ET
Price
$19.04
Change
-$0.03 (-0.16%)
Updated
Jun 10, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
65.59B
56 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
TRGP
Price
$272.52
Change
+$8.35 (+3.16%)
Updated
Jun 10, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
56.7B
50 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
WES
Price
$44.30
Change
+$0.81 (+1.86%)
Updated
Jun 10, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
17.42B
63 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

ET or TRGP or WES

Header iconET vs TRGP vs WES Comparison
Open Charts ET vs TRGP vs WESBanner chart's image
ET vs TRGP vs WES Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Energy Transfer LP (ET) vs. Targa Resources Corp. (TRGP) vs. Western Midstream Partners, LP (WES) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • TRGP leads year-to-date (YTD) performance at 39.20%, driven by a 25% dividend hike and Permian Basin expansion plans.
  • ET boasts the largest market capitalization at $68.6 billion and a solid 23.19% YTD return, reflecting its diversified midstream operations.
  • WES offers the highest dividend yield around 8.8%, appealing to income-focused investors despite a more modest 11.51% YTD gain.
  • All three stocks experienced minor pullbacks in recent market sessions but benefit from upcoming Q1 2026 earnings reports and sector payout growth trends.
  • Valuations vary, with WES at the lowest trailing P/E ratio (price-to-earnings) of 14.15, compared to ET's 16.48 and TRGP's 29.95.
  • Low betas (0.57 for ET, 0.74 for TRGP, 0.70 for WES) indicate relative stability versus the broader market.

Introduction

Energy Transfer LP (ET), Targa Resources Corp. (TRGP), and Western Midstream Partners, LP (WES) are prominent players in the midstream energy sector, focusing on natural gas gathering, processing, and transportation. This comparison analyzes their recent market positioning, performance, and key metrics amid fluctuating energy commodity prices and infrastructure demand. Traders seeking momentum and investors prioritizing high-yield dividends or growth potential in pipelines and natural gas liquids (NGL) will find these insights valuable for evaluating relative strengths in the current environment.

ET Overview and Recent Performance

Energy Transfer LP (ET) operates an extensive network of pipelines for natural gas, NGLs, and crude oil across the U.S., including intrastate and interstate transportation, midstream gathering, and investments in Sunoco LP and USA Compression Partners. With a market cap of $68.6 billion, it closed at $19.94 on May 1, 2026, near its 52-week high of $20.28. In recent weeks, the stock has demonstrated resilience with a 23.19% YTD return, outperforming the S&P 500, amid positive industry outlooks for midstream firms. Sentiment has been influenced by upcoming Q1 2026 earnings on May 5 and a 6.70% dividend yield, though analysts note caution due to sector challenges like commodity volatility.

TRGP Overview and Recent Performance

Targa Resources Corp. (TRGP) specializes in gathering, processing, and logistics for natural gas, NGLs, and crude oil, with key operations in the Permian Basin and Gulf Coast. Its $54.7 billion market cap reflects strong growth positioning, with shares closing at $254.28 on May 1, 2026, close to the 52-week high of $260.49. Recent market activity shows robust momentum, including a 39.20% YTD gain, fueled by a 25% quarterly dividend increase to $1.25 and Permian capacity expansions projecting revenue growth. Despite a minor dip and insider sales, positive analyst updates and Q1 earnings on May 7 have supported upward sentiment.

WES Overview and Recent Performance

Western Midstream Partners, LP (WES) focuses on natural gas gathering, processing, and crude handling in Texas, New Mexico, and the Rockies, including produced water services. At a $17.2 billion market cap, it traded at $42.16 on May 1, 2026, within its 52-week range of $35.25-$44.74. Recent weeks featured a price pullback after strong long-term returns and an 11.51% YTD performance. Key drivers include a high 8.82% dividend yield, Q1 distribution announcement, and earnings on May 6, with mixed analyst views contributing to steady but cautious market positioning.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page curates the top performers from its library of over 350 AI trading bots that analyze thousands of tickers across diverse strategies, timeframes, and market conditions. These bots employ AI/ML agents for momentum, trend following, and risk-managed trades like take-profit/stop-loss corridors, with trending selections excelling in volatile sectors such as semiconductors, energy, and industrials. Stats highlight impressive ranges: annualized returns from 24% to 163%, win rates of 51%-88%, profit factors up to 11.7, and drawdowns under $50,000 on simulated portfolios. Selected for current trends like AI infrastructure and commodity plays, they offer varied styles from short-term (15min) scalps to multi-day holds. Explore these bots to align automated strategies with today’s market dynamics.

Head-to-Head Comparison

All three operate in midstream energy, transporting and processing natural gas and NGLs, but differ in scale and focus: ET’s vast pipeline network provides diversification, while TRGP emphasizes Permian growth and WES targets specific basins with water services. Recent momentum favors TRGP amid expansion catalysts, contrasting WES’s pullback. Risk profiles are low across the board with betas under 0.8, though TRGP shows higher volatility. Valuation sensitivity highlights WES’s attractive P/E and yield for value plays versus TRGP’s premium for growth. Market sentiment tilts positive on dividend sustainability and sector payout trends, balancing trade-offs in stability versus upside potential.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron’s AI models would likely favor TRGP in the current environment, given its superior YTD trend consistency, recent dividend growth catalyst, and Permian-driven positioning amid energy infrastructure demand. While ET offers scale and stability and WES high yield, TRGP’s momentum edges it probabilistically higher for near-term relative performance.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 11, 2026
Stock price -- (ET: $19.06TRGP: $264.17WES: $43.50)
Brand notoriety: ET and TRGP are notable and WES is not notable
The three companies represent the Oil & Gas Pipelines industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ET: 55%, TRGP: 60%, WES: 52%
Market capitalization -- ET: $65.59B, TRGP: $56.7B, WES: $17.42B
$ET is valued at $65.59B, while TRGP has a market capitalization of $56.7B, and WES's market capitalization is $17.42B. The market cap for tickers in this @Oil & Gas Pipelines ranges from $121.38B to $0. The average market capitalization across the @Oil & Gas Pipelines industry is $16.71B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ET’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileTRGP’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s), and WES’s FA Score reflects 3 green FA rating(s).

