GGLL
Price
$123.33
Change
-$2.62 (-2.08%)
Updated
Jun 5 closing price
Net Assets
1.4B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
QLD
Price
$89.54
Change
-$9.48 (-9.57%)
Updated
Jun 5 closing price
Net Assets
13.2B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
TQQQ
Price
$73.05
Change
-$12.17 (-14.28%)
Updated
Jun 5 closing price
Net Assets
33.96B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

GGLL or QLD or TQQQ

Header iconGGLL vs QLD vs TQQQ Comparison
Open Charts GGLL vs QLD vs TQQQBanner chart's image
GGLL vs QLD vs TQQQ Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which ETF would AI Choose? Direxion Daily GOOGL Bull 2X Shares (GGLL) vs. ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD) vs. ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ)

Key Takeaways

  • GGLL offers 2x leveraged exposure to a single stock (GOOGL), resulting in extreme concentration risk versus the diversified Nasdaq-100 approaches of QLD (2x) and TQQQ (3x).
  • QLD and TQQQ track the Nasdaq-100 Index, providing broader technology-heavy exposure with ~100 holdings, while GGLL holds ~10-13 positions focused on derivatives and cash equivalents tied to one name.
  • Expense ratios are competitive: GGLL at 0.96%, QLD at 0.95% net, TQQQ at 0.82% net (with waiver), favoring cost efficiency in longer tactical holds.
  • TQQQ's 3x leverage amplifies volatility and potential returns but increases drawdown severity compared to QLD's balanced 2x profile and GGLL's single-stock swings.
  • All three employ daily rebalancing via swaps and derivatives, making them suited for short-term trading rather than buy-and-hold due to compounding effects.
  • Diversification depth positions QLD and TQQQ for sector rotation benefits, while GGLL targets precise GOOGL momentum in AI and cloud trends.

Introduction

Comparing GGLL, QLD, and TQQQ is timely amid surging interest in leveraged tech exposure during AI-driven market cycles. GGLL provides concentrated 2x daily leverage to Alphabet Class A shares (GOOGL), a key Nasdaq-100 constituent, while QLD and TQQQ offer 2x and 3x leverage, respectively, to the broader Nasdaq-100 Index of 100 large non-financial companies. These ETFs represent tiered risk approaches to the same innovation theme: GGLL for single-stock conviction, QLD for moderate amplification, and TQQQ for aggressive upside in tech rallies. Investors weigh structural trade-offs in concentration, volatility, and diversification as macroeconomic shifts like interest rates and earnings influence tech positioning.

Direxion Daily GOOGL Bull 2X Shares (GGLL) Overview

The Direxion Daily GOOGL Bull 2X Shares (GGLL) seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, of 200% of the performance of Alphabet Inc. Class A shares (GOOGL). Launched in September 2022, it is a non-diversified, leveraged ETF using swaps and derivatives for exposure. It typically holds 10-13 positions, including cash equivalents like government money market funds (~80-90%) and direct/swap exposure to GOOGL (~10-12%). Sector allocation is 100% Communication Services via Alphabet's dominance in digital advertising, cloud (Google Cloud), and AI. The gross/net expense ratio is 0.96%, with a waiver through September 2027. Daily rebalancing maintains leverage, amplifying volatility in this single-stock structure designed for tactical trading.

ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD) Overview

ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD), launched in June 2006, seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, of 2x the Nasdaq-100 Index—a modified market-cap-weighted benchmark of 100 large non-financial Nasdaq-listed companies. It holds ~120 positions via derivatives (swaps) and equities, with top exposures mirroring the index: NVIDIA (~6%), AAPL (~5%), MSFT (~4%), AMZN (~3.5%), and GOOGL. Sector breakdown aligns with the index: Technology ~54-66%, Communication Services ~16%, Consumer Discretionary ~13-19%. Net expense ratio is 0.95% (gross 0.98%). As a passive leveraged fund, it rebalances daily to target exposure, offering liquidity with tight bid-ask spreads.

ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ) Overview

ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ), inception February 2010, targets 3x the daily performance of the Nasdaq-100 Index before fees and expenses. It employs ~120 holdings, primarily swaps, cash equivalents (e.g., money market ETFs ~25-30%), and index components like NVDA (~3-5%), AAPL (~3%), MSFT (~2%). Sector allocations track the index: Technology ~54%, Communication Services ~16%, Consumer Discretionary ~13%, with minor Health Care and Industrials. Net expense ratio is 0.82% (gross 0.97%, waiver to September 2026). Daily rebalancing via derivatives supports high liquidity, positioning it for short-term bullish Nasdaq bets.

Industry and Thematic Landscape

The technology and communication services sectors underpinning these ETFs face dynamic macro drivers. The Nasdaq-100, heavily tilted toward technology (65.77%), benefits from AI adoption, cloud computing expansion, and semiconductor demand, with leaders like NVIDIA and Alphabet driving capital flows. Regulatory scrutiny on antitrust (e.g., big tech dominance), geopolitical tensions affecting supply chains, and interest rate sensitivity impact earnings trends. Sector risks include rapid innovation cycles leading to obsolescence, competition in advertising/cloud, and macroeconomic slowdowns curbing discretionary spending. Recent cycles show inflows during risk-on environments, but rotations to value amid inflation or recession fears pressure growth stocks.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent months, TQQQ has amplified Nasdaq-100 uptrends with 3x leverage, delivering superior gains in AI-fueled rallies but deeper drawdowns during volatility spikes, as seen in past cycles (-80%+ max drawdowns). QLD offers consistent trend capture with 2x sensitivity, lower volatility than TQQQ, and resilience in sideways markets. GGLL tracks GOOGL closely (2x), outperforming in Alphabet-specific surges from cloud/AI but underperforming amid ad revenue concerns or single-stock events, with higher relative volatility (~20% monthly vs. QLD's ~13%). Structural differences explain variances: GGLL's concentration heightens event risk, while QLD/TQQQ benefit from diversification; higher leverage in TQQQ boosts macro sensitivity.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization (market cap), technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener identifies trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening, empowering data-driven decisions in dynamic environments like leveraged ETF positioning. Explore it today for smarter screening.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron’s AI currently favors QLD for its optimal balance of 2x leverage, cost efficiency (0.95% net ER), diversification across ~100 Nasdaq-100 holdings, and momentum stability in recent tech uptrends. While TQQQ offers higher upside potential, its amplified drawdowns elevate risk; GGLL's single-stock focus limits broad positioning. QLD's profile suggests ~60-70% probability of superior risk-adjusted returns over coming weeks in stable growth scenarios, based on structural depth and lower concentration risk—not advice.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TQQQ has more net assets: 34B vs. QLD (13.2B) and GGLL (1.4B). TQQQ has a higher annual dividend yield than GGLL and QLD: TQQQ (38.790) vs GGLL (28.150) and QLD (27.196). GGLL was incepted earlier than QLD and TQQQ: GGLL (4 years) vs QLD (20 years) and TQQQ (16 years). TQQQ (0.82) has a lower expense ratio than QLD (0.95) and GGLL (0.96). TQQQ has a higher turnover QLD (16.00) and GGLL (0.00) vs QLD (16.00) and GGLL (0.00).
GGLLQLDTQQQ
Gain YTD28.15027.19638.790
Net Assets1.4B13.2B34B
Total Expense Ratio0.960.950.82
Turnover0.0016.0025.00
Yield3.330.120.37
Fund Existence4 years20 years16 years
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GGLLQLDTQQQ
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
89%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
89%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
90%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
87%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GGLL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
QLD
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
TQQQ
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
JCNRX30.54N/A
N/A
Janus Henderson Contrarian R
RWMGX67.92-0.87
-1.26%
American Funds Washington Mutual R6
MWEBX33.50-0.67
-1.96%
MFS Global Equity B
NFJEX11.80-0.25
-2.07%
Virtus NFJ Dividend Value Inst
TGVCX50.45-1.63
-3.13%
Touchstone Dynamic Large Cap Growth C

TQQQ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TQQQ has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TQQQ jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TQQQ
1D Price
Change %
TQQQ100%
-14.28%
LRCX - TQQQ
71%
Closely correlated
-9.85%
NVDA - TQQQ
68%
Closely correlated
-6.20%
KLAC - TQQQ
67%
Closely correlated
-9.47%
AMAT - TQQQ
67%
Closely correlated
-9.71%
ASML - TQQQ
66%
Loosely correlated
-6.59%
More