Go to the list of all blogs
Sergey Savastiouk's Avatar
published in Blogs
Feb 13, 2021
Why ‘Head-and-Shoulders’ Patterns Form...and How to Trade Them

Why ‘Head-and-Shoulders’ Patterns Form...and How to Trade Them

Technical investors will tell you that one of the pillars of investing, at least for them, is the art of finding patterns and trends in the markets and using them to trade. There was once a time when traders and analysts pored over hundreds — even thousands — of stock charts every day, looking for patterns and opportunities. Today, the process of manual search is about as useful as a VCR. Now algorithms can do all the work.

One of the most well-recognized patterns for traders is the “Head-and-Shoulders” pattern. The bearish version of it, the “Head-and-Shoulders Top,” forms when a stock is testing new highs on an uptrend, but fails to retest its highest high and break upward. Mounting selling pressure takes over each time a stock approaches its high.

You can see this formation easily in the image below. The pattern forms with a center peak (the Head, labeled 3) and the left and right Shoulders (1,5).

The Geometric Elements of a Head-and-Shoulders Top Pattern

In theory, it makes sense how a Head-and-Shoulders pattern forms. But perhaps the more interesting question is, why does it form?

The Investor Psychology Behind a Head-and-Shoulders Pattern

The theory behind a Head-and-Shoulders formation makes logical sense from a trader’s standpoint. As a security tests a new high that investors believe is the best it can reach, sell orders are placed to take profits off the table (point 1 to point 2 on the chart above). Selling pressure pushes the security back down to an attractive entry point, and fresh capital comes in — driving the price up again to an even higher high (point 2 to point 3). The process repeats itself, but eventually, investors will become convinced that the security won’t break upward. At that point, it becomes a scramble to take profits off the table at the best price possible, which causes a cascade of selling from the Shoulder (5) to the Breakout and eventually down to the Target Price.

Here’s a real-world example of how the Head-and-Shoulders Top Pattern looks. The image below was generated by Tickeron’s Artificial Intelligence, which has the capability of scanning the stock, bond, and cryptocurrency markets in search of patterns. Tickeron’s AI, called the Pattern Search Engine, can help traders find patterns and trading opportunities every day! Here a pattern was found in early December of last year:

 

To note, while the above example is an actual stock and an actual confirmed and successful head-and-shoulders pattern, it does not constitute investment advice nor is it a recommendation for the stock.

Not only does Tickeron’s AI find new patterns, but it also generates trade ideas for investors to consider — while also providing you a Target Price and a level of confidence that the target price will be reached. If you’re interested in pattern trading and don’t have the time or desire to manually scan the market in search of them, then you should be using algorithms to do the work for you. Armed with patterns, hard data and trade ideas, you can then make an informed decision on how to act.

Working the Other Way: The Head-and-Shoulders Bottom Pattern

The first example talked about the psychology of the bearish Head-and-Shoulders pattern when a security can’t quite break out to the upside. The opposite type of pattern, a “Head-and-Shoulders Bottom,” works the opposite way — a security tests lows, but investors continually see the lows as fresh buying opportunities. Eventually, if the security breaks out to the upside, investors won’t want to be left on the sidelines as the security takes off...so the buying continues.

That’s exactly what we see in the example below, which was also discovered by Tickeron’s Pattern Search Engine:

To note, while the above example is an actual stock and an actual confirmed and successful head-and-shoulders pattern, it does not constitute investment advice nor is it a recommendation for the stock.

You can clearly see the Head-and-Shoulders pattern formation, and in this case, the stock really broke out convincingly to the upside. Tickeron’s AI set a high target price for this stock, and the pattern turned out to be a success that would have generated a 30.81% gain for the trader.

Does the Security Pattern Search Engine Really Work?

Tickeron’s AI maintains statistics for all of the patterns it finds. With just a few clicks, a Tickeron user can obtain the following statistics about the Pattern Search Engine:

  • How many total Head-and-Shoulders patterns the AI has recognized

  • How many of those patterns actually reached the target price

  • The average return if the pattern was successful versus if it failed

  • The average return of all patterns recognized.

  • A list of all of the securities (including cryptocurrencies) that the AI has identified in a Head-and-Shoulders pattern over time.

The AI also has different “confidence levels” for how likely the pattern is to play out, and the user can adjust confidence levels higher or lower to obtain different statistics.

