WEBL is a passively managed, non-diversified leveraged ETF designed to deliver, before fees and expenses, 300% of the daily performance of the Dow Jones Internet Composite Index. That index, maintained by S&P Dow Jones Indices, focuses on companies deriving at least half their revenue from internet-related activities, covering both commerce and services. It contains roughly 40 holdings, and the fund carries a net expense ratio near 0.96% with assets under management of about $100 million.
The portfolio tilts heavily toward large-cap internet and technology names. Top holdings include Amazon (AMZN) and Meta Platforms (META) at around 10% each, followed by Cisco Systems (CSCO) near 8.5%, along with Alphabet (GOOGL), Arista Networks (ANET), Booking Holdings (BKNG), Oracle (ORCL), and Salesforce (CRM). Technology and communication services each represent about one-third of exposure, with consumer cyclical names making up most of the balance. This concentrated growth profile explains the sharp price swings when mega-cap internet names move.
Over the past 30 days, WEBL moved from roughly $28 down to about $21.70, for a decline of approximately 23%. The drop was not linear; the fund traded in a wide range for much of the period before accelerating lower, with several sizable single-day moves reflecting its 3x daily leverage.
The quarterly view shows a milder but still negative result. Starting near $25 in late July, WEBL fell to about $21.70, a loss of roughly 14% over three months. The fund actually climbed through August to a local high near $30 before reversing, so the quarter featured elevated volatility and a reversal rather than a steady decline.
The primary driver remains the fund’s 3x daily leverage, which mechanically triples the daily moves of the Dow Jones Internet Composite Index during a stretch of renewed pressure on high-multiple internet and technology stocks. Because WEBL resets exposure each day, volatility over multiple sessions can produce results that differ from a straightforward three-times multiple of the index.
The largest holdings drove most of the decline. Amazon and Meta Platforms together account for close to 20% of index weight, with Alphabet, Netflix, Cisco, and Oracle also prominent. These large-cap growth names are sensitive to changes in interest-rate expectations and risk appetite. When they pulled back, the concentration magnified WEBL’s downside. The index’s tilt toward consumer cyclical internet businesses, including e-commerce and travel platforms, added further exposure to broader cyclical sentiment. I also checked this using Tickeron’s AI Screener to see how WEBL compares to other sector vehicles on volatility metrics.
The three-month trend reflects a broader rotation within internet and technology stocks. WEBL advanced through the summer as large-cap names rose, peaking near $30 in late August before reversing. Higher interest-rate expectations, profit-taking in long-duration growth equities, and a shift toward defensive or value-oriented areas weighed on the index and were amplified threefold by the fund’s structure.
Institutional flows into leveraged ETFs also contributed, as these products often attract short-term traders who exit when momentum fades. The daily-reset feature compounds the effect, so even a flat underlying index over a volatile quarter can erode value through volatility drag. From what I see, this dynamic is worth monitoring closely when considering tactical use of the fund.
Near-term direction for WEBL will hinge on the path and volatility of large-cap internet equities, given the 3x daily leverage. Investors should track interest-rate expectations and inflation data, which affect discount rates applied to long-duration names such as Amazon, Meta, and Alphabet. Earnings reports from the largest holdings, along with spending on artificial intelligence infrastructure and cloud services, will also influence index performance.
Regulatory developments for big technology platforms, shifts in institutional positioning, and flows into or out of leveraged products remain additional considerations. Because of its daily reset, WEBL functions best as a short-term tactical tool; compounding from volatility means multi-day and multi-month returns will seldom match a simple three-times multiple of the index. These structural traits, more than any single catalyst, are likely to shape the fund’s risk profile ahead.
I often turn to Tickeron’s AI Screener when evaluating leveraged ETFs like WEBL. The platform lets me scan technical indicators, fundamentals, volatility measures, and sector-specific patterns across thousands of securities in one place. This helps isolate momentum or trend conditions in internet and technology names without spending hours on manual checks, and it fits naturally into a systematic approach to idea generation.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
Financial analyst and market blogger with expertise in equity research, fundamental analysis, and macroeconomic trends. I regularly publish coverage on individual stocks, ETFs, and sector developments — combining rigorous financial analysis with clear, engaging writing for a broad investment audience.
WEBL saw its Momentum Indicator move below the 0 level on October 16, 2026. This is an indication that the stock could be shifting in to a new downward move. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or exploring put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 80 similar instances where the indicator turned negative. In 77 of the 80 cases, the stock moved further down in the following days. The odds of a decline are at 90%.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence Histogram (MACD) for WEBL turned negative on October 15, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to turn lower in the coming weeks. Traders may want to sell the stock or buy put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 47 similar instances when the indicator turned negative. In 41 of the 47 cases the stock turned lower in the days that followed. This puts the odds of success at 87%.
WEBL moved below its 50-day moving average on October 16, 2026 date and that indicates a change from an upward trend to a downward trend.
The 10-day moving average for WEBL crossed bearishly below the 50-day moving average on October 22, 2026. This indicates that the trend has shifted lower and could be considered a sell signal. In 14 of 17 past instances when the 10-day crossed below the 50-day, the stock continued to move higher over the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 82%.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where WEBL declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 90%.
The RSI Indicator demonstrates that the ticker has stayed in the oversold zone for 1 day, which means it's wise to expect a price bounce in the near future.
The Stochastic Oscillator shows that the ticker has stayed in the oversold zone for 10 days. The price of this ticker is presumed to bounce back soon, since the longer the ticker stays in the oversold zone, the more promptly an upward trend is expected.
Following a +1.44% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where WEBL advanced for three days, in 319 of 344 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 90%.
WEBL may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options.
The Aroon Indicator entered an Uptrend today. In 246 of 253 cases where WEBL Aroon's Indicator entered an Uptrend, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued Uptrend are 90%.
The average fundamental analysis ratings, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, are as follows
Category Trading