Pros and Cons of Leveraged Russell 2000 IWM ETFs: URTY vs. SRTY
Leveraged and inverse ETFs offer traders amplified exposure to market moves—both up and down—without requiring margin accounts. The Russell 2000 small‑cap index, known for its higher volatility and growth orientation, is a popular target. Below, we compare key 2× and 3× Russell 2000 ETFs, with a focus on ProShares UltraPro Russell2000 (URTY) and ProShares UltraPro Short Russell2000 (SRTY), alongside other leveraged plays.
Amplified Upside: Seeks 300% of the Russell 2000’s daily return—ideal in strong small‑cap rallies
(According to ETFDB)
.
No Margin Needed: Provides 3× exposure without a margin account.
Focused on Growth: Small caps often outperform in early bull cycles, offering outsized gains.
Cons
Compounding Drag: Daily rebalancing can erode returns over volatile stretches; multi‑day returns may deviate from 3× the index
.
High Expense: 0.95% fee can eat into profits, especially in choppy markets.
Volatility Risk: Losses also magnified—1% drop in the Russell 2000 yields a 3% loss in URTY.
SRTY (3× Bear)
Pros
Powerful Hedge: Seeks –300% of the Russell 2000’s daily return, enabling traders to profit from downturns or protect long portfolios
(According to ETFDB)
.
High Liquidity: Solid AUM and trading volume relative to peers ensure tight spreads.
Cons
Volatility Decay: Similar compounding issues; in whippy markets, SRTY may underperform –3× the index over time
.
Expense Ratio: 0.95% can erode hedging benefits if bearish moves are short‑lived.
Not Long‑Term: Designed for tactical use; holding through rebounds can generate steep losses.
Other Leveraged Russell 2000 ETFs
UWM (2× Bull): Lower leverage reduces compounding risk but still amplifies both gains and losses
.
TWM (–2× Bear): Similar to SRTY but with half the leverage, offering a more moderate hedge.
TNA/TZA (3× Bull/Bear by Direxion): Comparable to URTY/SRTY but with higher expenses (1.14%) and larger AUM for TNA
(According to ETFDB)
.
RWM (–1× Short): Simple inverse exposure; less risky than leveraged bears but offers smaller downside protection.
SMLL (2× Bull by Direxion): Niche fund with minimal AUM—liquidity risk for larger trades.
Key Considerations for Traders
Time Horizon: These funds are not buy‑and‑hold vehicles. Use them for daily or very short‑term trades.
Risk Management: Employ stop‑loss orders and position sizing to control drawdowns.
Monitoring: Frequent (daily) monitoring is essential to avoid compounding pitfalls.
Cost Impact: Higher expense ratios can materially affect returns in sideways markets.
Conclusion
For traders seeking tactical exposure to the Russell 2000, URTY and SRTY offer powerful, no‑margin alternatives to traditional leveraged or inverse positions. However, they carry significant compounding and volatility risks that demand disciplined risk management and daily oversight. Lower‑leverage ETFs like UWM or TWM, or the simple inverse RWM, may suit those seeking a milder approach. Ultimately, choosing the right ETF hinges on your market outlook, risk tolerance, and trading horizon—understanding these pros and cons is critical before deploying leveraged Russell 2000 ETFs in your portfolio.
URTY's RSI Oscillator leaves overbought zone
The 10-day RSI Indicator for URTY moved out of overbought territory on June 11, 2025. This could be a sign that the stock is shifting from an upward trend to a downward trend. Traders may want to look at selling the stock or buying put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 27 instances where the indicator moved out of the overbought zone. In of the 27 cases the stock moved lower in the days that followed. This puts the odds of a move down at .
Technical Analysis (Indicators)
Bearish Trend Analysis
The Stochastic Oscillator may be shifting from an upward trend to a downward trend. In of 62 cases where URTY's Stochastic Oscillator exited the overbought zone, the price fell further within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are .
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where URTY declined for three days, the price rose further in of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are .
URTY broke above its upper Bollinger Band on June 09, 2025. This could be a sign that the stock is set to drop as the stock moves back below the upper band and toward the middle band. You may want to consider selling the stock or exploring put options.
Bullish Trend Analysis
The Momentum Indicator moved above the 0 level on June 05, 2025. You may want to consider a long position or call options on URTY as a result. In of 90 past instances where the momentum indicator moved above 0, the stock continued to climb. The odds of a continued upward trend are .
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for URTY just turned positive on June 04, 2025. Looking at past instances where URTY's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in of 46 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are .
URTY moved above its 50-day moving average on May 09, 2025 date and that indicates a change from a downward trend to an upward trend.
The 10-day moving average for URTY crossed bullishly above the 50-day moving average on May 13, 2025. This indicates that the trend has shifted higher and could be considered a buy signal. In of 17 past instances when the 10-day crossed above the 50-day, the stock continued to move higher over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are .
Following a 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where URTY advanced for three days, in of 313 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are .
The Aroon Indicator entered an Uptrend today. In of 241 cases where URTY Aroon's Indicator entered an Uptrend, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued Uptrend are .
Notable companies
Industry description
Market Cap
High and low price notable news
Volume
Fundamental Analysis Ratings
The average fundamental analysis ratings, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, are as follows
Advertisement
General Information
Category Trading
Advertisement