Go to the list of all blogs
Sergey Savastiouk's Avatar
published in Blogs
Feb 13, 2021
Trading psychology in a cup-and-handle pattern

Trading psychology in a cup-and-handle pattern

Pattern trading in the security market isn’t new. For years — decades even— traders have been scouring charts on a daily basis in search of pattern formations. The thinking has been that if you found a pattern early in its formation, maybe you could capitalize on a trade by predicting where the security was headed.

The Cup-and-Handle pattern is a great example of how this works. Here is an image of the geometric pattern formation:

From a geometric shape standpoint, it is easy to see how the cup and the handle forms in the image above. But perhaps the more important question here is: why does the pattern form this way?

To answer that, let’s think about the cup-and-handle pattern from a behavioral finance/investor psychology standpoint.

The Psychology Behind a Cup-and-Handle Pattern

Point #1 on the chart is easy enough — the security reaches a new high or tests an old one, and investors take some profits off the table.

At point #2, the security has pared back some of the gains, but at a certain point, investors will see it as an attractive price to buy, which creates a support level. As buyers pour-in, the price ultimately climbs back up to the high it reached earlier (point #3).

Investors often figure that if the price can reach its old high (points #1 and 3) again, that would provide yet another optimal opportunity to take some profits off the table. However, this time the stock only traces back part of the way (point #4) before investors want to pile back in, hoping to capitalize the next time the stock retests the high. Indeed, once the stock finally crosses its support level (points #1 and #3), investors will see it as a “breakout” and will fear missing out on further gains, driving the price even higher. In addition, all those how could have placed short bets might get scared and start covering their short positions and driving the price even higher.

For investors watching this pattern form and then seeing it confirmed as a cup-and-handle, the ideal outcome would be to identify the breakout price and to trade with the trend. Two potential trades in this case of the example would be for the investor to either going long the security or perhaps buy some call options.

How Can an Individual Investor Find Patterns in the Sprawling, Ever-Changing Market?

Obviously, the monumental challenge for investors is how to identify patterns in the securities markets. Today, there are 3,671 domestic companies listed on US stock exchanges. But then there is also forex, ETFs, commodities, and the emerging asset class, cryptocurrencies. The time and manpower needed to scan charts is unfathomable.

But that's where Artificial Intelligence comes in.

Tickeron has developed Artificial Intelligence (AI) that is programmed to search for cup-and-holder patterns in the security market, but it can also search for patterns in forex, cryptocurrencies, ETFs, and other securities.

The tool is called the Pattern Search Engine, and it can revolutionize the way you trade. Using algorithms and AI is no longer limited to hedge funds and big institutional Wall St. firms. Now you, the retail trader, can use the same high-powered technology to scan the markets for patterns.

Here’s How it Works

Here’s a typical example of a Cup-and-Handle pattern identified by Tickeron’s AI, and this is how it would be delivered right to your inbox.

Cup-and-Handle (Bullish) Example

To note, while the above example is an actual stock and an actual confirmed and successful cup-and-handle pattern, it does not constitute investment advice nor is it a recommendation for the stock.

In the example above, Tickeron’s AI would have delivered this pattern and stock ticker to your inbox once it was confirmed, and then it would be up to you to trade at the breakout price in anticipation of the stock reaching its target price. In this case, the stock MRUS confirmed the cup-and-handle pattern on December 21, 2017, and by the 28th it had notched a +12.05% gain from breakout price to the target price.

What’s more, the cup-and-handle pattern works for both bullish scenarios and bearish scenarios. As you can see from the pattern chart below, the AI detected an inverse cup-and-handle pattern for the stock ticker CERS on December 20, 2017, and by the 29th the stock had plunged as predicted to the target price. Traders who received this pattern from Tickeron’s AI could have attempted to capitalize by potentially shorting the stock at the breakout price or purchasing put options.  

To note, while the above example is an actual stock and an actual confirmed and successful cup-and-handle pattern, it does not constitute investment advice nor is it a recommendation for the stock.

