On Holding AG is a Swiss sportswear company founded in 2010 and listed on the New York Stock Exchange since 2021. The company designs and sells premium performance running shoes, athletic footwear, apparel, and accessories, best known for its proprietary CloudTec cushioning technology. Its portfolio spans performance running, training, tennis, and lifestyle categories, with footwear representing the largest share of revenue.
On has built a premium brand that competes with larger rivals such as Nike (NKE), Adidas (ADDYY), and Deckers' (DECK) Hoka brand in the running segment. Investors follow the stock closely for its rapid revenue growth, expanding margins, and direct-to-consumer momentum, which the company has prioritized as a way to protect full-price selling and premium positioning. I also checked this using Tickeron’s AI Screener to see how the stock compares to others in the industry.
Over the last 30 days, ONON shares declined from approximately $37.91 to $28.85, a drop of about 24%. The move was not gradual: the stock traded in the mid-to-upper $30s through early August and touched $38.78 on August 10, before collapsing to $30.91 the following session after second-quarter earnings.
The broader quarterly trend has been similarly negative. Roughly three months earlier, the stock closed near $39.75, meaning ONON has fallen about 27% over the quarter. The decline reflects a mid-June pullback, a late-July dip, and the sharp post-earnings selloff in August, leaving shares well below their levels from earlier in 2026. From what I see, this kind of sharp move often signals that the market is reassessing growth expectations.
The primary catalyst was On Holding's second-quarter 2026 earnings report, released on August 11. Net sales reached CHF 850.3 million, up 21.6% at constant currency but up only 13.5% on a reported basis, missing consensus estimates of roughly CHF 880 million. The shortfall was concentrated in the wholesale channel, where reported revenue grew just 4.8%.
Management attributed the softer wholesale performance to a deliberate decision to hold back shipments in a promotional marketplace, particularly in the Americas, in order to protect full-price integrity. While that discipline supported margins, investors focused on the weaker top line. The company also cut its full-year 2026 constant-currency sales growth outlook to the low-20% range, down from a prior forecast of at least 23%, with guidance implying full-year sales of CHF 3.47 billion to CHF 3.56 billion versus a consensus near CHF 3.56 billion.
The results were not uniformly weak. Adjusted earnings per share of CHF 0.35 beat estimates of CHF 0.34, net income swung to a profit of CHF 105 million from a year-ago loss, and gross margin expanded 390 basis points to 65.4%. Direct-to-consumer sales rose 34.3% at constant currency and reached a record 45.7% of sales. The company also raised its full-year gross margin outlook to at least 65%. I’m watching this closely because the margin strength shows the premium strategy is holding up even as growth slows.
The market reaction nonetheless reflected disappointment with slowing growth. Shares fell 20.3% on August 11 on volume of about 42.2 million shares, roughly 604% above the three-month average. Several analysts trimmed their targets following the report, including Raymond James, which downgraded the stock to Outperform and lowered its price target to $38, and Baird and Barclays, which cut their targets to $55 and $42, respectively.
On Holding's quarterly decline stems from a broader narrative of decelerating top-line growth even as profitability improves. Over the past three months, investors have weighed the company's premium-brand strategy against a more promotional wholesale environment, particularly in the Americas, where reported sales grew just 4.5% in the second quarter.
Meanwhile, other regions outperformed: EMEA net sales rose 15.4% and Asia-Pacific grew 43.1% on a reported basis, with APAC again representing more than 20% of total sales. Apparel grew 47.7% and accessories 88.3%, underscoring diversification beyond core footwear. Leadership changes also shaped sentiment during the period; in March, co-founders David Allemann and Caspar Coppetti were named co-CEOs effective May 1, replacing Martin Hoffmann. The market's reaction suggests a premium valuation left little room for the combination of a revenue miss and a trimmed growth outlook.
