Go to the list of all blogs
Sergey Savastiouk's Avatar
published in Blogs
Sep 03, 2026
D-Wave Quantum (QBTS): Can It Reclaim the $40 Level?

D-Wave Quantum (QBTS): Can It Reclaim the $40 Level?

Key Takeaways

  • Investors continue to ask whether D-Wave Quantum Inc. (QBTS) can return to the $40 level, a round-number target cited by several Wall Street firms.
  • The main bullish argument centers on an order book that has grown sharply even while reported revenue has remained modest, alongside expanding production deployments and U.S. government support.
  • The primary challenges include uneven revenue recognition, widening operating losses, a valuation that embeds significant future growth, and a technical picture that sits below key moving averages.
  • Key support rests near the 52-week low around $12.75, with resistance in the low-$20s and again near prior highs around $46.75.
  • Reaching $40 would require roughly a 140% advance from recent levels, so the outlook hinges on bookings converting into recognized revenue more rapidly than they have to date.

Why the $40 Level Draws Attention

D-Wave Quantum develops quantum annealing computing systems, software, and services, and it has drawn steady interest within the emerging quantum-computing space. After reaching a peak near $46.75 in late 2025, the stock has retreated and recently traded around $16.50, giving the company a market capitalization near $6.1 billion. That pullback has led many investors to wonder whether QBTS can realistically revisit the $40 mark.

The $40 level is not random. Firms including Cantor Fitzgerald, Jefferies, Craig-Hallum, and Wedbush have issued $40 price targets, positioning the round number in the upper half of the consensus range. Because the stock has already traded above $40, the target represents a return to familiar territory rather than a leap into unknown valuation territory.

Current Market Position

Recent results present a mixed picture. In the latest quarter, revenue held essentially flat year over year at about $3.1 million and fell short of estimates, while the adjusted EBITDA loss widened to roughly $37.1 million amid higher spending on development and commercialization. The company closed the period with approximately $546 million in cash and marketable securities, a sizable buffer that shrank partly due to the roughly $250 million acquisition of Quantum Circuits.

Demand signals, however, strengthened markedly. First-half bookings jumped more than 1,120% year over year to about $35.5 million, and remaining performance obligations rose to roughly $40.7 million. Management expects a meaningful share of that backlog to convert within twelve months, and a roughly $20 million system sale to Florida Atlantic University is slated for delivery and recognition largely in the fourth quarter.

Factors That Could Support Further Gains

The clearest route to $40 runs through revenue conversion. Successful shipment of annealing systems and recognition of the RPO as sales would lift the top line and validate the demand already secured. Management also plans to deliver a 17-qubit gate-based system by the end of 2026 and has mapped a longer roadmap toward fault-tolerant, 100-logical-qubit systems by 2032.

Commercial traction is expanding in ways that could underpin a higher valuation. Six customer applications are now running in production, and production use accounts for more than a third of quantum-computing-as-a-service revenue, a sharp increase from the prior year. Deployments with large customers have shown measurable operational gains, and a partnership in financial-crime detection points to wider enterprise use. U.S. government backing, including up to $100 million under the CHIPS Act, adds further validation of the dual annealing and gate-based strategy. I also checked this using Tickeron’s AI Trend Prediction Engine to see how the broader sector momentum compares.

Obstacles That Could Limit Upside

Several hurdles stand between the current price and $40. Revenue remains lumpy and tied to a small number of large system sales, so quarterly results can vary sharply. The company is still deeply unprofitable, and a valuation that already prices in years of growth leaves little margin for execution shortfalls. Competition from better-funded names such as IonQ (IONQ) and Rigetti Computing (RGTI), along with large technology incumbents, raises the bar for sustained commercial progress.

Volatility is another consideration. With a beta well above 2, QBTS has seen frequent double-digit single-day moves, and recent insider selling adds a note of caution. Failure to convert bookings into revenue could keep the shares range-bound well below the $40 goal.

