Advertisement
ABM vs GHC
Which Stock Would AI Choose? ABM Industries (ABM) vs. Graham Holdings (GHC) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- ABM Industries (ABM) operates in facility services with steady revenue growth and upcoming second-quarter 2026 earnings on June 5.
- Graham Holdings (GHC) is a diversified holding company with recent first-quarter 2026 results showing revenue of $1.24 billion and an earnings beat.
- Both stocks have shown resilience in recent market activity, with ABM (ABM) trading near $39 and GHC (GHC) near $1,097 as of late May 2026.
- Sector exposure differs: ABM (ABM) focuses on industrials and business services, while GHC (GHC) spans education, media, and healthcare.
- Relative performance highlights trade-offs in scale, dividend policies, and growth drivers amid broader market conditions.
- Market sentiment remains data-driven, influenced by earnings visibility and macroeconomic factors.
Introduction
This comparison examines ABM Industries (ABM) and Graham Holdings (GHC) to provide traders and investors with an objective view of their relative positioning. The analysis targets those evaluating stocks in the facilities management and diversified holding sectors, particularly individuals seeking insights into recent performance trends, business models, and market dynamics. By focusing on verifiable developments from the past several weeks alongside longer-term context, the review supports informed assessment of these equities in the current environment.
ABM Overview and Recent Performance
ABM Industries (ABM) provides facility maintenance, engineering, and infrastructure solutions across the United States and internationally. Its operations span janitorial, energy, and technical services for commercial and industrial clients. In recent weeks, the stock has traded around the $39 level amid anticipation of fiscal second-quarter 2026 results scheduled for release on June 5. Prior quarterly data indicated revenue expansion, supported by demand in core service segments. Sentiment has been shaped by operational execution and broader industrial sector trends, with analysts noting steady fundamentals rather than dramatic shifts.
GHC Overview and Recent Performance
Graham Holdings (GHC) functions as a diversified holding company with interests in education services, television broadcasting, healthcare, manufacturing, and other areas. Formerly known as The Washington Post Company, it maintains a broad portfolio that provides revenue diversification. Recent market activity followed strong first-quarter 2026 results reported in late April, featuring revenue of approximately $1.24 billion and an earnings per share beat versus consensus estimates. The stock has fluctuated near $1,097, influenced by these results and ongoing portfolio adjustments, including healthcare expansion initiatives.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page curates a selection of high-performing AI trading bots from hundreds available on the platform. These bots trade thousands of different tickers using varied strategies, timeframes, and performance metrics tailored to current market conditions. Only those demonstrating consistent results and suitability for prevailing environments appear in the trending section, with available statistics covering win rates, profit factors, and drawdown ranges that help users evaluate options. All bots differ in their approaches, from short-term momentum tactics to longer-horizon trend following. For additional details on active bots and their statistics, visit the Trending AI Robots page.
Head-to-Head Comparison
ABM Industries (ABM) centers on a focused facilities services model with exposure to cyclical industrial demand, while Graham Holdings (GHC) benefits from diversification across education, media, and healthcare, which can mitigate sector-specific volatility. Growth drivers for ABM (ABM) include service contract renewals and efficiency gains, whereas GHC (GHC) draws from acquisitions and operational improvements in its education and healthcare units. Recent momentum shows GHC (GHC) with a notable earnings surprise in its latest report, contrasted with ABM (ABM) building toward its upcoming release. Risk factors differ: ABM (ABM) faces labor and input cost pressures common in services, while GHC (GHC) contends with regulatory and advertising market fluctuations. Market sentiment reflects these contrasts, with both equities exhibiting measured responses to macroeconomic data rather than outsized moves.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Based on observable factors such as earnings consistency, revenue visibility, and relative positioning in recent market activity, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a modestly higher probability of favorable near-term stability to GHC (GHC) due to its documented first-quarter beat and diversified revenue base. However, ABM (ABM) retains appeal for investors monitoring service-sector recovery signals ahead of its June earnings. This assessment remains probabilistic and tied to available data trends rather than forward guarantees.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ABM is a Buy and GHC is a StrongBuy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ABM’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileGHC’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).
- ABM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- GHC’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ABM’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GHC’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- ABM’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
- GHC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
ABM (@Office Equipment/Supplies) experienced а +8.91% price change this week, while GHC (@Other Consumer Specialties) price change was +3.21% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Office Equipment/Supplies industry was -2.05%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -6.47%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.81%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Consumer Specialties industry was -2.98%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.80%, and the average quarterly price growth was -16.21%.
