Go to the list of all blogs
Harry Richardson's Avatar
published in Blogs
Jul 14, 2020
Huge Disparity Between the Performances of Growth and Value Heading in to Earnings Season

Huge Disparity Between the Performances of Growth and Value Heading in to Earnings Season

Since the beginning of 2020, the S&P Growth Index has outperformed the S&P Value Index at every step of the way. Normally during a big market selloff, we would see growth stocks get hit harder than value stocks, but not this year. When the market went through its big selloff from February 19 through March 23, the SPDR S&P Growth ETF (NYSE: SPYG) dropped 31.27%. While that is a pretty sizable decline, the SPDR S&P Value ETF (NYSE: SPYV) fell 36.67%.

Even after the bounce off the lows, the growth index has outperformed the value index. Year to date (YTD), the growth fund is up 11.04% while the value fund is down 14.97%. Since the March 23 low, the growth fund is up 48.38% while the value fund is up 32.97%.

Sure, investment styles go in and out of favor all the time—one year value will perform better than growth and the next year we may see the opposite is true. For instance, in 2010, it was pretty close, but growth outperformed 16.24% to 15.48%. In 2011 growth managed a gain of 4.64% while value was down 0.72%. In 2012, value gained 17.22% and growth gained 14.19%. One of the closest races came in 2013 when growth gained 32.6% and value gained 31.76%.

Hopefully you are starting to see my point, but just in case you aren’t, in 2014 growth beat value out by 2.63%, and in 2o15 growth won again with a difference of 8.26%. Value won out in 2016 and the difference in returns was 10.23%. Growth won again in ’17 with a difference of 27.24% to 15.4%. Both funds lost ground in ’18, but growth lost 8.9% less. Value won out in another close race in 2019, 31.70% to 30.85%.

Looking at all of these past years we see that growth has outperformed value in the last 10 years. It’s been a historical bull market rally from the bear market that ended in early 2009, but look at the performance differences. The biggest disparity between the two styles came in 2017 when value was up almost 12% more than value.

Right now, so far in 2020, growth is up 11.04% and value is down almost 15% for a difference of 26%. That is an insane disparity between the two.

Monday, July 13, was an interesting day for the indices as all four of the main indices started out with significant gains, but selling hit the market in the afternoon and three of the four finished with significant losses. This date isn’t just a random date because it was the day before the second quarter earnings season was set to start.

Personally I took note of the fact that the SPDR Growth ETF dropped 1.62% on the day and the SPDR Value ETF gained 0.17%. This got my attention and I did a comparison between the two ETFs on the Tickeron platform. The thing that jumped out at me the most was how the most closely correlated stocks to each of the two funds performed on Monday. For the SPYG, seven of the 10 most correlated lost ground and there were a couple of big declines.

The opposite was true for the stocks most closely correlated to the SPYV. Eight of the 10 most highly correlated gained ground, one was unchanged, and one fell. Five of the 10 gained more than 1.0% on a day when the S&P itself was down almost 1.0%.

Obviously, one day’s returns don’t mean that a trend is changing, but the timing of the change caught my attention as the reversal in the main indices came just ahead of the earnings season.

I went back and looked at the 12-month returns of both the SPYG and the SPYV for the last 20 years. I took note of anytime where the growth fund beat the value fund by a substantial margin. Right now the 12-month return of the growth fund is 26% greater than the value fund and that is the biggest difference in the last 20 years.

Other times where growth outperformed value by more than 15% were very few, but they seemed to come at times where volatility increased—June ’08, December ’09, August ’11, and September ’18.

Based on these findings, I would advise investors to be cautious and prepare for a more volatile market in the second half of 2020.

Related Ticker: SPYG

Contributor

Harry Richardson — Algorithmic Trader & Strategy Developer Harry is an algorithmic trader specializing in impulse and breakout trading strategies across cryptocurrency and equity markets. With more than 10 years of experience in developing automated trading systems, he focuses on building structured algorithms designed to capture momentum while maintaining strict risk control. His approach combines quantitative analysis, real-market execution, and continuous performance monitoring. Vitalii prioritizes risk management, drawdown control, and strategy stability over short-term optimization, ensuring algorithms are adaptable to changing market conditions. He has developed and tested hundreds of automated strategies, working extensively with live trading environments, forward testing, and portfolio-level algorithm management. His work centers on transforming trading ideas into fully operational, scalable automated systems.