Analyst Targets and Technical Levels

Analyst sentiment stays largely positive. The consensus recommendation sits in “buy” territory, with an average price target of roughly $35 to $36, a low near $22, and a high near $43 to $45. The $40 objective therefore sits modestly above the consensus average yet receives backing from multiple individual firm targets.

From a technical standpoint the outlook is more guarded. The stock has traded below both its 50-day and 200-day moving averages, signaling a downtrend that has not yet reversed. The 52-week low near $12.75 remains the key support level, while the low-$20s represent an initial resistance that would need to be cleared before a sustained move toward $40 becomes realistic.

Monitoring QBTS with AI Tools

When tracking names like QBTS and the wider quantum-computing group, I often rely on Tickeron’s AI Daily Buy/Sell Signals as part of my routine review. The tool applies artificial intelligence to scan thousands of stocks and ETFs, producing automated Buy, Sell, or Hold signals drawn from technical behavior, trend shifts, and AI-driven analysis. This helps surface fresh ideas, follow existing holdings, and spot changing conditions more quickly than manual checks alone would allow, which is especially useful in volatile sectors where momentum can shift rapidly.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

Related Ticker: QBTS

Contributor

Sergey Savastiouk, Ph.D. has a degree in Applied Mathematics from Moscow University and has extensive experience as an entrepreneur, investor, manager, and mathematician. His professional expertise is in applied mathematics, mathematical modeling, system and pattern analysis, and software and hardware system integration. He has served as the CEO of several hi-tech start-up companies and nonprofit organizations, which has given him proven capabilities in business strategy for high-tech start-up companies, market assessment, company formation, team building, product development, marketing, and sales. He has published numerous articles in journals and magazines on related fields. As a retail investor, he spent 15 years developing his proprietary trading and quantitative algorithms (now Tickeron’s A.I.), which brought him significant returns in trading the stock market. His current work and goal in founding Tickeron is to bring professional, sophisticated stock market analysis capabilities to retail investors via an easy-to-use interface.


QBTS in upward trend: price may ascend as a result of having broken its lower Bollinger Band on October 08, 2026

QBTS may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options. In 27 of 30 cases where QBTS's price broke its lower Bollinger Band, its price rose further in the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 90%.

Price Prediction Chart

Technical Analysis (Indicators)

Bullish Trend Analysis

The RSI Indicator demonstrates that the ticker has stayed in the oversold zone for 1 day, which means it's wise to expect a price bounce in the near future.

The Stochastic Oscillator shows that the ticker has stayed in the oversold zone for 7 days. The price of this ticker is presumed to bounce back soon, since the longer the ticker stays in the oversold zone, the more promptly an upward trend is expected.

Following a +1.02% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where QBTS advanced for three days, in 166 of 195 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 85%.

Bearish Trend Analysis

The Momentum Indicator moved below the 0 level on October 01, 2026. You may want to consider selling the stock, shorting the stock, or exploring put options on QBTS as a result. In 63 of 67 cases where the Momentum Indicator fell below 0, the stock fell further within the subsequent month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 90%.

The Moving Average Convergence Divergence Histogram (MACD) for QBTS turned negative on October 02, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to turn lower in the coming weeks. Traders may want to sell the stock or buy put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 33 similar instances when the indicator turned negative. In 31 of the 33 cases the stock turned lower in the days that followed. This puts the odds of success at 90%.

Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where QBTS declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 87%.

The Aroon Indicator for QBTS entered a downward trend on September 25, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.

Fundamental Analysis (Ratings)

The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 65 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating fairly steady price growth. QBTS’s price grows at a lower rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.

The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 78 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is slightly overvalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (5.882) is normal, around the industry mean (7.321). P/E Ratio (0.000) is within average values for comparable stocks, (51.117). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.000) is also within normal values, averaging (23.994). Dividend Yield (0.000) settles around the average of (0.004) among similar stocks. QBTS's P/S Ratio (476.190) is very high in comparison to the industry average of (51.774).

The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 96 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating weak sales and an unprofitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.

The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 100 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to worse than average earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.

The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 100 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. QBTS’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 87, placing this stock worse than average.

