DD
Price
$137.70
Change
+$0.30 (+0.22%)
Updated
Jul 24 closing price
Capitalization
18.59B
9 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
LIN
Price
$512.28
Change
+$5.96 (+1.18%)
Updated
Jul 24 closing price
Capitalization
236.85B
5 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
OLN
Price
$23.20
Change
-$0.44 (-1.86%)
Updated
Jul 24 closing price
Capitalization
2.64B
4 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

DD or LIN or OLN

DD vs LIN vs OLN Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
Jul 19, 2026

Which Stock Would AI Choose? DuPont de Nemours (DD) vs. Linde plc (LIN) vs. Olin Corporation (OLN) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • DD has undergone a transformative portfolio restructuring, spinning off its Electronics business and sharpening its focus on water, healthcare, and diversified industrials, with analysts broadly maintaining constructive ratings.
  • LIN stands out as the largest and most stable of the three, with a market capitalization above $230 billion, a 32-year dividend growth streak, and an unmatched track record of consecutive quarterly EPS (earnings per share) beats.
  • OLN has faced significant headwinds across its chemical and ammunition segments, with profitability under sustained pressure from weak pricing, destocking in commercial ammunition, and aggressive Asian competition in epoxy markets.
  • Over the past year, DD has delivered the strongest relative performance among the three, while OLN remains the most deeply discounted — and the most volatile — name in the group.
  • Sector exposure and risk profiles diverge sharply: LIN offers defensive consistency tied to long-term industrial gas contracts, while DD and OLN carry more cyclical sensitivity to end-market demand and raw material costs.

Introduction

Investors evaluating the materials and chemicals sector face a diverse landscape of business models, risk profiles, and growth trajectories. DD (DuPont de Nemours, Inc.), LIN (Linde plc), and OLN (Olin Corporation) represent three distinct approaches to value creation within this broad industrial space — from a recently streamlined specialty materials powerhouse to the world's largest industrial gas franchise and a diversified chemicals and ammunition manufacturer. This comparison is designed for traders and investors seeking to understand how relative positioning, recent momentum, and structural business characteristics differentiate these three publicly traded companies in the current market environment.

DD Overview and Recent Performance

DD, headquartered in Wilmington, Delaware, has undergone one of the most significant corporate transformations in the chemicals sector over the past two years. The company completed the spin-off of its Electronics business — branded as Qnity — in November 2025, marking a pivotal shift toward a more focused portfolio centered on water, healthcare, and diversified industrial applications. This restructuring substantially altered DD's revenue profile, with the remaining businesses generating annual sales of approximately $6.8 billion as of the most recent fiscal year.

In recent months, DD shares have demonstrated notable resilience, posting a year-to-date gain above 13% and a one-year return exceeding 47%, buoyed by improving fundamentals and the unlocking of shareholder value through the Qnity separation. The company's operating EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization) margins have held in the 27% range, supported by sustained strength in healthcare and water end-markets. Analysts have pointed to DD as one of the more catalyst-rich names in specialty chemicals, with the potential for further margin expansion and disciplined capital allocation — including a $2 billion share repurchase authorization — underpinning medium-term targets of 3% to 4% organic growth and 8% to 10% EPS growth through 2028.

LIN Overview and Recent Performance

LIN, domiciled in the United Kingdom and listed on the NASDAQ, is the world's largest industrial gas company by market capitalization — currently exceeding $230 billion. The company supplies essential process gases including oxygen, nitrogen, hydrogen, and carbon dioxide to a vast array of industries, from healthcare and electronics to manufacturing and aerospace. Its business model is built on long-term, take-or-pay contracts that provide significant revenue visibility and downside protection during periods of macroeconomic softness, a structural advantage few competitors can match.