SPYG's MACD Histogram just turned positive

The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for SPYG turned positive on September 21, 2026. Looking at past instances where SPYG's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 43 of 50 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 86%.

Price Prediction Chart

Technical Analysis (Indicators)

Bullish Trend Analysis

The Momentum Indicator moved above the 0 level on September 21, 2026. You may want to consider a long position or call options on SPYG as a result. In 63 of 76 past instances where the momentum indicator moved above 0, the stock continued to climb. The odds of a continued upward trend are 83%.

SPYG moved above its 50-day moving average on September 17, 2026 date and that indicates a change from a downward trend to an upward trend.

Following a +1.25% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where SPYG advanced for three days, in 303 of 360 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 84%.

Bearish Trend Analysis

The Stochastic Oscillator demonstrated that the ticker has stayed in the overbought zone for 9 days. The longer the ticker stays in the overbought zone, the sooner a price pull-back is expected.

Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where SPYG declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 75%.

SPYG broke above its upper Bollinger Band on September 21, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to drop as the stock moves back below the upper band and toward the middle band. You may want to consider selling the stock or exploring put options.

The Aroon Indicator for SPYG entered a downward trend on September 18, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.

Notable companies

The most notable companies in this group are NVIDIA Corp (NASDAQ:NVDA), Apple (NASDAQ:AAPL), Alphabet (NASDAQ:GOOG), Alphabet (NASDAQ:GOOGL), Microsoft Corp (NASDAQ:MSFT), Amazon.com (NASDAQ:AMZN), Meta Platforms (NASDAQ:META), Broadcom Inc. (NASDAQ:AVGO), Tesla (NASDAQ:TSLA), Micron Technology (NASDAQ:MU).

Industry description

The investment seeks to provide investment results that, before fees and expenses, correspond generally to the total return performance of the S&P 500 Growth Index that tracks the performance of large capitalization exchange traded U.S. equity securities exhibiting "growth" characteristics. The fund generally invests substantially all, but at least 80%, of its total assets in the securities comprising the index. The index measures the performance of the large-capitalization growth segment of the U.S. equity market. It is non-diversified.

Market Cap

The average market capitalization across the State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG) ETF is 273.2B. The market cap for tickers in the group ranges from 6.57B to 5.53T. NVDA holds the highest valuation in this group at 5.53T. The lowest valued company is NCLH at 6.57B.

High and low price notable news

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG) ETF was 0%. For the same ETF, the average monthly price growth was 4%, and the average quarterly price growth was 26%. LITE experienced the highest price growth at 15%, while FICO experienced the biggest fall at -23%.

Volume

The average weekly volume growth across all stocks in the State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG) ETF was 13%. For the same stocks of the ETF, the average monthly volume growth was 8% and the average quarterly volume growth was -23%

Fundamental Analysis Ratings

The average fundamental analysis ratings, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, are as follows

Valuation Rating: 63
P/E Growth Rating: 55
Price Growth Rating: 51
SMR Rating: 40
Profit Risk Rating: 55
Seasonality Score: 43 (-100 ... +100)
View a ticker or compare two or three
SPYG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interact to see
Advertisement
A.I.Advisor
published price charts
A.I. Advisor
published General Information

