As finance analytics, I am pleased to report on the recent success of the AI bot Swing Trader TA-FA and NET's RSI indicator.
Firstly, the AI bot Swing Trader TA-FA has generated impressive returns for NET, with a 29.05% gain. Swing trading is a popular strategy that involves holding a position for a short period of time, typically ranging from a few days to a few weeks. It is a challenging strategy that requires a lot of market knowledge, technical analysis, and a sound trading plan. However, AI-powered bots like Swing Trader TA-FA can analyze vast amounts of data and identify trading opportunities that human traders may miss. In this case, Swing Trader TA-FA has demonstrated its ability to generate significant returns for NET, which is a positive sign for traders who are considering using AI-powered bots in their trading strategies.
Secondly, NET's RSI indicator has recovered from oversold territory. The Relative Strength Index (RSI) is a momentum indicator that measures the magnitude of recent price changes to evaluate overbought or oversold conditions in the market. When the RSI is above 70, it suggests that an asset is overbought and due for a correction, while an RSI below 30 indicates that an asset is oversold and may be due for a rebound. In the case of NET, the RSI had previously fallen into oversold territory, indicating that the stock may have been undervalued. However, the RSI has since recovered, suggesting that the stock is regaining momentum and attracting more buyers.
Overall, these developments are positive signs for NET and its investors. The use of AI-powered bots like Swing Trader TA-FA can help traders identify profitable trading opportunities, while technical indicators like the RSI can provide valuable insights into market trends and conditions.
NET saw its Momentum Indicator move above the 0 level on May 12, 2023. This is an indication that the stock could be shifting in to a new upward move. Traders may want to consider buying the stock or buying call options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 65 similar instances where the indicator turned positive. In of the 65 cases, the stock moved higher in the following days. The odds of a move higher are at .
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for NET just turned positive on May 15, 2023. Looking at past instances where NET's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in of 38 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are .
NET moved above its 50-day moving average on May 18, 2023 date and that indicates a change from a downward trend to an upward trend.
The 10-day moving average for NET crossed bullishly above the 50-day moving average on May 26, 2023. This indicates that the trend has shifted higher and could be considered a buy signal. In of 13 past instances when the 10-day crossed above the 50-day, the stock continued to move higher over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are .
Following a 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where NET advanced for three days, in of 248 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are .
The Aroon Indicator entered an Uptrend today. In of 209 cases where NET Aroon's Indicator entered an Uptrend, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued Uptrend are .
The RSI Oscillator demonstrated that the stock has entered the overbought zone. This may point to a price pull-back soon.
The Stochastic Oscillator has been in the overbought zone for 1 day. Expect a price pull-back in the near future.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where NET declined for three days, the price rose further in of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are .
NET broke above its upper Bollinger Band on May 18, 2023. This could be a sign that the stock is set to drop as the stock moves back below the upper band and toward the middle band. You may want to consider selling the stock or exploring put options.
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating steady price growth. NET’s price grows at a higher rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is significantly overvalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (31.056) is normal, around the industry mean (31.357). P/E Ratio (0.000) is within average values for comparable stocks, (167.955). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (2.604) is also within normal values, averaging (4.102). Dividend Yield (0.000) settles around the average of (0.033) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (19.048) is also within normal values, averaging (70.673).
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating weak sales and an unprofitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to worse than average earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. NET’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 89, placing this stock worse than average.
The average fundamental analysis ratings, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, are as follows