Burlington Stores, Inc. (NYSE: BURL) ranks among the largest off-price retailers in the United States, offering branded apparel, footwear, accessories, baby products, beauty items, and home goods at everyday low prices. Based in Burlington, New Jersey, the company grew from the Burlington Coat Factory concept of the early 1970s into a broad off-price operator with roughly 1,287 stores spanning 47 states, Washington D.C., and Puerto Rico.
The merchandising approach centers on sourcing excess inventory, closeouts, and opportunistic purchases, which lets the retailer pass brand-name products to customers below typical department-store levels. I have been following the name because of its ambitious expansion plans—management aims for more than 1,500 locations by 2028 and roughly 115 net new openings in fiscal 2026—alongside a history of turning sales growth into margin gains and double-digit earnings increases. I also checked this using Tickeron’s AI Screener to see how the stock compares to others in the industry.
From July 30 to August 28, 2026, BURL shares declined approximately 26.7%, moving from a close of $372.19 down to $272.95, or about $99 per share lower. Most of the damage occurred late in the period: the stock fell roughly 7.6% on August 27 after the quarterly release and another 5.9% the following day.
Over the full trailing three months the picture looks somewhat different. Shares started near $324 in late May, climbed to an intraday peak around $378 in late July, then reversed. Measured from late-May levels, the stock finished the quarter down about 16%, with the entire drop coming after that July high.
The main trigger was the second-quarter fiscal 2026 earnings release on August 27. BURL posted adjusted EPS of $2.37, up 38% year over year and ahead of the roughly $2.17 consensus, extending its streak of double-digit earnings growth to 15 quarters. Total sales rose 11% to about $3.0 billion, yet revenue came in just below the $3.02–$3.03 billion expected range, and comparable-store sales growth eased to 2% from 5% a year earlier.
Investors zeroed in on the outlook. Third-quarter adjusted EPS guidance of $1.60–$1.70 missed the roughly $2.04 consensus, with management forecasting a 60-to-80-basis-point decline in operating margins. That guidance incorporates the choice to reinvest $55 million in tariff refunds—roughly $0.64 per share—into lower prices across the third and fourth quarters instead of keeping the benefit. Although full-year EPS guidance was lifted to $11.77–$11.97, the near-term margin pressure and a more cautious tone on moderate- and lower-income consumers weighed on sentiment. In my view, the decision to pass savings along quickly makes sense strategically but clearly surprised the market.
Analyst and insider moves added to the tone. Citigroup downgraded the shares to Neutral in early August, while UBS lifted its price target to $440 and Morgan Stanley kept an Overweight rating. Insiders sold more than $10 million of stock over the prior three months, which reinforced a cautious stance at a time when the stock’s premium valuation faced renewed scrutiny.
The period opened with positive momentum. Strong first-quarter results—14% total sales growth and 6% comparable-store growth—plus record store openings and margin expansion helped push shares toward their late-July high near $378. Through the first half of the quarter, the off-price value story and the “Burlington 2.0” smaller-store model kept investors engaged.
The reversal came from a mix of factors: a valuation around 24x trailing earnings, softening comparable-sales trends, and wider worries about consumer spending among lower-income households. The late-August earnings report crystallized those concerns, and the combination of softer Q3 guidance and the tariff-refund reinvestment decision produced a rapid repricing.
Looking ahead, the most important near-term catalysts are the third-quarter fiscal 2026 earnings report, expected in late November, and the holiday quarter, for which management has guided adjusted EPS of $5.05–$5.15. I’m watching closely to see whether comparable-store sales stay within the 1%–3% band and whether the decision to lower prices lifts traffic and conversion as hoped.
Broader consumer-health signals—gasoline prices, wage growth, and spending patterns among moderate- and lower-income households—remain important variables for the off-price sector. The pace of store openings, margin sustainability, and progress toward the 1,500-store target will also shape the longer-term outlook. Analyst expectations, with an average price target near $371.50, will continue to influence sentiment as fresh data arrives. From what I see, monitoring these elements should help clarify whether the post-earnings reset creates an opportunity or signals further near-term caution.
When evaluating names like BURL after volatile moves, I often turn to Tickeron’s AI Trading Bots to test how automated strategies have performed across similar setups. These bots apply data-driven signals to thousands of tickers and can highlight patterns that might otherwise be missed in manual review. Exploring the platform’s bot offerings has become a regular part of my process for cross-checking both short-term momentum and longer-term trend ideas.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
Financial analyst and market blogger with expertise in equity research, fundamental analysis, and macroeconomic trends. I regularly publish coverage on individual stocks, ETFs, and sector developments — combining rigorous financial analysis with clear, engaging writing for a broad investment audience.
The RSI Oscillator for BURL moved out of oversold territory on September 21, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is shifting from a downward trend to an upward trend. Traders may want to buy the stock or call options. The A.I.dvisor looked at 24 similar instances when the indicator left oversold territory. In 22 of the 24 cases the stock moved higher. This puts the odds of a move higher at 90%.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for BURL just turned positive on September 21, 2026. Looking at past instances where BURL's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 34 of 41 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 83%.
Following a +1.62% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where BURL advanced for three days, in 219 of 305 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 72%.
The Aroon Indicator entered an Uptrend today. In 180 of 250 cases where BURL Aroon's Indicator entered an Uptrend, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued Uptrend are 72%.
The Stochastic Oscillator may be shifting from an upward trend to a downward trend. In 40 of 63 cases where BURL's Stochastic Oscillator exited the overbought zone, the price fell further within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 63%.
The Momentum Indicator moved below the 0 level on October 13, 2026. You may want to consider selling the stock, shorting the stock, or exploring put options on BURL as a result. In 64 of 95 cases where the Momentum Indicator fell below 0, the stock fell further within the subsequent month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 67%.
The 50-day moving average for BURL moved below the 200-day moving average on September 25, 2026. This could be a long-term bearish signal for the stock as the stock shifts to an downward trend.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where BURL declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 67%.
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 25 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating very strong sales and a profitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 57 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating steady price growth. BURL’s price grows at a higher rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 66 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to average earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 78 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is slightly overvalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: BURL's P/B Ratio (8.354) is slightly higher than the industry average of (3.366). P/E Ratio (23.934) is within average values for comparable stocks, (154.317). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.955) is also within normal values, averaging (0.517). Dividend Yield (0.000) settles around the average of (0.013) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (1.212) is also within normal values, averaging (0.652).
The Tickeron Seasonality Score of 95 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is significantly overvalued in the industry. The Tickeron Seasonality score describes the variance of predictable price changes around the same period every calendar year. These changes can be tied to a specific month, quarter, holiday or vacation period, as well as a meteorological or growing season.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 100 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. BURL’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 87, placing this stock worse than average.
The average fundamental analysis ratings, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, are as follows
a provider of men's, women's and children's apparel
Industry ApparelFootwearRetail