Go to the list of all blogs
Sergey Savastiouk's Avatar
published in Blogs
Aug 14, 2020
Marriott (MAR, $97.03) and Hilton (HIL, $1.50) get ratings boost from Jefferies

Marriott (MAR, $97.03) and Hilton (HIL, $1.50) get ratings boost from Jefferies

Marriott International  and Hilton Worldwide got a rating boost from Jefferies analyst David Katz.

Katz  raised his ratings on the hotel chain owners to buy from hold.

The analyst finds the cash-generating characteristics of the low-capital business models as particularly “compelling”.

“Both [companies] are anchored by proven management teams and business models which we have confidence will recover,” Katz wrote in a report .“We believe the Street will increasingly seek high-quality laggards as the economy recovers.”

Tickeron's Comparision of Marriott International, Inc.  (MAR) vs Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc (HLT) :

Both companies represent the Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines industry

Market capitalization -- MAR: $31.3B vs. HLT: $23.7B

Stock price -- (MAR: $97.08 vs. HLT: $86.62)

Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MAR: 51% vs. HLT: 53%

Brand notoriety: MAR and HLT are both notable

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MAR’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green while HLT’s FA Score has 2’s green FA rating(s).

  • MAR’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • HLT’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MAR’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HLT’s TA Score has 5’s bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MAR’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • HLT’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.

Industries' Descriptions

@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines (+7.0% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate and manage one or more of the following: lodging facilities (e.g. hotels and motels), resorts (e.g. ski resorts), spas, cruise ships and timeshare facilities. Marriott International, Inc., Carnival Corporation, Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. and Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd. are some of the biggest names in this industry.

HLT vs MAR: Fundamental Ratings

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MAR's Valuation (5) in the Hotels Or Resorts Or Cruiselines industry is significantly better than the same rating for HLT (98). This means that MAR’s stock grew significantly faster than HLT’s over the last 12 months.

MAR's Profit vs Risk Rating (72) in the Hotels Or Resorts Or Cruiselines industry is in the same range as HLT (85). This means that MAR’s stock grew similarly to HLT’s over the last 12 months.

HLT's SMR Rating (1) in the Hotels Or Resorts Or Cruiselines industry is in the same range as MAR (13). This means that HLT’s stock grew similarly to MAR’s over the last 12 months.

HLT's Price Growth Rating (49) in the Hotels Or Resorts Or Cruiselines industry is in the same range as MAR (56). This means that HLT’s stock grew similarly to MAR’s over the last 12 months.

HLT's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the Hotels Or Resorts Or Cruiselines industry is in the same range as MAR (12). This means that HLT’s stock grew similarly to MAR’s over the last 12 months.

MAR ($31.3B) has a higher market cap than HLT ($23.7B). HLT has higher P/E ratio than MAR: -22.792 vs -36.022. HLT YTD gains are higher at: -22.792 vs. MAR (-36.022). MAR has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.333B vs. HLT (1.102B). HLT has more cash in the bank: 3.575B vs. MAR (2.283B). HLT has less debt than MAR: 11.4B vs 12.8B. MAR has higher revenues than HLT: 16.8B vs 7.278B.

Related Ticker: MAR

MAR in upward trend: price rose above 50-day moving average on July 02, 2026

MAR moved above its 50-day moving average on July 02, 2026 date and that indicates a change from a downward trend to an upward trend. In of 42 similar past instances, the stock price increased further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are .

Price Prediction Chart

Technical Analysis (Indicators)

Bullish Trend Analysis

The Stochastic Oscillator suggests the stock price trend may be in a reversal from a downward trend to an upward trend. of 60 cases where MAR's Stochastic Oscillator exited the oversold zone resulted in an increase in price. Tickeron's analysis proposes that the odds of a continued upward trend are .

Following a 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where MAR advanced for three days, in of 323 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are .

The Aroon Indicator entered an Uptrend today. In of 326 cases where MAR Aroon's Indicator entered an Uptrend, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued Uptrend are .

Bearish Trend Analysis

The 10-day RSI Indicator for MAR moved out of overbought territory on June 15, 2026. This could be a bearish sign for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 52 similar instances where the indicator moved out of overbought territory. In of the 52 cases, the stock moved lower in the following days. This puts the odds of a move lower at .

The Momentum Indicator moved below the 0 level on June 22, 2026. You may want to consider selling the stock, shorting the stock, or exploring put options on MAR as a result. In of 86 cases where the Momentum Indicator fell below 0, the stock fell further within the subsequent month. The odds of a continued downward trend are .

