This comparison examines Levi Strauss (LEVI), PVH Corp. (PVH), and Ralph Lauren (RL), three established players in the global apparel and accessories sector. Investors and traders focused on consumer discretionary equities often review these names together due to shared exposure to fashion trends, retail dynamics, and macroeconomic factors affecting discretionary spending. The analysis highlights recent performance patterns, business fundamentals, and relative positioning to support informed evaluation of their market behavior in the current environment.
Levi Strauss (LEVI) designs, markets, and sells jeans, casual apparel, and related products under the Levi’s brand and other labels. In recent market activity, the company reported first-quarter 2026 results that exceeded expectations, with net revenues rising 14% year-over-year on a reported basis and 9% organically. Growth was broad-based across regions, including the Americas, supported by direct-to-consumer channel expansion. Recent weeks reflected continued investor attention to inventory levels and brand momentum following the earnings release and subsequent outlook adjustments.
PVH Corp. (PVH) owns and operates global lifestyle brands including Calvin Klein and Tommy Hilfiger, spanning apparel, accessories, and footwear. Recent market activity has centered on preparations for its first-quarter 2026 earnings release, expected shortly. Prior-quarter results demonstrated revenue growth, though analysts have noted potential margin headwinds from tariffs and uneven demand patterns. Stock movements in recent weeks have aligned with broader sector sentiment ahead of the upcoming report.
Ralph Lauren (RL) develops, markets, and distributes premium lifestyle products under the Ralph Lauren, Polo, and related brands. In recent market activity, the company announced fourth-quarter 2026 results that surpassed consensus estimates, with revenue reaching approximately $1.98 billion and adjusted earnings per share of $2.80. Strong contributions from Asia, particularly China, and North American retail performance supported the outcome. Recent weeks have featured positive follow-through on the earnings beat and updated fiscal 2027 guidance.
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page curates a selection of high-performing AI trading bots from hundreds available across the platform. These bots trade thousands of different tickers using varied strategies, timeframes, and performance metrics tailored to prevailing market conditions. Only those demonstrating consistent results, favorable statistics, and suitability for current environments are featured in this dynamic section. Readers interested in exploring automated trading approaches across diverse styles and ticker sets may review the page for additional details and performance ranges.
Levi Strauss (LEVI), PVH Corp. (PVH), and Ralph Lauren (RL) share apparel sector exposure yet differ in positioning: Levi Strauss emphasizes denim and casual wear with broad accessibility, PVH Corp. balances mid-tier lifestyle brands across wholesale and retail, and Ralph Lauren targets premium segments with stronger luxury-adjacent appeal. Recent momentum has favored names with clear earnings visibility, as seen in Ralph Lauren (RL)’s post-report gains versus the pre-earnings positioning for PVH Corp. (PVH). Risk factors include tariff impacts on margins for all three, though geographic diversification—particularly Asia for Ralph Lauren (RL) and Americas strength for Levi Strauss (LEVI)—provides varying buffers. Valuation multiples reflect differing growth profiles and stability perceptions, with consumer spending sensitivity and channel shifts (direct-to-consumer versus wholesale) creating trade-offs in relative resilience.
Based on observable factors such as recent earnings consistency, geographic momentum, and forward visibility, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a relatively higher probability of favorable near-term positioning to Ralph Lauren (RL) among the three, driven by its post-earnings execution and guidance. Levi Strauss (LEVI) follows closely given its earlier-cycle strength, while PVH Corp. (PVH) remains more dependent on the imminent report outcome. This assessment reflects probabilistic weighting of trend stability and catalysts rather than definitive outcomes.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
LEVI’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePVH’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s), and RL’s FA Score reflects 2 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
LEVI’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PVH’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s), and RL’s TA Score reflects 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
LEVI (@Apparel/Footwear) experienced а -2.89% price change this week, while PVH (@Apparel/Footwear) price change was -16.56% , and RL (@Apparel/Footwear) price fluctuated +0.73% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Apparel/Footwear industry was -3.39%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.99%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.49%.
LEVI is expected to report earnings on Jul 02, 2026.
