The First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund (QCLN) is a passively managed exchange-traded fund that aims to track the NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index. This market-cap-weighted benchmark focuses on U.S.-listed companies involved in clean energy, with the fund typically allocating at least 90% of its assets to index components spanning solar, wind, electric vehicles, batteries, fuel cells, and related power electronics.
The portfolio includes more than 50 securities and carries an expense ratio of 0.59%. Its largest holdings feature BE, TSLA, MPWR, ON, FSLR, and RIVN, where the top 10 positions make up roughly 60% of assets. Sector exposure leans toward information technology, industrials, and consumer discretionary, alongside notable materials and utilities weightings.
This setup explains much of the fund’s sensitivity. A limited number of large, high-beta holdings in areas like semiconductors, autos, and solar equipment can drive both upside and downside moves, resulting in elevated volatility compared with many other thematic ETFs. I also checked this using Tickeron’s AI Screener to see how the stock compares to others in the industry.
Over the trailing 30 days, QCLN posted a clear decline of approximately 10%, moving from around $48.27 down to $43.43. The path was uneven, with the fund drifting lower for much of the period before a sharper selloff toward the end.
The quarterly view shows a similar direction but greater magnitude, with the fund down about 12% from levels three months prior. Early in the quarter, QCLN traded near $60 before a steep mid-quarter correction, highlighting the elevated annualized volatility that has historically ranged in the mid-to-high 30% area.
The latest leg lower stemmed mainly from a repricing of interest-rate-sensitive clean energy assets. With the 10-year Treasury yield near 5% and the Federal Reserve maintaining its target range at 3.75%–4.00%, elevated financing costs continued to pressure capital-intensive renewables and electric vehicle companies.
A key catalyst emerged from the solar segment. ENPH dropped sharply after lowering forward revenue guidance below expectations, pointing to softer U.S. residential demand, higher rates, and the expiration of the Section 25D federal tax credit. This development weighed on SEDG and RUN, while even FSLR traded lower year-to-date despite its utility-scale backlog. Concentration effects amplified the impact, as BE corrected after an earlier advance and TSLA faced pressure from valuation and delivery concerns. Ongoing outflows from clean energy funds added to the selling.
The broader quarterly decline reflects a sector rotation more than any isolated event. Long-duration, capital-intensive clean energy names lagged as yields rose and investors favored segments with stronger cash flows and less rate sensitivity. Electric vehicle valuations, particularly around TSLA, came under renewed scrutiny, and residential solar continued to face demand softness linked to borrowing costs and expired incentives.
Within the portfolio, results were mixed. Fuel-cell and baseload-power holdings such as BE delivered solid year-to-date gains before reversing recently, while solar and residential-focused names lagged. This dispersion underscores how differing fundamentals within the same thematic index can produce a uniformly negative headline return.
Several themes are likely to influence QCLN in the months ahead. The trajectory of interest rates stands out, as any sustained decline in Treasury yields or Federal Reserve easing could ease financing conditions for solar, storage, and EV adoption, whereas firmer rates would extend the current pressure. Policy developments around clean-energy tax credits and trade measures affecting solar and battery supply chains will also matter for both demand and costs.
Earnings reports from major holdings in semiconductors, autos, and solar equipment should drive near-term volatility, alongside trends in residential solar demand, utility-scale backlogs, and electric vehicle deliveries. Capital flows into thematic ETFs and competition from lower-cost clean energy funds will remain relevant as well. In my view, monitoring these variables provides a clearer picture than simply extrapolating recent price action.
When evaluating thematic ETFs like QCLN, I frequently rely on Tickeron’s AI Screener to quickly compare performance metrics, volatility profiles, and industry exposures across similar funds. This helps surface patterns that might otherwise require manual review of dozens of holdings. The platform allows filtering by technical indicators, fundamentals, and AI-generated signals, which supports a more systematic approach to thematic analysis. To explore the tool, visit the AI Screener.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
The RSI Indicator for QCLN moved out of oversold territory on October 26, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is shifting from a downward trend to an upward trend. Traders may want to buy the stock or call options. The A.I.dvisor looked at 30 similar instances when the indicator left oversold territory. In 28 of the 30 cases the stock moved higher. This puts the odds of a move higher at 90%.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for QCLN just turned positive on October 29, 2026. Looking at past instances where QCLN's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 46 of 52 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 88%.
Following a +6.11% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where QCLN advanced for three days, in 262 of 293 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 89%.
QCLN may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options.
The Stochastic Oscillator entered the overbought zone. Expect a price pull-back in the foreseeable future.
The Momentum Indicator moved below the 0 level on October 29, 2026. You may want to consider selling the stock, shorting the stock, or exploring put options on QCLN as a result. In 77 of 85 cases where the Momentum Indicator fell below 0, the stock fell further within the subsequent month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 90%.
QCLN moved below its 50-day moving average on October 07, 2026 date and that indicates a change from an upward trend to a downward trend.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where QCLN declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 90%.
The Aroon Indicator for QCLN entered a downward trend on September 24, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.
The average fundamental analysis ratings, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, are as follows
Category MiscellaneousSector