GDX
Price
$95.48
Change
-$0.44 (-0.46%)
Updated
Sep 18 closing price
Net Assets
27.74B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
GDXJ
Price
$124.44
Change
+$0.81 (+0.66%)
Updated
Sep 18 closing price
Net Assets
8.75B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SGDM
Price
$80.18
Change
-$0.09 (-0.11%)
Updated
Sep 18 closing price
Net Assets
687.99M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

GDX or GDXJ or SGDM

GDX vs GDXJ vs SGDM Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Sep 01, 2026

Which ETF would AI Choose? VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDX) vs. VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF (GDXJ) vs. Sprott Gold Miners ETF (SGDM)

Key Takeaways

  • GDX and GDXJ are both passive ETFs from VanEck tracking market-capitalization-weighted indexes of gold mining companies, while SGDM employs a factor-based smart beta approach via the Solactive Gold Miners Custom Factors Index.
  • GDX offers broad exposure to established large-cap gold miners with approximately 66 holdings, GDXJ focuses on smaller junior miners with around 120 holdings, and SGDM concentrates on 49 larger North American gold companies selected for revenue growth, free cash flow yield, and low debt-to-equity ratios.
  • Expense ratios differ modestly: SGDM at 0.46 percent provides the lowest cost, followed by GDX at 0.51 percent and GDXJ at 0.52 percent.
  • GDX delivers the deepest diversification among senior producers, GDXJ introduces higher volatility through junior miner exposure, and SGDM emphasizes quality factors that may support more stable risk-adjusted returns in certain market cycles.
  • All three ETFs provide leveraged equity exposure to gold prices within the precious metals sector, with structural differences driving variations in concentration risk and sensitivity to macroeconomic drivers such as interest rates and geopolitical events.
  • Relative positioning favors GDX for liquidity and scale, GDXJ for growth-oriented junior exposure, and SGDM for cost efficiency combined with factor tilts.

Introduction

Investors seeking gold mining equity exposure often compare VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDX), VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF (GDXJ), and Sprott Gold Miners ETF (SGDM) because these funds compete within the same thematic sector yet employ distinct structural approaches. GDX and GDXJ track traditional market-cap indexes of gold and silver miners, while SGDM incorporates quantitative factors. The comparison highlights differences in index methodology, holding counts, expense structures, and risk profiles that influence how each ETF responds to gold price movements and broader economic conditions over recent market cycles.

VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDX) Overview

VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDX) seeks to replicate the performance of the MarketVector Global Gold Miners Index before fees and expenses. The fund invests at least 80 percent of assets in securities of companies primarily engaged in gold mining, resulting in a portfolio of approximately 66 holdings focused on senior producers. Top holdings typically include major global miners, with sector allocation concentrated nearly entirely in materials. The expense ratio stands at 0.51 percent. GDX operates as a passive, non-diversified ETF with modified market-cap weighting and rebalancing aligned to its benchmark index. It provides liquid access to established gold mining equities listed on major exchanges.

VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF (GDXJ) Overview

VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF (GDXJ) tracks the MVIS Global Junior Gold Miners Index, targeting small-capitalization companies that derive at least 50 percent of revenue from gold or silver mining or hold qualifying development projects. The fund maintains around 120 holdings, emphasizing junior and early-stage miners. Sector exposure remains overwhelmingly in materials. The expense ratio is 0.52 percent. As a passive ETF, GDXJ uses modified capitalization weighting with periodic index rebalancing. Its structure delivers higher-beta exposure to gold prices through smaller, more volatile companies compared with senior miner funds.

Sprott Gold Miners ETF (SGDM) Overview

Sprott Gold Miners ETF (SGDM) aims to track the Solactive Gold Miners Custom Factors Index before fees and expenses. The index selects larger-sized gold companies listed on Canadian and major U.S. exchanges using rules-based factors including revenue growth, free cash flow yield, and low long-term debt-to-equity ratios. The fund holds approximately 49 issuers with quarterly reconstitution. Sector allocation centers on materials, primarily North American producers. The expense ratio is 0.46 percent. SGDM functions as a passive smart beta ETF, blending market-cap elements with factor screening to potentially enhance risk-adjusted characteristics relative to pure market-cap peers.

