ENTG
Price
$126.37
Change
-$2.78 (-2.15%)
Updated
Jul 27 closing price
Capitalization
19.25B
7 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
FORM
Price
$98.80
Change
-$5.24 (-5.04%)
Updated
Jul 27 closing price
Capitalization
7.7B
One day until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
QCOM
Price
$170.04
Change
+$3.07 (+1.84%)
Updated
Jul 27 closing price
Capitalization
179.22B
One day until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

ENTG or FORM or QCOM

ENTG vs FORM vs QCOM Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
Jul 27, 2026

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Entegris (ENTG) vs. FormFactor (FORM) vs. QUALCOMM (QCOM) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • ENTG, FORM, and QCOM operate in the semiconductor supply chain, with ENTG focused on specialty materials and solutions, FORM on probe cards and testing, and QCOM on wireless chipsets and broader semiconductor applications.
  • Recent market activity shows all three stocks experiencing pressure amid sector-wide pullbacks, with FORM and ENTG posting sharper short-term declines compared to QCOM in the most recent trading sessions.
  • Year-to-date performance highlights stronger gains for ENTG and FORM relative to QCOM, reflecting varying degrees of momentum tied to semiconductor demand cycles.
  • Key recent developments include dividend affirmations and upcoming earnings for ENTG, robust growth positioning for FORM, and announced price adjustments by QCOM in response to cost pressures.
  • Valuation sensitivity and sector exposure differ notably, with QCOM offering larger scale and dividend yield, while ENTG and FORM provide more specialized exposure to semiconductor manufacturing and testing segments.
  • Market sentiment across the group remains influenced by broader technology sector dynamics, supply chain factors, and macroeconomic variables affecting capital spending in electronics.

Introduction

This comparison examines Entegris (ENTG), FormFactor (FORM), and QUALCOMM (QCOM), three companies positioned within the semiconductor ecosystem. The analysis focuses on their business models, recent performance trends, and relative positioning in the current market environment. Institutional investors, active traders, and portfolio managers evaluating semiconductor exposure or seeking diversification within the technology sector may find this stock comparison useful for assessing contrasts in growth drivers, risk profiles, and market sentiment.

ENTG Overview and Recent Performance

Entegris provides advanced materials, specialty chemicals, and engineered solutions primarily for the semiconductor and electronics industries. In recent weeks, the stock has shown notable volatility amid broader semiconductor sector movements, with a pullback following earlier gains. Recent market activity includes the declaration of a quarterly cash dividend and preparations for second-quarter earnings scheduled for early August. Sentiment has been shaped by analyst price target adjustments and the company's positioning in semiconductor materials, which benefits from ongoing industry capacity expansions but remains sensitive to cyclical demand shifts.

FORM Overview and Recent Performance

FormFactor specializes in probe cards, advanced packaging, and testing solutions critical for semiconductor manufacturing and development. The stock has delivered substantial year-to-date appreciation, though recent trading sessions reflect pressure from sector-wide selling. Recent market activity highlights strong relative performance over longer periods within the year, supported by demand for its specialized testing technologies. Sentiment remains tied to semiconductor capital equipment trends and the company's ability to capture share in high-growth segments of the supply chain.

QCOM Overview and Recent Performance

QUALCOMM develops and licenses wireless technologies, chipsets, and related semiconductor products with applications across mobile, automotive, and internet-of-things markets. In recent weeks, the stock has experienced more moderate declines compared to some peers amid announcements of planned price increases to address rising costs. Recent market activity includes commentary on supply dynamics and broader technology sector performance. Sentiment reflects the company's established market position and efforts to navigate cost pressures while maintaining exposure to evolving connectivity demands.

Trending AI Robots

Trending AI Robots showcases a curated selection from Tickeron’s extensive library of hundreds of AI trading bots that execute strategies across thousands of tickers. Only those demonstrating the strongest alignment with prevailing market conditions and robust statistical profiles earn inclusion in this section. Available bots span diverse trading styles, strategies, timeframes, performance metrics, and ticker sets, with many exhibiting win rates and risk-adjusted returns that vary by configuration. This resource offers traders and investors a data-driven lens into automated approaches potentially suited to stocks like ENTG, FORM, and QCOM. Explore the full selection on the Trending AI Robots page for additional details.

