Go to the list of all blogs
Sergey Savastiouk's Avatar
published in Blogs
Feb 13, 2021
Trading psychology in a cup-and-handle pattern

Trading psychology in a cup-and-handle pattern

Pattern trading in the security market isn’t new. For years — decades even— traders have been scouring charts on a daily basis in search of pattern formations. The thinking has been that if you found a pattern early in its formation, maybe you could capitalize on a trade by predicting where the security was headed.

The Cup-and-Handle pattern is a great example of how this works. Here is an image of the geometric pattern formation:

From a geometric shape standpoint, it is easy to see how the cup and the handle forms in the image above. But perhaps the more important question here is: why does the pattern form this way?

To answer that, let’s think about the cup-and-handle pattern from a behavioral finance/investor psychology standpoint.

The Psychology Behind a Cup-and-Handle Pattern

Point #1 on the chart is easy enough — the security reaches a new high or tests an old one, and investors take some profits off the table.

At point #2, the security has pared back some of the gains, but at a certain point, investors will see it as an attractive price to buy, which creates a support level. As buyers pour-in, the price ultimately climbs back up to the high it reached earlier (point #3).

Investors often figure that if the price can reach its old high (points #1 and 3) again, that would provide yet another optimal opportunity to take some profits off the table. However, this time the stock only traces back part of the way (point #4) before investors want to pile back in, hoping to capitalize the next time the stock retests the high. Indeed, once the stock finally crosses its support level (points #1 and #3), investors will see it as a “breakout” and will fear missing out on further gains, driving the price even higher. In addition, all those how could have placed short bets might get scared and start covering their short positions and driving the price even higher.

For investors watching this pattern form and then seeing it confirmed as a cup-and-handle, the ideal outcome would be to identify the breakout price and to trade with the trend. Two potential trades in this case of the example would be for the investor to either going long the security or perhaps buy some call options.

How Can an Individual Investor Find Patterns in the Sprawling, Ever-Changing Market?

Obviously, the monumental challenge for investors is how to identify patterns in the securities markets. Today, there are 3,671 domestic companies listed on US stock exchanges. But then there is also forex, ETFs, commodities, and the emerging asset class, cryptocurrencies. The time and manpower needed to scan charts is unfathomable.

But that's where Artificial Intelligence comes in.

Tickeron has developed Artificial Intelligence (AI) that is programmed to search for cup-and-holder patterns in the security market, but it can also search for patterns in forex, cryptocurrencies, ETFs, and other securities.

The tool is called the Pattern Search Engine, and it can revolutionize the way you trade. Using algorithms and AI is no longer limited to hedge funds and big institutional Wall St. firms. Now you, the retail trader, can use the same high-powered technology to scan the markets for patterns.

Here’s How it Works

Here’s a typical example of a Cup-and-Handle pattern identified by Tickeron’s AI, and this is how it would be delivered right to your inbox.

Cup-and-Handle (Bullish) Example

To note, while the above example is an actual stock and an actual confirmed and successful cup-and-handle pattern, it does not constitute investment advice nor is it a recommendation for the stock.

In the example above, Tickeron’s AI would have delivered this pattern and stock ticker to your inbox once it was confirmed, and then it would be up to you to trade at the breakout price in anticipation of the stock reaching its target price. In this case, the stock MRUS confirmed the cup-and-handle pattern on December 21, 2017, and by the 28th it had notched a +12.05% gain from breakout price to the target price.

What’s more, the cup-and-handle pattern works for both bullish scenarios and bearish scenarios. As you can see from the pattern chart below, the AI detected an inverse cup-and-handle pattern for the stock ticker CERS on December 20, 2017, and by the 29th the stock had plunged as predicted to the target price. Traders who received this pattern from Tickeron’s AI could have attempted to capitalize by potentially shorting the stock at the breakout price or purchasing put options.  

To note, while the above example is an actual stock and an actual confirmed and successful cup-and-handle pattern, it does not constitute investment advice nor is it a recommendation for the stock.

Does the Security Pattern Search Engine Really Work?

How do you know if Tickeron’s Artificial Intelligence — or any trading platform or strategy for that matter — really works?? The answer: statistics.

