Go to the list of all blogs
Harry Richardson's Avatar
published in Blogs
Aug 01, 2020
Life Insurers are Limping in to Their Earnings Reports, and the Fundamentals Aren’t Good

Life Insurers are Limping in to Their Earnings Reports, and the Fundamentals Aren’t Good

Life insurance companies mainly sell policies that pay a death benefit as a lump sum upon the death of the insured. Policies may be sold as term life which guarantees payment of a stated death benefit, but expires at the end of a specified term. They can also be sold as permanent or whole life policies. These policies are more expensive, but lasts a lifetime and carry a cash accumulation component. Life insurance firms may also sell long-term disability policies that help to replace the insured’s income if they become sick or disabled.

Over the last week the life insurance group has been one of the worst performing groups in terms of stock returns. We see on Tickeron’s Group Trends Screener that it’s within the worst seven performers with a loss of 3.19%. This probably isn’t what investors want to see with a number of members of the group getting ready to report earnings next week.

Prudential Financial (PRU) will report earnings on August 4. Manulife Financial (MFC) and Metlife (MET) will both report on August 5. Looking at a comparison of these three companies and their fundamental indicators, there isn’t much to be excited about.

All three companies get positive ratings for being undervalued, but the only other positive rating for any of them is a the outlook rating for Prudential. All of the other ratings are either neutral or negative. There are seven different categories and that gives us a total of 21 indicators. Out of 21 indicators, only four are positive. That’s not a very good percentage.

Personally I find it very concerning that all three stocks get the worst possible scores on the Profit Vs. Risk rating and the SMR rating. That is a major red flag for me when it comes to the long-term prospects for the stocks. Tickeron has a negative outlook on this group and predicts a further decline by more than 4.00% within the next month with a likelihood of 65%.

The technical analysis looks considerably better. You should keep in mind though that technical analysis tends to be more useful over the short-term. Tickeron’s technical analysis screener shows Metlife with five positive ratings and only one negative rating.

Prudential has four positive ratings and only two negative ratings. Manulife has only one positive rating and one negative rating.

The earnings estimates and the sentiment indicators for the three companies are very different in some areas and very similar in other areas. Metlife and Prudential have seen their consensus estimate get cut rather drastically over the last 90 days. For Metlife the EPS estimate was at $1.32 three months ago and is now at $0.90. Prudential’s EPS estimate was $2.65 and it’s now $1.71. Those are cuts of 31.8% and 35.5% respectively. We see that both of the companies are expected to earn considerably less than they did in the same period of 2019.

Manulife’s numbers are very different. We see that EPS estimate has been bumped up slightly, from $0.47 to $0.50, and the company is expected to earn more than it did last year.

As for the sentiment indicators, analysts have similar ratings on Metlife and Manulife with both buy percentages at 64%. Analysts are considerably more bearish on Prudential with a buy percentage of only 20%. Short sellers share a similar opinion with the short interest ratios for Metlife and Manulife in the same range while Prudential’s is higher.

The Tickeron Scorecard for these three stocks shows Metlife and Prudential each have “buy” ratings while Manulife has a “sell” rating. Those ratings are based primarily on the short-term outlook and the technical indicators. From a longer term perspective, I feel Manulife has the better outlook.

 

Related Ticker: PRU

PRU's MACD Histogram just turned positive

The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for PRU turned positive on July 01, 2026. Looking at past instances where PRU's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in of 46 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are .

Price Prediction Chart

Technical Analysis (Indicators)

Bullish Trend Analysis

The Momentum Indicator moved above the 0 level on July 01, 2026. You may want to consider a long position or call options on PRU as a result. In of 95 past instances where the momentum indicator moved above 0, the stock continued to climb. The odds of a continued upward trend are .

The 50-day moving average for PRU moved above the 200-day moving average on July 01, 2026. This could be a long-term bullish signal for the stock as the stock shifts to an upward trend.

Following a 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where PRU advanced for three days, in of 342 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are .

The Aroon Indicator entered an Uptrend today. In of 299 cases where PRU Aroon's Indicator entered an Uptrend, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued Uptrend are .

Bearish Trend Analysis

The 10-day RSI Indicator for PRU moved out of overbought territory on July 08, 2026. This could be a bearish sign for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 35 similar instances where the indicator moved out of overbought territory. In of the 35 cases, the stock moved lower in the following days. This puts the odds of a move lower at .

The Stochastic Oscillator demonstrated that the ticker has stayed in the overbought zone for 3 days. The longer the ticker stays in the overbought zone, the sooner a price pull-back is expected.

Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where PRU declined for three days, the price rose further in of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are .

PRU broke above its upper Bollinger Band on July 01, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to drop as the stock moves back below the upper band and toward the middle band. You may want to consider selling the stock or exploring put options.

Fundamental Analysis (Ratings)

The Tickeron Valuation Rating of (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is seriously undervalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (1.224) is normal, around the industry mean (1.488). P/E Ratio (11.604) is within average values for comparable stocks, (13.946). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (1.225) is also within normal values, averaging (1.811). Dividend Yield (0.049) settles around the average of (0.044) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (0.630) is also within normal values, averaging (1.436).

The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating steady price growth. PRU’s price grows at a higher rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.

The Tickeron Seasonality Score of (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is fair valued in the industry. The Tickeron Seasonality score describes the variance of predictable price changes around the same period every calendar year. These changes can be tied to a specific month, quarter, holiday or vacation period, as well as a meteorological or growing season.

The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating well-balanced risk and returns. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 62, placing this stock slightly better than average.

The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to worse than average earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.

The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating weak sales and an unprofitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.

Notable companies

The most notable companies in this group are MetLife (NYSE:MET), Prudential Financial (NYSE:PRU), Lincoln National Corp (NYSE:LNC), Genworth Financial (NYSE:GNW).

Industry description

Life insurance companies mainly sell policies that pay a death benefit as a lump sum upon the death of the insured to their beneficiaries. Life insurance policies may be sold as term life, (which guarantees payment of a stated death benefit and expires at the end of a specified term) or permanent /typically whole life (which is more expensive but lasts a lifetime and carries a cash accumulation component). Life insurance firms may also sell long-term disability policies that help to replace the insured individual’s income if they become sick or disabled. Health insurance, on the other hand, helps pay for medical expenses. Anthem, Inc., MetLife, Inc. and Aflac Incorporated are some of the largest U.S. companies in this industry.

Market Cap

The average market capitalization across the Life/Health Insurance Industry is 18.41B. The market cap for tickers in the group ranges from 228.36K to 154.94B. PIAIF holds the highest valuation in this group at 154.94B. The lowest valued company is GWGHQ at 228.36K.

High and low price notable news

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the Life/Health Insurance Industry was 1%. For the same Industry, the average monthly price growth was 7%, and the average quarterly price growth was 4%. LNC experienced the highest price growth at 7%, while CIA experienced the biggest fall at -6%.

Volume

The average weekly volume growth across all stocks in the Life/Health Insurance Industry was -10%. For the same stocks of the Industry, the average monthly volume growth was -7% and the average quarterly volume growth was -14%

Fundamental Analysis Ratings

The average fundamental analysis ratings, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, are as follows

Valuation Rating: 35
P/E Growth Rating: 64
Price Growth Rating: 46
SMR Rating: 85
Profit Risk Rating: 62
Seasonality Score: 30 (-100 ... +100)
View a ticker or compare two or three
PRU
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interact to see
Advertisement
A.I.Advisor
published price charts
Last 5 trading days
A.I. Advisor
published General Information

