A.I. Stock Market Predictions: Three Rising Valleys
Statistics for the Three Rising Valleys Pattern
If you’re a trader who likes bullish patterns, the “Three Rising Valleys” pattern is built for you. Take a look at the chart below for Goldman Sachs (ticker GS). Last summer, Tickeron's A.I. discovered a Three Rising Valleys bullish pattern and accurately predicted the stock price surge from the Breakout Price of $231.54 to the Target Price of $247.18 — a nearly +7% gain.
The Three Rising Valleys pattern forms when three minor Lows (1, 3, 5 on the chart) arrange along an upward sloping trend line. The pattern often appears at the end of a declining trend, as you can clearly see from March to June in the chart above. The Rising Valleys indicate that buyers are overtaking sellers, which ultimately pushes the price higher.
Goldman Sachs followed the pattern almost perfectly, with the stock progressively hitting higher lows last summer after a declining trend. Tickeron’s algorithms spotted the trend, and as soon as GS hit its Breakout Price of $231.54, the A.I. called for a Target Price of $247.18. Goldman Sachs hit it before the end of the year.
Microsoft was another stock that Tickeron’s A.I. confirmed in a Three Rising Valleys pattern. Check out the chart below, which was produced by the A.I. late last year:
The A.I. found the Three Rising Valleys (1,3,5) on September 21, 2017, and then waited for the stock to hit the Breakout Price of $74.71. When MSFT reached $74.71, Tickeron’s A.I. projected it would hit a Target Price of $77.44. For traders who were subscribed to this pattern, you would have received a notification in your inbox of a potential trade. Had the investor bought MSFT or a call option at the Breakout Price, there would have been a potential profit on the table.
How Effective is Tickeron’s A.I.?
Any reasonable investor or trader would say, “Ok, this looks great on paper. But how effective is Tickeron’s A.I. at making these predictions? Where are the statistics?”
See for yourself below. In instances where the A.I. was more than 40% confident that the price of the stock would move at least 7% higher to its target price, the A.I. was right more than 54.56% of the time. That’s a solid metric.
Another solid metric? When Tickeron’s A.I. was right, the average return on the trade was +14.13%
Ready to Start Trading?
For investors who enjoy trading the markets and looking for unique opportunities, it could make sense to add a new, Artificial Intelligence-powered tool to your investment toolbox. You can find this tool on tickeron.com.
Humans do not have the time or the ability to scan the markets day-in and day-out looking for patterns in stocks, ETFs, mutual funds, and cryptocurrencies. It is simply not possible — unless you get help from algorithms and A.I. Give Tickeron’s new platform a try to enhance your trading, by using hard data to trade patterns and make investment decisions. A 45-day trial is free, and you might be surprised at just how effective Artificial Intelligence can be when applied to trading.
GS saw its Stochastic Oscillator recovers from the overbought zone
The Stochastic Oscillator for GS moved out of overbought territory on July 09, 2025. This could be a bearish sign for the stock and investors may want to consider selling or taking a defensive position. A.I.dvisor looked at 68 similar instances where the indicator exited the overbought zone. In of the 68 cases the stock moved lower. This puts the odds of a downward move at .
Technical Analysis (Indicators)
Bearish Trend Analysis
The 10-day RSI Indicator for GS moved out of overbought territory on July 08, 2025. This could be a bearish sign for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 45 similar instances where the indicator moved out of overbought territory. In of the 45 cases, the stock moved lower in the following days. This puts the odds of a move lower at .
The Momentum Indicator moved below the 0 level on July 15, 2025. You may want to consider selling the stock, shorting the stock, or exploring put options on GS as a result. In of 73 cases where the Momentum Indicator fell below 0, the stock fell further within the subsequent month. The odds of a continued downward trend are .
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence Histogram (MACD) for GS turned negative on July 11, 2025. This could be a sign that the stock is set to turn lower in the coming weeks. Traders may want to sell the stock or buy put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 44 similar instances when the indicator turned negative. In of the 44 cases the stock turned lower in the days that followed. This puts the odds of success at .
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where GS declined for three days, the price rose further in of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are .
GS broke above its upper Bollinger Band on June 30, 2025. This could be a sign that the stock is set to drop as the stock moves back below the upper band and toward the middle band. You may want to consider selling the stock or exploring put options.
Bullish Trend Analysis
The 50-day moving average for GS moved above the 200-day moving average on June 10, 2025. This could be a long-term bullish signal for the stock as the stock shifts to an upward trend.
Following a 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where GS advanced for three days, in of 341 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are .
The Aroon Indicator entered an Uptrend today. In of 285 cases where GS Aroon's Indicator entered an Uptrend, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued Uptrend are .
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating outstanding price growth. GS’s price grows at a higher rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating low risk on high returns. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 68, placing this stock better than average.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is fair valued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (1.270) is normal, around the industry mean (5.755). P/E Ratio (18.081) is within average values for comparable stocks, (35.318). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (3.284) is also within normal values, averaging (2.610). Dividend Yield (0.026) settles around the average of (0.031) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (3.091) is also within normal values, averaging (82.424).
The Tickeron Seasonality Score of (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is fair valued in the industry. The Tickeron Seasonality score describes the variance of predictable price changes around the same period every calendar year. These changes can be tied to a specific month, quarter, holiday or vacation period, as well as a meteorological or growing season.
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to worse than average earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating weak sales and an unprofitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
Notable companies
Industry description
Market Cap
High and low price notable news
Volume
Fundamental Analysis Ratings
The average fundamental analysis ratings, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, are as follows
Advertisement
General Information
a provider of investment banking, securities and asset management services
Industry InvestmentBanksBrokers
Advertisement