Last week, an AI trading robot produced a 5.25% increase in QS's earnings.
This AI trading robot, available at Swing trader: Volatility Balanced Strategy v.2 (TA), was a top performer in our robot factory, generating a 5.25% for QS over the past week.
Last week, an AI trading robot produced a 5.25% increase in QS's earnings, marking a significant success for the technology. As a technical analyst, it's important to understand the market trends and historical data to predict future growth for the stock.
When a stock moves higher for three consecutive days, it's often seen as a bullish sign. In the case of QS, the stock has been on an upward trend for the past three days. This is a positive sign for investors, as it indicates that the stock is gaining momentum and could continue to rise in value.
To gain a deeper understanding of what could happen in the near future, it's important to look at the historical data of QS. When the stock has advanced for three consecutive days, there have been 143 instances in the past where the price continued to rise further within the following month. Out of these 143 cases, the price rose in 120 instances, indicating an 84% chance of a continued upward trend.
With this historical data in mind, investors should keep a close eye on QS in the coming weeks to see if the trend continues. The AI trading robot that produced a 5.25% increase in earnings last week shows the potential for technology to play a significant role in the stock market. By analyzing large amounts of data and making predictions based on historical trends, AI trading robots can help investors make informed decisions and capitalize on opportunities for growth.
QS saw its Stochastic Oscillator peaks and leaves the overbought zone
The Stochastic Oscillator for QS moved out of overbought territory on May 25, 2023. This could be a bearish sign for the stock and investors may want to consider selling or taking a defensive position. A.I.dvisor looked at 26 similar instances where the indicator exited the overbought zone. In of the 26 cases the stock moved lower. This puts the odds of a downward move at .
Technical Analysis (Indicators)
Bearish Trend Analysis
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where QS declined for three days, the price rose further in of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are .
QS broke above its upper Bollinger Band on May 22, 2023. This could be a sign that the stock is set to drop as the stock moves back below the upper band and toward the middle band. You may want to consider selling the stock or exploring put options.
The Aroon Indicator for QS entered a downward trend on May 24, 2023. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.
Bullish Trend Analysis
The RSI Oscillator points to a transition from a downward trend to an upward trend -- in cases where QS's RSI Indicator exited the oversold zone, of 19 resulted in an increase in price. Tickeron's analysis proposes that the odds of a continued upward trend are .
The Momentum Indicator moved above the 0 level on May 22, 2023. You may want to consider a long position or call options on QS as a result. In of 46 past instances where the momentum indicator moved above 0, the stock continued to climb. The odds of a continued upward trend are .
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for QS just turned positive on May 18, 2023. Looking at past instances where QS's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in of 22 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are .
Following a 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where QS advanced for three days, in of 154 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are .
Fundamental Analysis (Ratings)
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating fairly steady price growth. QS’s price grows at a lower rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is fair valued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (2.203) is normal, around the industry mean (2.861). P/E Ratio (0.000) is within average values for comparable stocks, (37.967). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.000) is also within normal values, averaging (1.536). QS has a moderately low Dividend Yield (0.000) as compared to the industry average of (0.033). P/S Ratio (0.000) is also within normal values, averaging (9.453).
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating weak sales and an unprofitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to worse than average earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. QS’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 89, placing this stock worse than average.
Notable companies
Industry description
Market Cap
High and low price notable news
Volume
Fundamental Analysis Ratings
The average fundamental analysis ratings, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, are as follows
