Go to the list of all blogs
Jimmy Landsman's Avatar
published in Blogs
Aug 07, 2026
TSLQ Delivers +65% Gains as TSLA Slides on Q2 Miss: An Inverse ETF Breakdown

TSLQ Delivers +65% Gains as TSLA Slides on Q2 Miss: An Inverse ETF Breakdown

Key Takeaways

  • TSLQ surged approximately 65% over the trailing 30-day period, driven by a sharp decline in TSLA shares following Tesla's Q2 2026 earnings report.
  • Tesla's stock dropped roughly 27% over the same window, and TSLQ's -2x daily leveraged structure amplified those losses into outsized gains for inverse ETF holders.
  • The primary catalyst was a significant earnings miss: Tesla reported adjusted EPS of $0.33 versus consensus estimates near $0.51, while operating margin collapsed to 1.4%.
  • Over the broader quarter, TSLQ gained approximately 23%, reflecting a more mixed period before the concentrated July selloff in TSLA.
  • As a leveraged inverse single-stock ETF, TSLQ is structured for short-term tactical trading and is not intended as a buy-and-hold vehicle due to the effects of daily compounding.

Tradr 2X Short TSLA Daily ETF (TSLQ) Overview and Portfolio Exposure

The Tradr 2X Short TSLA Daily ETF (TSLQ) is an actively managed exchange-traded fund that seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, corresponding to two times the inverse (-200%) of the daily performance of Tesla, Inc. (TSLA) common shares. Issued by AXS Investments and launched in July 2022, the fund maintains at least 80% exposure to financial instruments — primarily total return swaps and contracts for difference (CFDs) — that deliver inverse leveraged exposure to TSLA on a single-day basis.

TSLQ carries a net expense ratio of 1.15% and held approximately $116 million in assets under management (AUM — the total market value of assets the fund manages). The portfolio is non-diversified and concentrated almost entirely around a single underlying equity: Tesla. The top holdings consist of swap agreements and CFDs referencing TSLA, alongside substantial cash and cash-equivalent positions that serve as collateral. Because TSLQ's performance is directly tied to the inverse daily movement of a single stock, its return profile is highly volatile and entirely dependent on TSLA's price direction. This concentrated structure explains why a sharp drawdown in Tesla shares translates so directly into amplified gains for TSLQ.

Tradr 2X Short TSLA Daily ETF (TSLQ) Price Performance: Last 30 Days vs. Quarter

Over the most recent 30-day period, TSLQ delivered an extraordinary gain of approximately 65%. The move was not gradual — it was concentrated and event-driven, with the bulk of the advance occurring in the final week of July when Tesla shares suffered one of their steepest single-day declines in history. Daily trading volume in TSLQ surged well above its three-month average during this period, reflecting intense tactical interest from traders positioning for or hedging against further TSLA weakness.

Over the broader quarter, TSLQ gained roughly 23%. This more modest three-month return reflects a divergent pattern: during April and May, TSLA shares were relatively resilient, which kept TSLQ range-bound and at times under pressure. The fund's quarterly gain is almost entirely attributable to the July selloff in TSLA. The contrast between the 30-day and quarterly figures illustrates how quickly leveraged inverse products can reverse course when the underlying equity enters a pronounced trend.

What Drove TSLQ Price in the Last 30 Days

The overwhelming driver of TSLQ's 30-day surge was Tesla's second-quarter 2026 earnings report, released after the market close on July 22. Despite record quarterly deliveries of 480,126 vehicles and revenue of $28.24 billion that exceeded consensus estimates, profitability metrics deteriorated sharply. Adjusted earnings per share (EPS — the portion of a company's profit allocated to each outstanding share) came in at $0.33, roughly 35% to 39% below analyst expectations of $0.51 to $0.54. GAAP operating income fell 57% year-over-year to $398 million, producing an operating margin of just 1.4%.

Several additional factors compounded the negative sentiment. Tesla's gross margin contracted to 16.8%, well below the consensus forecast of approximately 19.4%, as the company's mix shifted toward lower-priced vehicle variants and away from discontinued higher-margin Model S and Model X units. Capital expenditures (CapEx — funds used to acquire or upgrade physical assets) nearly doubled sequentially to $5.8 billion, pushing free cash flow (FCF — operating cash flow minus capital expenditures) to negative $1.1 billion. Management reaffirmed full-year CapEx guidance above $25 billion, with spending expected to increase further in subsequent years to fund AI infrastructure, Robotaxi expansion, and Optimus humanoid robot production.