General Information

Category LargeGrowth

Category
Large Growth
Address
SPDR Series TrustOne Lincoln Street Cph0326Boston
Phone
N/A
Web
www.spdrs.com
Interact to see
Advertisement
Shares of TE are down approximately 13% in premarket trading on March 31, 2026, following the release of Q4 and full-year 2025 financial results before market open. The primary catalyst is a significant earnings miss: T1 Energy reported Q4 2025 EPS of -$0.70 per share, versus the consensus analyst estimate of +$0.05 — a deviation of roughly 1,500%.
PHR shares are plunging approximately 26.64% in premarket trading on March 31, 2026, falling from a prior close of $11.41 to $8.37. The primary catalyst is a significant downward revision to fiscal 2027 revenue guidance, cutting the midpoint outlook by roughly $37 million.
I've been following NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) closely as it stands out as a leader in graphics processing units (GPUs) that drive artificial intelligence (AI), gaming, data centers, and autonomous vehicles. The company's business model centers on designing high-performance semiconductors and software platforms like CUDA, which builds an ecosystem that keeps developers and enterprises committed. With over 80% share in data center GPUs, NVIDIA has capitalized on surging demand for AI training and inference. From what I see, this strong positioning explains the recent stock behavior: solid fundamentals from AI growth are clashing with investor concerns about competition and the sustainability of spending, putting pressure on the share price even as revenues keep climbing.
Apple's fiscal second quarter, which ended around March 28, 2026, follows a strong Q1 where revenue reached a record $143.8 billion, up 16% year-over-year. That performance was driven by the best-ever quarter for the AAPL iPhone and solid Services growth. From what I see, this upcoming report is crucial because it will test whether the momentum from holiday upgrade cycles, AI-enhanced devices, and the 38% rebound in Greater China sales can continue. For investors like us, it provides key insights into supply chain resilience, the acceleration of Services with a 2.5 billion active device base, and Apple's ongoing capital returns—$25 billion in share repurchases last quarter alone. In a tech sector under scrutiny for margins and growth, Q2 will show if AAPL can keep outperforming.
Apple Inc. (AAPL) follows a conservative dividend policy, distributing quarterly cash dividends with a forward annual payout of $1.04 per share and a current yield of 0.42%. The latest quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share was declared on January 29, 2026, with an ex-dividend date of February 9, 2026, and payment on February 12, 2026. In my view, this modest yield positions AAPL not as a high-yield play or traditional dividend aristocrat, but as a solid dividend growth stock that emphasizes reinvestment in innovation and shareholder returns through buybacks. With trailing twelve months earnings per share (EPS) at $7.89, the low payout ratio leaves plenty of room for future increases while focusing on capital appreciation.
In my analysis of the tech sector, I often circle back to AAPL and MSFT, two companies that continue to define market leadership. Apple Inc. holds its ground in consumer hardware and services, while Microsoft Corporation powers ahead in cloud computing and enterprise software. For traders chasing short-term opportunities or investors building long-term positions, understanding their relative strengths—particularly with evolving dynamics in AI, cloud infrastructure, and product launches—proves essential. From what I see, this comparison sheds light on key metrics, developments, and positioning that can guide decisions in today's environment.
From what I see, NVIDIA commands a dominant position in the AI semiconductor space, holding an estimated 80-90% share of the AI accelerator market. This leadership is rooted in the CUDA software platform, which creates a proprietary ecosystem that makes it expensive and time-consuming for developers to switch to competitors. The company's full-stack offerings—covering GPUs, CPUs, networking, and software—allow it to deliver complete rack-scale AI supercomputers like the Blackwell NVL72, distinguishing it from rivals focused on individual chips.
APLS shares surged approximately +138.56% in premarket trading on March 31, 2026, from a prior close of $17.09 to a premarket price of approximately $40.77. The primary catalyst is a definitive acquisition agreement announced by Biogen (BIIB), which agreed to acquire all outstanding shares of Apellis for $41.00 per share in cash, representing an upfront equity consideration of approximately $5.6 billion.
Shares of CEG are declining approximately 7% intraday on March 31, 2026, from a prior close of $298.61 to roughly $277–$278. The primary catalyst is Constellation Energy's long-awaited Business and Earnings Outlook call, in which the company's 2026 adjusted EPS guidance midpoint of $11.50 per share came in below the Wall Street consensus estimate of $11.60 per share.
PEPG shares are down approximately 64% in intraday trading on March 31, 2026, from a prior close of $4.23 to roughly $1.52, building on steep after-hours losses recorded on March 30. The primary catalyst is deeply disappointing Phase 2 clinical trial data from the FREEDOM2-DM1 study of PGN-EDODM1, PepGen's lead asset for myotonic dystrophy type 1 (DM1) — the drug showed virtually no benefit over placebo at the tested dose.