Head-to-Head Comparison

ENTG, FORM, and QCOM differ in business models, with ENTG emphasizing materials and contamination control for semiconductor fabrication, FORM concentrating on precision testing equipment, and QCOM delivering scalable chipset solutions with licensing revenue. Growth drivers vary accordingly: ENTG and FORM tie more directly to manufacturing capacity and yield improvements, while QCOM benefits from wireless adoption cycles across end markets. Recent momentum shows ENTG and FORM with stronger year-to-date gains amid specialized demand, though all have faced short-term pressure from sector rotation. Risk factors include cyclical semiconductor spending for ENTG and FORM versus competitive and regulatory considerations for QCOM. Valuation sensitivity appears higher for growth-oriented names like FORM, while QCOM offers greater scale and a dividend component. Market sentiment across the trio reflects shared exposure to technology spending but differentiated responses to cost inflation and supply dynamics.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable factors including relative momentum consistency, sector positioning, and recent catalysts such as cost management initiatives, Tickeron’s AI models would currently assign a probabilistic preference toward QUALCOMM (QCOM) for its broader market exposure and efforts to address margin pressures through pricing actions. ENTG and FORM demonstrate compelling specialized growth characteristics that could support outperformance in favorable semiconductor environments. This assessment draws from trend stability and positioning metrics rather than forward projections.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 28, 2026
Stock price -- (ENTG: $126.37FORM: $98.80QCOM: $170.04)
Brand notoriety: ENTG and FORM are not notable and QCOM is notable
ENTG and FORM are part of the Electronic Production Equipment industry, and QCOM is in the Semiconductors industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ENTG: 43%, FORM: 46%, QCOM: 36%
Market capitalization -- ENTG: $19.25B, FORM: $7.7B, QCOM: $179.22B
$ENTG [@Electronic Production Equipment] is valued at $19.25B. $FORM’s [@Electronic Production Equipment] market capitalization is $ $7.7B. $QCOM [@Semiconductors] has a market capitalization of $ $179.22B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Electronic Production Equipment] industry ranges from $ $682.84B to $ $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Semiconductors] industry ranges from $ $4.76T to $ $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Electronic Production Equipment] industry is $ $66.97B. The average market capitalization across the [@Semiconductors] industry is $ $184.13B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ENTG’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFORM’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s), and QCOM’s FA Score reflects 1 green FA rating(s).

  • ENTG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • FORM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • QCOM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, QCOM is a better buy in the long-term than FORM, which in turn is a better option than ENTG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ENTG’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FORM’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s), and QCOM’s TA Score reflects 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ENTG’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 7 bearish.
  • FORM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • QCOM’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FORM is a better buy in the short-term than QCOM, which in turn is a better option than ENTG.

Price Growth

ENTG (@Electronic Production Equipment) experienced а -5.55% price change this week, while FORM (@Electronic Production Equipment) price change was -6.18% , and QCOM (@Semiconductors) price fluctuated -0.16% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronic Production Equipment industry was -2.27%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -18.03%, and the average quarterly price growth was +38.82%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Semiconductors industry was -2.05%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -13.37%, and the average quarterly price growth was +33.18%.

Reported Earning Dates

ENTG is expected to report earnings on Aug 04, 2026.

FORM is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2026.

QCOM is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Electronic Production Equipment (-2.27% weekly)

The electronic production equipment industry makes equipment used to produce semiconductors. Such equipment includes wafer fabrication, plasma etching and photo-resist processing equipment. The industry also makes chemical vapor deposition processing systems and photomasks, which are high-purity quartz plates that contain patterns to define integrated circuits layouts. Applied Materials, Inc., Lam Research Corporation, and KLA-Tencor Corporation are examples of electronic production equipment manufacturing companies.