Notable companies

The most notable companies in this group are Dell Technologies (NYSE:DELL), Arista Networks Inc (NYSE:ANET), Seagate Technology Holdings PLC (NASDAQ:STX), Western Digital Corp (NASDAQ:WDC), HP (NYSE:HPQ), 3D Systems Corp (NYSE:DDD).

Industry description

Computer Processing Hardware industry produces central processing unit, monitor, keyboard, computer data storage devices, and graphics card. Business activity and economic growth are potential drivers of this industry – if more businesses are growing or flourishing, so would their investments in computer equipment. Dell Technologies, Inc, Hewlett Packard Enterprise Co., NCR Corporation are key producers of computer processing hardware.

Market Cap

The average market capitalization across the Computer Processing Hardware Industry is 32.27B. The market cap for tickers in the group ranges from -0.18 to 345.52B. DELL holds the highest valuation in this group at 345.52B. The lowest valued company is HAUP at -0.18.

High and low price notable news

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the Computer Processing Hardware Industry was -5%. For the same Industry, the average monthly price growth was -4%, and the average quarterly price growth was 34%. QTEX experienced the highest price growth at 70%, while MCRP experienced the biggest fall at -32%.

Volume

The average weekly volume growth across all stocks in the Computer Processing Hardware Industry was -57%. For the same stocks of the Industry, the average monthly volume growth was -9% and the average quarterly volume growth was -39%

Fundamental Analysis Ratings

The average fundamental analysis ratings, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, are as follows

Valuation Rating: 44
P/E Growth Rating: 66
Price Growth Rating: 57
SMR Rating: 79
Profit Risk Rating: 86
Seasonality Score: 24 (-100 ... +100)
View a ticker or compare two or three
QBTS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interact to see
Advertisement
A.I.Advisor
published price charts
A.I. Advisor
published General Information

