Go to the list of all blogs
Sergey Savastiouk's Avatar
published in Blogs
Feb 13, 2021
Why ‘Head-and-Shoulders’ Patterns Form...and How to Trade Them

Why ‘Head-and-Shoulders’ Patterns Form...and How to Trade Them

Technical investors will tell you that one of the pillars of investing, at least for them, is the art of finding patterns and trends in the markets and using them to trade. There was once a time when traders and analysts pored over hundreds — even thousands — of stock charts every day, looking for patterns and opportunities. Today, the process of manual search is about as useful as a VCR. Now algorithms can do all the work.

One of the most well-recognized patterns for traders is the “Head-and-Shoulders” pattern. The bearish version of it, the “Head-and-Shoulders Top,” forms when a stock is testing new highs on an uptrend, but fails to retest its highest high and break upward. Mounting selling pressure takes over each time a stock approaches its high.

You can see this formation easily in the image below. The pattern forms with a center peak (the Head, labeled 3) and the left and right Shoulders (1,5).

The Geometric Elements of a Head-and-Shoulders Top Pattern

In theory, it makes sense how a Head-and-Shoulders pattern forms. But perhaps the more interesting question is, why does it form?

The Investor Psychology Behind a Head-and-Shoulders Pattern

The theory behind a Head-and-Shoulders formation makes logical sense from a trader’s standpoint. As a security tests a new high that investors believe is the best it can reach, sell orders are placed to take profits off the table (point 1 to point 2 on the chart above). Selling pressure pushes the security back down to an attractive entry point, and fresh capital comes in — driving the price up again to an even higher high (point 2 to point 3). The process repeats itself, but eventually, investors will become convinced that the security won’t break upward. At that point, it becomes a scramble to take profits off the table at the best price possible, which causes a cascade of selling from the Shoulder (5) to the Breakout and eventually down to the Target Price.

Here’s a real-world example of how the Head-and-Shoulders Top Pattern looks. The image below was generated by Tickeron’s Artificial Intelligence, which has the capability of scanning the stock, bond, and cryptocurrency markets in search of patterns. Tickeron’s AI, called the Pattern Search Engine, can help traders find patterns and trading opportunities every day! Here a pattern was found in early December of last year:

 

To note, while the above example is an actual stock and an actual confirmed and successful head-and-shoulders pattern, it does not constitute investment advice nor is it a recommendation for the stock.

Not only does Tickeron’s AI find new patterns, but it also generates trade ideas for investors to consider — while also providing you a Target Price and a level of confidence that the target price will be reached. If you’re interested in pattern trading and don’t have the time or desire to manually scan the market in search of them, then you should be using algorithms to do the work for you. Armed with patterns, hard data and trade ideas, you can then make an informed decision on how to act.

Working the Other Way: The Head-and-Shoulders Bottom Pattern

The first example talked about the psychology of the bearish Head-and-Shoulders pattern when a security can’t quite break out to the upside. The opposite type of pattern, a “Head-and-Shoulders Bottom,” works the opposite way — a security tests lows, but investors continually see the lows as fresh buying opportunities. Eventually, if the security breaks out to the upside, investors won’t want to be left on the sidelines as the security takes off...so the buying continues.

That’s exactly what we see in the example below, which was also discovered by Tickeron’s Pattern Search Engine:

To note, while the above example is an actual stock and an actual confirmed and successful head-and-shoulders pattern, it does not constitute investment advice nor is it a recommendation for the stock.

You can clearly see the Head-and-Shoulders pattern formation, and in this case, the stock really broke out convincingly to the upside. Tickeron’s AI set a high target price for this stock, and the pattern turned out to be a success that would have generated a 30.81% gain for the trader.

Does the Security Pattern Search Engine Really Work?

Tickeron’s AI maintains statistics for all of the patterns it finds. With just a few clicks, a Tickeron user can obtain the following statistics about the Pattern Search Engine:

  • How many total Head-and-Shoulders patterns the AI has recognized

  • How many of those patterns actually reached the target price

  • The average return if the pattern was successful versus if it failed

  • The average return of all patterns recognized.

  • A list of all of the securities (including cryptocurrencies) that the AI has identified in a Head-and-Shoulders pattern over time.

The AI also has different “confidence levels” for how likely the pattern is to play out, and the user can adjust confidence levels higher or lower to obtain different statistics.