The market reaction was swift and severe. TSLA shares fell as much as 15% intraday on July 23, erasing more than $140 billion in market capitalization in a single session. With the stock closing near $320 that day and continuing to slide toward $309 by month-end, TSLQ's -2x daily leverage mechanically amplified those declines into substantial gains. The fund's performance was further supported by sustained elevated trading volumes and a broader rotation away from high-valuation, high-CapEx technology names as investors reassessed the near-term payoff profile of aggressive AI spending.

What Drove TSLQ Performance Over the Last Quarter

The quarterly picture is more nuanced. During April and the first half of May, TSLA shares traded within a relatively stable range, buoyed by optimism around delivery growth, Full Self-Driving subscription momentum, and the launch of unsupervised Robotaxi services in select U.S. cities. During this phase, TSLQ drifted lower or traded sideways, reflecting the inverse relationship. By late June, TSLA had recovered toward the $420 level, and TSLQ had declined to approximately $16–$17.

The turning point arrived with the Q2 earnings release. The quarterly gain of roughly 23% for TSLQ therefore masks considerable intra-quarter volatility: a challenging environment for inverse strategies during the first two months, followed by a concentrated July rally that more than recovered earlier losses. This pattern underscores an important structural feature of leveraged inverse ETFs: their returns over periods longer than a single day are path-dependent and can diverge meaningfully from a simple multiple of the underlying asset's cumulative return due to the mathematics of daily compounding. The divergence was favorable for TSLQ holders in this instance because TSLA's decline was sharp and sustained.

TSLQ ETF Outlook: What Investors Should Watch Next

The forward-looking environment for TSLQ remains closely tied to Tesla's ability to stabilize profitability while executing on its ambitious capital investment roadmap. Investors should monitor several key factors in the months ahead. First, Tesla's automotive gross margin trajectory will be critical — any recovery toward the 19–20% range could stabilize TSLA shares and pressure inverse positions. Second, CapEx spending levels and free cash flow generation will remain under intense scrutiny; another quarter of significant cash burn could extend Tesla's decline. Third, progress on Robotaxi deployment, FSD subscription growth, and Optimus commercialization will influence whether the market continues assigning a premium technology multiple to a company whose core auto business currently operates at a 1.4% margin.

Macroeconomic conditions also matter. The Federal Reserve's interest rate path affects growth-stock valuations broadly, and any shift in rate expectations could impact TSLA's multiple. Additionally, the competitive landscape in electric vehicles continues to intensify, with legacy automakers and Chinese manufacturers pressing on pricing. On the fund-specific level, TSLQ's daily reset mechanism means that its performance will depend not only on the direction of TSLA shares but also on the path they take — periods of choppy, range-bound trading can erode returns in leveraged inverse products even if the underlying stock ends the period modestly lower. Finally, elevated volatility in single-stock leveraged ETFs makes position sizing and risk management essential considerations for any investor using these instruments.

AI-Powered Screening in My Research Process

When evaluating leveraged products like TSLQ or comparing them against sector peers, I often turn to Tickeron’s AI Screener to quickly filter for volatility, technical patterns, and industry signals that align with the trade thesis. It streamlines the process of spotting comparable opportunities without manually sifting through thousands of securities.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

Related Ticker: TSLQ

Contributor

My name is Jimmy, and I’m a financial analyst focused on identifying compelling opportunities across the ETF market. Each day, I analyze hundreds of ETFs to uncover potential trading and investment opportunities using a broad range of market factors. For short-term trading, I rely heavily on technical analysis, including price channels, momentum indicators, support and resistance levels, trend patterns, and other market signals. At the same time, I dedicate significant attention to evaluating ETFs from a long-term investment perspective. My objective is to build a well-balanced ETF portfolio that combines core investment holdings with more tactical and speculative positions. The goal is to create a portfolio that can participate effectively in market rallies while also remaining resilient during periods of volatility and market corrections.


TSLQ's RSI Indicator peaks and leaves overbought zone

The 10-day RSI Oscillator for TSLQ moved out of overbought territory on July 30, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is shifting from an upward trend to a downward trend. Traders may want to look at selling the stock or buying put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 23 instances where the indicator moved out of the overbought zone. In of the 23 cases the stock moved lower in the days that followed. This puts the odds of a move down at .