Example: For the Head-and-Shoulders Bottom (Bullish) Pattern, we ran statistics for patterns where Tickeron’s AI had at least 20% confidence the security would reach its target price, and we looked for patterns where the distance to the target price was at least 5%. Here are the statistics:

  • 33,097 Patterns found

  • 19,118 number of times the security reached its target price (57.76% of the time)

  • +11.62% — average return of successfully predicted patterns

  • -6.44% — average loss when the security did not reach its target price

Example #2: For the Head-and-Shoulders Top (Bearish) Pattern, we looked at instances where Tickeron’s AI had at least 20% confidence the security would reach its target price, but this time we looked for patterns where the distance to target price was at least 10%. Here are the statistics:

  • 11,202 Patterns found

  • 4,849 — number of times the security reached its target price (43.29% of the time)

  • +18.80% — average return of successfully predicted patterns

  • -10.86% — average loss when the security did not reach its target price

Test the Pattern Search Engine for Yourself

If you’ve never seen technology like this before, it’s because it has never been available to retail investors in this format. The idea is to provide retail investors with technology and tools to enable trading with massive amounts of data and analysis. The end result is arming retail investors with a high-powered, virtual research assistant: Tickeron’s Artificial Intelligence.

Interested in stock patterns? Identify 37 pattern types across thousands of stocks, ETFs and cryptocurrencies. Learn more here.

Related Ticker: GCAP

Contributor

Sergey Savastiouk, Ph.D. has a degree in Applied Mathematics from Moscow University and has extensive experience as an entrepreneur, investor, manager, and mathematician. His professional expertise is in applied mathematics, mathematical modeling, system and pattern analysis, and software and hardware system integration. He has served as the CEO of several hi-tech start-up companies and nonprofit organizations, which has given him proven capabilities in business strategy for high-tech start-up companies, market assessment, company formation, team building, product development, marketing, and sales. He has published numerous articles in journals and magazines on related fields. As a retail investor, he spent 15 years developing his proprietary trading and quantitative algorithms (now Tickeron’s A.I.), which brought him significant returns in trading the stock market. His current work and goal in founding Tickeron is to bring professional, sophisticated stock market analysis capabilities to retail investors via an easy-to-use interface.


View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
A.I.Advisor
published price charts
A.I. Advisor
published General Information

