Advertisement
CRM or SCM or SNOW
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CRM’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSCM’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s), and SNOW’s FA Score reflects 0 green FA rating(s).
- CRM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- SCM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- SNOW’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CRM’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SCM’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s), and SNOW’s TA Score reflects 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CRM’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 7 bearish.
- SCM’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
- SNOW’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
CRM (@Packaged Software) experienced а -8.81% price change this week, while SCM (@Investment Managers) price change was -5.65% , and SNOW (@Packaged Software) price fluctuated -3.37% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -2.09%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.34%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.38%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +0.17%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.04%, and the average quarterly price growth was -6.94%.
Reported Earning Dates
CRM is expected to report earnings on Sep 02, 2026.
SCM is expected to report earnings on Aug 12, 2026.
SNOW is expected to report earnings on Aug 26, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Packaged Software (-2.09% weekly)Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
@Investment Managers (+0.17% weekly)Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.
| CRM | SCM | SNOW | |
| Capitalization | 124B | 242M | 80.5B |
| EBITDA | 13.7B | N/A | -936.8M |
| Gain YTD | -42.414 | -30.330 | 5.894 |
| P/E Ratio | 17.59 | 10.06 | N/A |
| Revenue | 42.8B | 30.4M | 5.03B |
| Total Cash | 1.8B | 19K | 2.96B |
| Total Debt | 41.9B | 618M | 2.77B |
CRM | SCM | SNOW | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 51 | 62 | 84 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 15 Undervalued | 2 Undervalued | 92 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 86 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 52 | 79 | 99 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 65 | 74 | 40 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 95 | 48 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 85 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
SCM's Valuation (2) in the null industry is in the same range as CRM (15) in the Packaged Software industry, and is significantly better than the same rating for SNOW (92) in the Other Consumer Services industry. This means that SCM's stock grew similarly to CRM’s and significantly faster than SNOW’s over the last 12 months.
SCM's Profit vs Risk Rating (86) in the null industry is in the same range as CRM (100) in the Packaged Software industry, and is in the same range as SNOW (100) in the Other Consumer Services industry. This means that SCM's stock grew similarly to CRM’s and similarly to SNOW’s over the last 12 months.
CRM's SMR Rating (52) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as SCM (79) in the null industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for SNOW (99) in the Other Consumer Services industry. This means that CRM's stock grew similarly to SCM’s and somewhat faster than SNOW’s over the last 12 months.
SNOW's Price Growth Rating (40) in the Other Consumer Services industry is in the same range as CRM (65) in the Packaged Software industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for SCM (74) in the null industry. This means that SNOW's stock grew similarly to CRM’s and somewhat faster than SCM’s over the last 12 months.
SCM's P/E Growth Rating (48) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CRM (95) in the Packaged Software industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for SNOW (100) in the Other Consumer Services industry. This means that SCM's stock grew somewhat faster than CRM’s and somewhat faster than SNOW’s over the last 12 months.
| CRM | SCM | SNOW | |
|---|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 65% | N/A | 4 days ago 79% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 73% | 4 days ago 48% | 4 days ago 80% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 68% | 4 days ago 38% | 4 days ago 77% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 70% | 4 days ago 54% | 4 days ago 80% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 65% | 4 days ago 46% | 4 days ago 77% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 70% | 4 days ago 42% | 4 days ago 74% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 21 days ago 69% | 10 days ago 51% | 11 days ago 77% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 64% | 4 days ago 49% | 4 days ago 75% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 68% | 4 days ago 54% | 4 days ago 81% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 83% | 4 days ago 40% | 4 days ago 71% |
Advertisement
SCM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SCM has been loosely correlated with PFLT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SCM jumps, then PFLT could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SCM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SCM | 100% | -1.18% | ||
| PFLT - SCM | 66% Loosely correlated | -1.32% | ||
| ARCC - SCM | 65% Loosely correlated | -0.39% | ||
| CGBD - SCM | 65% Loosely correlated | +0.83% | ||
| HTGC - SCM | 63% Loosely correlated | +0.52% | ||
| FDUS - SCM | 62% Loosely correlated | +1.77% | ||
More | ||||
SNOW and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SNOW has been closely correlated with MDB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SNOW jumps, then MDB could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SNOW | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SNOW | 100% | -0.95% | ||
| MDB - SNOW | 67% Closely correlated | -0.58% | ||
| COIN - SNOW | 63% Loosely correlated | -1.00% | ||
| NET - SNOW | 62% Loosely correlated | -1.24% | ||
| CLSK - SNOW | 61% Loosely correlated | +2.74% | ||
| ESTC - SNOW | 60% Loosely correlated | +0.70% | ||
More | ||||