PVH is expected to report earnings on Sep 01, 2026.
RL is expected to report earnings on Aug 11, 2026.
Apparel/footwear might be slightly more ‘cyclical’ in the largely non-cyclical category of non-durables. While digital giants like Amazon have been rapidly expanding their presence, traditional clothing/footwear retailers have also been bulking up their online presence in recent years, to milk the burgeoning trend of online shopping among consumers across the globe. The apparel and footwear retail market was valued at around $ 360 billion in 2018, and this figure was expected to reach about $386 billion by 2020 (according to a Statista report). NIKE, Inc, V.F. Corporation and Under Armour, Inc. are some of the companies with the largest U.S. stock market caps in this segment.
| LEVI | PVH | RL | |
| Capitalization | 8.67B | 3.59B | 21.8B |
| EBITDA | 949M | 518M | 1.43B |
| Gain YTD | 10.008 | 16.195 | 3.944 |
| P/E Ratio | 16.57 | 23.58 | 24.26 |
| Revenue | 6.5B | 8.95B | 7.83B |
| Total Cash | 812M | N/A | N/A |
| Total Debt | 2.32B | 4.3B | 2.86B |
LEVI | PVH | RL | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 8 | 26 | 78 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 23 Undervalued | 60 Fair valued | 63 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | 17 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 34 | 91 | 29 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 47 | 55 | 48 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 66 | 7 | 48 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
LEVI's Valuation (23) in the Apparel Or Footwear industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PVH (60) in the Apparel Or Footwear industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for RL (63) in the Apparel Or Footwear Retail industry. This means that LEVI's stock grew somewhat faster than PVH’s and somewhat faster than RL’s over the last 12 months.
RL's Profit vs Risk Rating (17) in the Apparel Or Footwear Retail industry is significantly better than the same rating for LEVI (100) in the Apparel Or Footwear industry, and is significantly better than the same rating for PVH (100) in the Apparel Or Footwear industry. This means that RL's stock grew significantly faster than LEVI’s and significantly faster than PVH’s over the last 12 months.
RL's SMR Rating (29) in the Apparel Or Footwear Retail industry is in the same range as LEVI (34) in the Apparel Or Footwear industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for PVH (91) in the Apparel Or Footwear industry. This means that RL's stock grew similarly to LEVI’s and somewhat faster than PVH’s over the last 12 months.
LEVI's Price Growth Rating (47) in the Apparel Or Footwear industry is in the same range as RL (48) in the Apparel Or Footwear Retail industry, and is in the same range as PVH (55) in the Apparel Or Footwear industry. This means that LEVI's stock grew similarly to RL’s and similarly to PVH’s over the last 12 months.
PVH's P/E Growth Rating (7) in the Apparel Or Footwear industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RL (48) in the Apparel Or Footwear Retail industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for LEVI (66) in the Apparel Or Footwear industry. This means that PVH's stock grew somewhat faster than RL’s and somewhat faster than LEVI’s over the last 12 months.
| LEVI | PVH | RL | |
|---|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 75% | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 80% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 79% | 3 days ago 66% | 3 days ago 71% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 67% | 3 days ago 64% | 3 days ago 63% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 67% | 3 days ago 73% | 3 days ago 83% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 71% | 3 days ago 75% | 3 days ago 73% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 70% | 3 days ago 74% | 3 days ago 71% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 69% | 5 days ago 70% | 13 days ago 72% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 66% | 3 days ago 74% | 5 days ago 61% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 71% | 3 days ago 70% | 3 days ago 68% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 65% | 3 days ago 75% | 3 days ago 60% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LEVI has been loosely correlated with SHOO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LEVI jumps, then SHOO could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LEVI | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LEVI | 100% | N/A | ||
| SHOO - LEVI | 59% Loosely correlated | -0.92% | ||
| CAL - LEVI | 55% Loosely correlated | -12.95% | ||
| CROX - LEVI | 54% Loosely correlated | -1.79% | ||
| RL - LEVI | 53% Loosely correlated | -0.05% | ||
| NKE - LEVI | 52% Loosely correlated | -1.47% | ||
More | ||||