CNTA shares surged approximately +45.32% in Tuesday's session, climbing from a prior close of $27.58 to approximately $40.08, driven entirely by a blockbuster acquisition announcement. Primary catalyst: Eli Lilly and Company (LLY) announced a definitive agreement to acquire Centessa Pharmaceuticals for $38.00 per share in cash, plus one contingent value right (CVR) worth up to $9.00 per share, for total potential consideration of up to $47.00 per share.
Meta Platforms, Inc. (META) runs some of the world's largest social media platforms, including Facebook, Instagram, WhatsApp, and Messenger. The company's core business model centers on digital advertising, which accounts for the vast majority of revenue, supplemented by emerging initiatives in AI and consumer hardware like smart glasses. In the competitive social media and internet content industry, Meta Platforms holds a dominant position with billions of monthly active users, giving it unparalleled data for targeted ads. This advertising strength initially buffered recent pressures, but exposure to regulatory scrutiny and heavy AI investments has contributed to the stock's downward price movement as investors weigh long-term growth against short-term costs. From what I see, this balance between scale and spending is one of the key tensions right now.
Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) stands as a powerhouse in technology, focusing on software, cloud computing, and productivity tools. At its core, the company relies on high-margin subscription services such as Microsoft 365, the Azure cloud platform, and growing AI features through Copilot. In the fiercely competitive software and cloud landscape, Microsoft commands over 30% market share in cloud infrastructure (IaaS/PaaS), second only to Amazon Web Services. What stands out to me are its solid fundamentals—recurring revenue makes up more than 70% of total sales, paired with strong free cash flow—that generally provide a buffer against volatility. That said, the recent price action has been driven by heavy AI-related capital expenditures and a slowdown in cloud growth, which are squeezing margins and testing investor patience in the short term.
Alphabet Inc. (GOOG), the parent of Google, continues to lead the digital advertising space with its search engine holding over 90% global market share. The company's model centers on targeted ads fueled by extensive user data, bolstered by high-margin areas like YouTube, Google Cloud Platform (GCP), and AI efforts such as the Gemini models. In my view, Alphabet's edge in the tech sector comes from its scaling cloud business and AI infrastructure leadership. These strengths provide a solid foundation, yet recent price action reveals sensitivities to regulatory pressures and hefty AI investments—explaining the decline even as Q4 2025 ad revenues grew robustly.
From what I see, Alphabet Inc. (GOOGL), the parent of Google, continues to lead in digital advertising while pushing deeper into cloud computing and AI. Its business model relies heavily on high-margin ad revenues from Search and YouTube, bolstered by growth in Google Cloud Platform (GCP) and AI services like Gemini. In the competitive tech landscape, Alphabet maintains over 90% global search market share, strong data advantages, and AI infrastructure leadership through custom TPUs. These strengths explain much of the recent stock action: steady ad demand provides a base, but substantial AI investments introduce volatility tied to capex and growth balances.
AMZN stock declined approximately -4% over the past 30 days amid concerns over elevated AI-driven capital expenditures pressuring margins. Over the past quarter, the stock fell around -13%, reflecting post-earnings selloff and broader tech sector volatility. Major drivers include surging AWS demand offset by high capex forecasts of up to $200 billion for 2026, macroeconomic pressures like trade policy risks, and geopolitical tensions impacting sentiment.
Meta Platforms holds a commanding presence in social media and digital advertising, drawing on powerful network effects from platforms like Facebook, Instagram, WhatsApp, and Messenger to reach over 3.5 billion daily active users. What stands out to me is how their advanced AI algorithms refine ad targeting and content recommendations, delivering superior return on ad spend for advertisers—Advantage+ campaigns, for instance, provide a $4.52 return per dollar invested. This gives META a clear advantage over competitors like TikTok and Snap, especially as AI helps offset challenges from Apple's privacy updates.
Tesla, Inc. (TSLA) stands as a leading electric vehicle (EV) manufacturer and energy solutions provider. The company designs, produces, and sells high-performance EVs including the Model 3, Model Y, Model S, Model X, and Cybertruck, alongside energy products like solar panels and Powerwall batteries. Its core business model revolves around direct-to-consumer sales, vertical integration in battery production, and software updates via over-the-air (OTA) capabilities, which enhance vehicle longevity and generate recurring revenue from features like Full Self-Driving (FSD).
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company (TSM), the world's largest dedicated semiconductor foundry, produces advanced integrated circuits for fabless firms such as Nvidia (NVDA), Apple (AAPL), and AMD (AMD). Operating a pure-play foundry model, TSMC avoids chip design, focusing instead on manufacturing. It holds over 50% market share in critical advanced nodes like 3nm and 5nm, which power AI applications, smartphones, and high-performance computing.
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited (TSM) ADRs rose 4.68% in the most recent completed session, climbing from a prior close of $316.50 to $331.32. The move comes after a brief two‑day pullback and reflects renewed buying interest as investors refocus on TSMC’s role at the center of the AI chip supply chain.