN vs MRVL Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Coherent Corp (COHR) vs. Fabrinet (FN) vs. Marvell Technology (MRVL) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • COHR surged over 15% in recent market activity on NVIDIA partnership news for AI optics, leading YTD gains among the trio.
  • FN advanced 6.5% recently amid blowout quarterly results and strong AI optical guidance, with robust revenue growth from datacom and HPC.
  • MRVL shows mixed momentum with YTD declines but anticipates Q4 revenue growth of 21%, supported by data center demand.
  • All three benefit from AI-driven photonics and optics demand, though COHR and FN exhibit stronger recent relative performance versus broader indices.
  • FN's manufacturing focus provides diversification, while MRVL offers broader semiconductor exposure.
  • Photonics catalysts position these stocks for potential outperformance in AI infrastructure trends.

Introduction

Coherent Corp (COHR), Fabrinet (FN), and Marvell Technology (MRVL) operate at the intersection of photonics, optics, and semiconductors, key enablers of AI data center expansion. This stock comparison evaluates their recent market positioning, performance drivers, and relative strengths amid surging demand for high-speed optical interconnects. Traders seeking momentum in AI-related hardware and investors eyeing long-term infrastructure growth will find insights into valuation sensitivity, sector tailwinds, and competitive dynamics in the current environment.

COHR Overview and Recent Performance

Coherent Corp (COHR) develops engineered materials, optoelectronic components, and lasers for industrial, communications, and electronics markets. In recent market activity, COHR shares jumped approximately 15% following NVIDIA's $2 billion investment and strategic partnership for AI optics development. This catalyzed sentiment shifts, with the stock posting strong gains over recent weeks, including double-digit advances in the prior month. Broader YTD performance exceeds 60%, outpacing the S&P 500, driven by AI datacenter optics demand and Q2 fiscal 2026 earnings that beat expectations. Influences include vertical integration in photonics and partnerships securing capacity for next-gen architectures.

FN Overview and Recent Performance

Fabrinet (FN) provides advanced optical packaging and precision manufacturing services for optical communication components, automotive, and sensors. Recent weeks saw FN rise over 6% after record Q2 fiscal 2026 revenue of $1.1 billion, up 15.8% sequentially, fueled by 29% optical communications growth. YTD returns stand at about 28%, with shares hitting new highs on upbeat AI optics guidance, including 800ZR and co-packaged optics catalysts. Sentiment has strengthened from HPC ramps and easing supply constraints in datacom, positioning FN as a key AI infrastructure supplier.

MRVL Overview and Recent Performance

Marvell Technology (MRVL) designs semiconductors for data infrastructure, including networking ASICs and optical solutions. In recent market activity, MRVL experienced mixed results, with shares down YTD by around 5% amid broader sector reassessments, though weekly gains reflect pre-earnings positioning. Q3 fiscal 2026 revenue hit a record $2.075 billion, up 37% year-over-year, driven by data center optics. Upcoming Q4 results anticipate 21% revenue growth. Performance reflects AI accelerators and acquisitions like Celestial AI enhancing photonics exposure, balancing volatility from competitive pressures.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases over 25 top-performing AI trading bots curated from hundreds available on the platform, which trade thousands of tickers across stocks, ETFs, and crypto. These bots employ diverse strategies like technical and fundamental analysis, operating on timeframes from 5 minutes to 60 minutes, with risk levels from low to high. AI scores and ranks them dynamically for current market conditions, highlighting those targeting growth sectors such as AI and photonics. Virtual and brokerage agents include risk management, while signal agents offer real-time copy trading. Past performances have shown annualized returns up to 124% in select sectors, far outpacing benchmarks. Traders can explore and follow these bots tailored to volatile environments. Visit Trending AI Robots to discover suitable options for your portfolio.