Does the Security Pattern Search Engine Really Work?

How do you know if Tickeron’s Artificial Intelligence — or any trading platform or strategy for that matter — really works?? The answer: statistics.

Tickeron tracks and backtests statistics for each cup-and-handle pattern detected by Artificial Intelligence, and compiles the data into a user-friendly format. The idea is that if an investor/trader can see past statistics for a particular pattern, it can better inform the investor whether or not the trade is worth the risk to him or her.

With Tickeron’s platform, an investor/user can obtain statistics about patterns the AI has detected and what percentage of them actually hit their target price — and what the potential gain could have been if the investor traded the pattern (or loss, if the pattern was not successful).

With just a few clicks, the user can obtain the following statistics:

  • How many total cup-and-handle patterns the AI has recognized

  • How many of those patterns actually reached the target price

  • The average return if the pattern was successful versus if it failed; and,

  • The average return of all patterns recognized.

  • A list of all of the securities (including cryptocurrencies) that the AI has identified over time in a cup-and-handle pattern.

The AI also has different “confidence levels” for how confident it is that the pattern will play out, and the user can adjust confidence levels higher or lower to obtain different statistics.

For example, if Tickeron’s AI is asked to detect all Cup-and-Handle Bullish Patterns with a 30%+ confidence level and a greater than 7% distance to the target price, then the user would discover that Tickeron’s AI has discovered 12,140 patterns meeting that criteria, having searched about 4000 stocks and about 10,000 ETFs. The user would also discover that 6,790 of those patterns actually reached the target price with average return +14%. Of the patterns that did not reach their target price, the average loss was about  -8%. The key here is that the AI was correct more than half the time, which is a strong statistic.

Test the Pattern Search Engine for Yourself

If you’ve never seen technology like this before, it’s because it has never been available to retail investors in this format. The idea is to provide retail investors with technology and tools to enable trading with massive amounts of data and analysis. The end result is arming retail investors with a high-powered, virtual research assistant: Tickeron’s Artificial Intelligence.

Interested in stock patterns? Identify 37 pattern types across thousands of stocks, ETFs and cryptocurrencies. Learn more here.

Related Ticker: CERS

CERS in downward trend: price expected to drop as it breaks its higher Bollinger Band on May 29, 2026

CERS broke above its upper Bollinger Band on May 29, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to drop as the stock moves back below the upper band and toward the middle band. You may want to consider selling the stock or exploring put options. The A.I.dvisor looked at 42 similar instances where the stock broke above the upper band. In of the 42 cases the stock fell afterwards. This puts the odds of success at .

Price Prediction Chart

Technical Analysis (Indicators)

Bearish Trend Analysis

The 10-day RSI Indicator for CERS moved out of overbought territory on June 01, 2026. This could be a bearish sign for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 18 similar instances where the indicator moved out of overbought territory. In of the 18 cases, the stock moved lower in the following days. This puts the odds of a move lower at .

The Momentum Indicator moved below the 0 level on June 05, 2026. You may want to consider selling the stock, shorting the stock, or exploring put options on CERS as a result. In of 104 cases where the Momentum Indicator fell below 0, the stock fell further within the subsequent month. The odds of a continued downward trend are .

The Moving Average Convergence Divergence Histogram (MACD) for CERS turned negative on June 02, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to turn lower in the coming weeks. Traders may want to sell the stock or buy put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 42 similar instances when the indicator turned negative. In of the 42 cases the stock turned lower in the days that followed. This puts the odds of success at .

Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where CERS declined for three days, the price rose further in of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are .

Bullish Trend Analysis

The Stochastic Oscillator suggests the stock price trend may be in a reversal from a downward trend to an upward trend. of 65 cases where CERS's Stochastic Oscillator exited the oversold zone resulted in an increase in price. Tickeron's analysis proposes that the odds of a continued upward trend are .

Following a 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where CERS advanced for three days, in of 225 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are .