In recent market activity, LIN has continued to perform as a steady compounder. Shares are up approximately 21% year-to-date and roughly 13% over the trailing twelve months. The company has delivered what analysts describe as an extraordinary streak of 25 or more consecutive quarterly EPS beats, even during what management characterized as an industrial recession. Operating margins consistently hover around 30%, among the highest in the sector. A $10 billion project backlog, strong free cash flow generation, and a 32-year record of consecutive annual dividend increases further reinforce LIN's reputation as a defensive, high-quality industrial holding. Recent strategic moves, including a long-term agreement to supply industrial gases to a low-carbon ammonia facility in Louisiana, underscore its positioning in the clean energy transition.

OLN Overview and Recent Performance

OLN, based in Clayton, Missouri, operates across three distinct business segments: Chlor Alkali Products and Vinyls, Epoxy, and Winchester ammunition. This diversified structure — spanning base chemicals, specialty epoxy resins, and defense-related manufacturing — gives OLN a unique profile within the materials sector, but also exposes it to a broad array of cyclical and competitive pressures. With a market capitalization of roughly $2.5 billion, it is by far the smallest of the three companies in this comparison.

Recent months have been challenging for OLN shareholders. While the company has posted modest year-to-date gains of around 7%, the longer-term picture is stark: the stock has declined more than 56% over the past three years. Profitability has come under sustained pressure from multiple directions — lower pricing for ethylene dichloride (EDC, a key plastic feedstock), aggressive subsidized competition from Asian epoxy producers, and ongoing destocking in the commercial ammunition market. The Winchester segment has benefited from rising military and government contract shipments, but that strength has been more than offset by weak consumer demand and rising raw material costs for metals and propellants. In response, OLN has accelerated its "Beyond250" cost reduction program, targeting over $250 million in structural savings by 2028, and trimmed capital expenditure guidance. Leverage, measured by net debt to adjusted EBITDA, has climbed above 3.9x, which warrants close monitoring.

Trending AI Robots

In a market environment where relative positioning and timing can make a decisive difference, AI-driven trading tools are increasingly drawing attention from active traders. Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page curates a selection of the platform's top-performing AI trading bots — chosen from a pool of hundreds of bots that collectively trade thousands of different tickers — based on their real-time suitability for current market conditions. These bots employ a wide range of trading styles, strategies, and timeframes, each with its own distinct performance metrics and statistical profile, including win rates, trade frequency, and risk-adjusted return characteristics. Only those demonstrating the strongest alignment with prevailing market dynamics earn a place in this curated section. For traders seeking data-driven guidance in an increasingly complex market, exploring the Trending AI Robots page offers a practical starting point.

Head-to-Head Comparison

When placed side by side, these three stocks reveal stark contrasts across nearly every meaningful investment dimension. LIN is the clear defensive anchor: its enormous scale, contractual revenue base, margin consistency, and capital return discipline make it the least volatile and most predictable of the group. The trade-off is a more modest growth trajectory and a valuation that, while not extreme, leaves less room for multiple expansion compared to the other two.

DD occupies the middle ground. The post-spin-off entity is leaner and more focused, but the restructuring also introduces a degree of uncertainty as the market digests the new portfolio profile. Growth drivers in water and healthcare are tangible and supported by secular trends, yet the company remains exposed to cyclical headwinds in construction and industrial end-markets. Valuation has been a point of debate: several Wall Street analysts have argued that DD trades at a discount to its sum-of-the-parts value, suggesting potential upside as the post-separation story matures.

