GET DAILY SIGNALSCIBR vs HACK: Weighing Two Cybersecurity ETFs
Key Takeaways
- Both ETFs provide targeted exposure to the cybersecurity theme through passive indexing strategies, but CIBR offers broader diversification with roughly twice as many holdings as HACK.
- CIBR tracks the Nasdaq CTA Cybersecurity Index and maintains a net expense ratio of 0.58%, while HACK follows the Nasdaq ISE Cyber Security Select Index at 0.60%.
- Top holdings overlap significantly in pure-play cybersecurity names such as PANW, CRWD, and FTNT, yet HACK incorporates a higher allocation to defense contractors including NOC and GD.
- CIBR exhibits a more balanced sector profile with meaningful exposure across software, hardware, and select industrials, whereas HACK tends toward greater concentration in a smaller basket of names.
- Structural differences in index construction and rebalancing frequency influence relative positioning, with both funds rebalanced quarterly and focused exclusively on companies where cybersecurity activities represent a core business driver.
- In the current market environment, investors compare the two for cost efficiency, liquidity, and the degree of pure-play versus diversified cybersecurity exposure within the broader technology and industrials sectors.
Why Cybersecurity ETFs Continue to Draw Attention
Cybersecurity remains a durable secular growth theme driven by rising digitalization, regulatory requirements, and persistent threat landscapes. The CIBR and HACK both deliver pure-play exposure to companies whose primary business involves cybersecurity solutions. While they compete directly within the same thematic niche, structural distinctions in index methodology, number of holdings, and sector weighting create meaningful differences in risk and return profiles that warrant comparison for investors seeking targeted sector exposure. I also checked this using Tickeron’s AI Screener to see how the funds align with broader industry patterns.
A Closer Look at CIBR
The CIBR seeks to track the performance of the Nasdaq CTA Cybersecurity Index. The fund employs a passive strategy and holds approximately 44 securities, with a net expense ratio of 0.58%. It maintains at least 90% exposure to index constituents classified as cybersecurity companies by the Consumer Technology Association. Top holdings typically include PANW, CRWD, FTNT, CSCO, and AVGO. Sector allocations emphasize technology services and electronic technology, with smaller weights in industrials such as aerospace and defense. The index applies a modified liquidity-weighted methodology with concentration caps and undergoes quarterly rebalancing. CIBR is structured as an open-end fund listed on NASDAQ.
A Closer Look at HACK
The HACK seeks investment results that correspond to the Nasdaq ISE Cyber Security Select Index. Launched in 2014 as the first dedicated cybersecurity ETF, it follows a passive approach with approximately 23 holdings and a net expense ratio of 0.60%. The index focuses on companies where cybersecurity represents a key business driver, split between infrastructure providers and service providers. Prominent holdings often feature PANW, CRWD, AVGO, CSCO, and defense names such as NOC and GD. Sector exposure centers on technology with a notable industrials component. The index is reconstituted and rebalanced quarterly using market-capitalization weighting subject to caps. HACK trades on NYSE Arca as an open-end fund.
The Broader Industry Context
The cybersecurity sector benefits from sustained demand fueled by expanding attack surfaces, enterprise digital transformation, and evolving compliance mandates across industries. Macroeconomic factors including interest-rate expectations and corporate capital-spending cycles influence technology budgets, while geopolitical tensions can accelerate defense-related cybersecurity spending. Both ETFs operate within a non-diversified structure, exposing investors to concentrated thematic risks such as rapid technological change, competitive intensity, and regulatory developments in data privacy and export controls. Capital flows into cybersecurity-themed products have remained resilient through recent market cycles, reflecting the sector’s defensive growth characteristics amid broader equity volatility.
Performance Patterns and Positioning
Over recent market cycles, both ETFs have exhibited elevated volatility relative to broad equity benchmarks, driven by earnings sensitivity among top holdings and shifts in growth-stock sentiment. CIBR’s larger number of holdings generally supports modestly lower idiosyncratic risk and smoother relative performance during sector rotations. HACK’s more concentrated profile can amplify returns when defense and large-cap cybersecurity names lead, yet it may experience sharper drawdowns during periods of software-sector weakness. Relative positioning reflects differences in defense exposure and index weighting schemes, with performance divergences often tied to the earnings trajectories of shared holdings and broader macroeconomic drivers such as corporate IT spending and interest-rate paths. From what I see, these nuances matter when constructing a thematic allocation.
Using AI Tools in ETF Research
When evaluating thematic ETFs like these, I turn to Tickeron’s AI Screener to filter holdings by technical patterns, fundamentals, and sector trends. It helps surface comparable ideas quickly without manual effort, which supports more informed decisions on diversification and risk. This approach has proven useful for refining exposure in areas such as cybersecurity.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
Contributor
With a background in economics and swing trading, I write about market trends, technical setups, momentum, and opportunities that develop over several days or weeks. I combine economic perspective with practical trading experience to explain why stocks move, what trends may be developing, and which market signals are worth watching.
CIBR's RSI Oscillator climbs out of oversold territory
The RSI Oscillator for CIBR moved out of oversold territory on November 09, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is shifting from a downward trend to an upward trend. Traders may want to buy the stock or call options. The A.I.dvisor looked at 20 similar instances when the indicator left oversold territory. In 20 of the 20 cases the stock moved higher. This puts the odds of a move higher at 90%.
Technical Analysis (Indicators)
Bullish Trend Analysis
The Stochastic Oscillator shows that the ticker has stayed in the oversold zone for 6 days. The price of this ticker is presumed to bounce back soon, since the longer the ticker stays in the oversold zone, the more promptly an upward trend is expected.
Following a +4.03% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where CIBR advanced for three days, in 307 of 357 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 86%.
CIBR may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options.
Bearish Trend Analysis
The Momentum Indicator moved below the 0 level on November 02, 2026. You may want to consider selling the stock, shorting the stock, or exploring put options on CIBR as a result. In 64 of 79 cases where the Momentum Indicator fell below 0, the stock fell further within the subsequent month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 81%.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence Histogram (MACD) for CIBR turned negative on October 30, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to turn lower in the coming weeks. Traders may want to sell the stock or buy put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 46 similar instances when the indicator turned negative. In 42 of the 46 cases the stock turned lower in the days that followed. This puts the odds of success at 90%.
CIBR moved below its 50-day moving average on October 30, 2026 date and that indicates a change from an upward trend to a downward trend.
The 10-day moving average for CIBR crossed bearishly below the 50-day moving average on November 06, 2026. This indicates that the trend has shifted lower and could be considered a sell signal. In 11 of 15 past instances when the 10-day crossed below the 50-day, the stock continued to move higher over the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 73%.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where CIBR declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 81%.
The Aroon Indicator for CIBR entered a downward trend on November 10, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.
Notable companies
Industry description
Market Cap
High and low price notable news
Volume
Fundamental Analysis Ratings
The average fundamental analysis ratings, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, are as follows
Advertisement
Advertisement