A Comparative Analysis: FuelCell Energy Inc (FCEL) vs. ChargePoint Holdings Inc (CHPT) and Compare Swing trader: Deep Trend Analysis (TA) generates 13.41% for FCEL vs Swing trader: Volatility Balanced Strategy (TA) generates 16.8% for CHPT
When comparing the tickers FCEL and CHPT, a discerning eye is drawn to their respective gains. Applying two different trading strategies demonstrates how the choice of strategy can impact the return on investment. For instance, using the Deep Trend Analysis (TA) strategy for swing trading with FCEL has yielded a return of 13.41%. Conversely, CHPT has returned 16.8% when the Volatility Balanced Strategy (TA) is used for swing trading.
Price Growth Comparisons
In terms of price growth, ChargePoint Holdings Inc. (CHPT), a player in the Specialty Stores industry, experienced a 7.46% price reduction this week, which deviates from the average weekly price growth of 0.03% across the entire industry. However, their longer-term trends look healthier, with monthly and quarterly price growth at 3.99% and 6.33% respectively.
On the other hand, FuelCell Energy Inc. (FCEL) has seen a positive weekly price change of 7.98%, outperforming the average weekly price growth of 2.45% in the Electrical Products industry. FCEL also surpasses the average monthly growth of its industry, with a growth rate of 4.42%, but falls behind on a quarterly basis, with a growth rate of only 2.24%.
Looking Ahead: Earnings Release
Investors and market analysts always keep a keen eye on upcoming earnings dates, as these often lead to volatility and present opportunities for profit. CHPT is expected to report earnings on August 30, 2023, while FCEL is slated to release its figures a week later, on September 7, 2023.
Understanding the Industries
The @Specialty Stores industry, where CHPT is categorized, has experienced modest weekly growth of 0.03%. On the other hand, the @Electrical Products industry, where FCEL operates, has shown a significantly higher weekly growth of 2.45%.
The choice between FCEL and CHPT ultimately comes down to individual investor preference and risk tolerance. Both stocks have shown promising growth in certain aspects, but they also carry their unique challenges and potential risks. It is important for investors to continue monitoring these stocks and their respective industries, while also remaining adaptable to market changes.
FCEL may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options. In of 39 cases where FCEL's price broke its lower Bollinger Band, its price rose further in the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are .
The RSI Oscillator points to a transition from a downward trend to an upward trend -- in cases where FCEL's RSI Oscillator exited the oversold zone, of 42 resulted in an increase in price. Tickeron's analysis proposes that the odds of a continued upward trend are .
The Stochastic Oscillator suggests the stock price trend may be in a reversal from a downward trend to an upward trend. of 61 cases where FCEL's Stochastic Oscillator exited the oversold zone resulted in an increase in price. Tickeron's analysis proposes that the odds of a continued upward trend are .
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for FCEL just turned positive on April 14, 2025. Looking at past instances where FCEL's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in of 46 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are .
Following a 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where FCEL advanced for three days, in of 244 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are .
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where FCEL declined for three days, the price rose further in of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are .
The Aroon Indicator for FCEL entered a downward trend on April 28, 2025. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is fair valued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (0.817) is normal, around the industry mean (3.967). P/E Ratio (0.000) is within average values for comparable stocks, (40.807). FCEL's Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.000) is slightly lower than the industry average of (1.638). Dividend Yield (0.000) settles around the average of (0.096) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (5.023) is also within normal values, averaging (138.878).
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating weak sales and an unprofitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating slightly worse than average price growth. FCEL’s price grows at a lower rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to worse than average earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. FCEL’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 78, placing this stock worse than average.
The average fundamental analysis ratings, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, are as follows
a manufacturer of installs and services fuel cell power plants for distributed power generation
Industry ElectricalProducts