OLN is the highest-risk, highest-potential-reward candidate. Its three business segments are each under pressure from distinct forces — oversupply in chlor alkali, structural challenges in epoxy, and weak commercial ammunition demand — and the rising leverage ratio adds a layer of financial risk. Yet for investors with a contrarian bent, the stock's deeply depressed valuation, ongoing cost restructuring, and exposure to defense spending through Winchester provide a potential catalyst narrative. The key question is whether visible earnings stabilization materializes before balance sheet concerns intensify.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable factors including trend consistency, earnings stability, and relative market positioning, Tickeron's AI-driven analysis would likely favor LIN among these three stocks in the current environment. The company's prolonged streak of earnings beats, high operating margins, low volatility, and substantial project backlog offer the kind of steady, quantifiable strength that algorithmic models tend to reward. DD presents an intriguing second option — its post-spin-off transformation and discounted valuation could generate favorable signals if momentum indicators continue to improve and margin expansion materializes as guided. OLN, while deeply undervalued by some traditional metrics, carries the highest degree of uncertainty across multiple dimensions — profitability, leverage, and end-market demand — which would likely temper any AI-driven conviction until clearer signs of a fundamental inflection point emerge. As always, these assessments are probabilistic in nature and reflect a snapshot of prevailing conditions rather than a permanent judgment on any company's long-term prospects.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 26, 2026
Stock price -- (DD: $137.70LIN: $512.28OLN: $23.20)
Brand notoriety: LIN and OLN are not notable and DD is notable
DD and LIN are part of the Chemicals: Specialty industry, and OLN is in the Chemicals: Major Diversified industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: DD: 63%, LIN: 39%, OLN: 82%
Market capitalization -- DD: $18.59B, LIN: $236.85B, OLN: $2.64B
$DD [@Chemicals: Specialty] is valued at $18.59B. $LIN’s [@Chemicals: Specialty] market capitalization is $ $236.85B. $OLN [@Chemicals: Major Diversified] has a market capitalization of $ $2.64B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Chemicals: Specialty] industry ranges from $ $236.85B to $ $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Chemicals: Major Diversified] industry ranges from $ $89.01B to $ $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Chemicals: Specialty] industry is $ $12.05B. The average market capitalization across the [@Chemicals: Major Diversified] industry is $ $2.45B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

DD’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileLIN’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s), and OLN’s FA Score reflects 2 green FA rating(s).

  • DD’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • LIN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • OLN’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, LIN is a better buy in the long-term than DD and OLN.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

DD’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LIN’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s), and OLN’s TA Score reflects 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • DD’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • LIN’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 7 bearish.
  • OLN’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, DD is a better buy in the short-term than LIN, which in turn is a better option than OLN.

Price Growth

DD (@Chemicals: Specialty) experienced а +1.78% price change this week, while LIN (@Chemicals: Specialty) price change was -0.18% , and OLN (@Chemicals: Major Diversified) price fluctuated +5.50% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Chemicals: Specialty industry was -1.62%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.81%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.29%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Chemicals: Major Diversified industry was +0.80%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.36%, and the average quarterly price growth was -2.12%.

Reported Earning Dates

DD is expected to report earnings on Aug 04, 2026.

LIN is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2026.

OLN is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Chemicals: Specialty (-1.62% weekly)

The specialty chemicals sector includes companies that produce chemicals and industrial gases, which are of relatively high-value, often made to customer specifications. Examples of specialty chemicals are electronic chemicals, industrial gases, coatings, adhesives and sealants, industrial and institutional cleaning chemicals. The products are often valued on the basis of their purposes/performances rather than for their composition. Linde Plc, Ecolab Inc., Air Products and Chemicals, Inc., and Dow, Inc. are some of the largest companies making specialty chemicals.

@Chemicals: Major Diversified (+0.80% weekly)