Tickeron tracks and backtests statistics for each cup-and-handle pattern detected by Artificial Intelligence, and compiles the data into a user-friendly format. The idea is that if an investor/trader can see past statistics for a particular pattern, it can better inform the investor whether or not the trade is worth the risk to him or her.

With Tickeron’s platform, an investor/user can obtain statistics about patterns the AI has detected and what percentage of them actually hit their target price — and what the potential gain could have been if the investor traded the pattern (or loss, if the pattern was not successful).

With just a few clicks, the user can obtain the following statistics:

  • How many total cup-and-handle patterns the AI has recognized

  • How many of those patterns actually reached the target price

  • The average return if the pattern was successful versus if it failed; and,

  • The average return of all patterns recognized.

  • A list of all of the securities (including cryptocurrencies) that the AI has identified over time in a cup-and-handle pattern.

The AI also has different “confidence levels” for how confident it is that the pattern will play out, and the user can adjust confidence levels higher or lower to obtain different statistics.

For example, if Tickeron’s AI is asked to detect all Cup-and-Handle Bullish Patterns with a 30%+ confidence level and a greater than 7% distance to the target price, then the user would discover that Tickeron’s AI has discovered 12,140 patterns meeting that criteria, having searched about 4000 stocks and about 10,000 ETFs. The user would also discover that 6,790 of those patterns actually reached the target price with average return +14%. Of the patterns that did not reach their target price, the average loss was about  -8%. The key here is that the AI was correct more than half the time, which is a strong statistic.

Test the Pattern Search Engine for Yourself

If you’ve never seen technology like this before, it’s because it has never been available to retail investors in this format. The idea is to provide retail investors with technology and tools to enable trading with massive amounts of data and analysis. The end result is arming retail investors with a high-powered, virtual research assistant: Tickeron’s Artificial Intelligence.

Interested in stock patterns? Identify 37 pattern types across thousands of stocks, ETFs and cryptocurrencies. Learn more here.

Related Ticker: CERS

Contributor

Sergey Savastiouk, Ph.D. has a degree in Applied Mathematics from Moscow University and has extensive experience as an entrepreneur, investor, manager, and mathematician. His professional expertise is in applied mathematics, mathematical modeling, system and pattern analysis, and software and hardware system integration. He has served as the CEO of several hi-tech start-up companies and nonprofit organizations, which has given him proven capabilities in business strategy for high-tech start-up companies, market assessment, company formation, team building, product development, marketing, and sales. He has published numerous articles in journals and magazines on related fields. As a retail investor, he spent 15 years developing his proprietary trading and quantitative algorithms (now Tickeron’s A.I.), which brought him significant returns in trading the stock market. His current work and goal in founding Tickeron is to bring professional, sophisticated stock market analysis capabilities to retail investors via an easy-to-use interface.


CERS's RSI Oscillator climbs out of oversold territory

The RSI Indicator for CERS moved out of oversold territory on October 05, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is shifting from a downward trend to an upward trend. Traders may want to buy the stock or call options. The A.I.dvisor looked at 28 similar instances when the indicator left oversold territory. In 24 of the 28 cases the stock moved higher. This puts the odds of a move higher at 86%.

Price Prediction Chart

Technical Analysis (Indicators)

Bullish Trend Analysis

The Stochastic Oscillator shows that the ticker has stayed in the oversold zone for 4 days. The price of this ticker is presumed to bounce back soon, since the longer the ticker stays in the oversold zone, the more promptly an upward trend is expected.

Following a +0.77% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where CERS advanced for three days, in 173 of 227 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 76%.

CERS may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options.

Bearish Trend Analysis

The Momentum Indicator moved below the 0 level on September 28, 2026. You may want to consider selling the stock, shorting the stock, or exploring put options on CERS as a result. In 89 of 102 cases where the Momentum Indicator fell below 0, the stock fell further within the subsequent month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 87%.

The Moving Average Convergence Divergence Histogram (MACD) for CERS turned negative on September 29, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to turn lower in the coming weeks. Traders may want to sell the stock or buy put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 42 similar instances when the indicator turned negative. In 35 of the 42 cases the stock turned lower in the days that followed. This puts the odds of success at 83%.

Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where CERS declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 83%.

The Aroon Indicator for CERS entered a downward trend on October 05, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.

