FNDX vs VTV: Fundamental Weighting Meets Traditional Value in Large-Cap ETFs

Key Takeaways

• FNDX uses a fundamentally weighted (RAFI) methodology across roughly 730 large-cap U.S. companies, while VTV tracks a market-cap-weighted large-cap value index of roughly 310–340 names.
• VTV is one of the cheapest large-cap value products available, with an expense ratio of 0.03%, versus 0.25% for FNDX.
• Sector exposure differs meaningfully: FNDX leans toward information technology and energy, while VTV is overweight financials, industrials, and health care.
• Both funds are passive, diversified, and liquid, but FNDX tilts toward fundamental size (sales, cash flow, dividends, and book value), whereas VTV applies a traditional value screen to market-cap-weighted holdings.
• Relative positioning favors VTV for pure value and cost efficiency, and FNDX for a broad, fundamentally driven tilt across the entire large-cap segment.

Introduction

Large-cap U.S. equities remain a core holding for most portfolios, but not every “value” or “large-company” fund follows the same construction. This comparison looks at FNDX and VTV, two established passive ETFs that sit in neighboring parts of the large-cap space. They do not share identical mandates, yet both aim to deliver broad large-cap exposure with a value or fundamentally oriented tilt. Their differences in indexing method, sector weights, and costs matter when deciding which vehicle aligns better with long-term goals.

Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF (FNDX) Overview

FNDX tracks the Russell RAFI U.S. Large Company Index, which weights holdings by fundamental measures such as adjusted sales, retained operating cash flow, and dividends plus buybacks rather than market capitalization. The result is a systematic tilt back toward value characteristics. The fund holds about 730 positions across the large-cap universe and includes meaningful exposure outside traditional value sectors. Top holdings include AAPL, MSFT, XOM, AMZN, META, and JPM. Information technology leads the sector allocation, followed by financials and health care, with a noticeable energy component. The expense ratio stands at 0.25%.

Vanguard Value ETF (VTV) Overview

VTV follows the CRSP U.S. Large Cap Value Index, applying a traditional value screen and then weighting by market capitalization. The fund typically holds 310–340 stocks and ranks among the largest and most liquid large-cap value ETFs. Top holdings include MU, JPM, BRK.B, XOM, JNJ, and WMT. Financials usually account for 22–24% of assets, followed by industrials and health care, while technology remains well below its broader-market weight. The 0.03% expense ratio places it among the lowest-cost options in the category.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

Both ETFs operate in the same large-cap U.S. equity market, yet their sector exposures create different sensitivities. VTV’s heavier financials and energy weights link it more closely to interest-rate moves, credit conditions, and commodity prices, while its lighter technology exposure reduces exposure to AI-related spending cycles. FNDX, with larger information-technology and energy allocations, maintains greater sensitivity to megacap tech results and commodity shifts. Recent capital flows have favored cheaper, cash-generating value areas amid elevated growth valuations, a dynamic that has supported both funds but to varying degrees depending on sector mix. I also checked this using Tickeron’s AI Screener to see how the sector weights compare to peers.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent cycles both funds have participated in the large-cap advance, yet their profiles have diverged with sector rotation. VTV’s underweight to megacap growth has produced a more defensive stance, with beta near 0.75 versus roughly 0.87 for FNDX. This means it tends to lag when growth leads but holds up better in value-driven or risk-off periods. FNDX’s fundamental weighting adds a mild value bias while retaining meaningful technology exposure, placing it between a pure value fund and a core large-cap vehicle. From a cost and volatility perspective, VTV delivers a straightforward value expression at lower cost, while FNDX offers broader diversification with systematic rebalancing. From what I see, the choice ultimately hinges on an investor’s preference for cost efficiency versus fundamental breadth.

Using Tickeron’s AI Tools for ETF Research

I regularly turn to Tickeron’s AI Screener when comparing ETFs like these. It lets me quickly filter on fundamentals, sector exposure, volatility, and AI-driven signals so I can place the two funds in context with thousands of other securities. The tool has become a standard part of my process for spotting relative strengths without manual spreadsheet work.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

Notable companies

Industry description

Market Cap

High and low price notable news

Volume