Price Prediction Chart

Technical Analysis (Indicators)

Bearish Trend Analysis

The Moving Average Convergence Divergence Histogram (MACD) for TSLQ turned negative on August 07, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to turn lower in the coming weeks. Traders may want to sell the stock or buy put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 33 similar instances when the indicator turned negative. In of the 33 cases the stock turned lower in the days that followed. This puts the odds of success at .

TSLQ moved below its 50-day moving average on August 21, 2026 date and that indicates a change from an upward trend to a downward trend.

The 10-day moving average for TSLQ crossed bearishly below the 50-day moving average on August 27, 2026. This indicates that the trend has shifted lower and could be considered a sell signal. In of 11 past instances when the 10-day crossed below the 50-day, the stock continued to move higher over the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are .

Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where TSLQ declined for three days, the price rose further in of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are .

The Aroon Indicator for TSLQ entered a downward trend on September 04, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.

Bullish Trend Analysis

The Stochastic Oscillator suggests the stock price trend may be in a reversal from a downward trend to an upward trend. of 49 cases where TSLQ's Stochastic Oscillator exited the oversold zone resulted in an increase in price. Tickeron's analysis proposes that the odds of a continued upward trend are .

The Momentum Indicator moved above the 0 level on September 04, 2026. You may want to consider a long position or call options on TSLQ as a result. In of 71 past instances where the momentum indicator moved above 0, the stock continued to climb. The odds of a continued upward trend are .

The 50-day moving average for TSLQ moved above the 200-day moving average on August 11, 2026. This could be a long-term bullish signal for the stock as the stock shifts to an upward trend.

Following a 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where TSLQ advanced for three days, in of 246 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are .

TSLQ may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options.

Industry description

The investment seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, that correspond to two times the inverse (-200%) of the daily performance of the common shares of TSLA. Under normal market circumstances, the fund will maintain at least 80% exposure to financial instruments that provide inverse exposure to two times the daily performance of TSLA. It is an actively-managed exchange-traded fund (“ETF”) that seeks to achieve on a daily basis, before fees and expenses, -200% performance of TSLA for a single day, not for any other period, by entering into one or more swaps on TSLA. The fund is non-diversified.
View a ticker or compare two or three
TSLQ
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interact to see
Advertisement
A.I.Advisor
published price charts
Last 5 trading days
A.I. Advisor
published General Information