Fundamental Analysis (Ratings)

The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 38 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is fair valued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (7.052) is normal, around the industry mean (10.853). P/E Ratio (0.000) is within average values for comparable stocks, (98.910). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.000) is also within normal values, averaging (11.052). Dividend Yield (0.000) settles around the average of (0.002) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (2.219) is also within normal values, averaging (39.828).

The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 54 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating steady price growth. CERS’s price grows at a higher rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.

The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 94 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating weak sales and an unprofitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.

The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 100 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to worse than average earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.

The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 100 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. CERS’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 96, placing this stock worse than average.

Notable companies

The most notable companies in this group are Abbott Laboratories (NYSE:ABT), Medtronic plc (NYSE:MDT), Boston Scientific Corp (NYSE:BSX), Edwards Lifesciences Corp (NYSE:EW).

Industry description

The medical/nursing services includes companies that provide medical-related services such as ambulance services, dialysis centers, respiratory therapy, blood testing and rehabilitation services. DaVita Inc., Chemed Corporation and Guardant Health, Inc. are examples of companies in this industry.

Market Cap

The average market capitalization across the Medical/Nursing Services Industry is 5.55B. The market cap for tickers in the group ranges from 837 to 174.73B. ABT holds the highest valuation in this group at 174.73B. The lowest valued company is DHAI at 837.

High and low price notable news

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the Medical/Nursing Services Industry was 7%. For the same Industry, the average monthly price growth was 1%, and the average quarterly price growth was 4%. PMI experienced the highest price growth at 96%, while VTAK experienced the biggest fall at -89%.

Volume

The average weekly volume growth across all stocks in the Medical/Nursing Services Industry was 17%. For the same stocks of the Industry, the average monthly volume growth was 114% and the average quarterly volume growth was 67%

Fundamental Analysis Ratings

The average fundamental analysis ratings, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, are as follows

Valuation Rating: 48
P/E Growth Rating: 74
Price Growth Rating: 62
SMR Rating: 89
Profit Risk Rating: 95
Seasonality Score: 10 (-100 ... +100)
View a ticker or compare two or three
CERS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interact to see
Advertisement
A.I.Advisor
published price charts
A.I. Advisor
published General Information

