Go to the list of all blogs
Sergey Savastiouk's Avatar
published in Blogs
Apr 06, 2025
Making a Case for Trading vs. Investing in 2025

Making a Case for Trading vs. Investing in 2025

As we are all in 2025, the investment landscape is poised for significant transformation. The convergence of low liquidity, diminished labor participation, and high interest rates suggests that traditional buy-and-hold strategies may yield only modest long-term returns. With Trump now serving as the current president, his policies—including tariffs reminiscent of those that disrupted markets in the past—continue to shape the economic environment. In such conditions, active trading strategies, particularly those emphasizing hedging and risk management, may offer superior returns compared to a passive approach.

Chart #1 and #2: Market Conditions and Long-Term Returns

 

Chart #1 provides a historical perspective by comparing the anticipated market behavior in 2025 to the downturns experienced during the 1930-1931 period. After Trump's imposed tariff. 

Chart #2 shows that the S&P 500 is expected either to trade sideways or decline, leading to projected long-term returns of approximately +3% over the next decade. This performance echoes the sluggish growth seen during the 2000-2010 period, when low liquidity and high interest rates limited market gains.

 

For investors, these conditions imply that a traditional buy-and-hold strategy may not be enough to generate attractive returns. The modest growth forecast forces a reevaluation of investment strategies, pushing market participants to consider active trading approaches that can capitalize on short-term volatility and hedge against downturns.

Chart #3: The Impact of Missing Key Trading Days

Another compelling piece of evidence is offered by the chart titled "Missing the Best vs. Worst Days." This chart tracks the performance of an initial investment in the S&P 500 from 1998 to 2025 under three different scenarios: staying fully invested, missing the 10 best trading days, and missing the 10 worst trading days.

 

The findings are striking:

  • For Traders:
    When the 10 worst trading days are removed from the performance data, the results significantly outperform the standard buy-and-hold strategy. This observation suggests that active traders who focus on avoiding the most severe downturns—by employing hedging strategies and risk management techniques—can achieve superior returns relative to the broader market.
     
  • For Investors:
    Conversely, missing the 10 best trading days leads to markedly inferior outcomes. This serves as a stark reminder for long-term investors: the market’s largest gains often occur on a few exceptional days, and missing these can severely impact overall performance. Thus, for investors, staying fully invested remains critical to capturing the market’s long-term growth, despite the inherent volatility.
     

These insights illustrate the divergent strategies required by traders and investors. While investors must maintain full market exposure to avoid missing significant upswings, active traders have the opportunity to enhance their returns by tactically managing risks and protecting their portfolios from the market’s worst days.

Chart #4. Trading vs. Investing: Strategic Considerations for 2025

The evidence presented by three charts above and anticipation of the stock market behavior as in Chart #4 below, combined with the tools available to active traders, clearly delineates the different approaches required for trading versus investing. In an environment forecasted to yield only modest long-term growth, active trading offers a viable strategy to outmaneuver market volatility. Traders can utilize inverse ETFs and sophisticated AI-driven systems like the Double Agent Trading Bot to hedge against downturns and capitalize on short-term market inefficiencies.

For long-term investors, the risk lies in the potential of missing the market’s most significant upswings. Despite the appeal of a fully invested portfolio, the historical data suggests that a few key trading days account for a disproportionate share of overall returns. Therefore, maintaining full market exposure is essential for capturing long-term growth, even if it means enduring short-term fluctuations.

The Importance of Inverse ETFs for Hedging

In this challenging market environment, the use of inverse ETFs has emerged as a crucial tool for active traders. Inverse ETFs are designed to move in the opposite direction of a specific index or asset, allowing investors to profit from market declines. They achieve this by utilizing derivatives such as futures contracts and swaps.

Inverse ETFs are particularly valuable for hedging purposes. In an environment where market returns may be modest and the risk of severe downturns is heightened, these instruments allow traders to offset potential losses by providing short exposure without the need for a margin account. However, they are best used as part of a broader risk management strategy, given their higher expense ratios, potential tracking errors, and the compounding effects that make them unsuitable for long-term investments.

The Role of Agentic AI and the Double Agent Trading Bot

Another significant advancement that bolsters the case for active trading in 2025 is the evolution of trading technology. At the forefront is the Double Agent Trading Bot, powered by Agentic AI. This cutting-edge system leverages a multi-agent framework to deliver several key advantages:

  • Real-Time Responsiveness:
    The system adapts to market fluctuations within milliseconds, a critical capability in volatile environments. This real-time responsiveness ensures that trades are executed at optimal moments, capturing fleeting opportunities.
     
