IONQ
Price
$56.59
Change
-$0.10 (-0.18%)
Updated
Jun 10, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
21.16B
63 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
QMCO
Price
$12.58
Change
-$0.47 (-3.60%)
Updated
Jun 10, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
190.15M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
RGTI
Price
$19.45
Change
-$0.25 (-1.27%)
Updated
Jun 10, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
6.54B
57 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

IONQ or QMCO or RGTI

Header iconIONQ vs QMCO vs RGTI Comparison
Open Charts IONQ vs QMCO vs RGTIBanner chart's image
IONQ vs QMCO vs RGTI Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which Stock Would AI Choose? IonQ, Inc. (IONQ) vs. Quantum Corporation (QMCO) vs. Rigetti Computing, Inc. (RGTI) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • IONQ leads with robust revenue growth, reporting Q1 2026 revenue of $64.7 million (up 755% YoY) and a market cap over $18 billion, driven by quantum computing advancements.
  • QMCO shows strong YTD gains of approximately 49%, trading around $9.62, supported by data storage demand in AI and unstructured data sectors.
  • RGTI exhibits high volatility with recent monthly gains over 25%, market cap near $6.3 billion, focusing on superconducting quantum processors and government contracts.
  • All three stocks operate in high-growth tech areas but differ in scale: IONQ and RGTI in quantum computing, QMCO in data storage, with varying YTD returns (IONQ +10%, RGTI -14%).
  • Recent momentum favors IONQ post-earnings surge (up 65% in a month), while QMCO and RGTI show solid short-term gains amid sector interest.
  • Risk profiles highlight IONQ's commercial traction versus peers' earlier-stage development and higher relative volatility.

Introduction

This comparison examines IONQ, QMCO, and RGTI—stocks at the intersection of quantum computing and data management—in today's dynamic market. IONQ and RGTI pioneer quantum hardware, while QMCO supports data storage needs amplified by AI growth. Traders seeking high-volatility plays in emerging tech and investors eyeing relative performance in quantum-related sectors will find value in analyzing their business models, recent momentum, and market positioning. With quantum advancements accelerating, these stocks offer insights into sector trends and trade-offs.

IONQ Overview and Recent Performance

IonQ, Inc. (IONQ) develops trapped-ion quantum computing systems, providing access via cloud platforms for complex computations beyond classical computers. In recent market activity, IONQ shares traded around $49, with a market cap exceeding $18 billion. The stock surged over 65% in the past month following Q1 2026 results, which delivered record revenue of $64.7 million—a 755% year-over-year increase—beating estimates and prompting raised full-year guidance to $260–$270 million. Key influences include strategic partnerships, a pending merger with SkyWater Technology, and growing commercial adoption, boosting sentiment despite ongoing losses and high valuation multiples.

QMCO Overview and Recent Performance

Quantum Corporation (QMCO) specializes in data storage and management solutions for unstructured data, video, and AI workloads, offering products like ActiveScale object storage and DXi backup appliances. Recently, shares hovered near $9.62, with a market cap around $140 million and YTD gains of about 49%, outperforming broader indices. In recent weeks, the stock rose over 48% monthly amid partnerships like one with Pink Elephant for sovereign cold storage in Europe. Earlier fiscal Q3 2026 revenue hit $74.6 million, exceeding guidance, though losses persisted; sentiment reflects demand for scalable storage in AI-driven environments, tempered by debt levels.

RGTI Overview and Recent Performance

Rigetti Computing, Inc. (RGTI) builds superconducting quantum processors and offers quantum computing as a service (QCaaS), targeting enterprises and governments with systems like the 84-qubit Ankaa-3. Shares traded around $19, with a $6.3 billion market cap; recent weeks saw over 25% monthly gains despite YTD declines of 14%. Momentum stems from launches like the 108-qubit modular system and government orders, including from India's Centre for Development of Advanced Computing. Q1 earnings anticipation builds on prior quarters' progress in qubit scaling, though revenue remains modest at $7 million TTM, influencing volatile sentiment around commercialization timelines.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page features 25+ top-performing AI trading bots selected from over 351 total bots that trade thousands of tickers across stocks, ETFs, and crypto. These curated bots excel in current market conditions, delivering annualized returns from 23% to 285%, win rates of 51–88%, and profit factors up to 11.7, spanning strategies like trend-following, multi-agent long/short, and sector rotation on 5–60 minute timeframes. Sectors include semiconductors, space infrastructure, data centers, and AI, with baskets of 3–18 tickers (e.g., NVDA, AMT). High performers like the Space Infrastructure bot boast 285% returns and 72% win rates. Explore these diverse trading styles—momentum, volatility, swing—for optimized performance; subscribe via Tickeron to copy top bots and enhance your strategy.