General Information

a developer of the INTERCEPT Blood System for platelets and plasma

Industry MedicalNursingServices

Industry
Medical Specialties
Address
1220 Concord Avenue
Phone
+1 925 288-6000
Employees
275
Web
https://www.cerus.com
Interact to see
Advertisement
The Bitwise Solana Staking ETF (BSOL) advanced roughly 18% over the trailing 30 days, closely tracking a sharp rally in Solana (SOL). The move extends a broader recovery, with BSOL up approximately 77% over the past three months from its mid-2026 trough.
MSTY is an actively managed single-stock option income ETF (exchange-traded fund) that writes call options on Strategy (MSTR), formerly MicroStrategy, to generate current income. The portfolio is anchored by U.S. Treasury bills and MSTR option contracts rather than a diversified basket of equities, concentrating exposure in one volatile underlying.
AMDL has surged roughly +64% over the past 30 days, from about $47.59 to $78.10, mirroring a powerful rally in its sole underlying stock, AMD . The fund is a leveraged single-stock ETF (exchange-traded fund) designed to deliver 2x the daily return of AMD, amplifying both gains and losses.
TSMX, a 2x daily leveraged single-stock ETF (exchange-traded fund), rose roughly +19% over the trailing 30 days, rebounding sharply from mid-September lows. The fund seeks 200% of the daily return of TSM (Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing), meaning its moves are roughly double the underlying stock's daily swings.
Contracted revenue anchor: A roughly $3.2 billion, seven-year LNG (liquefied natural gas) supply agreement with Puerto Rico has received final approval, providing multi-year cash-flow visibility if execution stays on track. Project pipeline inflection: Upcoming milestones include the Barcarena and PortoCem power plants in Brazil, a potential Gás Sul terminal restart, and optimization of the company's modular "Fast LNG" (FLNG) liquefaction fleet.
AMD (Advanced Micro Devices) designs central processing units (CPUs), graphics processing units (GPUs), and AI accelerators, while LRCX (Lam Research) supplies the wafer-fabrication equipment used to build advanced chips. AMD has delivered strong double-digit revenue growth on AI data-center demand, but its shares trade with elevated expectations that can trigger sharp reactions around earnings.
Origination momentum: Velocity Financial enters 2026 off record annual originations of roughly $2.7 billion (up about 48%), positioning it to keep gaining share in a fragmented investor-loan market. Credit normalization is the central watch item: Nonperforming loans fell toward the 8.5% range of portfolio unpaid principal balance (UPB), but asset quality remains the primary swing factor for earnings.
Turnaround milestone ahead: Management has pointed to reaching cash generation in 2027, making the pace of cost discipline and margin recovery the central question for the stock forecast. Fresh capital supports execution: A recently announced $45.5 million equity financing, with participation from management and a single institutional investor, strengthens the balance sheet as the company funds its transformation.
NFE closed at $5.51, down -6.13% during Tuesday's regular session, extending a slide that has pushed shares near a 52-week low. Primary catalyst: the company disclosed its Fast LNG unit is offline after a gas-turbine mechanical failure, with return to service not expected until Q4.
The central $11 target is the arithmetic mean of four verified analyst price targets, rounded from roughly $10.75. With the stock near $2.06, reaching $11 would require an upside of more than 400%, an extremely large move.
The $23 central target is the rounded arithmetic mean of four verified analyst price targets, which average $23.25. The latest verified price is around $9.57, meaning the target implies roughly 140% upside—a very large move.
NXH closed down -11.17% (-$0.23) to $1.83 on Oct 6, the most recent regular session, extending a steep two-day decline. Selling continued as investors digested the mutual termination of the Fathom Holdings merger and a dilutive $45.5M registered direct offering of ~16.5M shares at $2.76.
AMD is a large-cap designer of CPUs (central processing units) and GPUs (graphics processing units) competing directly with Nvidia in the AI accelerator market, while FORM is a small-cap provider of semiconductor test and measurement equipment, primarily probe cards. AMD's narrative has been driven by multi-billion-dollar hyperscaler deals, while FORM's has been powered by record revenue and sharp margin expansion tied to high-bandwidth memory (HBM) demand.
AMD has surged roughly 200% year to date, crossing a $1 trillion market capitalization on AI data-center demand and a "CPU renaissance" narrative. KLAC has gained about 71% year to date, supported by record process-control revenue and rapid growth in advanced packaging for AI chips.
AMD is a large-cap semiconductor designer riding explosive AI compute demand, while ENTG is a mid-cap supplier of materials and purity solutions that feed the same AI-driven chip cycle. AMD recently crossed a $1 trillion market capitalization on surging data center revenue, whereas ENTG operates at a far smaller scale (roughly $23 billion) with steadier, double-digit growth.
VELO closed Tuesday at $9.57, unchanged (+0.00%) from the prior session, with the move occurring during regular market hours. The flat close marked stabilization after Monday's -14.5% plunge, when shares fell to $9.57 from $11.20 following disclosure of CFO James Suva's departure.
The $8 target used here is a technical, publicly discussed recovery objective — not an analyst consensus — because legacy analyst price targets were set before NFE's restructuring and reverse stock split. New Fortress Energy Inc. ( NFE ) trades near $5.51, so reaching $8 implies a roughly 45% advance.
AVBP plunged -46.98% during Tuesday's regular session, closing at $15.09 versus $28.46, marking its worst single-day decline on record. The catalyst was the Phase 3 FURVENT trial of firmonertinib failing its primary endpoint—progression-free survival—in first-line EGFR exon 20 insertion non-small cell lung cancer.
Upcoming catalyst: The company's next earnings release is estimated for November 6, 2026, which should offer fresh detail on its SKY token holdings, staking rewards, and treasury strategy. Strategic positioning: SDEV is an on-chain holding company providing public-market exposure to the Sky protocol ecosystem, with SKY as its core digital asset and a stated focus on the stablecoin economy.
Different roles in the chip ecosystem: AMAT is a materials-engineering and deposition leader, while KLAC dominates process control, inspection, and yield management. Momentum favors AMAT: AMAT shares have more than doubled this year, while KLAC has recently pulled back roughly 9% in a month on margin and execution concerns.