Ford’s $500 million investment in the electric truck maker Rivian looks all the more promising after the latter’s deal with General Motors (GM) came to a final stall. It is rumored that GM wanted all the technology rights of the start-up that eventually led to the dropping of the deal.
On the other hand, the deal with Ford is progressing fast as the deal allegedly allows Rivian to move ahead with its own plans and also to sign up with other potential partners. The deal is also consistent with Ford’s own electrification program that would additionally invest $11 billion to develop battery-based vehicles, including hybrids, plug-ins and pure battery-electric models.
Rivian has recently unveiled its two battery-electric vehicle models, the R1T pickup and the R1S sport utility vehicle, whose unique layout lowers a vehicle’s center of gravity – enhancing handling — and also frees up space normally devoted to an engine compartment for adding passenger and cargo space.
Ford will use Rivian’s flexible skateboard platform to address the problems of its own electrified vehicles that have reduced passenger and cargo space to make room for batteries and other components. The Rivian platform will also be used to for other electric vehicles at Ford to help maximize economies of scale.
But Rivian’s potential capacity of its assembly plant in Normal, Illinois may not be fully in line with its ambition to roll out a sale of 70,000 – 80,000 models of R1T and R1S annually. Plus, it has also partnered with Amazon (AMZN) to help the e-commerce giant launch its electric delivery truck. So, Rivian will use its normal plant to produce the platforms that Ford plans to use, then will ship the products to a Ford assembly plant for the rest of the process.
The deal looks a like a mutual benefit is in the order. Both companies plan to share intellectual property, Rivian could help Ford learn how to speed up its own EV developments, and in turn, Ford could teach its new partner a lot about mass production.
F may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options. In of 42 cases where F's price broke its lower Bollinger Band, its price rose further in the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are .
The Stochastic Oscillator demonstrated that the ticker has stayed in the oversold zone for 2 days, which means it's wise to expect a price bounce in the near future.
The 10-day moving average for F crossed bullishly above the 50-day moving average on November 12, 2024. This indicates that the trend has shifted higher and could be considered a buy signal. In of 14 past instances when the 10-day crossed above the 50-day, the stock continued to move higher over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are .
Following a 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where F advanced for three days, in of 306 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are .
The Aroon Indicator entered an Uptrend today. In of 237 cases where F Aroon's Indicator entered an Uptrend, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued Uptrend are .
The Momentum Indicator moved below the 0 level on December 02, 2024. You may want to consider selling the stock, shorting the stock, or exploring put options on F as a result. In of 85 cases where the Momentum Indicator fell below 0, the stock fell further within the subsequent month. The odds of a continued downward trend are .
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence Histogram (MACD) for F turned negative on December 02, 2024. This could be a sign that the stock is set to turn lower in the coming weeks. Traders may want to sell the stock or buy put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 46 similar instances when the indicator turned negative. In of the 46 cases the stock turned lower in the days that followed. This puts the odds of success at .
F moved below its 50-day moving average on December 04, 2024 date and that indicates a change from an upward trend to a downward trend.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where F declined for three days, the price rose further in of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are .
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is seriously undervalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (1.235) is normal, around the industry mean (6.142). P/E Ratio (12.306) is within average values for comparable stocks, (18.218). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.785) is also within normal values, averaging (5.723). Dividend Yield (0.045) settles around the average of (0.042) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (0.305) is also within normal values, averaging (78.580).
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to outstanding earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Seasonality Score of (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is fair valued in the industry. The Tickeron Seasonality score describes the variance of predictable price changes around the same period every calendar year. These changes can be tied to a specific month, quarter, holiday or vacation period, as well as a meteorological or growing season.
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating steady price growth. F’s price grows at a higher rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. F’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 89, placing this stock better than average.
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating weak sales and an unprofitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The average fundamental analysis ratings, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, are as follows
a manufacturer of automobiles and trucks
Industry MotorVehicles