Industry and Thematic Landscape

The gold mining sector remains sensitive to gold bullion prices, interest rate environments, inflation expectations, and geopolitical developments. Capital flows into precious metals equities often increase during periods of economic uncertainty or monetary easing. Regulatory factors affecting permitting and environmental standards, along with operational challenges such as rising input costs, influence earnings of major holdings across the industry. Earnings trends among producers depend on realized gold prices net of all-in sustaining costs, while sector risks include currency fluctuations, labor issues, and reserve depletion. These macro drivers affect all three ETFs similarly, though structural differences in holdings and selection criteria create varied sensitivities.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent weeks and months, performance differences among the ETFs have stemmed primarily from exposure variations rather than short-term price swings. GDX has generally exhibited more stable trend consistency due to its focus on larger, established miners with lower concentration risk. GDXJ has shown greater volatility and larger drawdowns during risk-off periods because of its junior miner tilt, which amplifies gold price movements. SGDM’s factor-based selection has contributed to potentially narrower drawdowns and more consistent momentum in certain cycles by favoring companies with stronger balance sheets and cash flow metrics. Relative positioning reflects trade-offs: GDX balances scale and liquidity, GDXJ offers higher growth potential at elevated risk, and SGDM prioritizes quality factors alongside competitive costs.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Investors seeking data-driven insights into ETFs like GDX, GDXJ, and SGDM may find the tool useful for refining screening criteria.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable structural strength, diversification profile, cost efficiency, momentum stability, and risk-adjusted positioning, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a modestly higher probability of favor to Sprott Gold Miners ETF (SGDM). Its lower expense ratio combined with factor tilts toward quality metrics offers a differentiated approach within the gold miners theme that balances cost and selection discipline relative to the market-cap peers.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GDX has more net assets: 27.7B vs. GDXJ (8.75B) and SGDM (688M). SGDM has a higher annual dividend yield than GDX and GDXJ: SGDM (15.152) vs GDX (11.321) and GDXJ (9.369). GDX was incepted earlier than GDXJ and SGDM: GDX (20 years) vs GDXJ (17 years) and SGDM (12 years). SGDM (0.46) has a lower expense ratio than GDX (0.51) and GDXJ (0.52). SGDM has a higher turnover GDX (50.00) and GDXJ (36.00) vs GDX (50.00) and GDXJ (36.00).
GDXGDXJSGDM
Gain YTD11.3219.36915.152
Net Assets27.7B8.75B688M
Total Expense Ratio0.510.520.46
Turnover50.0036.0059.00
Yield0.642.070.89
Fund Existence20 years17 years12 years
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GDXGDXJSGDM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 18 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 18 days ago
90%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
87%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
GDX
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
GDXJ
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SGDM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GLTR199.342.09
+1.06%
abrdn Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF (GLTR)
KBUF25.690.13
+0.49%
KraneShares 90% KWEB Defined Outcome January 2027 ETF (KBUF)
KNO62.190.07
+0.11%
AXS Knowledge Leaders ETF (KNO)
SPTB29.17-0.10
-0.34%
State Street SPDR Portfolio Treasury ETF (SPTB)
DSMC42.75-0.53
-1.22%
Distillate Small/Mid Cash Flow ETF (DSMC)

GDXJ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GDXJ has been closely correlated with KGC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 93% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GDXJ jumps, then KGC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GDXJ
1D Price
Change %
GDXJ100%
+0.66%
KGC - GDXJ
93%
Closely correlated
-1.44%
PAAS - GDXJ
93%
Closely correlated
+0.75%
FSM - GDXJ
92%
Closely correlated
+0.25%
CGAU - GDXJ
92%
Closely correlated
+1.19%
AEM - GDXJ
91%
Closely correlated
-0.93%
More

SGDM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SGDM has been closely correlated with AEM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 96% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SGDM jumps, then AEM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SGDM
1D Price
Change %
SGDM100%
-0.11%
AEM - SGDM
96%
Closely correlated
-0.93%
WPM - SGDM
95%
Closely correlated
-0.78%
IAG - SGDM
93%
Closely correlated
+0.94%
NEM - SGDM
93%
Closely correlated
-0.79%
AU - SGDM
91%
Closely correlated
+0.91%
More