General Information

a financial conglomerate

Industry LifeHealthInsurance

Profile
Details
Industry
Financial Conglomerates
Address
751 Broad Street
Phone
+1 973 802-6000
Employees
40658
Web
https://www.investor.prudential.com
Interact to see
Advertisement
Aon plc (AON) reported third-quarter 2025 revenue of $3.997 billion, representing a 7% year-over-year increase with equal organic growth. Adjusted earnings per share came in at $3.05, exceeding expectations. In late November, Moody’s reaffirmed Aon’s Baa2 credit rating and revised the outlook to positive, citing reduced leverage following the NFP acquisition.
Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. (APD) entered the spotlight after announcing advanced discussions with Yara International on December 8 to collaborate on low-emission ammonia projects. While the strategic direction aligns with global decarbonization trends, uncertainty around execution and capital requirements triggered a 9.45% one-day decline in the stock.
Lockheed Martin and RTX Corporation are two of the most prominent names in the aerospace and defense industry, both positioned to benefit from heightened global security concerns and sustained U.S. military spending.
As 2025 winds down, the Savings Banks sector reflects a mix of stability, innovation, and AI-driven disruption. Among the most closely watched tickers—SOFI Technologies (SOFI), Ally Financial (ALLY), and PayPal Holdings (PYPL)—investors have witnessed contrasting stories of growth, valuation, and market perception.
Ondas Holdings (ONDS) is a wireless technology company focused on delivering secure, long-range communications for industrial Internet of Things (IoT) and data networking applications. Its solutions are built to support mission-critical operations across sectors such as rail, energy, maritime, infrastructure, and industrial automation.
Ciena’s growth is driven by expanding offerings in optical networking, network automation software, and 5G transport infrastructure, complemented by services designed to help customers modernize and future-proof their networks. Its evolving technology portfolio addresses the rising complexity, speed, and reliability requirements of today’s communications environment.
Marathon Digital Holdings (MARA) and Riot Platforms (RIOT) are two leading companies in the Bitcoin mining industry, each operating energy-intensive infrastructure to capitalize on cryptocurrency market cycles. This comparison is especially relevant amid ongoing Bitcoin price volatility and growing interest in digital assets and AI-related infrastructure.
Roivant Sciences has delivered strong year-to-date performance, with shares up roughly 82%, driven by encouraging pipeline developments and increased investment in high-potential subsidiaries such as Immunovant.
MP Materials Corp. (MP) and USA Rare Earth, Inc. (USAR) are central to the United States’ push to establish a secure, domestic supply of rare earth elements—materials critical to electric vehicles, renewable energy, and defense technologies. As geopolitical tensions and supply chain vulnerabilities intensify, these two companies offer distinct approaches to addressing U.S. dependence on foreign sources.
The Invesco QQQ Trust (NASDAQ: QQQ) remains one of the most closely followed ETFs worldwide, offering investors direct exposure to the NASDAQ-100 Index®. In the most recent data, QQQ has gained a notable +20.16% year-to-date, even as markets experienced bouts of elevated volatility.
Sidus Space has expanded its portfolio in 2025, focusing on satellite missions and supporting technologies to enhance space infrastructure. Key product advancements include the LizzieSat platforms, with multiple units progressing in design and manufacturing. LizzieSat-3 is set for launch no earlier than Q1 2025, building on prior missions to boost data capabilities for clients in Earth observation and communication.
As 2025 comes to a close, Dingdong (Cayman) Limited (DDL) continues to strengthen its position in China’s competitive fresh grocery e-commerce market. Operating from Shanghai, the company focuses on high-quality fresh produce, ready-to-eat meals, and daily essentials delivered directly to consumers. Throughout the year, Dingdong emphasized private-label expansion, supply-chain optimization, and fulfillment network growth—initiatives that supported improving quarterly performance and positioned the company for sustained momentum.
Pioneer Power's 2025 highlights include the expansion of its mobile power and charging footprint with new orders and partnerships; the launch of a new suite of e-Boost solutions for off-grid EV charging; the rebranding of HomeBoost as PowerCore with events in December; the introduction of PRYMUS in December; and a new five-year contract for network transformers with a regional utility provider.
An AI-driven comparison between Palantir (PLTR) and Oracle (ORCL) points to Palantir as the more compelling investment heading into 2026. The analysis highlights PLTR’s AI-native platforms, which enable real-time, data-driven decision-making across fast-growing sectors such as government, defense, and enterprise analytics.
An AI-driven comparison between D-Wave Quantum (QBTS) and IonQ (IONQ) points to IonQ as the stronger opportunity heading into 2026. The analysis highlights IONQ’s gate-based, trapped-ion quantum architecture, which supports a wide range of algorithms and positions the company for broader adoption across AI, simulation, and cryptography.
An AI-driven comparison of Rigetti Computing (RGTI) and D-Wave Quantum (QBTS) points to Rigetti as the more compelling opportunity heading into 2026. The analysis highlights RGTI’s gate-based quantum architecture, which supports universal quantum computing and a wide range of complex algorithms. While D-Wave remains a leader in quantum annealing for optimization problems, Rigetti’s full-stack, gate-based approach offers greater scalability and broader long-term applications.
An AI-driven comparison of Rigetti Computing (RGTI) and TeraWulf (WULF) points to TeraWulf as the more attractive investment heading into 2026. The analysis emphasizes WULF’s large-scale digital infrastructure supporting Bitcoin mining and high-performance computing (HPC), which generates immediate revenue in expanding digital asset and AI-driven markets.
An AI-driven comparison between Rocket Lab USA (RKLB) and Planet Labs (PL) identifies Rocket Lab as the more compelling investment heading into 2026. The analysis highlights RKLB’s vertically integrated space services and consistent launch performance, which position the company to benefit from rising demand for satellite deployment and space infrastructure.
An AI-driven comparison of Tempus AI (TEM) and Doximity (DOCS) points to Tempus AI as the more compelling investment opportunity heading into 2026. The analysis highlights TEM’s AI-powered precision medicine platform, which applies advanced analytics and genomic data to transform diagnostics and treatment in oncology and cardiology.