Looking ahead, investors are likely to focus on whether On Holding's direct-to-consumer momentum and margin expansion can offset softer wholesale growth. Key items to monitor include the company's third-quarter results, which management has indicated could show lower growth than the fourth quarter as it continues to manage wholesale sell-in deliberately, as well as the product launches expected to build into 2027.
Other factors include the pace of Americas wholesale recovery, currency movements given the company's Swiss franc reporting, tariff impacts, and the promotional intensity of the broader footwear market. The company's Investor Day, scheduled for September 21-22, 2026, in Zurich, may also provide updated long-term targets. These are informational factors to watch rather than investment recommendations, and outcomes will depend on consumer demand, competitive dynamics, and broader macroeconomic conditions.
In my own research process, I often turn to Tickeron’s AI Trading Bots to run systematic checks alongside fundamental analysis. These tools help surface data-driven signals across thousands of tickers and can highlight patterns that complement earnings reviews like the one for ONON. Reviewing the currently trending bots on the platform gives an additional layer of perspective on market activity without replacing core due diligence.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
Sergey Savastiouk, Ph.D. has a degree in Applied Mathematics from Moscow University and has extensive experience as an entrepreneur, investor, manager, and mathematician. His professional expertise is in applied mathematics, mathematical modeling, system and pattern analysis, and software and hardware system integration. He has served as the CEO of several hi-tech start-up companies and nonprofit organizations, which has given him proven capabilities in business strategy for high-tech start-up companies, market assessment, company formation, team building, product development, marketing, and sales. He has published numerous articles in journals and magazines on related fields. As a retail investor, he spent 15 years developing his proprietary trading and quantitative algorithms (now Tickeron’s A.I.), which brought him significant returns in trading the stock market. His current work and goal in founding Tickeron is to bring professional, sophisticated stock market analysis capabilities to retail investors via an easy-to-use interface.
The price of this ticker is presumed to bounce back soon, since the longer the ticker stays in the oversold zone, the more promptly an uptrend is expected.
The Stochastic Oscillator shows that the ticker has stayed in the oversold zone for 11 days. The price of this ticker is presumed to bounce back soon, since the longer the ticker stays in the oversold zone, the more promptly an upward trend is expected.
Following a 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where ONON advanced for three days, in of 278 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are .
ONON may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options.
The Momentum Indicator moved below the 0 level on August 11, 2026. You may want to consider selling the stock, shorting the stock, or exploring put options on ONON as a result. In of 88 cases where the Momentum Indicator fell below 0, the stock fell further within the subsequent month. The odds of a continued downward trend are .
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence Histogram (MACD) for ONON turned negative on August 11, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to turn lower in the coming weeks. Traders may want to sell the stock or buy put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 44 similar instances when the indicator turned negative. In of the 44 cases the stock turned lower in the days that followed. This puts the odds of success at .
ONON moved below its 50-day moving average on August 11, 2026 date and that indicates a change from an upward trend to a downward trend.
The 10-day moving average for ONON crossed bearishly below the 50-day moving average on August 11, 2026. This indicates that the trend has shifted lower and could be considered a sell signal. In of 17 past instances when the 10-day crossed below the 50-day, the stock continued to move higher over the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are .
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where ONON declined for three days, the price rose further in of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are .
The Aroon Indicator for ONON entered a downward trend on August 17, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating strong sales and a profitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is slightly overvalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (4.062) is normal, around the industry mean (2.578). P/E Ratio (19.686) is within average values for comparable stocks, (38.200). ONON's Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.549) is slightly lower than the industry average of (1.041). ONON has a moderately low Dividend Yield (0.000) as compared to the industry average of (0.032). ONON's P/S Ratio (4.645) is slightly higher than the industry average of (1.848).
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating slightly worse than average price growth. ONON’s price grows at a lower rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to worse than average earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. ONON’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 92, placing this stock worse than average.
The average fundamental analysis ratings, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, are as follows
Industry WholesaleDistributors