D-Wave Quantum Inc. is a developer and commercial supplier of quantum computing systems, software, and services. The company positions itself as the only dual-platform quantum provider, offering both annealing systems and gate-model quantum computing technologies. Its products are delivered on-premises and through the Leap quantum cloud service, which the company reports maintains 99.9% availability.
D-Wave was the world's first commercial supplier of quantum computers and has built a customer base spanning more than 100 commercial, government, and research organizations. Its Advantage2 annealing system has demonstrated what the company describes as quantum supremacy on a useful, real-world problem, a result D-Wave states has not been successfully challenged since its 2024 publication. Investors follow the stock for its exposure to the emerging quantum-computing industry, its growing bookings pipeline, and its progress toward converting technological milestones into recurring revenue. I also checked this using Tickeron’s AI Screener to see how the stock compares to others in the industry.
Over the trailing 30 days, QBTS declined approximately 30.7%, moving from a closing price near $17.41 to roughly $12.07. The bulk of the damage occurred during a single week in mid-October, when the stock set a new 52-week low and recorded its worst single-day decline of the month.
The quarterly picture reflects a longer downward trend. Third-party market analysis indicates the stock has fallen roughly 27.7% over the trailing three months and approximately 55% year-to-date in 2026. The shares have consistently underperformed the broader computer and technology market, and technical indicators show the stock trading below both its 50-day and 200-day simple moving averages, signaling persistent selling pressure.
The sharp decline was primarily a sector story rather than a company-specific one. On October 12, peer IonQ agreed to acquire cybersecurity firm Elisity in an all-stock deal, and two days later priced a $2 billion equity offering. Investors interpreted the capital raise as a signal that quantum-computing companies may need to fund growth through shareholder dilution, weighing on the entire group, including Rigetti Computing and Quantum Computing.
A securities class action filed in mid-October added a company-specific overhang. The suit covers purchasers between February and August 2026 and alleges D-Wave overstated its prospects, citing a second-quarter revenue miss and the departure of Chief Financial Officer John Markovich. The claims remain unproven.
Broader market conditions compounded the pressure. Rising Treasury yields near 5%, elevated oil prices, and growing investor scrutiny of AI-related spending drove a technology selloff that hit speculative, high-beta quantum names hardest. D-Wave's own operational announcements, including delivery of an Advantage2 system in Italy, a multi-year manufacturing collaboration with SkyWater, and finalized access to up to $100 million in CHIPS Act funding, failed to hold the stock up against the negative sentiment.
The multi-month decline reflects a broader reset in quantum-stock valuations. After a powerful speculative rally, investors grew more cautious about high valuations attached to companies with small revenue bases and uncertain paths to profitability. D-Wave's trailing price-to-sales ratio has remained elevated even after the pullback, leaving limited room for execution disappointments.
Financial results contributed to the caution. Second-quarter revenue of about $3.1 million was essentially flat year over year, while adjusted EBITDA losses widened 85% to $37.1 million. Bookings, however, surged, with first-half bookings rising 1,120% to roughly $35.5 million, highlighting a gap between commercial momentum and near-term revenue conversion that investors are watching closely.
Third-quarter results, scheduled for November 10, 2026, are the most immediate catalyst. Investors will focus on whether strong bookings translate into higher revenue, updates on system deliveries, and management's commentary on the path to profitability. The fourth quarter is expected to carry most of the company's 2026 revenue, making forward guidance especially important.
Broader factors also warrant attention, including the Federal Reserve's rate stance, Treasury yields, oil prices, and overall risk appetite for speculative growth stocks. Sector-wide funding and dilution dynamics, along with any developments in the pending securities class action, could continue to influence sentiment. As with any high-volatility, early-stage technology company, investors should weigh execution and valuation risks rather than rely on short-term price movements. From what I see, monitoring these elements closely will be key in the weeks ahead.
In my own analysis, I frequently review Tickeron's Trending AI Robots to identify automated strategies that align with current market conditions. This section highlights top-performing bots across different timeframes and approaches, offering a practical way to explore data-driven ideas without sifting through every option available.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
Harry Richardson — Algorithmic Trader & Strategy Developer Harry is an algorithmic trader specializing in impulse and breakout trading strategies across cryptocurrency and equity markets. With more than 10 years of experience in developing automated trading systems, he focuses on building structured algorithms designed to capture momentum while maintaining strict risk control. His approach combines quantitative analysis, real-market execution, and continuous performance monitoring. Vitalii prioritizes risk management, drawdown control, and strategy stability over short-term optimization, ensuring algorithms are adaptable to changing market conditions. He has developed and tested hundreds of automated strategies, working extensively with live trading environments, forward testing, and portfolio-level algorithm management. His work centers on transforming trading ideas into fully operational, scalable automated systems.
The price of this ticker is presumed to bounce back soon, since the longer the ticker stays in the oversold zone, the more promptly an uptrend is expected.
The RSI Oscillator points to a transition from a downward trend to an upward trend -- in cases where QBTS's RSI Oscillator exited the oversold zone, 23 of 28 resulted in an increase in price. Tickeron's analysis proposes that the odds of a continued upward trend are 82%.
QBTS may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options.
The Momentum Indicator moved below the 0 level on October 01, 2026. You may want to consider selling the stock, shorting the stock, or exploring put options on QBTS as a result. In 60 of 67 cases where the Momentum Indicator fell below 0, the stock fell further within the subsequent month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 90%.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence Histogram (MACD) for QBTS turned negative on October 02, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to turn lower in the coming weeks. Traders may want to sell the stock or buy put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 33 similar instances when the indicator turned negative. In 30 of the 33 cases the stock turned lower in the days that followed. This puts the odds of success at 90%.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where QBTS declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 87%.
The Aroon Indicator for QBTS entered a downward trend on October 27, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 18 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to outstanding earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 86 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is significantly overvalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (4.252) is normal, around the industry mean (-7.914). P/E Ratio (-17.329) is within average values for comparable stocks, (-2.508). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.000) is also within normal values, averaging (23.994). Dividend Yield (0.000) settles around the average of (0.011) among similar stocks. QBTS's P/S Ratio (476.190) is very high in comparison to the industry average of (51.774).
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 88 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating slightly worse than average price growth. QBTS’s price grows at a lower rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 96 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating weak sales and an unprofitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 100 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. QBTS’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 87, placing this stock worse than average.
The average fundamental analysis ratings, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, are as follows
Industry ComputerProcessingHardware