  • ET’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • TRGP’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • WES’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, ET and WES are a better buy in the long-term than TRGP.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ET’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TRGP’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s), and WES’s TA Score reflects 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ET’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • TRGP’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • WES’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, WES is a better buy in the short-term than ET, which in turn is a better option than TRGP.

Price Growth

ET (@Oil & Gas Pipelines) experienced а -2.46% price change this week, while TRGP (@Oil & Gas Pipelines) price change was +0.33% , and WES (@Oil & Gas Pipelines) price fluctuated -0.28% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Pipelines industry was +1.86%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.08%, and the average quarterly price growth was +30.84%.

Reported Earning Dates

ET is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2026.

TRGP is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2026.

WES is expected to report earnings on Aug 12, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oil & Gas Pipelines (+1.86% weekly)

Oil & Gas Pipelines industry includes companies that transport natural gas and crude oil through pipelines. These companies also collect and market the fuels. The pipeline segment could be considered as a midstream operation – functioning as a link between the upstream and downstream operations in the oil and gas industry. Some of the largest U.S. pipeline players include Enterprise Products Partners L.P, TC Energy Corporation and Energy Transfer, L.P.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ET($65.6B) has a higher market cap than TRGP($56.7B) and WES($17.4B). TRGP has higher P/E ratio than ET and WES: TRGP (26.98) vs ET (15.88) and WES (14.55). TRGP YTD gains are higher at: 44.618 vs. ET (19.783) and WES (15.059). ET has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 15.9B vs. TRGP (5.22B) and WES (2.41B). ET has more cash in the bank: 951M vs. WES (647M) and TRGP (100M). WES has less debt than TRGP and ET: WES (8.71B) vs TRGP (19.1B) and ET (71.1B). ET has higher revenues than TRGP and WES: ET (92.3B) vs TRGP (16.6B) and WES (4.05B).
ETTRGPWES
Capitalization65.6B56.7B17.4B
EBITDA15.9B5.22B2.41B
Gain YTD19.78344.61815.059
P/E Ratio15.8826.9814.55
Revenue92.3B16.6B4.05B
Total Cash951M100M647M
Total Debt71.1B19.1B8.71B
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ET vs TRGP vs WES: Fundamental Ratings
ET
TRGP
WES
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
848892
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
2
Undervalued
32
Undervalued
5
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1383
SMR RATING
1..100
100100100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
461344
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
346229
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
651650

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ET's Valuation (2) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry is in the same range as WES (5) in the Oil Refining Or Marketing industry, and is in the same range as TRGP (32) in the Oil Refining Or Marketing industry. This means that ET's stock grew similarly to WES’s and similarly to TRGP’s over the last 12 months.

WES's Profit vs Risk Rating (3) in the Oil Refining Or Marketing industry is in the same range as TRGP (8) in the Oil Refining Or Marketing industry, and is in the same range as ET (13) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry. This means that WES's stock grew similarly to TRGP’s and similarly to ET’s over the last 12 months.

WES's SMR Rating (100) in the Oil Refining Or Marketing industry is in the same range as TRGP (100) in the Oil Refining Or Marketing industry, and is in the same range as ET (100) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry. This means that WES's stock grew similarly to TRGP’s and similarly to ET’s over the last 12 months.

TRGP's Price Growth Rating (13) in the Oil Refining Or Marketing industry is in the same range as WES (44) in the Oil Refining Or Marketing industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for ET (46) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry. This means that TRGP's stock grew similarly to WES’s and somewhat faster than ET’s over the last 12 months.

WES's P/E Growth Rating (29) in the Oil Refining Or Marketing industry is in the same range as ET (34) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for TRGP (62) in the Oil Refining Or Marketing industry. This means that WES's stock grew similarly to ET’s and somewhat faster than TRGP’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ETTRGPWES
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
38%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
47%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
43%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
38%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
42%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
42%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
65%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
42%
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
44%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ET
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
TRGP
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
WES
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
KALU180.452.29
+1.29%
Kaiser Aluminum Corp
SFBC42.300.23
+0.55%
Sound Financial Bancorp
FET52.18-0.35
-0.67%
Forum Energy Technologies
MGA66.09-0.58
-0.87%
Magna International
MNDR0.70-0.01
-1.99%
Mobile-health Network Solutions

ET and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ET has been loosely correlated with OKE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 58% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ET jumps, then OKE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ET
1D Price
Change %
ET100%
-1.45%
OKE - ET
58%
Loosely correlated
-0.41%
WES - ET
53%
Loosely correlated
-1.94%
EPD - ET
52%
Loosely correlated
-0.45%
TRGP - ET
52%
Loosely correlated
+0.02%
PAGP - ET
52%
Loosely correlated
-1.16%
More

TRGP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TRGP has been closely correlated with OKE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TRGP jumps, then OKE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TRGP
1D Price
Change %
TRGP100%
+0.02%
OKE - TRGP
72%
Closely correlated
-0.41%
KMI - TRGP
57%
Loosely correlated
+0.16%
KNTK - TRGP
55%
Loosely correlated
-0.24%
WMB - TRGP
54%
Loosely correlated
N/A
PAGP - TRGP
54%
Loosely correlated
-1.16%
More