The Moving Average Convergence Divergence Histogram (MACD) for MAR turned negative on June 22, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to turn lower in the coming weeks. Traders may want to sell the stock or buy put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 52 similar instances when the indicator turned negative. In of the 52 cases the stock turned lower in the days that followed. This puts the odds of success at .

Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where MAR declined for three days, the price rose further in of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are .

Fundamental Analysis (Ratings)

The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating very strong sales and a profitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.

The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating low risk on high returns. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 63, placing this stock better than average.

The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to outstanding earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.

The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating steady price growth. MAR’s price grows at a higher rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.

The Tickeron Valuation Rating of (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is significantly overvalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (0.000) is normal, around the industry mean (10.322). P/E Ratio (38.865) is within average values for comparable stocks, (25.805). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (2.205) is also within normal values, averaging (28.724). Dividend Yield (0.007) settles around the average of (0.019) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (3.784) is also within normal values, averaging (3.071).

Notable companies

The most notable companies in this group are Marriott International (NASDAQ:MAR), Hilton Worldwide Holdings (NYSE:HLT), H World Group Limited (NASDAQ:HTHT).

Industry description

Companies that operate paid and subscriber-based broadcast facilities for cable and home satellite systems. Comcast Corp, Charter Communications, Inc. and DISH Network Corporation are some of the biggest cable/satellite TV providers. Customers typically pay a regular monthly fee to cable TV operators for unlimited access to a certain package of channels. Since the rising popularity of online streaming services have increased instances of cord-cutting among consumers, several cable operators have also diversified into internet services to milk the burgeoning appetite for internet-based content.

Market Cap

The average market capitalization across the Cable/Satellite TV Industry is 22.51B. The market cap for tickers in the group ranges from 196.44K to 100.4B. MAR holds the highest valuation in this group at 100.4B. The lowest valued company is UOKA at 196.44K.

High and low price notable news

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the Cable/Satellite TV Industry was -2%. For the same Industry, the average monthly price growth was 1%, and the average quarterly price growth was 7%. MAR experienced the highest price growth at 3%, while WH experienced the biggest fall at -8%.

Volume

The average weekly volume growth across all stocks in the Cable/Satellite TV Industry was -3%. For the same stocks of the Industry, the average monthly volume growth was -25% and the average quarterly volume growth was -32%

Fundamental Analysis Ratings

The average fundamental analysis ratings, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, are as follows

Valuation Rating: 54
P/E Growth Rating: 44
Price Growth Rating: 53
SMR Rating: 39
Profit Risk Rating: 63
Seasonality Score: -13 (-100 ... +100)
View a ticker or compare two or three
MAR
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interact to see
Advertisement
A.I.Advisor
published price charts
Last 5 trading days
A.I. Advisor
published General Information