Head-to-Head Comparison

COHR, FN, and MRVL share AI photonics exposure but differ in business models: COHR focuses on components and lasers, FN on contract manufacturing, and MRVL on integrated semiconductors. Growth drivers include datacenter optics for all, with COHR and FN showing superior recent momentum (15%+ and 6%+ gains) versus MRVL's YTD dip. Risk factors: COHR faces cyclicality, FN customer concentration, MRVL competition. Sector overlap in tech boosts sentiment, but FN's margins benefit from scaling, while MRVL offers diversification. Valuation sensitivity ties to AI capex; trade-offs favor pure-play optics for momentum traders.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron’s AI currently favors COHR due to consistent trend strength from the NVIDIA partnership, superior YTD relative performance, and positioned catalysts in AI optics. While FN shows stability via earnings beats and MRVL broader data center exposure, COHR's momentum suggests higher near-term probability of outperformance amid photonics demand.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full Disclaimers and Limitations.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 04, 2026
Stock price -- (COHR: $417.43FN: $725.00MRVL: $301.65)
Brand notoriety: COHR and FN are not notable and MRVL is notable
COHR represents the Electronic Equipment/Instruments industry, FN is part of the Electronic Components industry, and MRVL is in the Semiconductors industry.
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: COHR: 85%, FN: 93%, MRVL: 337%
Market capitalization -- COHR: $81.67B, FN: $25.98B, MRVL: $254.38B
COHR [@Electronic Equipment/Instruments] is valued at $81.67B. FN’s [@Electronic Components] market capitalization is $25.98B. MRVL [@Semiconductors] has a market capitalization of $254.38B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Electronic Equipment/Instruments] industry ranges from $122.53B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Electronic Components] industry ranges from $181.61B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Semiconductors] industry ranges from $5.2T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Electronic Equipment/Instruments] industry is $9.37B. The average market capitalization across the [@Electronic Components] industry is $14.8B. The average market capitalization across the [@Electronic Components] industry is $207.29B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

COHR’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFN’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s), and MRVL’s FA Score reflects 2 green FA rating(s).

  • COHR’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • FN’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • MRVL’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, FN is a better buy in the long-term than MRVL, which in turn is a better option than COHR.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

COHR’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FN’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s), and MRVL’s TA Score reflects 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • COHR’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • FN’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • MRVL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FN is a better buy in the short-term than COHR and MRVL.

Price Growth

COHR (@Electronic Equipment/Instruments) experienced а +9.80% price change this week, while FN (@Electronic Components) price change was +5.55% , and MRVL (@Semiconductors) price fluctuated +51.81% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronic Equipment/Instruments industry was -1.52%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +39.42%, and the average quarterly price growth was +43.50%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronic Components industry was +2.23%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +19.37%, and the average quarterly price growth was +58.86%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Semiconductors industry was +1.16%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +29.02%, and the average quarterly price growth was +101.40%.

Reported Earning Dates

COHR is expected to report earnings on Aug 13, 2026.

FN is expected to report earnings on Aug 24, 2026.

MRVL is expected to report earnings on Aug 20, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Electronic Equipment/Instruments (-1.52% weekly)

This industry manufactures electronic products used in various critical and sophisticated technologies, including laser-based systems, circuit and continuity testers, electro-optical measuring instruments and high-speed precision weighing and inspection equipment. Some major companies operating in this business are Canon Inc., Keysight Technologies Inc., and Fortive Corp.

@Electronic Components (+2.23% weekly)

The Electronic Components industry produces electronic equipment for industries and consumer electronics products, such as mobile devices, televisions, and circuit boards. TE Connectivity Ltd, for example, is a company that designs and manufactures connectivity and sensor products for harsh environments in various industries, such as automotive, industrial equipment, aerospace, and oil & gas. Another major player, Corning Inc., makes advanced optics including end-to-end fiber and wireless solutions for communications networks along with various other technologies catering to industrial and scientific applications.

@Semiconductors (+1.16% weekly)

