Go to the list of all blogs
Sergey Savastiouk's Avatar
published in Blogs
Feb 13, 2021
Why ‘Head-and-Shoulders’ Patterns Form...and How to Trade Them

Why ‘Head-and-Shoulders’ Patterns Form...and How to Trade Them

Technical investors will tell you that one of the pillars of investing, at least for them, is the art of finding patterns and trends in the markets and using them to trade. There was once a time when traders and analysts pored over hundreds — even thousands — of stock charts every day, looking for patterns and opportunities. Today, the process of manual search is about as useful as a VCR. Now algorithms can do all the work.

One of the most well-recognized patterns for traders is the “Head-and-Shoulders” pattern. The bearish version of it, the “Head-and-Shoulders Top,” forms when a stock is testing new highs on an uptrend, but fails to retest its highest high and break upward. Mounting selling pressure takes over each time a stock approaches its high.

You can see this formation easily in the image below. The pattern forms with a center peak (the Head, labeled 3) and the left and right Shoulders (1,5).

The Geometric Elements of a Head-and-Shoulders Top Pattern

In theory, it makes sense how a Head-and-Shoulders pattern forms. But perhaps the more interesting question is, why does it form?

The Investor Psychology Behind a Head-and-Shoulders Pattern

The theory behind a Head-and-Shoulders formation makes logical sense from a trader’s standpoint. As a security tests a new high that investors believe is the best it can reach, sell orders are placed to take profits off the table (point 1 to point 2 on the chart above). Selling pressure pushes the security back down to an attractive entry point, and fresh capital comes in — driving the price up again to an even higher high (point 2 to point 3). The process repeats itself, but eventually, investors will become convinced that the security won’t break upward. At that point, it becomes a scramble to take profits off the table at the best price possible, which causes a cascade of selling from the Shoulder (5) to the Breakout and eventually down to the Target Price.

Here’s a real-world example of how the Head-and-Shoulders Top Pattern looks. The image below was generated by Tickeron’s Artificial Intelligence, which has the capability of scanning the stock, bond, and cryptocurrency markets in search of patterns. Tickeron’s AI, called the Pattern Search Engine, can help traders find patterns and trading opportunities every day! Here a pattern was found in early December of last year:

 

To note, while the above example is an actual stock and an actual confirmed and successful head-and-shoulders pattern, it does not constitute investment advice nor is it a recommendation for the stock.

Not only does Tickeron’s AI find new patterns, but it also generates trade ideas for investors to consider — while also providing you a Target Price and a level of confidence that the target price will be reached. If you’re interested in pattern trading and don’t have the time or desire to manually scan the market in search of them, then you should be using algorithms to do the work for you. Armed with patterns, hard data and trade ideas, you can then make an informed decision on how to act.

Working the Other Way: The Head-and-Shoulders Bottom Pattern

The first example talked about the psychology of the bearish Head-and-Shoulders pattern when a security can’t quite break out to the upside. The opposite type of pattern, a “Head-and-Shoulders Bottom,” works the opposite way — a security tests lows, but investors continually see the lows as fresh buying opportunities. Eventually, if the security breaks out to the upside, investors won’t want to be left on the sidelines as the security takes off...so the buying continues.

That’s exactly what we see in the example below, which was also discovered by Tickeron’s Pattern Search Engine:

To note, while the above example is an actual stock and an actual confirmed and successful head-and-shoulders pattern, it does not constitute investment advice nor is it a recommendation for the stock.

You can clearly see the Head-and-Shoulders pattern formation, and in this case, the stock really broke out convincingly to the upside. Tickeron’s AI set a high target price for this stock, and the pattern turned out to be a success that would have generated a 30.81% gain for the trader.

Does the Security Pattern Search Engine Really Work?

Tickeron’s AI maintains statistics for all of the patterns it finds. With just a few clicks, a Tickeron user can obtain the following statistics about the Pattern Search Engine:

  • How many total Head-and-Shoulders patterns the AI has recognized

  • How many of those patterns actually reached the target price

  • The average return if the pattern was successful versus if it failed

  • The average return of all patterns recognized.