General Information

Category Trading

Profile
Details
Category
Trading--Inverse Equity
Address
Investment Managers Series Trust II803 West Michigan StreetMilwaukee
Phone
(414) 299-2295
Web
N/A
Interact to see
Advertisement
HII is the dominant U.S. Navy shipbuilder, focused on aircraft carriers, submarines, and other major naval vessels, with about 12.0 billion dollars in trailing revenue, 569 million dollars in net income, and EPS of 14.50. The Iran war and threats around the Strait of Hormuz highlight the importance of naval and missile-defense capabilities; reports show interceptor stocks being depleted and stress that keeping sea lanes open will likely require sustained naval investment where HII is a key contractor.
United is a large global carrier with a premium‑focused “United Next” strategy that upgauges to larger, more fuel‑efficient aircraft and adds premium seats to improve margins over the next several years. The Iran war has forced widespread Middle East airspace closures, creating thousands of cancellations, diversions, longer flight times, and higher fuel burn; analysts warn of higher fares and air‑freight rates if the conflict persists.
GE Aerospace is a focused aviation and defense company with two major segments—commercial engines and services, and defense and propulsion—earning most of its profits from long‑duration engine service on an installed base near 80,000 engines. Revenue and earnings growth have been strong, with recent quarterly revenue above 11 billion dollars, up high‑teens year over year, and net income over 2 billion dollars; management guides to 2026 EPS of 7.10–7.40 dollars, well above this year’s roughly 5.4‑dollar consensus.
Shares of Citigroup (C) declined approximately 5.17% in the most recent completed trading session, closing at $110.19 versus a prior close of $116.19. The primary catalyst was hotter-than-expected U.S. Producer Price Index (PPI) data, stoking fears of persistent inflation and a reduced likelihood of near-term Federal Reserve rate cuts.
AVAV surged +16.83% in Monday's session, trading at $294.70 compared to Friday's closing price of $252.25 — a gain of $42.45 per share. The primary catalyst was a powerful confluence of geopolitical demand and corporate developments: the escalating U.S.-Iran military conflict dramatically amplified investor focus on AeroVironment's loitering munitions portfolio.
Shares of Venture Global surged approximately +16.61% on March 2, 2026, closing at $11.30 compared to the prior close of $9.69. The primary catalyst was a stronger-than-expected Q4 2025 earnings report, with GAAP EPS of $0.41 beating the consensus estimate of $0.36 by $0.05.
Shares of CCL plunged 10.11% in Monday's session, falling from a prior close of $31.55 to $28.36. The primary catalyst was a coordinated U.S. and Israeli military strike on Iran over the weekend, causing crude oil prices to surge approximately 8–9% and triggering a global risk-off selloff.
ADT shares dropped sharply — falling as much as 13.4% intraday and hitting a new 52-week low of $6.65 — after reporting Q4 2025 results before the Monday open. Fourth-quarter revenue and guidance both missed analyst expectations, overshadowing an earnings-per-share beat.
Shares of Karman Holdings surged approximately +13.00% in Monday's session, closing near $99.57, up from a prior close of $88.11. The primary catalyst was the release of the company's fourth-quarter and full-year 2025 financial results, which showed strong revenue growth and exceeded top-line expectations.
Netflix dropped out of a months‑long bidding war for Warner Bros Discovery after Paramount/Skydance raised their offer, and Netflix refused to match it, saying the new price was “no longer financially appealing.” The stock jumped roughly 10%+ on the news as investors read this as fiscal discipline—management chose not to overpay, which protects the balance sheet and future returns instead of chasing scale at any price.
SE shares plunged approximately 23% at Tuesday's open, marking one of the steepest single-session selloffs in recent company history. The primary catalyst was a severe Q4 2025 earnings miss: adjusted EPS of $0.63 fell well short of the analyst consensus of $0.80, a miss of roughly 21%.
Shares of Southern Copper Corporation (SCCO) are down 10.32% in Tuesday's session, trading at $196.27 versus the prior close of $218.85 — a single-day loss of $22.58 per share. The primary catalyst is a Bank of America downgrade issued on March 2, cutting SCCO from Neutral to Underperform, which triggered accelerating sell pressure into Tuesday's open.
MDB shares plummeted approximately 26.44% on March 3, 2026, closing around $238.24, down from a prior close of approximately $322.55. The primary catalyst was weaker-than-expected fiscal Q1 2027 guidance, with non-GAAP EPS projected at $1.15–$1.19 versus analyst expectations of roughly $1.46.
Shares of Battalion Oil Corporation (BATL) are surging approximately +130% in Tuesday's session, with the stock hitting a fresh 52-week high as of intraday trading on March 3, 2026. The dominant catalyst is a sharp escalation of U.S.-Israel-Iran military tensions, with Tehran restricting access to the Strait of Hormuz — triggering a spike in crude oil futures and a broad-based energy sector rally.
Shares of CRDO dropped 18.55% on March 3, 2026, falling from a prior close of $114.22 to approximately $93.03. The primary catalyst was a "sell the news" reaction to fiscal Q3 2026 earnings — despite beating consensus estimates on both revenue and EPS, the market sold off on forward margin compression guidance.
PSIX shares plummeted approximately 25.37% on March 3, 2026, closing near $64.00 versus the prior session's close of $85.75. The primary catalyst was the company's Q4 and full-year 2025 earnings report, which revealed Q4 net income fell 31% year-over-year to $16.1 million despite a 33% revenue increase.
Life360 Inc Common (LIF) stunned many traders today as the stock slid more than 20% despite reporting what, on the surface, looked like very strong results: revenue up roughly 32% year over year to about $489.5 million and the company’s first-ever full‑year profitability.
StoneCo Ltd. (STNE) shares dropped more than 15% today after the market reacted negatively to the company’s latest Q4 2025 and full‑year results and its updated outlook. While StoneCo delivered year‑over‑year revenue and earnings growth and even topped EPS expectations, investors focused on weaker‑than‑hoped revenue numbers, rising credit risk metrics, and a more cautious medium‑term guidance profile, which together triggered a sharp rerating of the stock.
Alamo Group reported Q4 2025 EPS of about 1.70 dollars, well below analyst expectations that were in the low‑2 dollar range, producing a sizable negative earnings surprise. Quarterly revenue came in around 373.7 million dollars, down roughly 3% year over year and about 7–8% below consensus estimates near 405 million dollars, signaling softer demand than the market anticipated.
Hycroft Mining Holding Corp (HYMC) shares slid more than 12% today as traders digested the company’s newly filed 2025 annual report, a major corporate update, and an extended development timeline that shifts the story further away from near‑term production and cash flow.