Statistics for the Three Rising Valleys Pattern
If you’re a trader who likes bullish patterns, the “Three Rising Valleys” pattern is built for you. Take a look at the chart below for Goldman Sachs (ticker GS). Last summer, Tickeron's A.I. discovered a Three Rising Valleys bullish pattern and accurately predicted the stock price surge from the Breakout Price of $231.54 to the Target Price of $247.18 — a nearly +7% gain.
The Three Rising Valleys pattern forms when three minor Lows (1, 3, 5 on the chart) arrange along an upward sloping trend line. The pattern often appears at the end of a declining trend, as you can clearly see from March to June in the chart above. The Rising Valleys indicate that buyers are overtaking sellers, which ultimately pushes the price higher.
Goldman Sachs followed the pattern almost perfectly, with the stock progressively hitting higher lows last summer after a declining trend. Tickeron’s algorithms spotted the trend, and as soon as GS hit its Breakout Price of $231.54, the A.I. called for a Target Price of $247.18. Goldman Sachs hit it before the end of the year.
Microsoft was another stock that Tickeron’s A.I. confirmed in a Three Rising Valleys pattern. Check out the chart below, which was produced by the A.I. late last year:
The A.I. found the Three Rising Valleys (1,3,5) on September 21, 2017, and then waited for the stock to hit the Breakout Price of $74.71. When MSFT reached $74.71, Tickeron’s A.I. projected it would hit a Target Price of $77.44. For traders who were subscribed to this pattern, you would have received a notification in your inbox of a potential trade. Had the investor bought MSFT or a call option at the Breakout Price, there would have been a potential profit on the table.
How Effective is Tickeron’s A.I.?
Any reasonable investor or trader would say, “Ok, this looks great on paper. But how effective is Tickeron’s A.I. at making these predictions? Where are the statistics?”
See for yourself below. In instances where the A.I. was more than 40% confident that the price of the stock would move at least 7% higher to its target price, the A.I. was right more than 54.56% of the time. That’s a solid metric.
Another solid metric? When Tickeron’s A.I. was right, the average return on the trade was +14.13%
Ready to Start Trading?
For investors who enjoy trading the markets and looking for unique opportunities, it could make sense to add a new, Artificial Intelligence-powered tool to your investment toolbox. You can find this tool on tickeron.com.
Humans do not have the time or the ability to scan the markets day-in and day-out looking for patterns in stocks, ETFs, mutual funds, and cryptocurrencies. It is simply not possible — unless you get help from algorithms and A.I. Give Tickeron’s new platform a try to enhance your trading, by using hard data to trade patterns and make investment decisions. A 45-day trial is free, and you might be surprised at just how effective Artificial Intelligence can be when applied to trading.
It is expected that a price bounce should occur soon.
The Stochastic Oscillator shows that the ticker has stayed in the oversold zone for 6 days. The price of this ticker is presumed to bounce back soon, since the longer the ticker stays in the oversold zone, the more promptly an upward trend is expected.
Following a 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where GS advanced for three days, in of 347 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are .
GS may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options.
The Momentum Indicator moved below the 0 level on February 23, 2026. You may want to consider selling the stock, shorting the stock, or exploring put options on GS as a result. In of 76 cases where the Momentum Indicator fell below 0, the stock fell further within the subsequent month. The odds of a continued downward trend are .
GS moved below its 50-day moving average on February 27, 2026 date and that indicates a change from an upward trend to a downward trend.
The 10-day moving average for GS crossed bearishly below the 50-day moving average on February 24, 2026. This indicates that the trend has shifted lower and could be considered a sell signal. In of 18 past instances when the 10-day crossed below the 50-day, the stock continued to move higher over the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are .
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where GS declined for three days, the price rose further in of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are .
The Aroon Indicator for GS entered a downward trend on March 13, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating very strong sales and a profitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating low risk on high returns. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 83, placing this stock better than average.
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to consistent earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating steady price growth. GS’s price grows at a higher rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is slightly overvalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (2.114) is normal, around the industry mean (8.007). P/E Ratio (15.242) is within average values for comparable stocks, (64.914). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (1.385) is also within normal values, averaging (1.589). Dividend Yield (0.020) settles around the average of (0.034) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (4.263) is also within normal values, averaging (1503216.500).
The average fundamental analysis ratings, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, are as follows
a provider of investment banking, securities and asset management services
Industry InvestmentBanksBrokers