  • A list of all of the securities (including cryptocurrencies) that the AI has identified in a Head-and-Shoulders pattern over time.

The AI also has different “confidence levels” for how likely the pattern is to play out, and the user can adjust confidence levels higher or lower to obtain different statistics.

Example: For the Head-and-Shoulders Bottom (Bullish) Pattern, we ran statistics for patterns where Tickeron’s AI had at least 20% confidence the security would reach its target price, and we looked for patterns where the distance to the target price was at least 5%. Here are the statistics:

  • 33,097 Patterns found

  • 19,118 number of times the security reached its target price (57.76% of the time)

  • +11.62% — average return of successfully predicted patterns

  • -6.44% — average loss when the security did not reach its target price

Example #2: For the Head-and-Shoulders Top (Bearish) Pattern, we looked at instances where Tickeron’s AI had at least 20% confidence the security would reach its target price, but this time we looked for patterns where the distance to target price was at least 10%. Here are the statistics:

  • 11,202 Patterns found

  • 4,849 — number of times the security reached its target price (43.29% of the time)

  • +18.80% — average return of successfully predicted patterns

  • -10.86% — average loss when the security did not reach its target price

Test the Pattern Search Engine for Yourself

If you’ve never seen technology like this before, it’s because it has never been available to retail investors in this format. The idea is to provide retail investors with technology and tools to enable trading with massive amounts of data and analysis. The end result is arming retail investors with a high-powered, virtual research assistant: Tickeron’s Artificial Intelligence.

Interested in stock patterns? Identify 37 pattern types across thousands of stocks, ETFs and cryptocurrencies. Learn more here.

Related Ticker: GCAP
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
A.I.Advisor
published price charts
Last 5 trading days
A.I. Advisor
published General Information