  • Robust Risk Management:
    The Double Agent Trading Bot integrates complementary strategies that mitigate risk. Losses in one segment of the portfolio can be offset by gains in another, preserving overall stability even during market downturns.
     
  • Enhanced Precision:
    Each specialized agent within the framework conducts focused analysis, resulting in more accurate trade execution. This precision reduces the likelihood of errors and optimizes the timing of entry and exit points.
     
  • Elimination of Human Bias:
    By relying on automated, data-driven decision-making, the system removes the emotional and psychological biases that often compromise manual trading. This leads to a more disciplined and consistent trading strategy.
     

These technological advancements underscore the potential for active trading strategies to not only mitigate risk but also to capture enhanced returns in a market environment where traditional investment strategies may fall short.

Example: AI Trading Double Agent – Outperforming Alphabet Inc. (GOOG)

The modern trading landscape demands speed and precision, and Agentic AI is revolutionizing the field with multi-agent architectures. One such innovation is the Double Agent Trading Bot, a cutting-edge system designed to capitalize on both bullish and bearish market conditions. By combining advanced pattern recognition with strategic hedging, particularly through inverse ETFs, this bot provides an intelligent and adaptive approach to autotrading. Its dual-strategy framework enables traders to navigate volatile markets more efficiently, making it a powerful tool for both seasoned and novice investors.

 

Inverse ETFs play a crucial role in this strategy by offering a means to profit from declining markets. These funds are engineered to move inversely to a specific index, allowing traders to hedge against downturns without short-selling. For instance, if the S&P 500 drops by 2%, an inverse ETF tracking the index is expected to gain roughly 2%. Such ETFs are commonly used for short-term hedging due to their susceptibility to compounding effects and tracking errors over extended periods. The ProShares UltraShort QQQ (QID), for example, is one such inverse ETF based on the NASDAQ-100 index, making it a viable hedge against tech-sector volatility.

 

Anti-correlated Dual-Strategy: Two Masters for GOOG and QID

This dual-strategy approach of two anticorrelated tickers ensures adaptability and enhanced profitability in both bullish and bearish market trends.

BUY LONG: Google LLC (GOOG), a subsidiary of Alphabet Inc., is a leading provider of internet-based search and advertising services. Its core business areas include advertising, search, platforms and operating systems, as well as enterprise and hardware products. Over the past week, GOOG experienced a +2.02% price change, outperforming the average weekly growth of +1.27% across the Internet Software/Services industry. However, the industry's average monthly price growth was -7.45%, indicating some volatility in the sector. Despite this, GOOG's steady quarterly growth of +1.32% suggests resilience in the market.

Buy LONG AS A HEDGE: ProShares UltraShort QQQ (QID), an ETF designed to perform inversely to the NASDAQ-100 index, offering potential downside protection in volatile market conditions. 

Revolutionizing Trading Environments

 

The Double Agent Trading Bot offers much more than its dual-strategy framework. In an era driven by algorithmic and high-frequency trading, its ability to seamlessly adapt to both bullish and bearish market signals distinguishes it from traditional models. Harnessing the collective intelligence of specialized agents, the system delivers unmatched precision and risk management, establishing itself as a game-changer in the world of modern autotrading.

 

Summary 

The traditional buy-and-hold strategy is being challenged by current market conditions—low liquidity, subdued economic participation, and the influence of Trump-era policies. These factors suggest that active trading strategies, which leverage tools such as inverse ETFs and advanced trading bots, may be more effective in managing risk and capitalizing on short-term opportunities. While long-term investors must remain fully invested to capture the market’s best days, active traders can potentially boost returns by avoiding the worst days, depending on their risk tolerance and expertise.

In this context, innovations like Agentic AI’s Double Agent Trading Bot are emerging as key tools for modern traders. This sophisticated system integrates inverse ETFs and a multi-agent framework to offer both intraday and swing trading strategies, ensuring precise, real-time, and unbiased decision-making. Such technologies empower traders to manage volatility more effectively, paving the way for smarter, more efficient autotrading.

Disclaimers and Limitation

Related Ticker: SPY, QQQ, TSLA, DIA

SPY's Indicator enters downward trend

The Aroon Indicator for SPY entered a downward trend on July 08, 2026. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor identified a pattern where the AroonDown red line was above 70 while the AroonUp green line was below 30 for three straight days. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options. A.I.dvisor looked at 140 similar instances where the Aroon Indicator formed such a pattern. In of the 140 cases the stock moved lower. This puts the odds of a downward move at .