Example: For the Head-and-Shoulders Bottom (Bullish) Pattern, we ran statistics for patterns where Tickeron’s AI had at least 20% confidence the security would reach its target price, and we looked for patterns where the distance to the target price was at least 5%. Here are the statistics:

  • 33,097 Patterns found

  • 19,118 number of times the security reached its target price (57.76% of the time)

  • +11.62% — average return of successfully predicted patterns

  • -6.44% — average loss when the security did not reach its target price

Example #2: For the Head-and-Shoulders Top (Bearish) Pattern, we looked at instances where Tickeron’s AI had at least 20% confidence the security would reach its target price, but this time we looked for patterns where the distance to target price was at least 10%. Here are the statistics:

  • 11,202 Patterns found

  • 4,849 — number of times the security reached its target price (43.29% of the time)

  • +18.80% — average return of successfully predicted patterns

  • -10.86% — average loss when the security did not reach its target price

Test the Pattern Search Engine for Yourself

If you’ve never seen technology like this before, it’s because it has never been available to retail investors in this format. The idea is to provide retail investors with technology and tools to enable trading with massive amounts of data and analysis. The end result is arming retail investors with a high-powered, virtual research assistant: Tickeron’s Artificial Intelligence.

Interested in stock patterns? Identify 37 pattern types across thousands of stocks, ETFs and cryptocurrencies. Learn more here.

Related Ticker: GCAP

Contributor

Sergey Savastiouk, Ph.D. has a degree in Applied Mathematics from Moscow University and has extensive experience as an entrepreneur, investor, manager, and mathematician. His professional expertise is in applied mathematics, mathematical modeling, system and pattern analysis, and software and hardware system integration. He has served as the CEO of several hi-tech start-up companies and nonprofit organizations, which has given him proven capabilities in business strategy for high-tech start-up companies, market assessment, company formation, team building, product development, marketing, and sales. He has published numerous articles in journals and magazines on related fields. As a retail investor, he spent 15 years developing his proprietary trading and quantitative algorithms (now Tickeron’s A.I.), which brought him significant returns in trading the stock market. His current work and goal in founding Tickeron is to bring professional, sophisticated stock market analysis capabilities to retail investors via an easy-to-use interface.


View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
A.I.Advisor
published price charts
Last 5 trading days
A.I. Advisor
published General Information

