Advertisement
DEO or MGPI or TAP
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
DEO’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMGPI’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s), and TAP’s FA Score reflects 1 green FA rating(s).
- DEO’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- MGPI’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- TAP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
DEO’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MGPI’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s), and TAP’s TA Score reflects 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
- DEO’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
- MGPI’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
- TAP’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
DEO (@Beverages: Alcoholic) experienced а +4.14% price change this week, while MGPI (@Beverages: Alcoholic) price change was +2.34% , and TAP (@Food: Meat/Fish/Dairy) price fluctuated +2.14% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Beverages: Alcoholic industry was +5.91%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.74%, and the average quarterly price growth was -24.57%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Meat/Fish/Dairy industry was +1.62%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.42%, and the average quarterly price growth was -6.57%.
Reported Earning Dates
DEO is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2026.
MGPI is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2026.
TAP is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Beverages: Alcoholic (+5.91% weekly)The alcoholic beverage market includes beer, wine, and spirits. From $230 billion in 2015, the industry has grown to around $250 billion by 2019. In recent years, alcoholic beverage makers have been looking to expand distribution and purchase channels, such as through online stores (e.g. e-commerce platform Drizly) and convenience stores. Anheuser-Busch In Bev and Diageo are major global alcoholic beverage companies, while U.S.-owned companies include Constellation Brands and Brown-Forman Corp. among several others.
@Food: Meat/Fish/Dairy (+1.62% weekly)The meat, fish, and dairy food industry processes livestock, fish and milk products for consumer consumption. Some companies also process dairy byproducts. Tyson Foods, Inc., Hormel Foods Corporation and Pilgrims Pride Corp. are some of the biggest producers in this industry. Many of these companies are recipients of American farm subsidies. On the other hand, new-age food innovation like plant-based meat substitutes (which are designed to simulate chicken, beef, and pork sausage) could potentially augur disruptions and/or create new competition in this space.
| DEO | MGPI | TAP | |
| Capitalization | 53.8B | 384M | 7.84B |
| EBITDA | 6.39B | -243.61M | -1.45B |
| Gain YTD | 10.938 | -24.818 | -7.989 |
| P/E Ratio | 30.41 | 58.74 | 8.52 |
| Revenue | 19.8B | 500M | 11.2B |
| Total Cash | 905M | 13.4M | 383M |
| Total Debt | 23.5B | 378M | 6.27B |
DEO | MGPI | TAP | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 36 | 8 | 41 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 22 Undervalued | 31 Undervalued | 11 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 90 | 98 | 96 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 45 | 61 | 54 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 32 | 4 | 67 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 85 | 50 | 75 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
TAP's Valuation (11) in the Beverages Alcoholic industry is in the same range as DEO (22) in the Beverages Alcoholic industry, and is in the same range as MGPI (31) in the Agricultural Commodities Or Milling industry. This means that TAP's stock grew similarly to DEO’s and similarly to MGPI’s over the last 12 months.
TAP's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Beverages Alcoholic industry is in the same range as DEO (100) in the Beverages Alcoholic industry, and is in the same range as MGPI (100) in the Agricultural Commodities Or Milling industry. This means that TAP's stock grew similarly to DEO’s and similarly to MGPI’s over the last 12 months.
DEO's SMR Rating (90) in the Beverages Alcoholic industry is in the same range as TAP (96) in the Beverages Alcoholic industry, and is in the same range as MGPI (98) in the Agricultural Commodities Or Milling industry. This means that DEO's stock grew similarly to TAP’s and similarly to MGPI’s over the last 12 months.
DEO's Price Growth Rating (45) in the Beverages Alcoholic industry is in the same range as TAP (54) in the Beverages Alcoholic industry, and is in the same range as MGPI (61) in the Agricultural Commodities Or Milling industry. This means that DEO's stock grew similarly to TAP’s and similarly to MGPI’s over the last 12 months.
MGPI's P/E Growth Rating (4) in the Agricultural Commodities Or Milling industry is in the same range as DEO (32) in the Beverages Alcoholic industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for TAP (67) in the Beverages Alcoholic industry. This means that MGPI's stock grew similarly to DEO’s and somewhat faster than TAP’s over the last 12 months.
| DEO | MGPI | TAP | |
|---|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 65% | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 57% | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 56% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 55% | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 66% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 58% | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 56% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 49% | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 62% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 48% | 2 days ago 65% | 2 days ago 64% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 42% | 16 days ago 67% | 3 days ago 63% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 58% | 2 days ago 74% | 15 days ago 58% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 66% | N/A | 2 days ago 62% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 35% | 2 days ago 49% | 2 days ago 56% |
Advertisement
DEO and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DEO has been loosely correlated with BUD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if DEO jumps, then BUD could also see price increases.
MGPI and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MGPI has been loosely correlated with DEO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MGPI jumps, then DEO could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MGPI | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MGPI | 100% | -0.22% | ||
| DEO - MGPI | 52% Loosely correlated | -1.37% | ||
| STZ - MGPI | 34% Loosely correlated | -1.88% | ||
| BUD - MGPI | 28% Poorly correlated | -0.69% | ||
| TAP - MGPI | 26% Poorly correlated | -2.28% | ||
| CCU - MGPI | 24% Poorly correlated | -0.79% | ||
More | ||||
TAP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TAP has been loosely correlated with SAM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TAP jumps, then SAM could also see price increases.