Price Prediction Chart

Technical Analysis (Indicators)

Bearish Trend Analysis

The 10-day RSI Indicator for SPY moved out of overbought territory on June 03, 2026. This could be a bearish sign for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 44 similar instances where the indicator moved out of overbought territory. In of the 44 cases, the stock moved lower in the following days. This puts the odds of a move lower at .

The Stochastic Oscillator demonstrated that the ticker has stayed in the overbought zone for 4 days. The longer the ticker stays in the overbought zone, the sooner a price pull-back is expected.

Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where SPY declined for three days, the price rose further in of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are .

Bullish Trend Analysis

The Momentum Indicator moved above the 0 level on July 02, 2026. You may want to consider a long position or call options on SPY as a result. In of 72 past instances where the momentum indicator moved above 0, the stock continued to climb. The odds of a continued upward trend are .

The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for SPY just turned positive on July 06, 2026. Looking at past instances where SPY's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in of 53 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are .

SPY moved above its 50-day moving average on June 29, 2026 date and that indicates a change from a downward trend to an upward trend.

Following a 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where SPY advanced for three days, in of 366 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are .

SPY may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options.

Notable companies

The most notable companies in this group are NVIDIA Corp (NASDAQ:NVDA), Apple (NASDAQ:AAPL), Alphabet (NASDAQ:GOOG), Alphabet (NASDAQ:GOOGL), Microsoft Corp (NASDAQ:MSFT), Amazon.com (NASDAQ:AMZN), Broadcom Inc. (NASDAQ:AVGO), Meta Platforms (NASDAQ:META), Tesla (NASDAQ:TSLA), Eli Lilly & Co (NYSE:LLY).

Industry description

The investment seeks to provide investment results that, before expenses, correspond generally to the price and yield performance of the S&P 500® Index. The trust seeks to achieve its investment objective by holding a portfolio of the common stocks that are included in the index (the “Portfolio”), with the weight of each stock in the Portfolio substantially corresponding to the weight of such stock in the index.

Market Cap

The average market capitalization across the State Street® SPDR® S&P 500® ETF ETF is 157.09B. The market cap for tickers in the group ranges from 4.21B to 4.94T. NVDA holds the highest valuation in this group at 4.94T. The lowest valued company is MKTX at 4.21B.

High and low price notable news

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the State Street® SPDR® S&P 500® ETF ETF was -0%. For the same ETF, the average monthly price growth was 1%, and the average quarterly price growth was 8%. OXY experienced the highest price growth at 12%, while TER experienced the biggest fall at -20%.

Volume

The average weekly volume growth across all stocks in the State Street® SPDR® S&P 500® ETF ETF was -18%. For the same stocks of the ETF, the average monthly volume growth was -22% and the average quarterly volume growth was -20%

Fundamental Analysis Ratings

The average fundamental analysis ratings, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, are as follows

Valuation Rating: 51
P/E Growth Rating: 51
Price Growth Rating: 41
SMR Rating: 50
Profit Risk Rating: 59
Seasonality Score: 21 (-100 ... +100)
View a ticker or compare two or three
SPY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interact to see
Advertisement
A.I.Advisor
published price charts
Last 5 trading days
A.I. Advisor
published General Information