Fundamental Analysis (Ratings)

The Tickeron Valuation Rating of (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is slightly undervalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (8.006) is normal, around the industry mean (10.931). P/E Ratio (0.000) is within average values for comparable stocks, (63.298). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.000) is also within normal values, averaging (3.716). CERS has a moderately low Dividend Yield (0.000) as compared to the industry average of (0.018). P/S Ratio (2.399) is also within normal values, averaging (22.338).

The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating steady price growth. CERS’s price grows at a higher rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.

The Tickeron Seasonality Score of (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is significantly overvalued in the industry. The Tickeron Seasonality score describes the variance of predictable price changes around the same period every calendar year. These changes can be tied to a specific month, quarter, holiday or vacation period, as well as a meteorological or growing season.

The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating weak sales and an unprofitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.

The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to worse than average earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.

The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. CERS’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 95, placing this stock worse than average.

Notable companies

The most notable companies in this group are Abbott Laboratories (NYSE:ABT), Medtronic plc (NYSE:MDT), Boston Scientific Corp (NYSE:BSX), Edwards Lifesciences Corp (NYSE:EW).

Industry description

The medical/nursing services includes companies that provide medical-related services such as ambulance services, dialysis centers, respiratory therapy, blood testing and rehabilitation services. DaVita Inc., Chemed Corporation and Guardant Health, Inc. are examples of companies in this industry.

Market Cap

The average market capitalization across the Medical/Nursing Services Industry is 5.39B. The market cap for tickers in the group ranges from 1.86K to 153.99B. ABT holds the highest valuation in this group at 153.99B. The lowest valued company is CSAY at 1.86K.

High and low price notable news

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the Medical/Nursing Services Industry was -1%. For the same Industry, the average monthly price growth was -4%, and the average quarterly price growth was -17%. ICCM experienced the highest price growth at 101%, while WOK experienced the biggest fall at -65%.

Volume

The average weekly volume growth across all stocks in the Medical/Nursing Services Industry was 148%. For the same stocks of the Industry, the average monthly volume growth was 24% and the average quarterly volume growth was 105%

Fundamental Analysis Ratings

The average fundamental analysis ratings, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, are as follows

Valuation Rating: 51
P/E Growth Rating: 76
Price Growth Rating: 61
SMR Rating: 90
Profit Risk Rating: 95
Seasonality Score: 25 (-100 ... +100)
View a ticker or compare two or three
CERS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interact to see
Advertisement
A.I.Advisor
published price charts
Last 5 trading days
A.I. Advisor
published General Information