General Information

an operator of hotels and related lodging facilities

Industry CableSatelliteTV

Profile
Details
Industry
Hotels Or Resorts Or Cruiselines
Address
7750 Wisconsin Avenue
Phone
+1 301 380-3000
Employees
414000
Web
https://www.marriott.com
Interact to see
Advertisement
Aon plc (AON) reported third-quarter 2025 revenue of $3.997 billion, representing a 7% year-over-year increase with equal organic growth. Adjusted earnings per share came in at $3.05, exceeding expectations. In late November, Moody’s reaffirmed Aon’s Baa2 credit rating and revised the outlook to positive, citing reduced leverage following the NFP acquisition.
Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. (APD) entered the spotlight after announcing advanced discussions with Yara International on December 8 to collaborate on low-emission ammonia projects. While the strategic direction aligns with global decarbonization trends, uncertainty around execution and capital requirements triggered a 9.45% one-day decline in the stock.
Lockheed Martin and RTX Corporation are two of the most prominent names in the aerospace and defense industry, both positioned to benefit from heightened global security concerns and sustained U.S. military spending.
As 2025 winds down, the Savings Banks sector reflects a mix of stability, innovation, and AI-driven disruption. Among the most closely watched tickers—SOFI Technologies (SOFI), Ally Financial (ALLY), and PayPal Holdings (PYPL)—investors have witnessed contrasting stories of growth, valuation, and market perception.
Ondas Holdings (ONDS) is a wireless technology company focused on delivering secure, long-range communications for industrial Internet of Things (IoT) and data networking applications. Its solutions are built to support mission-critical operations across sectors such as rail, energy, maritime, infrastructure, and industrial automation.
Ciena’s growth is driven by expanding offerings in optical networking, network automation software, and 5G transport infrastructure, complemented by services designed to help customers modernize and future-proof their networks. Its evolving technology portfolio addresses the rising complexity, speed, and reliability requirements of today’s communications environment.
Marathon Digital Holdings (MARA) and Riot Platforms (RIOT) are two leading companies in the Bitcoin mining industry, each operating energy-intensive infrastructure to capitalize on cryptocurrency market cycles. This comparison is especially relevant amid ongoing Bitcoin price volatility and growing interest in digital assets and AI-related infrastructure.
Roivant Sciences has delivered strong year-to-date performance, with shares up roughly 82%, driven by encouraging pipeline developments and increased investment in high-potential subsidiaries such as Immunovant.
MP Materials Corp. (MP) and USA Rare Earth, Inc. (USAR) are central to the United States’ push to establish a secure, domestic supply of rare earth elements—materials critical to electric vehicles, renewable energy, and defense technologies. As geopolitical tensions and supply chain vulnerabilities intensify, these two companies offer distinct approaches to addressing U.S. dependence on foreign sources.
The Invesco QQQ Trust (NASDAQ: QQQ) remains one of the most closely followed ETFs worldwide, offering investors direct exposure to the NASDAQ-100 Index®. In the most recent data, QQQ has gained a notable +20.16% year-to-date, even as markets experienced bouts of elevated volatility.
Sidus Space has expanded its portfolio in 2025, focusing on satellite missions and supporting technologies to enhance space infrastructure. Key product advancements include the LizzieSat platforms, with multiple units progressing in design and manufacturing. LizzieSat-3 is set for launch no earlier than Q1 2025, building on prior missions to boost data capabilities for clients in Earth observation and communication.
As 2025 comes to a close, Dingdong (Cayman) Limited (DDL) continues to strengthen its position in China’s competitive fresh grocery e-commerce market. Operating from Shanghai, the company focuses on high-quality fresh produce, ready-to-eat meals, and daily essentials delivered directly to consumers. Throughout the year, Dingdong emphasized private-label expansion, supply-chain optimization, and fulfillment network growth—initiatives that supported improving quarterly performance and positioned the company for sustained momentum.
Pioneer Power's 2025 highlights include the expansion of its mobile power and charging footprint with new orders and partnerships; the launch of a new suite of e-Boost solutions for off-grid EV charging; the rebranding of HomeBoost as PowerCore with events in December; the introduction of PRYMUS in December; and a new five-year contract for network transformers with a regional utility provider.
An AI-driven comparison between Palantir (PLTR) and Oracle (ORCL) points to Palantir as the more compelling investment heading into 2026. The analysis highlights PLTR’s AI-native platforms, which enable real-time, data-driven decision-making across fast-growing sectors such as government, defense, and enterprise analytics.
An AI-driven comparison between D-Wave Quantum (QBTS) and IonQ (IONQ) points to IonQ as the stronger opportunity heading into 2026. The analysis highlights IONQ’s gate-based, trapped-ion quantum architecture, which supports a wide range of algorithms and positions the company for broader adoption across AI, simulation, and cryptography.
An AI-driven comparison of Rigetti Computing (RGTI) and D-Wave Quantum (QBTS) points to Rigetti as the more compelling opportunity heading into 2026. The analysis highlights RGTI’s gate-based quantum architecture, which supports universal quantum computing and a wide range of complex algorithms. While D-Wave remains a leader in quantum annealing for optimization problems, Rigetti’s full-stack, gate-based approach offers greater scalability and broader long-term applications.
An AI-driven comparison of Rigetti Computing (RGTI) and TeraWulf (WULF) points to TeraWulf as the more attractive investment heading into 2026. The analysis emphasizes WULF’s large-scale digital infrastructure supporting Bitcoin mining and high-performance computing (HPC), which generates immediate revenue in expanding digital asset and AI-driven markets.
An AI-driven comparison between Rocket Lab USA (RKLB) and Planet Labs (PL) identifies Rocket Lab as the more compelling investment heading into 2026. The analysis highlights RKLB’s vertically integrated space services and consistent launch performance, which position the company to benefit from rising demand for satellite deployment and space infrastructure.
An AI-driven comparison of Tempus AI (TEM) and Doximity (DOCS) points to Tempus AI as the more compelling investment opportunity heading into 2026. The analysis highlights TEM’s AI-powered precision medicine platform, which applies advanced analytics and genomic data to transform diagnostics and treatment in oncology and cardiology.