AI Trading Bot Generated Impressive 7.34% Returns for MULN, but Technical Analysis Signals Potential Downturn
Swing Trader's Volatility Balanced Strategy v.2 (TA) AI trading bot has been generating impressive returns for MULN over the past year, with a return of 7.34%. However, technical analysis signals a potential downturn in the stock's future. On April 24, 2023, MULN's Momentum Indicator moved below the 0 level, indicating that the stock could be shifting into a new downward move.
Traders who hold MULN may want to consider selling the stock or exploring put options, as the odds of a decline are at 90%. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor has looked at 80 similar instances where the Momentum Indicator turned negative, and in 77 of those cases, the stock moved further down in the following days.
While Swing Trader's AI trading bot has been successful in generating profits for MULN in the past, traders should always be aware of potential risks and market signals. Using technical analysis tools like the Momentum Indicator can help traders make informed decisions about when to buy and sell stocks, and utilizing AI trading bots can help remove emotion from the trading process and lead to more consistent profits.
MULN in -33.28% downward trend, declining for three consecutive days on March 27, 2025
Moving lower for three straight days is viewed as a bearish sign. Keep an eye on this stock for future declines. Considering data from situations where MULN declined for three days, in of 462 cases, the price declined further within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are .
Technical Analysis (Indicators)
Bearish Trend Analysis
The Aroon Indicator for MULN entered a downward trend on March 27, 2025. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.
Bullish Trend Analysis
The Tickeron Seasonality Score of (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is fair valued in the industry. The Tickeron Seasonality score describes the variance of predictable price changes around the same period every calendar year. These changes can be tied to a specific month, quarter, holiday or vacation period, as well as a meteorological or growing season.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is fair valued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (0.155) is normal, around the industry mean (6.202). P/E Ratio (0.001) is within average values for comparable stocks, (17.826). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.000) is also within normal values, averaging (5.723). MULN has a moderately low Dividend Yield (0.000) as compared to the industry average of (0.042). P/S Ratio (14.265) is also within normal values, averaging (77.712).
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating slightly worse than average price growth. MULN’s price grows at a lower rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to worse than average earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating weak sales and an unprofitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. MULN’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 83, placing this stock worse than average.
Notable companies
Industry description
Market Cap
High and low price notable news
Volume
Fundamental Analysis Ratings
The average fundamental analysis ratings, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, are as follows
General Information
Industry MotorVehicles