Head-to-Head Comparison

IONQ, QMCO, and RGTI contrast sharply in business models: IONQ and RGTI focus on quantum hardware (trapped-ion vs. superconducting), while QMCO emphasizes practical data storage. Growth drivers differ—IONQ's revenue scales fastest ($187M TTM) via cloud access, RGTI via qubit expansion and grants, QMCO ($263M TTM) via AI storage demand. Recent momentum favors IONQ (65% monthly) over QMCO (49%) and RGTI (25%). Risks include IONQ/ RGTI's losses and tech hurdles versus QMCO's debt; quantum peers show higher volatility. Valuation sensitivity is extreme for quantum stocks (high P/S), with QMCO more grounded; sentiment tilts to IONQ's catalysts amid sector hype.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron’s AI currently favors IONQ due to superior trend consistency from explosive revenue growth, stability via cash reserves ($2B+), near-term catalysts like partnerships, and leading relative positioning in quantum commercialization. While QMCO offers value in storage momentum and RGTI qubit progress, IONQ shows higher probability of outperformance in observable metrics, though all carry sector risks.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full Disclaimers and Limitations.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 11, 2026
Stock price -- (IONQ: $56.69QMCO: $12.99RGTI: $19.69)
Brand notoriety: IONQ, QMCO and RGTI are all not notable
The three companies represent the Computer Processing Hardware industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: IONQ: 101%, QMCO: 227%, RGTI: 109%
Market capitalization -- IONQ: $21.16B, QMCO: $190.15M, RGTI: $6.54B
$IONQ is valued at $21.16B, while QMCO has a market capitalization of $190.15M, and RGTI's market capitalization is $6.54B. The market cap for tickers in this @Computer Processing Hardware ranges from $247.99B to $0. The average market capitalization across the @Computer Processing Hardware industry is $24.82B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

IONQ’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileQMCO’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s), and RGTI’s FA Score reflects 0 green FA rating(s).

  • IONQ’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • QMCO’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • RGTI’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, IONQ is a better buy in the long-term than QMCO, which in turn is a better option than RGTI.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

IONQ’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while QMCO’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s), and RGTI’s TA Score reflects 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • IONQ’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • QMCO’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • RGTI’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, QMCO is a better buy in the short-term than RGTI, which in turn is a better option than IONQ.

Price Growth

IONQ (@Computer Processing Hardware) experienced а -20.60% price change this week, while QMCO (@Computer Processing Hardware) price change was +3.59% , and RGTI (@Computer Processing Hardware) price fluctuated -26.75% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Processing Hardware industry was -10.10%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +10.58%, and the average quarterly price growth was +26.48%.

Reported Earning Dates

IONQ is expected to report earnings on Aug 12, 2026.

RGTI is expected to report earnings on Aug 06, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Computer Processing Hardware (-10.10% weekly)

Computer Processing Hardware industry produces central processing unit, monitor, keyboard, computer data storage devices, and graphics card. Business activity and economic growth are potential drivers of this industry – if more businesses are growing or flourishing, so would their investments in computer equipment. Dell Technologies, Inc, Hewlett Packard Enterprise Co., NCR Corporation are key producers of computer processing hardware.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IONQ($21.2B) has a higher market cap than RGTI($6.55B) and QMCO($190M). QMCO YTD gains are higher at: 101.395 vs. IONQ (26.343) and RGTI (-11.106). QMCO has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -68.8M vs. RGTI (-211.57M) and IONQ (-710.97M). IONQ has more cash in the bank: 2.03B vs. RGTI (418M) and QMCO (13.2M). RGTI has less debt than IONQ and QMCO: RGTI (6.78M) vs IONQ (30.4M) and QMCO (137M). QMCO has higher revenues than IONQ and RGTI: QMCO (263M) vs IONQ (187M) and RGTI (10M).
IONQQMCORGTI
Capitalization21.2B190M6.55B
EBITDA-710.97M-68.8M-211.57M
Gain YTD26.343101.395-11.106
P/E Ratio145.36N/AN/A
Revenue187M263M10M
Total Cash2.03B13.2M418M
Total Debt30.4M137M6.78M
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
QMCO: Fundamental Ratings
QMCO
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
13
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
26
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
36
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
IONQQMCORGTI
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
84%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
83%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
IONQ
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
QMCO
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
RGTI
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ENPIX58.81N/A
N/A
ProFunds UltraSector Energy Investor
GMRIX15.40N/A
N/A
Nationwide Small Cap Index R6
FGIQX20.01N/A
N/A
Nomura Growth and Income R6
JATSX81.88N/A
N/A
Janus Henderson Glb Tech and Innovt S
CTSOX60.27-0.57
-0.94%
Calamos Timpani Small Cap Growth R6

QMCO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QMCO has been loosely correlated with QUBT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if QMCO jumps, then QUBT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To QMCO
1D Price
Change %
QMCO100%
+3.59%
QUBT - QMCO
54%
Loosely correlated
-9.04%
RGTI - QMCO
54%
Loosely correlated
-9.53%
QBTS - QMCO
52%
Loosely correlated
-8.94%
IONQ - QMCO
50%
Loosely correlated
-9.73%
AGMH - QMCO
43%
Loosely correlated
+5.93%
More