General Information

a provider of online foreign exchange trading services

Industry InvestmentBanksBrokers

Industry
Investment Banks Or Brokers
Address
Suite 11
Phone
+1.908.731.0700
Employees
676
Web
http://www.gaincapital.com
Interact to see
Advertisement
The Bitwise Solana Staking ETF (BSOL) advanced roughly 18% over the trailing 30 days, closely tracking a sharp rally in Solana (SOL). The move extends a broader recovery, with BSOL up approximately 77% over the past three months from its mid-2026 trough.
MSTY is an actively managed single-stock option income ETF (exchange-traded fund) that writes call options on Strategy (MSTR), formerly MicroStrategy, to generate current income. The portfolio is anchored by U.S. Treasury bills and MSTR option contracts rather than a diversified basket of equities, concentrating exposure in one volatile underlying.
AMDL has surged roughly +64% over the past 30 days, from about $47.59 to $78.10, mirroring a powerful rally in its sole underlying stock, AMD . The fund is a leveraged single-stock ETF (exchange-traded fund) designed to deliver 2x the daily return of AMD, amplifying both gains and losses.
TSMX, a 2x daily leveraged single-stock ETF (exchange-traded fund), rose roughly +19% over the trailing 30 days, rebounding sharply from mid-September lows. The fund seeks 200% of the daily return of TSM (Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing), meaning its moves are roughly double the underlying stock's daily swings.
Contracted revenue anchor: A roughly $3.2 billion, seven-year LNG (liquefied natural gas) supply agreement with Puerto Rico has received final approval, providing multi-year cash-flow visibility if execution stays on track. Project pipeline inflection: Upcoming milestones include the Barcarena and PortoCem power plants in Brazil, a potential Gás Sul terminal restart, and optimization of the company's modular "Fast LNG" (FLNG) liquefaction fleet.
AMD (Advanced Micro Devices) designs central processing units (CPUs), graphics processing units (GPUs), and AI accelerators, while LRCX (Lam Research) supplies the wafer-fabrication equipment used to build advanced chips. AMD has delivered strong double-digit revenue growth on AI data-center demand, but its shares trade with elevated expectations that can trigger sharp reactions around earnings.
Origination momentum: Velocity Financial enters 2026 off record annual originations of roughly $2.7 billion (up about 48%), positioning it to keep gaining share in a fragmented investor-loan market. Credit normalization is the central watch item: Nonperforming loans fell toward the 8.5% range of portfolio unpaid principal balance (UPB), but asset quality remains the primary swing factor for earnings.
Turnaround milestone ahead: Management has pointed to reaching cash generation in 2027, making the pace of cost discipline and margin recovery the central question for the stock forecast. Fresh capital supports execution: A recently announced $45.5 million equity financing, with participation from management and a single institutional investor, strengthens the balance sheet as the company funds its transformation.
NFE closed at $5.51, down -6.13% during Tuesday's regular session, extending a slide that has pushed shares near a 52-week low. Primary catalyst: the company disclosed its Fast LNG unit is offline after a gas-turbine mechanical failure, with return to service not expected until Q4.
The central $11 target is the arithmetic mean of four verified analyst price targets, rounded from roughly $10.75. With the stock near $2.06, reaching $11 would require an upside of more than 400%, an extremely large move.
The $23 central target is the rounded arithmetic mean of four verified analyst price targets, which average $23.25. The latest verified price is around $9.57, meaning the target implies roughly 140% upside—a very large move.
NXH closed down -11.17% (-$0.23) to $1.83 on Oct 6, the most recent regular session, extending a steep two-day decline. Selling continued as investors digested the mutual termination of the Fathom Holdings merger and a dilutive $45.5M registered direct offering of ~16.5M shares at $2.76.
AMD is a large-cap designer of CPUs (central processing units) and GPUs (graphics processing units) competing directly with Nvidia in the AI accelerator market, while FORM is a small-cap provider of semiconductor test and measurement equipment, primarily probe cards. AMD's narrative has been driven by multi-billion-dollar hyperscaler deals, while FORM's has been powered by record revenue and sharp margin expansion tied to high-bandwidth memory (HBM) demand.
AMD has surged roughly 200% year to date, crossing a $1 trillion market capitalization on AI data-center demand and a "CPU renaissance" narrative. KLAC has gained about 71% year to date, supported by record process-control revenue and rapid growth in advanced packaging for AI chips.
AMD is a large-cap semiconductor designer riding explosive AI compute demand, while ENTG is a mid-cap supplier of materials and purity solutions that feed the same AI-driven chip cycle. AMD recently crossed a $1 trillion market capitalization on surging data center revenue, whereas ENTG operates at a far smaller scale (roughly $23 billion) with steadier, double-digit growth.
VELO closed Tuesday at $9.57, unchanged (+0.00%) from the prior session, with the move occurring during regular market hours. The flat close marked stabilization after Monday's -14.5% plunge, when shares fell to $9.57 from $11.20 following disclosure of CFO James Suva's departure.
The $8 target used here is a technical, publicly discussed recovery objective — not an analyst consensus — because legacy analyst price targets were set before NFE's restructuring and reverse stock split. New Fortress Energy Inc. ( NFE ) trades near $5.51, so reaching $8 implies a roughly 45% advance.
AVBP plunged -46.98% during Tuesday's regular session, closing at $15.09 versus $28.46, marking its worst single-day decline on record. The catalyst was the Phase 3 FURVENT trial of firmonertinib failing its primary endpoint—progression-free survival—in first-line EGFR exon 20 insertion non-small cell lung cancer.
Upcoming catalyst: The company's next earnings release is estimated for November 6, 2026, which should offer fresh detail on its SKY token holdings, staking rewards, and treasury strategy. Strategic positioning: SDEV is an on-chain holding company providing public-market exposure to the Sky protocol ecosystem, with SKY as its core digital asset and a stated focus on the stablecoin economy.
Different roles in the chip ecosystem: AMAT is a materials-engineering and deposition leader, while KLAC dominates process control, inspection, and yield management. Momentum favors AMAT: AMAT shares have more than doubled this year, while KLAC has recently pulled back roughly 9% in a month on margin and execution concerns.