The semiconductor industry manufacturers all chip-related products, including research and development. These chips are used in innumerable electronic devices, including computers, cell phones, smartphones, and GPSs. Intel Corporation, NVIDIA Corp., and Broadcomm are some of the prominent players in this industry. Semiconductor companies usually tend to do well during periods of healthy economic growth, thereby inducing further research and development in the industry – which in turn augurs well for productivity and growth in the economy. In the near future, demand for semiconductor products (and possibly innovation within the segment) should only expand further, with the proliferation of 5G, autonomous vehicles, IoT, and various AI-driven electronics set to herald a new, advanced chapter in the technology-driven world as we know it. With burgeoning prospects comes great competition. In 2015, SIA estimated that U.S. semiconductor industry ranks as the second most competitive U.S. industry out of 2882 U.S. industries designated manufacturers by the U.S. Census Bureau.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MRVL($254B) has a higher market cap than COHR($81.7B) and FN($26B). COHR has higher P/E ratio than MRVL and FN: COHR (198.78) vs MRVL (103.66) and FN (62.29). MRVL YTD gains are higher at: 255.399 vs. COHR (126.164) and FN (59.243). MRVL has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 4.54B vs. COHR (1.23B) and FN (510M). MRVL has more cash in the bank: 2.64B vs. COHR (2.42B) and FN (945M). FN has less debt than COHR and MRVL: FN (4.43M) vs COHR (3.43B) and MRVL (4.79B). MRVL has higher revenues than COHR and FN: MRVL (8.2B) vs COHR (6.6B) and FN (4.24B).
COHRFNMRVL
Capitalization81.7B26B254B
EBITDA1.23B510M4.54B
Gain YTD126.16459.243255.399
P/E Ratio198.7862.29103.66
Revenue6.6B4.24B8.2B
Total Cash2.42B945M2.64B
Total Debt3.43B4.43M4.79B
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
COHR vs FN vs MRVL: Fundamental Ratings
COHR
FN
MRVL
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
856745
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
81
Overvalued
66
Overvalued
77
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
438
SMR RATING
1..100
864647
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
353834
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4485
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
505050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FN's Valuation (66) in the Electronic Components industry is in the same range as MRVL (77) in the Semiconductors industry, and is in the same range as COHR (81) in the Electronic Equipment Or Instruments industry. This means that FN's stock grew similarly to MRVL’s and similarly to COHR’s over the last 12 months.

FN's Profit vs Risk Rating (3) in the Electronic Components industry is in the same range as COHR (4) in the Electronic Equipment Or Instruments industry, and is in the same range as MRVL (8) in the Semiconductors industry. This means that FN's stock grew similarly to COHR’s and similarly to MRVL’s over the last 12 months.

FN's SMR Rating (46) in the Electronic Components industry is in the same range as MRVL (47) in the Semiconductors industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for COHR (86) in the Electronic Equipment Or Instruments industry. This means that FN's stock grew similarly to MRVL’s and somewhat faster than COHR’s over the last 12 months.

MRVL's Price Growth Rating (34) in the Semiconductors industry is in the same range as COHR (35) in the Electronic Equipment Or Instruments industry, and is in the same range as FN (38) in the Electronic Components industry. This means that MRVL's stock grew similarly to COHR’s and similarly to FN’s over the last 12 months.

MRVL's P/E Growth Rating (5) in the Semiconductors industry is in the same range as FN (8) in the Electronic Components industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for COHR (44) in the Electronic Equipment Or Instruments industry. This means that MRVL's stock grew similarly to FN’s and somewhat faster than COHR’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
COHRFNMRVL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
74%
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
87%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
85%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 18 days ago
72%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
86%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
COHR
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
FN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MRVL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MATX185.81-1.25
-0.67%
Matsons
ADP227.75-3.43
-1.48%
Automatic Data Processing
HIVE4.38-0.16
-3.52%
HIVE Digital Technologies Ltd
IPM1.96-0.09
-4.39%
Intelligent Protection Management Corp
LAW3.88-0.37
-8.71%
CS Disco

COHR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, COHR has been loosely correlated with MKSI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if COHR jumps, then MKSI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To COHR
1D Price
Change %
COHR100%
-2.22%
MKSI - COHR
62%
Loosely correlated
+1.22%
KEYS - COHR
49%
Loosely correlated
+1.13%
ST - COHR
40%
Loosely correlated
+0.79%
BKSY - COHR
38%
Loosely correlated
-14.64%
ESE - COHR
37%
Loosely correlated
+1.32%
More

FN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FN has been closely correlated with GLW. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FN jumps, then GLW could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FN
1D Price
Change %
FN100%
+3.41%
GLW - FN
67%
Closely correlated
+0.18%
TTMI - FN
65%
Loosely correlated
+5.56%
CLS - FN
65%
Loosely correlated
-3.02%
JBL - FN
64%
Loosely correlated
+1.58%
BHE - FN
56%
Loosely correlated
+0.11%
More

MRVL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MRVL has been loosely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MRVL jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MRVL
1D Price
Change %
MRVL100%
+3.73%
LRCX - MRVL
65%
Loosely correlated
+2.78%
ENTG - MRVL
64%
Loosely correlated
-1.81%
KLAC - MRVL
61%
Loosely correlated
+3.91%
KLIC - MRVL
61%
Loosely correlated
-0.08%
VECO - MRVL
60%
Loosely correlated
-0.90%
More