Marriott (MAR, $97.03) and Hilton (HIL, $1.50) get ratings boost from Jefferies
Marriott International and Hilton Worldwide got a rating boost from Jefferies analyst David Katz.
Katz raised his ratings on the hotel chain owners to buy from hold.
The analyst finds the cash-generating characteristics of the low-capital business models as particularly “compelling”.
“Both [companies] are anchored by proven management teams and business models which we have confidence will recover,” Katz wrote in a report .“We believe the Street will increasingly seek high-quality laggards as the economy recovers.”
Tickeron's Comparision of Marriott International, Inc. (MAR) vs Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc (HLT) :
Both companies represent the Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines industry
Market capitalization -- MAR: $31.3B vs. HLT: $23.7B
Stock price -- (MAR: $97.08 vs. HLT: $86.62)
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MAR: 51% vs. HLT: 53%
Brand notoriety: MAR and HLT are both notable
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
MAR’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green while HLT’s FA Score has 2’s green FA rating(s).
- MAR’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
- HLT’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
MAR’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HLT’s TA Score has 5’s bullish TA indicator(s).
- MAR’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
- HLT’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
Industries' Descriptions
@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines (+7.0% weekly)
The industry includes companies that operate and manage one or more of the following: lodging facilities (e.g. hotels and motels), resorts (e.g. ski resorts), spas, cruise ships and timeshare facilities. Marriott International, Inc., Carnival Corporation, Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. and Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd. are some of the biggest names in this industry.
HLT vs MAR: Fundamental Ratings
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
MAR's Valuation (5) in the Hotels Or Resorts Or Cruiselines industry is significantly better than the same rating for HLT (98). This means that MAR’s stock grew significantly faster than HLT’s over the last 12 months.
MAR's Profit vs Risk Rating (72) in the Hotels Or Resorts Or Cruiselines industry is in the same range as HLT (85). This means that MAR’s stock grew similarly to HLT’s over the last 12 months.
HLT's SMR Rating (1) in the Hotels Or Resorts Or Cruiselines industry is in the same range as MAR (13). This means that HLT’s stock grew similarly to MAR’s over the last 12 months.
HLT's Price Growth Rating (49) in the Hotels Or Resorts Or Cruiselines industry is in the same range as MAR (56). This means that HLT’s stock grew similarly to MAR’s over the last 12 months.
HLT's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the Hotels Or Resorts Or Cruiselines industry is in the same range as MAR (12). This means that HLT’s stock grew similarly to MAR’s over the last 12 months.
MAR ($31.3B) has a higher market cap than HLT ($23.7B). HLT has higher P/E ratio than MAR: -22.792 vs -36.022. HLT YTD gains are higher at: -22.792 vs. MAR (-36.022). MAR has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.333B vs. HLT (1.102B). HLT has more cash in the bank: 3.575B vs. MAR (2.283B). HLT has less debt than MAR: 11.4B vs 12.8B. MAR has higher revenues than HLT: 16.8B vs 7.278B.
Momentum Indicator for MAR turns negative, indicating new downward trend
MAR saw its Momentum Indicator move below the 0 level on July 16, 2025. This is an indication that the stock could be shifting in to a new downward move. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or exploring put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 88 similar instances where the indicator turned negative. In of the 88 cases, the stock moved further down in the following days. The odds of a decline are at .
Technical Analysis (Indicators)
Bearish Trend Analysis
The 10-day RSI Indicator for MAR moved out of overbought territory on July 16, 2025. This could be a bearish sign for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 47 similar instances where the indicator moved out of overbought territory. In of the 47 cases, the stock moved lower in the following days. This puts the odds of a move lower at .
The Stochastic Oscillator may be shifting from an upward trend to a downward trend. In of 65 cases where MAR's Stochastic Oscillator exited the overbought zone, the price fell further within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are .
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence Histogram (MACD) for MAR turned negative on July 16, 2025. This could be a sign that the stock is set to turn lower in the coming weeks. Traders may want to sell the stock or buy put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 47 similar instances when the indicator turned negative. In of the 47 cases the stock turned lower in the days that followed. This puts the odds of success at .
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where MAR declined for three days, the price rose further in of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are .
Bullish Trend Analysis
The 50-day moving average for MAR moved above the 200-day moving average on July 11, 2025. This could be a long-term bullish signal for the stock as the stock shifts to an upward trend.
Following a 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where MAR advanced for three days, in of 342 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are .
The Aroon Indicator entered an Uptrend today. In of 304 cases where MAR Aroon's Indicator entered an Uptrend, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued Uptrend are .
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating very strong sales and a profitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating low risk on high returns. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 69, placing this stock better than average.
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to outstanding earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating steady price growth. MAR’s price grows at a higher rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Seasonality Score of (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is fair valued in the industry. The Tickeron Seasonality score describes the variance of predictable price changes around the same period every calendar year. These changes can be tied to a specific month, quarter, holiday or vacation period, as well as a meteorological or growing season.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is significantly overvalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: MAR's P/B Ratio (443.634) is very high in comparison to the industry average of (30.451). P/E Ratio (24.689) is within average values for comparable stocks, (31.992). MAR's Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (2.536) is very high in comparison to the industry average of (1.378). Dividend Yield (0.008) settles around the average of (0.023) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (3.210) is also within normal values, averaging (2.508).
Notable companies
Industry description
Market Cap
High and low price notable news
Volume
Fundamental Analysis Ratings
The average fundamental analysis ratings, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, are as follows
Advertisement
General Information
an operator of hotels and related lodging facilities
Industry HotelsResortsCruiselines
Advertisement