Reported Earning Dates
ABM is expected to report earnings on Sep 04, 2026.
GHC is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Office Equipment/Supplies (-2.05% weekly)The industry produces equipment regularly used in offices by businesses and other organizations, and could range from items like Blank sheet paper, calendars, Label and adhesive paper, paper clips, janitorial supplies, to larger /higher cost products like computers, printers, photocopiers, office furniture and so on. Many businesses in the office supply industry have been expanding into related markets like business cards, plus printing and binding of high quality, high volume business and engineering documents. Some companies in this industry also offer shipping services, including packaging and bulk mailing. Herman Miller, Inc., Steelcase Inc. and HNI Corporation.
@Other Consumer Specialties (-2.98% weekly)‘Other Consumer Specialties’ represents an industry that typically sells durable consumer products, but do not have a classification in another category. The products include jewelry, smoke detectors, watches, collectibles and safety products. MSA Safety (makes products which enhances the safety and health of workers and protect facility infrastructures), Matthews International (memorialization business), Fitbit (makes wireless-enabled wearable technology devices that gauge data such as the number of steps walked, heart rate, quality of sleep), and Fossil Group (makes watches and accessories) have some of the largest market caps in this group.
| ABM | GHC | ABM / GHC | |
| Capitalization | 2.33B | 4.81B | 49% |
| EBITDA | 419M | 678M | 62% |
| Gain YTD | 1.995 | 3.429 | 58% |
| P/E Ratio | 16.36 | 16.74 | 98% |
| Revenue | 8.88B | 4.98B | 178% |
| Total Cash | 100M | 1.11B | 9% |
| Total Debt | 1.74B | 1.25B | 140% |
ABM | GHC | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 86 | 20 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 9 Undervalued | 15 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 20 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 83 | 83 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 71 | 51 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 96 | 7 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
ABM's Valuation (9) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is in the same range as GHC (15) in the Other Consumer Services industry. This means that ABM’s stock grew similarly to GHC’s over the last 12 months.
GHC's Profit vs Risk Rating (20) in the Other Consumer Services industry is significantly better than the same rating for ABM (100) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that GHC’s stock grew significantly faster than ABM’s over the last 12 months.
GHC's SMR Rating (83) in the Other Consumer Services industry is in the same range as ABM (83) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that GHC’s stock grew similarly to ABM’s over the last 12 months.
GHC's Price Growth Rating (51) in the Other Consumer Services industry is in the same range as ABM (71) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that GHC’s stock grew similarly to ABM’s over the last 12 months.
GHC's P/E Growth Rating (7) in the Other Consumer Services industry is significantly better than the same rating for ABM (96) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that GHC’s stock grew significantly faster than ABM’s over the last 12 months.
| ABM | GHC | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 6 days ago 63% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 54% | 2 days ago 54% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | 2 days ago 50% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | 2 days ago 58% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 66% | 2 days ago 56% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 59% | 2 days ago 53% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 54% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 55% | 4 days ago 46% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 44% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 62% | 2 days ago 31% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| JDOC | 56.93 | -0.01 | -0.02% |
| JPMorgan Healthcare Leaders ETF | |||
| DGOC | 32.28 | -0.09 | -0.27% |
| FT Vest U.S. Eq Buf & Dgtl Rt ETF Oct | |||
| EWO | 40.07 | -0.86 | -2.10% |
| iShares MSCI Austria ETF | |||
| QINT | 69.13 | -1.65 | -2.33% |
| American Century Quality Dvrs Intl ETF | |||
| SCZ | 83.52 | -2.17 | -2.53% |
| iShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF | |||
ABM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ABM has been loosely correlated with MSA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ABM jumps, then MSA could also see price increases.
GHC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GHC has been loosely correlated with MSA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 60% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GHC jumps, then MSA could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GHC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GHC | 100% | +1.48% | ||
| MSA - GHC | 60% Loosely correlated | -0.13% | ||
| CASS - GHC | 57% Loosely correlated | +1.80% | ||
| AZZ - GHC | 56% Loosely correlated | -0.56% | ||
| BRC - GHC | 53% Loosely correlated | -0.53% | ||
| EXPO - GHC | 52% Loosely correlated | +0.83% | ||
More | ||||