Zillow earnings rebounded to positive territory from the year-ago quarter’s loss.
In the second quarter, the online real estate service company’s earnings came in at 4 cents a share, compared to a loss of -38 cents a share in the year-ago period. After adjusting for stock-based compensation and other costs, the earnings were 44 cents a share, vs. an adjusted loss of -17 cents a share in the year-ago quarter. Analysts polled by FactSet expected adjusted earnings of 24 cents a share.
Revenue surged +70% year-over-year to $1.31 billion in the quarter, surpassing analysts’ estimate of $1.28 billion. Zillow’s revenue from the Internet, Media & Technology segment came in at $476.1 million (vs. $280 million a year ago, and compared to analysts’ expected $467 million); revenue from for its core Premier Agent offering for professionals was $348.8 million (vs. $192 million a year-ago, and compared to analysts’ expected $345 million).
The company’s revenue from its Homes segment was $777.1 million (vs. $454.3 million in the same quarter last year, and $751 million expected by analysts polled by Factset). The Mortgages segment had sales of $56.7 million (vs. $33.8 million, and $62 million expected by analysts).
For the third quarter, Zillow has projected revenue in the range of $1.93 billion to $2.05 billion, well above analysts' estimate of $1.45 billion (based on FactSet poll). The biggest contributor to the difference between analysts’ estimates and Zillow’s forecast was expected growth in Zillow Offers: Zillow’s forecast for the Home business far exceeded analysts’ $900 million expectation for the segment.
Moving higher for three straight days is viewed as a bullish sign. Keep an eye on this stock for future growth. Considering data from situations where ZG advanced for three days, in of 305 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are .
The Momentum Indicator moved above the 0 level on July 02, 2025. You may want to consider a long position or call options on ZG as a result. In of 77 past instances where the momentum indicator moved above 0, the stock continued to climb. The odds of a continued upward trend are .
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for ZG just turned positive on July 01, 2025. Looking at past instances where ZG's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in of 46 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are .
ZG moved above its 50-day moving average on June 23, 2025 date and that indicates a change from a downward trend to an upward trend.
The 10-day moving average for ZG crossed bullishly above the 50-day moving average on June 03, 2025. This indicates that the trend has shifted higher and could be considered a buy signal. In of 16 past instances when the 10-day crossed above the 50-day, the stock continued to move higher over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are .
The RSI Oscillator demonstrated that the stock has entered the overbought zone. This may point to a price pull-back soon.
The Stochastic Oscillator demonstrated that the ticker has stayed in the overbought zone for 4 days. The longer the ticker stays in the overbought zone, the sooner a price pull-back is expected.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where ZG declined for three days, the price rose further in of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are .
ZG broke above its upper Bollinger Band on July 09, 2025. This could be a sign that the stock is set to drop as the stock moves back below the upper band and toward the middle band. You may want to consider selling the stock or exploring put options.
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating steady price growth. ZG’s price grows at a higher rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Seasonality Score of (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is fair valued in the industry. The Tickeron Seasonality score describes the variance of predictable price changes around the same period every calendar year. These changes can be tied to a specific month, quarter, holiday or vacation period, as well as a meteorological or growing season.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is slightly overvalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (2.445) is normal, around the industry mean (11.909). P/E Ratio (128.205) is within average values for comparable stocks, (50.062). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.000) is also within normal values, averaging (3.572). Dividend Yield (0.000) settles around the average of (0.027) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (5.692) is also within normal values, averaging (20.696).
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. ZG’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 89, placing this stock worse than average.
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating weak sales and an unprofitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to worse than average earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The average fundamental analysis ratings, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, are as follows
a real estate app
Industry InternetSoftwareServices