@Semiconductors (-2.05% weekly)

The semiconductor industry manufacturers all chip-related products, including research and development. These chips are used in innumerable electronic devices, including computers, cell phones, smartphones, and GPSs. Intel Corporation, NVIDIA Corp., and Broadcomm are some of the prominent players in this industry. Semiconductor companies usually tend to do well during periods of healthy economic growth, thereby inducing further research and development in the industry – which in turn augurs well for productivity and growth in the economy. In the near future, demand for semiconductor products (and possibly innovation within the segment) should only expand further, with the proliferation of 5G, autonomous vehicles, IoT, and various AI-driven electronics set to herald a new, advanced chapter in the technology-driven world as we know it. With burgeoning prospects comes great competition. In 2015, SIA estimated that U.S. semiconductor industry ranks as the second most competitive U.S. industry out of 2882 U.S. industries designated manufacturers by the U.S. Census Bureau.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
QCOM($179B) has a higher market cap than ENTG($19.2B) and FORM($7.7B). FORM has higher P/E ratio than ENTG and QCOM: FORM (113.56) vs ENTG (73.05) and QCOM (18.28). FORM YTD gains are higher at: 77.124 vs. ENTG (50.222) and QCOM (0.417). QCOM has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 14B vs. ENTG (848M) and FORM (128M). QCOM has more cash in the bank: 9.8B vs. ENTG (443M) and FORM (303M). FORM has less debt than ENTG and QCOM: FORM (31.9M) vs ENTG (3.76B) and QCOM (15.3B). QCOM has higher revenues than ENTG and FORM: QCOM (44.5B) vs ENTG (3.24B) and FORM (840M).
ENTGFORMQCOM
Capitalization19.2B7.7B179B
EBITDA848M128M14B
Gain YTD50.22277.1240.417
P/E Ratio73.05113.5618.28
Revenue3.24B840M44.5B
Total Cash443M303M9.8B
Total Debt3.76B31.9M15.3B
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ENTG vs FORM vs QCOM: Fundamental Ratings
ENTG
FORM
QCOM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
505050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
64
Fair valued
77
Overvalued
40
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
894173
SMR RATING
1..100
818127
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
614256
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
14837
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
90n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

QCOM's Valuation (40) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry is in the same range as ENTG (64) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for FORM (77) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry. This means that QCOM's stock grew similarly to ENTG’s and somewhat faster than FORM’s over the last 12 months.

FORM's Profit vs Risk Rating (41) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry is in the same range as QCOM (73) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for ENTG (89) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry. This means that FORM's stock grew similarly to QCOM’s and somewhat faster than ENTG’s over the last 12 months.

QCOM's SMR Rating (27) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FORM (81) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for ENTG (81) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry. This means that QCOM's stock grew somewhat faster than FORM’s and somewhat faster than ENTG’s over the last 12 months.

FORM's Price Growth Rating (42) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry is in the same range as QCOM (56) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry, and is in the same range as ENTG (61) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry. This means that FORM's stock grew similarly to QCOM’s and similarly to ENTG’s over the last 12 months.

FORM's P/E Growth Rating (8) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry is in the same range as ENTG (14) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry, and is in the same range as QCOM (37) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry. This means that FORM's stock grew similarly to ENTG’s and similarly to QCOM’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ENTGFORMQCOM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
82%
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
66%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
71%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
70%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 19 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 19 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
64%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
74%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
66%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ENTG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
FORM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
QCOM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IDYA36.771.37
+3.87%
IDEAYA Biosciences
ZS147.304.98
+3.50%
Zscaler
BCAL21.210.19
+0.90%
California BanCorp
BSBK8.95-0.09
-1.00%
Bogota Financial Corp
ACON2.22-0.20
-8.26%
Aclarion Inc

ENTG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ENTG has been closely correlated with LSCC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ENTG jumps, then LSCC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ENTG
1D Price
Change %
ENTG100%
-2.15%
LSCC - ENTG
78%
Closely correlated
-4.29%
NXPI - ENTG
77%
Closely correlated
-0.58%
MCHP - ENTG
77%
Closely correlated
-1.22%
ON - ENTG
76%
Closely correlated
+2.57%
SLAB - ENTG
76%
Closely correlated
+0.19%
More

FORM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FORM has been closely correlated with RMBS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FORM jumps, then RMBS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FORM
1D Price
Change %
FORM100%
-5.04%
RMBS - FORM
74%
Closely correlated
+0.43%
SLAB - FORM
73%
Closely correlated
+0.19%
ADI - FORM
72%
Closely correlated
+0.01%
ARM - FORM
72%
Closely correlated
+2.43%
QCOM - FORM
72%
Closely correlated
+1.84%
More