General Information

a provider of online foreign exchange trading services

Industry InvestmentBanksBrokers

Profile
Details
Industry
Investment Banks Or Brokers
Address
Suite 11
Phone
+1.908.731.0700
Employees
676
Web
http://www.gaincapital.com
Interact to see
Advertisement
ERII shares have remained resilient, trading near $15.47 ahead of Q4 and full-year 2025 earnings scheduled for February 25, 2026. Q3 2025 results exceeded expectations, with revenue of $32 million and EPS of $0.07, despite year-over-year declines tied to project timing.
Liberty Broadband Corporation (LBRDA) has experienced pronounced swings in recent weeks, touching multiyear lows before staging a sharp recovery. The stock continues to trade within a wide 52-week range, closely tied to the value of its Charter Communications stake and investor expectations around the proposed merger.
Arm Holdings (ARM) shares have demonstrated resilience in recent sessions, rebounding after an initial earnings-related pullback and stabilizing near technical support levels. While smartphone-related headwinds tied to memory shortages pressured sentiment, momentum in AI-driven data center royalties helped restore confidence.
Shell plc (SHEL) reported Q4 2025 adjusted earnings of $3.3 billion, below expectations due to weaker oil prices and non-cash tax charges. Full-year adjusted earnings reached $18.5 billion, supported by strong LNG and upstream operations. A 4% dividend increase to $0.372 per share and a new $3.5 billion buyback program reinforce capital return commitments.
Linde (LIN) reported Q4 2025 adjusted EPS of $4.20, topping estimates, with full-year revenue reaching $34 billion. 2026 EPS guidance of $17.40–$17.90 implies 6–9% growth, supported by a record $10 billion project backlog.
ConocoPhillips (COP) reported Q4 2025 adjusted EPS of $1.02, missing estimates due to weaker oil prices. Full-year adjusted earnings totaled $7.7 billion, with $19.9 billion in operating cash flow. Shares have gained more than 10% in recent weeks, supported by analyst upgrades and sector momentum.
Verisk Analytics (VRSK) delivered Q4 2025 revenue of $779 million, up 5.9% year over year, with adjusted EPS of $1.82, beating expectations. Booz Allen Hamilton (BAH) reported Q3 FY2026 revenue of $2.62 billion, down 10.2% year over year, but adjusted diluted EPS climbed 14% to $1.77, well above estimates.
(OMC) Omnicom’s fourth-quarter report, released February 18, 2026, marked its first earnings update incorporating results from Interpublic Group (IPG), acquired on November 26, 2025. The combination created the world’s largest marketing services firm by revenue, a significant milestone as the advertising industry consolidates and adapts to digital transformation.
Copart (CPRT) is set to report fiscal Q2 2026 earnings on February 19, 2026, after market close. Consensus calls for EPS of $0.39–$0.40 and revenue of $1.15–$1.18 billion. Global Payments (GPN) posted Q4 2025 adjusted EPS of $3.18, in line with expectations, and adjusted net revenue of $2.32 billion, up 6% in constant currency (excluding dispositions). Thomson Reuters (TRI) delivered Q4 2025 adjusted EPS of $1.07 and revenue of $2.01 billion, up 5% year over year, supported by recurring subscription growth.
Unilever PLC (UL) leads year-to-date performance with a 12.61% gain, ahead of Diageo plc (DEO) at 9.90% and Keurig Dr Pepper Inc. (KDP) at 4.27%. DEO offers the highest dividend yield at 4.35%, compared with KDP (3.16%) and UL (2.97%). All three stocks carry low betas—DEO (0.18), UL (0.24), and KDP (0.35)—highlighting their defensive characteristics.
Q1 Fiscal 2026 Results: Revenue of $333M and adjusted EBITDA of $50M (15% margin), exceeding analyst expectations. FY2026 Guidance Raised: Adjusted EBITDA now projected at $225M, with revenue reaffirmed near $1.5B. EV Backlog Growth: 855 electric buses worth $277M, highlighting robust demand supported by EPA clean bus funding.
IBM fell over 10% today mainly because a new AI tool from Anthropic is seen as a direct threat to IBM’s lucrative COBOL modernization and consulting business, triggering worries that key legacy‑modernization revenue will be automated away.
Today’s drop is mainly about competitive positioning and future growth expectations, not an immediate collapse of current Wegovy/Ozempic sales, but it signals that Novo may not have the strongest next‑wave obesity drug versus Eli Lilly, which is why the stock sold off so sharply.
RNG (RingCentral) dropped over 12% today mainly as a sharp pullback after a very steep recent run‑up driven by upbeat Q4 results, guidance, and capital‑return news, with profit‑taking amplified by valuation concerns and a weak broader tech tap
Fundamentally, the latest public guidance is still for rapid growth and profitability, but today’s drop reflects a reset of sentiment and valuation rather than a brand‑new deterioration in those targets. For investors, the key question is whether the current price appropriately reflects execution risk, competition in diagnostics, and macro volatility after the guidance‑driven rally and subsequent reversal.
TNC (Tennant Company) is down more than 25% today because it reported a very large earnings and revenue miss for Q4 2025, blamed on serious ERP rollout problems and weaker demand, and guided to a slower‑than‑hoped recovery in 2026.
XMTR (Xometry) is down more than 21% today because, despite reporting record growth and an earnings beat, the company announced a CEO transition and investors used the news to take profits after a big prior run‑up, with heavy short interest amplifying the drop.
EDSA (Edesa Biotech) is up more than 21% today largely on speculative trading in a very illiquid penny stock with no clear, company‑specific news catalyst, likely driven by technical factors, retail flows, and short‑term trading rather than fundamentals.
Q4 2025 revenue came in strong at about 214–215 million, up mid‑30s percent year over year and a few percent above estimates, but GAAP EPS was only 0.08 versus expectations around 0.31, a roughly 70–75% miss and down from 0.13 a year earlier.
Estée Lauder Companies Inc. (EL) has rebounded with ~12% YTD gains and 50%+ one-year returns, supported by margin improvements and strong skincare/fragrance demand despite broader prestige beauty challenges.
Why ‘Head-and-Shoulders’ Patterns Form...and How to Trade Them