General Information

a developer of the INTERCEPT Blood System for platelets and plasma

Industry MedicalNursingServices

Profile
Details
Industry
Medical Specialties
Address
1220 Concord Avenue
Phone
+1 925 288-6000
Employees
275
Web
https://www.cerus.com
Interact to see
Advertisement
In the ever-shifting healthcare sector, CVS Health (CVS) and UnitedHealth Group (UNH) represent two powerhouse approaches: CVS as a retail pharmacy giant with integrated insurance and services, and UNH as a leading health insurer with diversified operations.
In the competitive retail landscape, American Eagle Outfitters (NYSE: AEO) is showing signs of robust upward potential as it navigates a strong 2025 performance.
In the dynamic world of satellite communications and broadband services, EchoStar Corporation (NASDAQ: SATS) has captured investor attention with a notable technical breakthrough. On December 8, 2025, the stock's 10-day moving average crossed above its 50-day moving average, signaling the onset of a bullish upward trend.
In an era where global investors demand instant access to markets, major players in the financial world are racing to extend trading hours beyond the traditional 9:30 a.m. to 4 p.m. ET window. This push is driven by surging foreign holdings of U.S. equities, which hit $17 trillion last year, and the growing appetite for nonstop trading in a 24/7 digital economy.
In the resilient gold mining sector, IAMGOLD Corporation (NYSE: IAG) has demonstrated an extraordinary uptrend throughout 2025, capitalizing on rising gold prices and operational milestones.
Within the rapidly evolving automotive retail landscape, Carvana Co. (NYSE: CVNA) has emerged as one of 2025’s standout performers. Once viewed as a highly volatile name, the company has transformed into a market leader as demand for online vehicle purchasing accelerates
Microsoft (MSFT) emerges as the AI-favored stock in 2025, outperforming Apple (AAPL) with a 16% year-to-date gain, compared to Apple’s 10% rise. The advantage stems from Microsoft’s deeper enterprise AI integration, accelerating cloud growth, and scalable software ecosystem.
ExxonMobil (XOM) emerges as the AI-preferred energy stock in 2025, posting a 10% year-to-date gain compared with Chevron’s (CVX) 2% increase. Stronger upstream production, exposure to high-growth assets, and expanding low-carbon initiatives support XOM’s momentum. Tickeron’s AI models signal continued upside for XOM, while CVX shows signs of overbought conditions and elevated downside risk.
Tesla (TSLA) emerges as the AI-preferred EV stock in 2025, posting a 19% year-to-date gain, while BYD (BYDDY) has declined 82%, reflecting diverging momentum across the global EV market. Tickeron’s AI trading bots indicate strong bullish conditions for TSLA, supported by positive momentum signals, whereas BYDDY shows sustained bearish trends.
Broadcom (AVGO) emerges as the AI-preferred semiconductor stock in 2025, posting a 48% year-to-date gain, compared with 37% for NVIDIA (NVDA), supported by stronger diversification across networking, infrastructure, and custom AI chips.
- Bio-Techne carries a “Moderate Buy” consensus from 13 analysts, with an average price target of $70.58, implying about 15% upside. - Recent positive revisions include TD Cowen (Oct. 14, target raised from $65 to $70, Strong Buy), Evercore ISI (Oct. 7, $60 to $72, Buy), and RBC -
Skyworks Solutions (SWKS) has traded unevenly in recent weeks as investors digest shifting sector dynamics and company-specific guidance. The stock has moved into a consolidation phase following broader semiconductor rotations, with optimism in diversified end markets offset by ongoing pressure in mobile.
Seagate Technology (STX) has emerged as one of the standout performers of 2025, powered by explosive demand for data storage tied to artificial intelligence workloads. As hyperscalers expand cloud and AI infrastructure, Seagate’s high-capacity hard drives have become essential, pushing the stock sharply higher and keeping investor attention firmly locked on upcoming earnings.
Home Depot and Lowe’s are the two dominant players in the home improvement retail space, frequently compared due to their similar product offerings and overlapping customer bases of DIY homeowners and professional contractors. Their performance is closely watched as a barometer for consumer discretionary spending, housing market trends, and interest rate impacts.
Over the past month, Wynn’s share price has been shaped by a combination of analyst actions, expansion-related news, and shifting industry dynamics. The stock reached a 52-week high in early December, supported by positive premarket activity and renewed optimism across consumer-facing sectors.
Visa (V) strengthened its leadership in global payments, advancing AI-driven tools, stablecoin advisory services, and enhanced security offerings in 2025.
Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley are leading global investment banks, frequently compared due to their overlapping operations in capital markets, wealth management, and advisory services. Evaluating these stocks side by side helps investors and traders understand differences in risk, growth potential, and revenue drivers amid ongoing macroeconomic shifts, tariff impacts, and a resurgence in deal-making activity.
Equinox Gold (EQX) and Coeur Mining (CDE) are notable players in the precious metals mining sector, focusing on gold and silver production in a market influenced by economic uncertainty, inflation hedges, and global demand. This comparison provides insight for investors tracking commodity trends or seeking safe-haven assets.
Strategic Acquisitions and Expansion: USAR acquired UK-based Less Common Metals, integrating rare earth metal and magnet production to create a comprehensive magnet-to-mine supply chain. Production Acceleration: Construction at the Round Top facility in Texas has been advanced, with commercial production now expected by late 2028—two years ahead of the original schedule.