General Information

Industry ComputerProcessingHardware

Industry
N/A
Address
2650 East Bayshore Road
Phone
+1 650 285-28812
Employees
382
Web
https://www.dwavequantum.com
Interact to see
Advertisement
The Bitwise Solana Staking ETF (BSOL) advanced roughly 18% over the trailing 30 days, closely tracking a sharp rally in Solana (SOL). The move extends a broader recovery, with BSOL up approximately 77% over the past three months from its mid-2026 trough.
MSTY is an actively managed single-stock option income ETF (exchange-traded fund) that writes call options on Strategy (MSTR), formerly MicroStrategy, to generate current income. The portfolio is anchored by U.S. Treasury bills and MSTR option contracts rather than a diversified basket of equities, concentrating exposure in one volatile underlying.
AMDL has surged roughly +64% over the past 30 days, from about $47.59 to $78.10, mirroring a powerful rally in its sole underlying stock, AMD . The fund is a leveraged single-stock ETF (exchange-traded fund) designed to deliver 2x the daily return of AMD, amplifying both gains and losses.
TSMX, a 2x daily leveraged single-stock ETF (exchange-traded fund), rose roughly +19% over the trailing 30 days, rebounding sharply from mid-September lows. The fund seeks 200% of the daily return of TSM (Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing), meaning its moves are roughly double the underlying stock's daily swings.
Contracted revenue anchor: A roughly $3.2 billion, seven-year LNG (liquefied natural gas) supply agreement with Puerto Rico has received final approval, providing multi-year cash-flow visibility if execution stays on track. Project pipeline inflection: Upcoming milestones include the Barcarena and PortoCem power plants in Brazil, a potential Gás Sul terminal restart, and optimization of the company's modular "Fast LNG" (FLNG) liquefaction fleet.
AMD (Advanced Micro Devices) designs central processing units (CPUs), graphics processing units (GPUs), and AI accelerators, while LRCX (Lam Research) supplies the wafer-fabrication equipment used to build advanced chips. AMD has delivered strong double-digit revenue growth on AI data-center demand, but its shares trade with elevated expectations that can trigger sharp reactions around earnings.
Origination momentum: Velocity Financial enters 2026 off record annual originations of roughly $2.7 billion (up about 48%), positioning it to keep gaining share in a fragmented investor-loan market. Credit normalization is the central watch item: Nonperforming loans fell toward the 8.5% range of portfolio unpaid principal balance (UPB), but asset quality remains the primary swing factor for earnings.
Turnaround milestone ahead: Management has pointed to reaching cash generation in 2027, making the pace of cost discipline and margin recovery the central question for the stock forecast. Fresh capital supports execution: A recently announced $45.5 million equity financing, with participation from management and a single institutional investor, strengthens the balance sheet as the company funds its transformation.
NFE closed at $5.51, down -6.13% during Tuesday's regular session, extending a slide that has pushed shares near a 52-week low. Primary catalyst: the company disclosed its Fast LNG unit is offline after a gas-turbine mechanical failure, with return to service not expected until Q4.
The central $11 target is the arithmetic mean of four verified analyst price targets, rounded from roughly $10.75. With the stock near $2.06, reaching $11 would require an upside of more than 400%, an extremely large move.
The $23 central target is the rounded arithmetic mean of four verified analyst price targets, which average $23.25. The latest verified price is around $9.57, meaning the target implies roughly 140% upside—a very large move.
NXH closed down -11.17% (-$0.23) to $1.83 on Oct 6, the most recent regular session, extending a steep two-day decline. Selling continued as investors digested the mutual termination of the Fathom Holdings merger and a dilutive $45.5M registered direct offering of ~16.5M shares at $2.76.
AMD is a large-cap designer of CPUs (central processing units) and GPUs (graphics processing units) competing directly with Nvidia in the AI accelerator market, while FORM is a small-cap provider of semiconductor test and measurement equipment, primarily probe cards. AMD's narrative has been driven by multi-billion-dollar hyperscaler deals, while FORM's has been powered by record revenue and sharp margin expansion tied to high-bandwidth memory (HBM) demand.
AMD has surged roughly 200% year to date, crossing a $1 trillion market capitalization on AI data-center demand and a "CPU renaissance" narrative. KLAC has gained about 71% year to date, supported by record process-control revenue and rapid growth in advanced packaging for AI chips.
AMD is a large-cap semiconductor designer riding explosive AI compute demand, while ENTG is a mid-cap supplier of materials and purity solutions that feed the same AI-driven chip cycle. AMD recently crossed a $1 trillion market capitalization on surging data center revenue, whereas ENTG operates at a far smaller scale (roughly $23 billion) with steadier, double-digit growth.
VELO closed Tuesday at $9.57, unchanged (+0.00%) from the prior session, with the move occurring during regular market hours. The flat close marked stabilization after Monday's -14.5% plunge, when shares fell to $9.57 from $11.20 following disclosure of CFO James Suva's departure.
The $8 target used here is a technical, publicly discussed recovery objective — not an analyst consensus — because legacy analyst price targets were set before NFE's restructuring and reverse stock split. New Fortress Energy Inc. ( NFE ) trades near $5.51, so reaching $8 implies a roughly 45% advance.
AVBP plunged -46.98% during Tuesday's regular session, closing at $15.09 versus $28.46, marking its worst single-day decline on record. The catalyst was the Phase 3 FURVENT trial of firmonertinib failing its primary endpoint—progression-free survival—in first-line EGFR exon 20 insertion non-small cell lung cancer.
Upcoming catalyst: The company's next earnings release is estimated for November 6, 2026, which should offer fresh detail on its SKY token holdings, staking rewards, and treasury strategy. Strategic positioning: SDEV is an on-chain holding company providing public-market exposure to the Sky protocol ecosystem, with SKY as its core digital asset and a stated focus on the stablecoin economy.
Different roles in the chip ecosystem: AMAT is a materials-engineering and deposition leader, while KLAC dominates process control, inspection, and yield management. Momentum favors AMAT: AMAT shares have more than doubled this year, while KLAC has recently pulled back roughly 9% in a month on margin and execution concerns.