General Information

Category LargeBlend

Profile
Details
Category
Large Blend
Address
PDR Services, 86 Trinity PlaceNew York
Phone
N/A
Web
www.spdrs.com
Interact to see
Advertisement
Aon plc (AON) reported third-quarter 2025 revenue of $3.997 billion, representing a 7% year-over-year increase with equal organic growth. Adjusted earnings per share came in at $3.05, exceeding expectations. In late November, Moody’s reaffirmed Aon’s Baa2 credit rating and revised the outlook to positive, citing reduced leverage following the NFP acquisition.
Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. (APD) entered the spotlight after announcing advanced discussions with Yara International on December 8 to collaborate on low-emission ammonia projects. While the strategic direction aligns with global decarbonization trends, uncertainty around execution and capital requirements triggered a 9.45% one-day decline in the stock.
Lockheed Martin and RTX Corporation are two of the most prominent names in the aerospace and defense industry, both positioned to benefit from heightened global security concerns and sustained U.S. military spending.
As 2025 winds down, the Savings Banks sector reflects a mix of stability, innovation, and AI-driven disruption. Among the most closely watched tickers—SOFI Technologies (SOFI), Ally Financial (ALLY), and PayPal Holdings (PYPL)—investors have witnessed contrasting stories of growth, valuation, and market perception.
Ondas Holdings (ONDS) is a wireless technology company focused on delivering secure, long-range communications for industrial Internet of Things (IoT) and data networking applications. Its solutions are built to support mission-critical operations across sectors such as rail, energy, maritime, infrastructure, and industrial automation.
Ciena’s growth is driven by expanding offerings in optical networking, network automation software, and 5G transport infrastructure, complemented by services designed to help customers modernize and future-proof their networks. Its evolving technology portfolio addresses the rising complexity, speed, and reliability requirements of today’s communications environment.
Marathon Digital Holdings (MARA) and Riot Platforms (RIOT) are two leading companies in the Bitcoin mining industry, each operating energy-intensive infrastructure to capitalize on cryptocurrency market cycles. This comparison is especially relevant amid ongoing Bitcoin price volatility and growing interest in digital assets and AI-related infrastructure.
Roivant Sciences has delivered strong year-to-date performance, with shares up roughly 82%, driven by encouraging pipeline developments and increased investment in high-potential subsidiaries such as Immunovant.
MP Materials Corp. (MP) and USA Rare Earth, Inc. (USAR) are central to the United States’ push to establish a secure, domestic supply of rare earth elements—materials critical to electric vehicles, renewable energy, and defense technologies. As geopolitical tensions and supply chain vulnerabilities intensify, these two companies offer distinct approaches to addressing U.S. dependence on foreign sources.
The Invesco QQQ Trust (NASDAQ: QQQ) remains one of the most closely followed ETFs worldwide, offering investors direct exposure to the NASDAQ-100 Index®. In the most recent data, QQQ has gained a notable +20.16% year-to-date, even as markets experienced bouts of elevated volatility.
Sidus Space has expanded its portfolio in 2025, focusing on satellite missions and supporting technologies to enhance space infrastructure. Key product advancements include the LizzieSat platforms, with multiple units progressing in design and manufacturing. LizzieSat-3 is set for launch no earlier than Q1 2025, building on prior missions to boost data capabilities for clients in Earth observation and communication.
As 2025 comes to a close, Dingdong (Cayman) Limited (DDL) continues to strengthen its position in China’s competitive fresh grocery e-commerce market. Operating from Shanghai, the company focuses on high-quality fresh produce, ready-to-eat meals, and daily essentials delivered directly to consumers. Throughout the year, Dingdong emphasized private-label expansion, supply-chain optimization, and fulfillment network growth—initiatives that supported improving quarterly performance and positioned the company for sustained momentum.
Pioneer Power's 2025 highlights include the expansion of its mobile power and charging footprint with new orders and partnerships; the launch of a new suite of e-Boost solutions for off-grid EV charging; the rebranding of HomeBoost as PowerCore with events in December; the introduction of PRYMUS in December; and a new five-year contract for network transformers with a regional utility provider.
An AI-driven comparison between Palantir (PLTR) and Oracle (ORCL) points to Palantir as the more compelling investment heading into 2026. The analysis highlights PLTR’s AI-native platforms, which enable real-time, data-driven decision-making across fast-growing sectors such as government, defense, and enterprise analytics.
An AI-driven comparison between D-Wave Quantum (QBTS) and IonQ (IONQ) points to IonQ as the stronger opportunity heading into 2026. The analysis highlights IONQ’s gate-based, trapped-ion quantum architecture, which supports a wide range of algorithms and positions the company for broader adoption across AI, simulation, and cryptography.
An AI-driven comparison of Rigetti Computing (RGTI) and D-Wave Quantum (QBTS) points to Rigetti as the more compelling opportunity heading into 2026. The analysis highlights RGTI’s gate-based quantum architecture, which supports universal quantum computing and a wide range of complex algorithms. While D-Wave remains a leader in quantum annealing for optimization problems, Rigetti’s full-stack, gate-based approach offers greater scalability and broader long-term applications.
An AI-driven comparison of Rigetti Computing (RGTI) and TeraWulf (WULF) points to TeraWulf as the more attractive investment heading into 2026. The analysis emphasizes WULF’s large-scale digital infrastructure supporting Bitcoin mining and high-performance computing (HPC), which generates immediate revenue in expanding digital asset and AI-driven markets.
An AI-driven comparison between Rocket Lab USA (RKLB) and Planet Labs (PL) identifies Rocket Lab as the more compelling investment heading into 2026. The analysis highlights RKLB’s vertically integrated space services and consistent launch performance, which position the company to benefit from rising demand for satellite deployment and space infrastructure.
An AI-driven comparison of Tempus AI (TEM) and Doximity (DOCS) points to Tempus AI as the more compelling investment opportunity heading into 2026. The analysis highlights TEM’s AI-powered precision medicine platform, which applies advanced analytics and genomic data to transform diagnostics and treatment in oncology and cardiology.