The major diversified chemicals industry includes companies that produce a wide range of chemicals and industrial gases. The products are often used as raw materials in the manufacturing of various types of goods, including plastics, paints, carpets, and fixtures to name a few. Major companies making diversified chemicals include DuPont de Nemours Inc., Celanese Corporation, Celanese Corporation and Westlake Chemical Corporation.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LIN($237B) has a higher market cap than DD($18.6B) and OLN($2.64B). DD has higher P/E ratio than OLN and LIN: DD (120.79) vs OLN (48.57) and LIN (33.97). LIN YTD gains are higher at: 20.928 vs. DD (14.482) and OLN (13.058). LIN has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 13.4B vs. DD (1.2B) and OLN (408M). DD and OLN has less debt than LIN: DD (3.17B) and OLN (3.31B) vs LIN (26.3B). LIN has higher revenues than DD and OLN: LIN (34.7B) vs DD (6.92B) and OLN (6.72B).
DDLINOLN
Capitalization18.6B237B2.64B
EBITDA1.2B13.4B408M
Gain YTD14.48220.92813.058
P/E Ratio120.7933.9748.57
Revenue6.92B34.7B6.72B
Total CashN/A3.96B192M
Total Debt3.17B26.3B3.31B
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
DD vs LIN vs OLN: Fundamental Ratings
DD
LIN
OLN
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
25028
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
32
Undervalued
49
Fair valued
18
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4314100
SMR RATING
1..100
924795
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
474950
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1005113
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50657

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

OLN's Valuation (18) in the Industrial Specialties industry is in the same range as DD (32) in the Integrated Oil industry, and is in the same range as LIN (49) in the Chemicals Specialty industry. This means that OLN's stock grew similarly to DD’s and similarly to LIN’s over the last 12 months.

LIN's Profit vs Risk Rating (14) in the Chemicals Specialty industry is in the same range as DD (43) in the Integrated Oil industry, and is significantly better than the same rating for OLN (100) in the Industrial Specialties industry. This means that LIN's stock grew similarly to DD’s and significantly faster than OLN’s over the last 12 months.

LIN's SMR Rating (47) in the Chemicals Specialty industry is somewhat better than the same rating for DD (92) in the Integrated Oil industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for OLN (95) in the Industrial Specialties industry. This means that LIN's stock grew somewhat faster than DD’s and somewhat faster than OLN’s over the last 12 months.

DD's Price Growth Rating (47) in the Integrated Oil industry is in the same range as LIN (49) in the Chemicals Specialty industry, and is in the same range as OLN (50) in the Industrial Specialties industry. This means that DD's stock grew similarly to LIN’s and similarly to OLN’s over the last 12 months.

OLN's P/E Growth Rating (13) in the Industrial Specialties industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LIN (51) in the Chemicals Specialty industry, and is significantly better than the same rating for DD (100) in the Integrated Oil industry. This means that OLN's stock grew somewhat faster than LIN’s and significantly faster than DD’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
DDLINOLN
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
48%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
49%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
39%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
40%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
45%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
49%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
46%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 25 days ago
48%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
68%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
44%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
73%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
33%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
42%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
DD
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
LIN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
OLN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FAS168.744.11
+2.50%
Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X ETF
TCAL22.630.15
+0.67%
T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Premium Income ETF
NCLO25.020.01
+0.04%
Nuveen AA-BBB CLO ETF
DJUN49.06-0.04
-0.09%
FT Vest US Equity Deep Bfr ETF Jun
TOLL38.96-0.40
-1.02%
Tema Durable Quality ETF

LIN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LIN has been loosely correlated with DD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LIN jumps, then DD could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LIN
1D Price
Change %
LIN100%
+1.18%
DD - LIN
59%
Loosely correlated
+0.22%
OLN - LIN
57%
Loosely correlated
-1.86%
ASIX - LIN
53%
Loosely correlated
-1.59%
APD - LIN
52%
Loosely correlated
+1.22%
DOW - LIN
49%
Loosely correlated
-3.43%
More

OLN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, OLN has been closely correlated with DOW. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if OLN jumps, then DOW could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To OLN
1D Price
Change %
OLN100%
-1.86%
DOW - OLN
78%
Closely correlated
-3.43%
HUN - OLN
77%
Closely correlated
-0.08%
PPG - OLN
76%
Closely correlated
+1.98%
LYB - OLN
75%
Closely correlated
-2.27%
DD - OLN
74%
Closely correlated
+0.22%
More