General Information

a provider of online foreign exchange trading services

Industry InvestmentBanksBrokers

Profile
Details
Industry
Investment Banks Or Brokers
Address
Suite 11
Phone
+1.908.731.0700
Employees
676
Web
http://www.gaincapital.com
Interact to see
Advertisement
Astronics Corporation has delivered solid share price performance in recent sessions, benefiting from renewed enthusiasm for aerospace and defense equities. The stock has demonstrated resilience despite broader market volatility, drawing consistent investor interest due to its exposure to mission-critical avionics, power systems, and test equipment.
Recent analyst upgrades from Piper Sandler and Morgan Stanley underscore improving valuation and renewed confidence in Motorola Solutions’ growth outlook. Third-quarter 2025 results exceeded expectations, with revenue increasing 7.8% year over year, driven by land mobile radio (LMR) and video security demand.
Innovative Aerosystems (ISSC) has emerged as a standout performer within the aerospace and avionics space, with its stock reflecting optimism around rising demand for advanced cockpit and navigation systems. Recent trading has seen shares hold near the upper end of their range, supported by strong fundamentals and a diversified customer base spanning business aviation, commercial airlines, and military platforms.
Hexcel Corporation (HXL), a leading supplier of advanced composite materials used across aerospace, defense, and industrial markets, has maintained steady momentum amid a shifting industry backdrop. Recent share performance reflects investor optimism around a gradual recovery in commercial aviation, balanced against concerns about production timing and cost pressures.
TAT Technologies (TATT), a provider of aerospace and defense systems with a focus on heat transfer solutions and MRO services, has demonstrated notable strength in recent trading. Shares have climbed sharply over the past month, reflecting growing investor confidence in the company’s operational improvements and exposure to aerospace recovery trends.
TSM’s upcoming earnings carry outsized importance for the semiconductor industry. As the world’s leading contract chip manufacturer, TSMC underpins AI innovation for customers such as Nvidia and Apple. Its results often serve as a bellwether for global chip demand, capacity constraints, and pricing trends.
Goldman Sachs (GS) is expected to report Q4 2025 EPS of $11.65 on revenue of $13.85 billion, reflecting steady results as investment banking activity continues to recover.
Citigroup (C) is expected to report Q4 2025 EPS of $1.58, representing a 17.9% year-over-year increase, with revenue projected at $20.95 billion, up 7%. Bank of America (BAC) consensus estimates call for Q4 EPS of $0.96, up from $0.82, on revenue of $27.74 billion, reflecting 9.45% growth. JPMorgan Chase (JPM) is forecast to deliver Q4 EPS of $4.86, a modest 0.95% increase, with revenue expected to rise 8.13% to $46.25 billion.
Wells Fargo (WFC) is expected to report Q4 2025 earnings on January 14, 2026, with consensus calling for EPS of $1.66, up 16.9% year over year, and revenue of approximately $21.66 billion, a 6.3% increase. Investor focus will center on net interest income stabilization, growth in fee-based businesses such as investment banking and mortgages, and credit provisioning in a lower-rate environment.
Wall Street expects Infosys Q3 FY2026 EPS of $0.20, based on estimates from eight analysts, with revenue forecast at ₹452.37 billion (approximately $5.45 billion), compiled from 33 analysts.
BitMine Immersion Technologies (BMNR) is set to report Q1 FY2026 earnings on January 16, 2026, with consensus estimates calling for EPS of $0.15 and revenue of approximately $79.3 million.
Bank of America (BAC) and Wells Fargo (WFC) will both report Q4 2025 earnings on January 14, 2026, creating a rare same-day, apples-to-apples comparison.
Citigroup (C) is set to report Q4 2025 earnings on January 14, 2026, making it the immediate catalyst in this comparison. HSBC Holdings (HSBC) will release its Full-Year 2025 results on February 25, 2026, positioning it as a medium-term earnings event.
Wells Fargo’s quarterly results carry broader significance because the bank serves as a key indicator of U.S. consumer and commercial banking conditions. Its earnings often influence sentiment toward the entire large-cap banking sector. After a stretch of improved market conditions and stronger capital markets activity, investors are looking for confirmation that profit momentum is sustainable rather than driven by a single favorable quarter.
Infosys (INFY) will report Q3 FY2026 results on January 14, 2026, making it the immediate catalyst in this comparison. Accenture (ACN) last reported Q1 FY2026 earnings on December 18, 2025, with its next update scheduled later in the fiscal quarter.
BMNR reported fiscal Q4 and full-year FY2025 results (ending August 31, 2025), with profitability heavily influenced by digital-asset accounting and treasury positioning. Full-year diluted EPS: $13.39; Net income attributable to common stockholders: $328.161 million.
M&T Bank (MTB) is expected to deliver Q4 2025 EPS of $4.44–$4.46, representing roughly 13% year-over-year growth, driven by improving net interest income as funding costs decline. PNC Financial Services Group (PNC) is projected to post Q4 EPS of $4.19–$4.23, supported by about 1.5% sequential NII growth from rate relief and steady loan demand. U.S. Bancorp (USB) is forecast to earn $1.19 per share, an 11.2% annual increase, with revenues estimated at $7.33 billion, up 5%.
Dash (DASH.X) has ignited the crypto market with a powerful mid-January 2026 breakout, rallying more than 125% in a single week and decisively outperforming fellow privacy coins such as Monero and Zcash. The surge was fueled by a sharp short squeeze that wiped out nearly $4.9 million in bearish positions, alongside a major catalyst: Dash’s integration with Alchemy Pay, enabling direct fiat purchases across 173 countries.
As 2026 gets underway, ether.fi’s governance token (ETHFI.X) is emerging as a focal point for traders seeking exposure to Ethereum’s rapidly expanding liquid restaking ecosystem. With total value locked climbing to $7.8 billion, ether.fi now ranks as the second-largest staking protocol after Lido, underscoring its growing influence in the Ethereum economy.
The Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF (SCHA) is holding firm near the $28 level as 2026 begins, even as broader markets remain volatile. While short-term price action has been uneven, underlying signals suggest the ETF may be setting up for a meaningful breakout as interest-rate cuts revive small-cap equities. Technical models highlight an unusually favorable risk-reward profile—up to 22:1—with long-term momentum strengthening despite near-term consolidation.